i understand that "proof of keys" campaign will never get popular enough to have a 90% bank run..
that was not my or your debate..
we both agree that PoK is an uneventful insignificant impact. i showed a chart and you bracketted a 'will never happen' so that is not in contest/debate..
the debate was your mention of "if every person withdrew, the exchange can just loan for one day"
here ill quote myself quoting you saying this as
YOUR!! scenario..
Even if every single person withdrew all their coin today (which will never happen), the exchange can just borrow bitcoin for the 24 hours needed
an exchange cannot just "borrow" bitcoin .. there is no magic mint that can raise 500k coins in one night.
only altcoins can.. again something you admitted to also
again ill quote myself quoting you
Obviously they are not creating them out of thin air, although in the case of exchanges like Binance, they can always just mint more of their fake wrapped/tokenized BTC, since apparently lots of people don't understand the difference.
..
if you were a scammy exchange owner with 100k btc deposits of customers. and you STOLE 90k. leaving only 10k for possible daily withdrawals.
if PoK event exceeded the 10k withdrawal amount.. you as a shady scammer are NOT LOANING ("borrowing") extra coins FROM YOURSELF!!(facepalm).. because you are you.
loans in the fiat world like credit cards and mortgages are not taking value from one source. they are MAKING value.
research how fiat 'money creation' works
edit to answer below:
seems oeleo is on a personal defence "i never said" ramble. totally missing the point of the scenario he did mention and my response to the scenario, he seems more interested in 'he never said' rather than discussing the scenario
so one last time the scenario was if EVERYONE did do a bank run on an exchange.. where value is not some small XXk but massive XXXk request, the exchange cant get hold of massive amount of coin. especially because unlike real banks, that can just magic money into existence, you cant magic up value in bitcoin.
the fiat banking sector got bailed out through loans which were government backed printing of new money.
this money printing bail out loan is not a thing that happens in bitcoin.
a thief returning the funds he stole is not a 'loan' its a return of stolen assets, with a possibility to steal again a day later.
there is a difference
(im not going to continue his silly side track of 'i never said 500k'.. so lets just say "massive value of 100% bank run" to void debates about questing silly who said what amount debates)
point being if an exchange only left 10% and stole 90% (note avoidance of actual unit numbers) if a 100% bank run occured. an exchange wont 'just'(making it seem easy) loan itself 90% to fulfil withdrawals and then take back its loan a day later.
..
as for the silly argument about separeting the businesss entity from the human entity.. (facepalm)
if someone crashes a car into you and you are injured. you dont care about diagnosing the two physical bodies of the car vs its driver, as to who is responsible. its common sense to treat the owner of the car as the perpetrator and the emphasis is on the car owner being responsible.
a business brand name is not an AI robot that steals and spends money on its wife and kids.. its a business entity. not a human. the human steals and spends the money on personal lifestyle. the human has the brains and arms and legs. a brand name has no brain or arms or legs.. as a doctor you should know this..
take this weeks 'theranos medical blood test' scam, .. the 'theranos' logo(brand) is not on trial, you wil never see a logo act as a defendant.. however, the CEO is on trial. and SHE(human) just got slapped by the courts
in car accidents. you will never see the car drive into the defendant seat. nor its licence plate say an oath to speak the truth in court.. the driver will