heck ill quote you quoting me mention
bitfarms. and you being silly mentioning marathon
notice the difference
BITFARMS report was about its 210mw facility.. in argentina..
bitfarms was about bitfarms.. not marathon
out of all the reports it was the bitfarms one that had the cheapest rate. which is why i chose that one as a picking point to show how he got the 2.x c number wrong because it was about a argentina facility
also
maybe he didnt understand that the 7c industrial 12cent residential was also a average.
but lets deal with stompix's new mis understanding. let go with marathons
The Data Center will lower Marathon’s aggregate mining cost for electricity and data center management to $0.034/kWh, which is 38% below the Company’s current cost of mining.
3.4c is 38% lower then CURRENT
meaning right now they are CURRENTLY averaging 5.5cent.. hmm.. well thats more then kazahkstan CURRENTLY
which america as a whole average 7cent(for industrial asic farms)
..
i dont know why stompix wants to knit pick one example of an average to try and then fail at understanding the point that it was to do with that kazahkstan is still cheaper to mine.
because if stompix can ignore the average, and try his failed hardest to find a bottom price of possible future price ESTIMATE.. i too can find a kazahkstan bottom price NOW that beats american bottom price FUTURE ESTIMATE..
which if he read the point.. would still apply to my point, that was "its still cheaper to mine in kazahkstan than it is to mine in america"
edit to answer stompix's latest sillyness below
stompix does not understand AVERAGES in the example many posts ago.
stompix went on a rant about how prices were not 7cent (in his mind minimum) but 2.5cent -4cent minimum
stompix does not understand AVERAGES. (needed emphasis)
so is now trying his damned hardest to ignore my average example quotes so that he can play silly games of minimums
i already said the 2.5minimum he quoted(related to bitfarm argentina number) is nothing to do with america.
so now he wants to say that bitfarms is 4cent in washington
well like i just said above
if he is trying hard to find a current US minimum i can find a kazahkstan current minimum that beats US current minimum.. thus circling back to the point that its still cheaper to mine in kazahkstan
last laugh of the day
link does not even refer to washington price of 4cent.. its says it helps bring the corporate wide price down to 4cent.. why..
well along with the argentina(at 2.5c) and the quebec(at more) the corporate average becomes 4 cent.. not washington
(10 farms, 4 countries = average 4cent... not washington)
anyway.. stompix.. your boring now.
its still cheaper to mine in kazahkstan. accept it, move on