@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser.

[Decrypted]

@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser. This user gave me a negative trust for no reason:



Reference - lead to a thread where there is not a word about me.

He didn't react even after I (aggressively) brought his attention to it.

Hey idiot!

You gave me red trust for promoting 1xbit, but where do you see i'm doing anything like that?



I think you have some mental problems, don't you?

One more time after he ignored me:

Can you explain how it came to your sick head that I have ever promoted 1xbit?

Later he called me "sock-puppet" and "paid shill", again for no reason:

Thank you TwitchySeal, I will continue to ignore the sock-puppets and paid shills  

I think the best response I have to them is to continue adding more names to the list that is in the OP. 1xbit have introduced a new colourful avatar and are pushing out their new "5" signature and that is all the more reason for forum members to get together to at least try to highlight the 1xbit scammers and those that spread their propaganda because it will hopefully end up saving some newbies from getting scammed.

Hey idiot!

People like him don't get attention in real life so they try to satisfy their craving here on the forum... more importantly in what way? the most retarded way.
Considering all participants are tagged he still doesn't stop being a Relentless whore.

JollyWood is not sooo Good.  

You seem pretty upset by what he's doing.

Keep it up JollyGood.

I have never promoted 1xBit or intended to do so. On the contrary, I have repeatedly criticized the work of the manager of their signature campaign. (there are a lot of posts on this subject in my history, so I won't quote them all here)

It's obvious that for some reason @JollyGood is ignoring me and wanting to spoil my opinion.

This means that he has some hidden purposes, or he is wrong, but despite the fact that he is aware of that, anyway he is giving out a negative trust for no reason.

I would like to draw the attention of other DT members to the fact that the actions of this user are destructive to the meaning of the trust system.

If he does not improve his behavior and explain his false accusations, this person should not be allowed to give a red trust to other users.

[1714923897]

1714923897

[1714923897]

1714923897

[1714923897]

1714923897

[1714923897]

1714923897

[owlcatz]

Anyone is allowed to give red trust to anyone else, so your last statement is null & void.

I don't have time to research whether or not you shilled for 1xbit or not, but if he has proof, I'm sure @Jollygood will certainly stop by and drop it off...

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Anyone is allowed to give red trust to anyone else, so your last statement is null & void.

Not only that, but because I have a custom trust list, OP has a trust score of -3.  JollyGood's tag isn't the only one OP has received; he's been tagged for account buying/selling in 2018.  If that reference link were more recent, I'd be giving OP a neg as well.

In any case, there's nothing you or anyone else can do about your trust page, Decrypted.  You've presumably been a member here long enough to know that by now (unless you're not the original owner of your account).  JollyGood might be harsh with feedback sometimes, but tagging 1xbit promoters is valid as far as I'm concerned.

[Decrypted]

Guys! Read the topic: "@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser."

I never promoted 1xbit or even intended to do it.

His accusation is a lie and an abuse of trust system.

[GowithMi_GMAT]

Guys! Read the topic: "@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser."

I never promoted 1xbit or even intended to do it.

His accusation is a lie and an abuse of trust system.

How about this

trading account?

Hello,
Im interested to buy 2 clean Senior Member accounts.
I pay $100 for each.
Only escrow.

part of the 1xbit project?

Thanks for my bounty: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7
As for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.

quote Decrypted

[Decrypted]

trading account?

Hello,
Im interested to buy 2 clean Senior Member accounts.
I pay $100 for each.
Only escrow.

Yes, I was trading accounts.

part of the 1xbit project?

No, if I want join 1xbit campaign I will try to buy red trust accounts, not clean. It would be much cheaper.

Thanks for my bounty: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7
As for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.

quote Decrypted

It is bounty for finding two accounts of this same person in their campaign.

Let us know your bitcoin address for the bounty!

BTC address: bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7

Give your address and I will send you that back. I feel like I took a candy from a child.

What do you think this has to do with promoting 1xbit?

[Bitcoin SV]

JollyGood probably is a defamator because I didn't see any proof of connection between Decryped and 1xbit

If JollyGood doesnt provide any proofs - JollyGood should be redtagged & distrusted, with  this reference: "JollyGood is framing his enemies in personal interests by using 1xbit scam franchise"

If a person like Decrypted is redtagged of many btt users this does not mean that it can be framed without evidences

JollyGood made a big mistake

[TwitchySeal]

Looking at your post history it's obvious you have alt account(s) in the 1xbit campaign and this is your shit talking sock puppet account.

Quit abusing the forum if you don't want to feel abused by Jollygood.

[Bitcoin SV]

Looking at your post history it's obvious you have alt account(s) in the 1xbit campaign and this is your shit talking sock puppet account.

Well if that's the truth then fine, all who are connected with 1xbit should be punished according to their depth of involvement

But JollyGood still didn't provide hard evidences. And this is very bad for him. If you have not hard evidences you should use neutral tags

I think the thread title is correct. @JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser.

[Clamsaladh]

@ jollygood....
why are you promote that website if they do not business with uk citizen ?
you post that much stuff on sport bets , wondering what target your have for your advertisment


JURISDICTIONS. Persons located in or reside in United States, Syrian Arab Republic, Islamic Republic Of Iran, The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Australia, Netherlands, France, United Kingdom, Portugal, Serbia or Slovakia (the ”Prohibited Jurisdictions”) are not permitted make use of the Service. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing restrictions on engaging in real- money play from Prohibited Jurisdictions applies equally to residents and citizens of other nations while located in a Prohibited Jurisdiction. Any attempt to circumvent the restrictions on play by any persons located in a Prohibited Jurisdiction or Restricted Jurisdiction, is a breach of this Agreement. An attempt at circumvention includes, but is not limited to, manipulating the information used by the company to identify your location and providing the company with false or misleading information regarding your location or place of residence.

[owlcatz]

@ jollygood....
why are you promote that website if they do not business with uk citizen ?
you post that much stuff on sport bets , wondering what target your have for your advertisment


JURISDICTIONS. Persons located in or reside in United States, Syrian Arab Republic, Islamic Republic Of Iran, The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Australia, Netherlands, France, United Kingdom, Portugal, Serbia or Slovakia (the ”Prohibited Jurisdictions”) are not permitted make use of the Service. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing restrictions on engaging in real- money play from Prohibited Jurisdictions applies equally to residents and citizens of other nations while located in a Prohibited Jurisdiction. Any attempt to circumvent the restrictions on play by any persons located in a Prohibited Jurisdiction or Restricted Jurisdiction, is a breach of this Agreement. An attempt at circumvention includes, but is not limited to, manipulating the information used by the company to identify your location and providing the company with false or misleading information regarding your location or place of residence.

This is a forum used by people all over the world, what don't you understand about that?

The dumb is strong in here, especially the guy up 👆

[Clamsaladh]

awww thank you for that info,
i honestly had no clue about that. ,  soooo

i had the impression that he is addicted to sport bets, thats why i ask.
i was interested to ask him, how it comes that he do that.

[icopress]

I think the thread title is correct. @JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser.

Sir, this is an Arby's

[FatFork]

@Decrypted, you're a liar and a cheat. If you haven't taken part in a 1xbit campaign before, why were you so interested in payments?
It doesn't matter whether you deleted those posts later, everything you posted is still available in the archives.

"1XBIT signature campaign V 1.0" was closed yesterday - October 26.

What about payment for the last week: October 19 - October 25 ? (spreadsheet is still empty)

[archive]

But everything is clear when we dig a little deeper. You actually had several alt accounts involved in the 1xbit campaigns.

Let us know your bitcoin address for the bounty!

BTC address: bc1qtfyjjvu5cx2clxqzcthferf603669mckflnlh6

[archive]

Bitcointalk Username: dodgrad
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=640564
Rank: Hero Member
Current post count (including this one): 1079
BTC address for payouts: bc1qtfyjjvu5cx2clxqzcthferf603669mckflnlh6

[archive]


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=640564


This explains why you defended kotwica666 and dodgrad so vigorously that they didn't break the bounty rules. You turned against the 1xbit manager only after he refused your payment and kicked your alts out of the campaign. Karma is a bitch! 

As for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.

[Ryu_Ar1]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profi
This explains why you defended kotwica666 and dodgrad so vigorously that they didn't break the bounty rules. You turned against the 1xbit manager only after he refused your payment and kicked your alts out of the campaign. Karma is a bitch! 

As for the rule of not joining with more than one account, it was added day after creating this thread, so after kotwica666 and dodgrad applied.
Only one account was active during the campaign, so the rules were not actually violated.
So kotwica666 was not cheating.

I'm still not very savvy about this kind of stuff and only know some alt vocabulary and other abuses. but it's very funny how someone gets angry but instead gets slapped with reality with the data and facts found
does this mean her negative tag is getting more and more lol

[Clamsaladh]

long ago jollygood collects money for an poor family who cant afford to pay for the  medicine,
anyone knows what happend with that money ?


he posted that a bit longer ago, but never any proof

[Poker Player]

long ago jollygood collects money for an poor family who cant afford to pay for the  medicine,
anyone knows what happend with that money ?

he posted that a bit longer ago, but never any proof

If you're going to say that you better cite the specific thread. I've looked at his created threads up to the beginning of 2021, before you registered in the forum, and I haven't seen anything like what you say.

I don't know him, we don't usually post in the same threads, but he has a great reputation, If you want us to doubt, you're going to have to come up with something more than mere words.

I think you have the wrong name or something.

[AB de Royse777]

You have 5 red trust from 5 different users (DT network). Hypothetically let's assume JollyGood revise the tag to neutral. What would you do about the other 4 tags? It seems personal hatred against JollyGood then attempt to remove the red trust. Is this because of 1xbit?

[examplens]

long ago jollygood collects money for an poor family who cant afford to pay for the  medicine,
anyone knows what happend with that money ?

he posted that a bit longer ago, but never any proof

If you're going to say that you better cite the specific thread. I've looked at his created threads up to the beginning of 2021, before you registered in the forum, and I haven't seen anything like what you say.

I don't know him, we don't usually post in the same threads, but he has a great reputation, If you want us to doubt, you're going to have to come up with something more than mere words.

I think you have the wrong name or something.

He probably thinks about this thread Seeking Donations For A Charitable Purpose
if you ^Clamsaladh doubt the whole process, why not launch an investigation or post any proof? In the end, ask JollyGood about this.

[Poker Player]

He probably thinks about this thread Seeking Donations For A Charitable Purpose
if you ^Clamsaladh doubt the whole process, why not launch an investigation or post any proof? In the end, ask JollyGood about this.

I missed that thread.

We are not talking about a large amount, nothing like the Bitcointalk Charity, but it seems that JollyGood is missing to update the thread, as the money was finally moved.

An update for those familiar with me and this thread, the funds from the wallet are still unspent and the crypto donation has not been sent...

When I have an update I will post here. Thank you.

[Clamsaladh]

He probably thinks about this thread Seeking Donations For A Charitable Purpose
if you ^Clamsaladh doubt the whole process, why not launch an investigation or post any proof? In the end, ask JollyGood about this.

how many families do you know, which do not have the appropriate social support or liquidity to provide medical care in the event of a "serious illness" ...
but can pay back 100€ per month



i wouldn't have a reason to ask, if he had post any information since September last Year.

I am seeking donations for charity. I hope members here will be generous enough to contribute towards a worthy cause that will help alleviate the stress and pain a family are suffering.
They have managed to cover their basic regular monthly living costs but now have to cover huge medical bills after one of their family was unexpectedly diagnosed with a serious illness recently. Other than very limited, they are not receiving any form of financial or medical assistance so they are in need of help.
Any donations received will help the family pay for ongoing medical costs incurred and they would appreciate it very much.



....... The funds will be sent to (and then converted to local currency through) a middle-person then handed to the family. I have checks and balances in place, I am 100% confident.
...... and will try to send the funds as soon as possible, depending on circumstances but either way I will update this thread when funds are moved. If the final amount reaches at around 0.15 BTC then that would be a wonderful amount that would make a big difference to the recipients.

[examplens]

i wouldn't have a reason to ask, if he had post any information since September last Year.

I would say you suspect here without reason. unfortunately for you (and all other Jollygood haters), I don't see any deception or lies here although I do not rule out the possibility of making a mistake.
I am not going to defend them but it's obvious that you draw conclusions by force, only to try to harm him. You quote something from his post but you miss this part where he says about their own donation in this case.

I have set aside a personal donation of at least 0.085 BTC towards this cause and will try to send the funds as soon as possible, depending on circumstances but either way, I will update this thread when funds are moved. If the final amount reaches at around 0.15 BTC then that would be a wonderful amount that would make a big difference to the recipients.

On deposit address, there is only one incoming transaction https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/bc1qsqq0dtqskfrs5nlcg5crtmgntmwd4aan8txudr

You are right, it really is not easy trying to fundraise especially if this is the first time an attempt was made but I hope it will be bring some benefit to the recipient. Thank you for your questions and comments. I am answering your points below:

1- I will offer the guarantee. You are right collateral will not be provided for this fundraiser

2- Yes I can sign a message with sufficient funds which would protect any lender from losses

3- The loan amounts mentioned were not slots, they were examples. I am not looking to have more than one lender because the repayment terms will be fixed at $100 per week. An ideal scenario would be for one lender being kind enough to offer an interest-free loan of at least $400 which will be paid back at $100 a week over a 4 week period. $400 will go a long way to contribute towards covering their expenses

4- There is one donation receiving address (bc1q6987cgd9s30y3hnrnrqg8vwlfvlll3mefujzal), any payments received will be up for all to see on the blockchain, however if a lender loans for example $400 then this thread could be used to show weekly transaction details when payments are sent/received likewise all donations received could be listed here for all to see too.

Ok, sounds good to me and I will help as much as I can, at this moment. I can "lend" you for this purpose 0.02BTC (~$680) with weekly payments as you said, no interest. When you sign the address, let me know so I can send you the funds. Hope it's something and I'm sorry that I can't offer more, at least for now.

If you follow the discussion on there, you can find that the user condoras offering them non-collateral loan as help which he is accepted. I don't know how it all ended, but I also saw no charges against Jollygood for the unpaid loan.

[Clamsaladh]

he seems to be a nice guy, even when his risk was low on a price drop to lose some less dollar.
and no need to say that it would be interesting to know if it's paid back as 0.005BTC or as $ value based on the exchange rate at that moment. , this would be just nice to know. 
because the money is alright paid back during 4 weeks before anything hits the family.
+ I can't imagine that it help the family when they paid the loan back in 28 days.  and I am unsure if a family who is happy to fill the fridge is able to pay a loan in a month back completely.
I may paint the story too dark or be pessimistic for the reason that he claims to target 0.15BTC and lure ppl by telling them that he put 0.085 BTC from his pocket in the bucket.

[Bitcoin SV]

+ I can't imagine that it help the family when they paid the loan back in 28 days.  and I am unsure if a family who is happy to fill the fridge is able to pay a loan in a month back completely.
I may paint the story too dark or be pessimistic for the reason that he claims to target 0.15BTC and lure ppl by telling them that he put 0.085 BTC from his pocket in the bucket.

Probaly JollYGood turned into a scam

[Clamsaladh]

I cannot recall him ever giving a straight answer to the concerns that forum members raised, he seemed to take it all as a joke.

[shasan]

Probaly JollYGood turned into a scam

Let's say JollyGood is a scammer but what is the benefit of the scam? Are you not aware without benefit there cant be a scam. Where there is a scam there is a benefit to the scammer. You are saying JollyGood turned into scam for your personal issue with JollyGood. As JollyGood provided you negative trust in 2020.

[Silver80]

What JollyGood does is "Extraordinary person crime" he acts on the arbitrariness of the power (power syndrome) that exists with him as if he were a very fair judge.


In fact, he punishes on the basis of allegations and past sins without being able to prove it of the sanctions imposed bylovesmayfamilis,

according to the rules he must understand as a police forum;

18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

If the police act arbitrarily how the forum will be fine.