Signature campaign earnings and monthly income.

[pakhitheboss]

Signature campaign are just like a part-time jobs. They pay you weekly and that is the only plus point here as you can use that earning for your weekly part-time expense. Some campaigns here have been running for more than a year but most do not run for long term. Hence, your income is not consistent with signature campaign. A stable job provides you a constant source of income and therefore you would be fool enough to leave a stable income source.

[libert19]

Solely sign campaigns, no. But, if you have other means online/offline that supplements your living then yes.

[lovesmayfamilis]

There is only one subscription company on the forum with which one could quit the main job. But as mentioned earlier, there is no guarantee that a well-paid company will exist for a long time. In addition, you need to have good knowledge to get into a good signature company. But in addition to working on the forum, if you wish and experience, you can find more part-time jobs on the Internet, given that if one income disappears, you will not end up with an empty trough.
But just hoping to make a living working on the forum would be a very stupid move, because the irony of life is that everything happens the other way around. Don't forget that it's good to be confident, but don't overestimate yourself.

[bakasabo]

There is only one subscription company on the forum with which one could quit the main job.

Are you talking about ChipMixer? Receiving $1200 per month just for writing posts no doubt is a lot. But I am not sure that a person can write 50 posts per week for a long period. If I were to write 50 posts per week, I would burn out after several months. I think that with such amount of weekly posts, there will be free time for a proper freelance job. Instability of crypto prices will be like a sword above my head.

$1200 per month maybe will be enough for a student or a persons that prefers asceticism. Such amount is not enough keep a family or to plan a future. Living only on signature campaign income wont build work experience. Person will have a huge bag of knowledge and zero experience of using most of it.

[Poker Player]

Are you talking about ChipMixer? Receiving $1200 per month just for writing posts no doubt is a lot. But I am not sure that a person can write 50 posts per week for a long period. If I were to write 50 posts per week, I would burn out after several months.

I am sure many people can and many do. My average is around 40 posts, and in my current sig campaign I only get paid for 25. That's apart from the fact that I have a main job, I also play poker and have some social life. If I didn't have a main job I think I could write 100 posts.

I would burn out if I had to play poker 8 hours a day but not for writing.

There was one in the CM campaign that had 3 or 4 alts until he got caught. He must have been writing 150 weekly posts at least.

[bakasabo]

I am sure many people can and many do. My average is around 40 posts, and in my current sig campaign I only get paid for 25. That's apart from the fact that I have a main job, I also play poker and have some social life. If I didn't have a main job I think I could write 100 posts.

Ok, maybe it is possible to make 50 posts per week for months and years. I was judging its impossibility after seeing how and what people write on cryptotalk forum to make 20 posts/daily quota. Maybe some people find it easy to make so many posts thanks to their skills and knowledge.

There was one in the CM campaign that had 3 or 4 alts until he got caught. He must have been writing 150 weekly posts at least.

That is a different story. In some cases, that will be worth switching regular work to forum writing if there will be 3 or 4 campaigns that pays like ChipMixer. But I see it like living life behind a screen. 24/7 just posting, posting, posting. That suits only for a no-life people.

Anyway, I wont change regular work income for signature campaign payments. People here, who says it is worth switching, they are comparing highest paid signature with highest rank with an average or below average job income. That is incorrect. They should make comparison more equal. It takes time to rank up and luck to get into a highly paid campaign. Compare income of top manager in huge campaign and being a legendary in ChipMixer or Bestchange. Or being a full member that frequently changes signature campaigns (as they ran for 4-12 weeks only) with average salary in your country. Results will be different.

[lovesmayfamilis]

There is only one subscription company on the forum with which one could quit the main job.

Are you talking about ChipMixer? Receiving $1200 per month just for writing posts no doubt is a lot. But I am not sure that a person can write 50 posts per week for a long period.

Why go far? Let's remember our Ratimov. You can see how many posts he manages to write on the forum, moreover, he does it with high quality. Also, as far as I know, he is engaged in trading (just guesses). I also know a person who lived on subscription ChipMixer, in addition to this, he led several telegram channels, also without having an offline job. Additionally, just look at the list of participants, most of them were able to meet the required number of posts.
However, there is another aspect to consider. We all know that getting into a high-paying company is much more difficult than flying out of it. There are examples in the Russian locale too, right?
Educating ourselves and developing our skills are the best ways to ensure the survival of our offline jobs, I agree with everyone else. 

[cryptoaddictchie]

Such amount is not enough keep a family or to plan a future. Living only on signature campaign income wont build work experience. Person will have a huge bag of knowledge and zero experience of using most of it.

Thats already huge in our country provided that your family is like have a member of 4 to 5 person. It will be enough if you have some control over money and you are good budgeter. But you are right, staying only on signature will not increase the skills and etc. But with that hugez some would be tempted to probably change especially if on their work they are earning less than that.

[aysg76]

Are you talking about ChipMixer? Receiving $1200 per month just for writing posts no doubt is a lot. But I am not sure that a person can write 50 posts per week for a long period. If I were to write 50 posts per week, I would burn out after several months. I think that with such amount of weekly posts, there will be free time for a proper freelance job. Instability of crypto prices will be like a sword above my head.

There have been cut-offs in the Chipmixer Campaign rates also but still it's good payout to the participants and you could see the members delivering the most quality content on the forum and one of the longest running campaign on the forum.You are paid for max 50 posts in CM campaign and you could go beyond that also as per your wish or time you are willing to spend on the forum.

But if you see making that much of post won't consume your full day and only few hours dedication is sufficient to deliver 7-8 posts per day but that of good quality only.At first i was also not much engaged in forum and limited posts were made but after that i developed keen interest in learning new things and participate in more discussion and you see my weekly post went to 30 above from few time and it doesn't cost me much of time.Once you start doing it you won't get exhausted and rather enjoy it.

I no longer trade, I just invest and accumulate bitcoin. 

Well that will add to much of your bonuses in this crypto market and urge to follow your passion.Same mentality that accumulation phase is best for only bitcoin and this earning is surplus to your regular income which can be safely secured for long term in btc only.

[bakasabo]

living completely on the money received from the forum is generally a path to nowhere, zero development, just stupidly spent valuable cryptocurrency for some banal natural needs.

That is something impossible not to agree with. What skills can a person develop just by posting on the forum? Improve English, speed typing. That is something future employer is not searching for. Maybe gaining all that knowledge from forum will help someone to become a journalist, or a writer one day. But that maybe confuses me. Having earnings only from forum signature campaign does not create a feeling of confidence in tomorrow.

It is easy to say that if you are all around crypto news and things that happens, it is easy to make 10 or 100 posts a day. But if you have other interests, other things that require time, then it will be rather complicated to post a lot. Even just reading news and forum eats a lot of time.

Why go far? Let's remember our Ratimov. I also know a person who lived on subscription ChipMixer, in addition to this, he led several telegram channels, also without having an offline job.

We are comparing unique forum users with regular jobs. Of course a persons that work shifts behind payment terminal in supermarket would love to quit his job to be able to earn from from a single signature.

Additionally, just look at the list of participants, most of them were able to meet the required number of posts.

I am not saying that it impossible to meet post quota, but check posting time of those who make 50 post per week. Often their posts are spread during whole day. I wish I could have that much time to spend on cryptocurrency.

[libert19]

...just stupidly spent valuable cryptocurrency for some banal natural needs.

What's use of money if you can't spend it on yourself? And specifically if it's a natural need?

[Rikafip]

Those who spent bitcoins when they cost 1-10 bucks, for all sorts of nonsense, for translating a text, for consolation prizes, for food, taxis, paying phone bills...and now 5-6 years have passed and the cost of these services is now estimated at millions of dollars.

Those early adopters who actually used Bitcoin for what it is created for are the reason why we are here on this forum talking about Bitcoin so instead looking at them like some fools that spend Bitcoin on trivial stuff, you should see them as OGs and thank them for what they did.

Every time I hear the nonsense you just wrote I like to share something from Laszlo Hanyecz (one of the morons by your standards) on the reasoning why he spent 10000 BTC on couple of pizzas while he could easily bought it with fiat.

what I was trying to do was make it clear that I didn't want somebody to send me a Papa John's gift card, or a Domino's credit or anything like that - I wanted food and I wanted to pay Bitcoins for food. Because if I can buy food with it, then it's it's as real as any other money, right? Food is a basic necessity -- if I can eat from Bitcoin, I can live off of Bitcoin.

[Marvelman]

I wish I could have that much time to spend on cryptocurrency.

That depends on your day job. I assume that most of us here have a day job that allows us to occasionally log onto the forum and read a few posts. There are plenty of times when I have been browsing forums, seen an topic and thought, "I should comment on that," but didn't because I didn't want my employer to know that I was reading a discussion board during work hours. 
 

There was one in the CM campaign that had 3 or 4 alts until he got caught. He must have been writing 150 weekly posts at least.

Yeah. Unless he outsourced the work to outside contractors. 

[Rikafip]

Well, don’t read that nonsense, go cry somewhere else.

Well someone has to call out the bullshit you just wrote so newbies that are reading this board don't get the wrong impression about Bitcoin and early adopters. 

We do not take into account the earliest times when almost no one believed in bitcoin, so do not rush to extremes.

It was you  who mentioned the 1-10 dollar range and last time BTC was in that range was probably 2011. If those are not the early times for Bitcoin and if they are not the OGs, then who is?

[Rikafip]

So if you don’t understand what I meant, it’s better not to go in with your value judgments and fantasies about it, whom I called there or did not call moron. Here is a bitcoin historical price service: https://bitcoin.zorinaq.com/price/

I know exactly what you meant. And me missing BTC price by a 6 months or a year (that's why I used the word probably) doesn't change the fact that all those who used the Bitcoin in 1-10 USD range for various stuff (including trivial crap) shouldn't be seen as those that did some kind of mistake as that's exactly what gave Bitcoin its value, people willing to exchange goods and services for it.

Enlighten yourself.

Right back at you buddy.

[Saint-loup]

Well someone has to call out the bullshit you just wrote so newbies that are reading this board don't get the wrong impression about Bitcoin and early adopters.

This obviously should be done not by people like you, provocateurs who are trying to expose the interlocutor in some bad way, attributing to him those words that he never said.

It was you  who mentioned the 1-10 dollar range and last time BTC was in that range was probably 2011. If those are not the early times for Bitcoin and if they are not the OGs, then who is?

You don't know the price history of bitcoin very well. The range that I named (1-10%) was with bitcoin until August 2012. And your story with pizza is actually 2010, when bitcoin was in its very infancy and many did not understand what to do with it, so we saw similar transactions, faucets that gave several bitcoins for solving captchas and so on. I think in 2012-2013, when the first major bitcoin exchanges appeared, people began to value bitcoin more.

So if you don’t understand what I meant, it’s better not to go in with your value judgments and fantasies about it, whom I called there or did not call moron. Here is a bitcoin historical price service: https://bitcoin.zorinaq.com/price/

Enlighten yourself.

I agree with Rikafip you shouldn't repeat that 3 or 4 times in a row in the beginners section IMO. "Hodling" is not the only right way to use Bitcoin, it's the only way to not use it actually. Moreover Bitcoin is a highly volatile asset, and therefore a highly risky one. Beginners should never hold Bitcoins acquired at the ATH.

[pawanjain]

-Will you quit your job if in a month, you earn more from signature campaign than you do get from working 8am - 4pm?

Definitely no because signature campaigns aren't really stable. It might run for a week or two or may be it might run for a year or two.
But nobody can say how long it may lost. So quitting your day job will just be foolishness.

-Is it okay to hinge your life on the earnings you get weekly from your signature campaigns?

It really depends on where you live and the cost of living in that territory. It also depends on how well you are at money management.
If you spend money lavishly you would hardly be able to live off signature campaign earnings.
Spending money while saving enough is really hard from these earnings.

-Has the existence of signature campaigns on this forum eliminated the need to work offline for other people? 

It hasn't eliminated the need of offline work but it has helped many people stabilize their total monthly income.
People earn a decent income from signature campaigns and that can help them to manage expenses but not solely depend on it.

[BlackHatCoiner]

I didn't say that whoever spent bitcoin in those days is an idiot.

Indeed, you didn't. You just said it was nonsense on behalf of them for using it to buy food, phone bills etc. And I'll have to disagree with this opinion; Bitcoin is still, along with alts, the only internet cash system. It's 2022, I've seen it rising, but I still prefer paying in cash rather than in credit.

Maybe privacy costs a lot. Or maybe I feel more of a moron when I support an innovation that I hesitate to use for its only purpose.

[Rikafip]

Indeed, you didn't. You just said it was nonsense on behalf of them for using it to buy food, phone bills etc. And I'll have to disagree with this opinion; Bitcoin is still, along with alts, the only internet cash system. It's 2022, I've seen it rising, but I still prefer paying in cash rather than in credit.

What Ratimov doesn't understand is that all these things add up; from those that spent Bitcoin when it was $0.10, $10, $100, $100 and right until now when its $40k+. I honestly can't believe that anyone that is true bitcoiner is advocating against spending BTC, even if it was for everyday stuff.

Says someone who thought bitcoin was worth 10 bucks sometime in 2011.

Yet again you missed to enter the word "probably" in Google translate. And yeah, at one point in 2011 BTC indeed was worth 10 USD

[libert19]