The technical aspects of your argument may or may not be a hinderance, but most people would never get to that point because of the world wide poverty that exists for almost every country outside of Westernized developed countries. The goal for poverty stricken citizens is not to adopt a new currency or to invest for future wealth. Their vision does not extend that far. They live each day trying to get enough resources to have enough to eat.
Bitcoin isn't suppose to take people out of extreme poverty nor would it matter if the extremely impoverished adopted crypto. There isn't a large amount of wealth controlled by these folks. World wide adoption really only includes the major players, US + EU and China.
you might want to try travelling some time.
in africa. they have dropped the government FIAT and mainly use cell phone credit as their currency. yep even poor people have phones and internet.
countries like africa by-passed dial-up landlines and basic ADSL and went straight to 4g-5g cellular internet which is far faster than landline dialup/ADSL
africa do not like african national currency, their 3 main currencies are mpasa, euro or dollar. they are definitely eager to find new financial solutions. especially ones that do the opposite to their hyper inflation national currency.
affricans love the idea of bitcoin. but hate the reality of the limitations that have been imposed onto it since 2015 by the developers.
(yep i said it and ill emphasise it. africans liked bitcoin in 2010-15, but started seeing issues with it after 2015 once the developer capitalists got involved and wanted to push out the "unbanked" portrayal of what bitcoin was made for)
i personally am british, i have a large hoard and self funded and self-sustained so my arguments about the unbanked and poor are not my own personal wishes. but wishes from the countries that have more population than US,UK, EURO combined. and yet its the US,uk, euro populations of developers and their sponsored corporations paying their salaries that are dictating the limitations of bitcoin so they can promote other networks/assets to get ROI on their "sponsor a dev campaign".
do you really think barry silbert((greyscale, aka blockstream) pumped over $XXm into the teams that developed the segwit offramp locks and the main LN devs, done so out of the kindness of the heart of wanting to make the bitcoin network grow.. nope. they wanted the locks and pegs so they can make other networks to offramp people off, so they can collect fee's/comission from these other network schemes
barry silbert didnt handout over $XXm for nothing. he wants ROI
..
as for your other paragraph
"Bitcoin isn't suppose to take people out of extreme poverty "
um.. you might want to find the white paper and use the "find" function in the browser and use the word "unbanked"
..
also.
because bitcoin is decided to assign itself to a dollar value. and then everyone convert that USD value to other fiat currencies using the silly forex, you start to see how other countries are less well off.
and you start to see how the fiat forex markets have decided to make an africans hours labour be treated as like 50cents .. you will find that.. on the balance of someones labour and how many loaves of bread, bags of rice he can buy locally.. (i mean basing 'value' of wealth on cost of living) if you took away the forex exchange rate and replaced it by a TRUE cost of living comparison. you will find that africa has more "wealth" than america.
yet the americans dominate
yep even in england.. our bitcoin exchange rates are not based on some completely separate market that has its own sentiment(reason for its own independant ). its actually just an arbitrage market order book following the USB market price.
yep lets take Us/China
it might look like on paper that US reigns supreme on GDP
but. if you took minimum wage units.. of both US and china.
and assigned that everyone got paid 1MWU. china would exceed by 5X
if you were to take chinas bread lof value and americas bread loaf value. and assigned that to peoples income to work out how many loaves of bread people can buy and how many total loaves the country has/needs based on common value.. again china would outpace america.
yet due to dirty number trickery, and cludgy maths. guess what it makes it look like america is supreme in every way becasue they de-base other currencies at forex level, to hide the true 'living value' wealth per country