My campaign journey has ended due to this

[Rikafip]

...the tag would have been revised or removed ..

Speaking of the tag he received, I don't think that explanation written is correct and is even misleading as when I read what you wrote I got impression that @Twentyonepaylots was part of 1xbit signature campaign and got paid for it while that's never been the case. Might be nitpicking but I think that feedbacks should be precise, especially the negative ones.

[1715042044]

1715042044

[1715042044]

1715042044

[1715042044]

1715042044

[1715042044]

1715042044

[logfiles]

I have tagged so many accounts that are participating in promoting the 1xbit scam, but this is one of the accounts I never tagged, probably because of one of these reasons;
- They didn't appear on the 1xbit signature campaign spreadsheet
- I didn't see their profile wearing a 1xbit signature, or they removed it after a few hours after applying.
- They didn't get paid by 1xbit to advertise their scam

I think they deserve a second chance.

[Pmalek]

Frustrating as it may seem, that negative feedback shouldn't become an obstacle to offer your art creation services (or whatever it is you wanted to offer) on Bitcointalk. You have not scammed anyone. You have not stolen money or crypto. You have not tried to infect someone with malware. You haven't failed in respecting a promise you made to someone when it comes to money or services. You never should have applied to that campaign though.

Having said all that, If I needed someone to create some artwork for me, I don't see why the fact that you wanted to participate in 1xBit's campaign should stop me from appointing you for the job. The two things are completely unrelated. Even if you didn't have that negative feedback, I wouldn't send you the coins without seeing the work first or without you sending it to an escrow who can confirm the quality of it.

If you are interested in providing a service here, I see no reason why you shouldn't.   

[Stalker22]

One thing I do not understand here. Is OP concerned about his status as an art service provider or his participation in signature campaigns on this forum? In the case of the former, I do not see how a single unrelated negative tag could affect his business, whereas in the case of the latter, his lack of activity on the forum has almost the same effect as the negative tag he carries on his profile. Aside from campaigns for scams like 1xBit, I doubt that any manager would accept him in any signature campaign.

Also, regardless of what the OP stated later, it should be noted that the title of this thread is "My campaign journey has ended due to this", and also he started his post with: "Few months ago, I was a very active campaigner ...".

In my opinion, the OP needs to engage and contribute a little more on the forum before he can expect his trust rating to be revised.

[The Cryptovator]

I am wondering how you weren't aware of the 1xbit scam? There was a red tag as well on the manager profile, how did you miss that. If you were active on the forum you should aware of the 1xbit scam
 A lot of discussions even on meta. We can't prevent any companies to run their campaign on the anyway unless they do massive spam here. But before joining any campaign should do our own diligence to save our accounts from getting the tag.

Anyway just be active and contribute to the forum. After PM to the person who tagged you. If he feels you are good now, then he might reconsider the feedback.

[dkbit98]

You forgot to mention in your full disclosure that I replied to your PM in around 3 hours from when you sent it thanking you for taking the time to write to me.

You also forgot to mention in your full disclosure that I stated I was in the middle of writing up a post for the thread related to the user you mentioned (the OP) but said I would get back to you via PM around the same time tomorrow or earlier.

Firstly, as for not getting back to you within the time period I estimated, I have a life outside of this forum and cannot always be prompt as much as I would like to. Instead of sending another kind PM asking why I did not get back to you around the specified time, you decided to write a not-so full disclosure post.

No hard feelings, but you are just making things more complicated than it should be.
I said everything I wanted to say in my previous post with message I sent you, and I didn't forget to add anything else.
I didn't ask you to write novels in this topic, nor did I ask you to write any reply to me at any time, you set those deadlines yourself and I don't care about them honestly.
It's interesting that you have a lot time writing this long posts, and simple removing or changing your feedback to this member would only take few seconds of your time... but I guess you juts don't want to listen anybody and you know everything already.
Have fun burning witches on your vigilante path.
Peace out.

[Dunamisx]

but then this shitty campaign by 1xbit caused my -1 neg trust from JollyGood after I tried applying  to their campaign which I don't have an idea that it was a scam campaign coz I see a lot of people are applying on which I take responsibility of.

Mate come to think of it, you're a sr member rank user, you've been active on the forum quite right, there's a warning message by the admin that prompt once you have a click on the campaign giving a warning alert about the campaign, does it not appear on your own screen? we have many threads created about the campaign yet you never come across any, you have nothing less than four years of experience on the forum and yet you want to make a claim that you don't know anything about 1xbit campaign? i doubt the genuity of this you statement in it entirety.