Bitcoin Forum
January 20, 2017, 06:26:56 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 37yr old woman has 15 kids and is angry the government isn't paying for them all  (Read 5993 times)
Minsc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
December 08, 2011, 04:59:56 AM
 #1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou_SEj1E

1DcXvfJdeJch9uptKopte5XQarTtj5ZjpL
1484936816
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484936816

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484936816
Reply with quote  #2

1484936816
Report to moderator
1484936816
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484936816

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484936816
Reply with quote  #2

1484936816
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1484936816
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484936816

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484936816
Reply with quote  #2

1484936816
Report to moderator
steelhouse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710


View Profile
December 18, 2011, 10:26:32 PM
 #2

There is so much fraud in welfare.  Families have kids and then they get divorced and decide to live together to get the welfare benefits, especially recent immigrants.
JonHind
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
December 18, 2011, 10:47:24 PM
 #3

Yeah, fuck the kids. It's their fault they were born to such greedy and selfish parents. They should be denied benefits, and the kids should be left to starve. It is the Libertarian way.
steelhouse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710


View Profile
December 18, 2011, 10:57:52 PM
 #4

No the kids won't starve, the family will have to work.  Everyone is entitled to food stamps, that is about it.  Land is free, so no one should be homeless.
JonHind
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
December 18, 2011, 11:44:47 PM
 #5

No the kids won't starve, the family will have to work.  Everyone is entitled to food stamps, that is about it.  Land is free, so no one should be homeless.
Yeah, there are lots of pavements. Fuck the kids. They should have been born to a better mother.

bb113
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
December 19, 2011, 02:13:12 AM
 #6

It seems unfair to help the starving kids in our own country when there are so many more in third world countries.
TheHeroMember
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126



View Profile WWW
December 19, 2011, 07:55:45 AM
 #7

If there's something wrong to the people in the government, the government should be to blame. It's the governments role.


Hey Guys! WWW.FREEBITCOINS.ORG introduces "Epic December Contest" where you can Win Sweet Casascius Coins !!!
bithobo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 87


Everybody's doing it


View Profile
December 19, 2011, 10:52:13 PM
 #8

Land is free

Where is this "free land" you speak of? I might know some potential buyers after I claim it Cheesy

Spare some bitcoin?
1Fw9ZHPEqKvPs3fcgx7My1Qa9qjF8WyCd6
NghtRppr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
December 21, 2011, 01:50:58 PM
 #9

Yeah, there are lots of pavements. Fuck the kids. They should have been born to a better mother.

So, instead of doing something yourself, you want to force other people to help using the threat of violence (government)?
dancupid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 954



View Profile
December 21, 2011, 02:26:36 PM
 #10

Excluding extremes like this, if we live in a society that generates unemployment due to the way work is distributed then unemployment will exist. If we want zero unemployment then all we need to do is redistribute the work - work 35 hours instead of 40 and there would be no unemployment - or we can make the decision that it's better for us to work longer hours and earn more and then pay off the people we deny work to.
Personally I think 'work is a four letter word' anyway - I've better things to do with my life than processing bureaucracy and selling crap.
bithobo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 87


Everybody's doing it


View Profile
December 21, 2011, 06:54:01 PM
 #11

work 35 hours instead of 40 and there would be no unemploymentt - or we can make the decision that it's better for us to work longer hours and earn more and then pay off the people we deny work to.

The biggest problem with such government-forced distribution is that sooner or later it starts sinking into communism. The biggest problem with communism is that "spreading the wealth equally" kills the will for competition which then kills the will to work. Consequentially, everything slows down and you have less of everything to spread equally. In the end, "equality" starts being "nobody has anything".

I support the existence of welfare better then the "no questions asked" market where a select few criminals become richer then the rest of the world. But I've seen communism and it ain't pretty to look at... Actually, you can't see it very well with all the electricity reductions every day or two Tongue

Spare some bitcoin?
1Fw9ZHPEqKvPs3fcgx7My1Qa9qjF8WyCd6
JonHind
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
December 21, 2011, 06:57:01 PM
 #12

Yeah, there are lots of pavements. Fuck the kids. They should have been born to a better mother.

So, instead of doing something yourself, you want to force other people to help using the threat of violence (government)?
No, I want them to rot on the streets like they deserve.
bb113
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
December 22, 2011, 12:31:26 AM
 #13

I think the first step here needs to be more community involvement and responsibility. This is likely very difficult in large cities.
NghtRppr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
December 23, 2011, 12:00:48 PM
 #14

Yeah, there are lots of pavements. Fuck the kids. They should have been born to a better mother.

So, instead of doing something yourself, you want to force other people to help using the threat of violence (government)?
No, I want them to rot on the streets like they deserve.

Are those the only two options you see? There's no such thing as voluntary charity?
bb113
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
December 23, 2011, 04:03:20 PM
 #15

People like JonHind will only accept that people can help each other without the government if they see concrete examples of it happening. So, if libertarians wish to convert them, they should work on creating private charitable systems that replace the need for government assistance. Hopefully, these systems will be less corruptible and more efficient than the government run ones.
NghtRppr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
December 24, 2011, 03:15:35 AM
 #16

People like JonHind will only accept that people can help each other without the government if they see concrete examples of it happening. So, if libertarians wish to convert them, they should work on creating private charitable systems that replace the need for government assistance. Hopefully, these systems will be less corruptible and more efficient than the government run ones.

You mean like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the hundreds of other private charities? As far as "replace the need for government assistance" that makes it sound like everyone will be in Utopia and have everything they want. The current system doesn't do that either.
bb113
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
December 24, 2011, 10:58:05 AM
 #17

Nope. Not large scale.
Vitalik Buterin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 331


View Profile
December 24, 2011, 11:27:09 AM
 #18

Nope. Not large scale.

Of course not, there's no reason for them to exist in the present world when the expectation is to rely on the government for everything. Things like private charities and mutual aid societies were far more powerful in the earlier half of this century before they got centralized into the government.

Argumentum ad lunam: the fallacy that because Bitcoin's price is rising really fast the currency must be a speculative bubble and/or Ponzi scheme.
NghtRppr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
December 24, 2011, 04:35:07 PM
 #19

Nope. Not large scale.

There are thousands of small missions rather than one large mission. I fail to see the why that difference matters.
bb113
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
December 24, 2011, 08:00:26 PM
 #20

I see similarities between large private organizations and governments. The most obvious is the amount of bureaucracy.
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!