But that is google, google is a company and not a law maker, google is just like other companies that can sue themselves to court because of wrong doing.
Irrelevant. We're talking about responsibilities here, not who's suing who and what for. It is unethical, undignified and dishonest on behalf of Google for choosing to collect and sell all that data, accept bribes from politicians, advertisers, spying companies, infringing every inch of privacy, inventing every kind of technique to glean your data from, literally, every move you make, turning this world into a surveillance capitalism.
A company can be bias, a company can see their bias but will not amend it when the company notice that they have no competitor. Google competitor is Apple but Apple is for the rich people, aveareg people use Android which uses google search as default and people like it because they do not know what google is doing to them and how it has been monitoring them. Also people lesser than average but not poor also used Android, it can be second hand.
Sorry, but I don't understand your point. What does this have to do with Google being a phishing lord?
