Bitcoin was completely different case than the altcoin project. Altcoin like ethereum, terra and etc were coming from the funding by investors. They need to reveal their identity to create project to be trusted by the investors.
Wasn't Bitcoin's blockchain technology created under the premise of "don't trust, verify"? If that's so, then why do other altcoin projects need investor's trust to succeed? If Bitcoin became widely successful without ever revealing its creator, so can any other altcoin on the market. I see this nothing more than an agenda from mainstream governments in order to enforce KYC/AML as much as possible. With a publicly recognizable developer team (and/or founder), it's easy to prosecute each person to shut down the project for good. That cannot be said about Bitcoin, since there's no one to hold accountable for his/her actions.
Consider how the Terra's price crash put the South Korean government under Do Kwon's (the founder) tail. That and the fact that someone went to Do Kwon's house to complain about his loss of money, tells us the dangers of making crypto project's team members publicly known to everyone worldwide. That wouldn't had been possible if Terra's team members (including the founder) were all anonymous. Nowadays, money talks so it's very unlikely crypto projects will change their stance anytime soon. As long as there's lack of anonymity among team members, it'll be impossible to achieve true decentralization and censorship-resistance. Just my opinion
