Genocide worked?

[bluefirecorp_]

Seems like my only trade feedback on this account came from a dead man.

[1715127367]

1715127367

[1715127367]

1715127367

[1715127367]

1715127367

[1715127367]

1715127367

[1715127367]

1715127367

[yahoo62278]

Seems like my only trade feedback on this account came from a dead man.

Why do you think he/she is dead? He has logged in within the last 10 months. Maybe he/she is just taking a break from the forum. Regardless, they are not on DT so it doesn't really matter a whole lot.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I first read Genocide dead? There were no clue for me to know who is Genocide so decided to use search member and laterally found a user name genocide LOL

Then realized it's something else.

Why do you think he/she is dead? He has logged in within the last 10 months. Maybe he/she is just taking a break from the forum. Regardless, they are not on DT so it doesn't really matter a whole lot.

OP is talking about the neutral feedback left by TECSHARE.

@OP, yes TECSHARE is dead. RIP brother.

[yahoo62278]

I first read Genocide dead? There were no clue for me to know who is Genocide so decided to use search member and laterally found a user name genocide LOL

Then realized it's something else.

Why do you think he/she is dead? He has logged in within the last 10 months. Maybe he/she is just taking a break from the forum. Regardless, they are not on DT so it doesn't really matter a whole lot.

OP is talking about the neutral feedback left by TECSHARE.

@OP, yes TECSHARE is dead. RIP brother.

Makes more sense since I have TECSHARE on my ~list I did not see his feedback. Still it is a neutral, so there is not much harm being done by the feedback being there.

[hugeblack]

Even the best apps and movies do not get the full review mark, so a negative feedback from an untrusted account is not supposed to be harmful to you, and the more positive treads you make, and trust from other members, the more people pass that negative trust (something I'm using a service with a rating of 4.1)

In general, what is the cause for negative trust? paid Google Translation?

[Little Mouse]

Even the best apps and movies do not get the full review mark, so a negative feedback from an untrusted account is not supposed to be harmful to you, and the more positive treads you make, and trust from other members, the more people pass that negative trust (something I'm using a service with a rating of 4.1)

In general, what is the cause for negative trust? paid Google Translation?

He is talking about the neutral feedback from TECSHARE. You can check it out. I don't think it should be an issue. Don't know why OP is so serious about that neutral feedback.
hugeblack, by any chance, do you have bitcoingirl.club in your ignored list? He has already shared the about the feedback OP is talking about.

[bluefirecorp_]

I'm not really serious about it. I found it funny the guy that said I shouldn't wish death on my political opponents died when he was a political opponent.

It's an interesting concept because out of all our arguments, he went to leave a rep for that

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Seems like my only trade feedback on this account came from a dead man.

But it has nothing to do with trade though

Anyway, there's no need calling out on a dead man, he's already dead. It isn't like he will see your reputation post from the grave and then reply 

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Makes more sense since I have TECSHARE on my ~list I did not see his feedback. Still it is a neutral, so there is not much harm being done by the feedback being there.

Nope, there's no harm, although that's the kind of feedback one would hope could get removed before the person who left it died or abandoned the forum. 

Views on genocide aside, this is one of the reasons why I think the trust system needs an overhaul.  It's acceptable to leave neutral feedback for disagreements like this one between TECSHARE and OP, but the fact is that they're notes that should only be viewable to the member leaving the feedback.  Why have the ability to broadcast something about someone for all to see on their trust page?  Sure, most people won't care....but you never know.

Anyway, what's the point here, OP?  I don't think that feedback is going anywhere.  I can't remember the last time Theymos or a moderator stepped in and deleted a feedback.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I can't remember the last time Theymos or a moderator stepped in and deleted a feedback.

Don't we know feedback are not moderated by forum staff? The only one who can change a feedback is the feedback sender.

but the fact is that they're notes that should only be viewable to the member leaving the feedback.  Why have the ability to broadcast something about someone for all to see on their trust page?

This is an interesting idea which got my attention.
May be this idea can be used in the current feedback.
I see many neutral/positive/negative feedback that are clearly between two people which has nothing to do with others. Mostly the feedback spammers do that.

In a feedback system why would someone care a feedback left by The Pharmacist to BitcoinGirl.club if the feedback is something like:
"I trust BitcoinGirl, he helped me a lot" or "BitcoinGirl is a freak, I do not trust him"

But obviously someone needs to know the following feedback (if they are provided enough proofs):
"We had a business of $1000 and it went very well, I recommend BitcoinGirl." or "BitcoinGirl scammed me $1000, fuck him. He is not trustworty"

[eddie13]

I'm not really serious about it. I found it funny the guy that said I shouldn't wish death on my political opponents died when he was a political opponent.

It's an interesting concept because out of all our arguments, he went to leave a rep for that

I hope your not hinting that you think it’s funny that he died..
What are you getting at here? You killed him with your comments about genocide?

OP here is a bit of a left wing extremist..
Kill all people who don’t believe in climate change, lol..
The vax too?

Don’t forget my name on your list of dissenters to round up because I don’t believe the vast majority of the “man made global warming” story either..

[DireWolfM14]

~
that's the kind of feedback one would hope could get removed before the person who left it died
~

Somehow I don't think he planned it.  It's just one of those things that happens to all of us, eventually.

And, I don't see anything wrong with the feedback; it's a neutral feedback for an obvious troll who misses his favorite target.

RIP, Tecshare.

[Mpamaegbu]

I first read Genocide dead? There were no clue for me to know who is Genocide so decided to use search member and laterally found a user name genocide LOL

Then realized it's something else.

Well, yes maybe OP meant something else apart from genocide according to the titled topic. However, even Tecshare mentioned "genocide" in the feedback on OP's profile. The coincidence is very striking indeed.

I can't remember the last time Theymos or a moderator stepped in and deleted a feedback.

Don't we know feedback are not moderated by forum staff? The only one who can change a feedback is the feedback sender.

I agree with The Pharmacist on that. The trust system should be overhauled and the new one made in a way that the one who tags or sends a feedback on anyone's profile doesn't have the absolute power to make it remain. There should be other users who can be enabled to overwrite certain needless and senseless feedback. We've seen cases where some members had gone psychiatric, leaving careless feedbacks on others for no just reason. For instance, the feedback I had from "isoneguy" didn't even come with any evidence or reference to what he alleged. Just an insane dude with his challenges as at then according to what I read about them. Perhaps, he was depressed at the time and decided to vet it on any account he saw close by.