The impact of Russian and Ukrain war on world economy

[serveria.com]

Of course, for a wild and authoritarian country like Russia, where any issues are still decided by the tsars, no matter what positions they formally and officially hold, the events that took place in Ukraine at the end of 2013 and the beginning of 2014 are something unusual and blasphemous. But for a democratic state, this is natural.

Last time I checked Russia was a democratic country with president being elected by popular vote, there's also parliament (the Duma) with legislative powers. What tsars and authoritarian rule are you talking about, troll?

Let me remind you that according to Article 5 of the Constitution of Ukraine, the people are the bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the country. The right to determine and change the constitutional structure belongs exclusively to the people, who are given the right to directly influence any government bodies or their officials. Therefore, when the pro-Russian President of Ukraine Yanukovych went against the will of the people and refused to sign the Association Agreement with the European Union, and also gave the order to kill his citizens who came out to protest, the people exercised their constitutional right. Moreover, no one removed Yanukovych from power. He himself shamefully and secretly fled the country to Russia, afraid of responsibility for what he had done in Ukraine.

... and people belong to the US (Nuland's cookies). There were snipers shooting at the police officers (paid by the CIA) and I'm sure Yanukovych was the ultimate target of these US sockpuppets that's why he had to flee to save his life.

Zelensky was elected as a result of direct and democratic elections of the entire people. 73.22% of voters cast their votes for him, and 24.45% for his opponent Poroshenko. In the run-up to the elections, Zelensky and Poroshenko held open debates at the Olympic Stadium in Kyiv, which simply cannot happen in Russia. International observers confirmed that Zelensky's elections in April 2019 were democratic, peaceful, and corresponded to the will of the people. Therefore, your claims that Zelensky came to power in Ukraine unconstitutionally are a lie.

OMG, are you really that naïve or just retarded? Poroshenko was the first president after Maidan, he is definitely pro-US and Zelensky is certainly pro-US too. So there you go, you're getting the illusion of choice, the illusion of democracy. Very similar to the US democrats vs republicans thing. Both candidates share the same views, it's like Putin debating with Medvedev at a stadium in Moscow.   You see the difference my little retarded friend?

The people of Ukraine also support the activities of President Zelensky in organizing the defense of Ukraine's sovereignty from Russian military aggression.

Yeah, I believe you. I've seen these videos on Telegram and Youtube how eager citizens of Ukraine can't wait to join the AFU on the frontline. Drafting officers are beating them up and throwing into vans and sending to Donbas immediately.

Anyway, AFU are getting their asses kicked in Kursk region. Today Russians have liberated Borki village in the East. I guess their plan is to completely encircle the AFU units in Kursk region and cut them off the border. Then the remaining units will be destroyed or will eventually surrender.  

Ukraine has lost the war, it's pretty clear already. NATO are considering direct confrontation with Russia as a last chance to turn the tide. Very foolish idea and a road to nuclear apocalypse. Our planet is in extreme danger and only because some crazy guys like Blinken and Biden Jr want to secure their investments in Ukraine. C'mon guys, let go, it's over. Money is not worth dying for in nuclear flames.

[AmoreJaz]

World economy

This is hard time for economy to survive what is your thinking about the collapsing of world economy with highing inflation.

We'll I think it's affecting most countries a whole lot and if this continues we can't really tell what will become of the world economy because due to this there's a high rate of things and it's affecting the market as well.
Insurgency, disaster, war and so on are huge effect of economic crisis and if care's not taken things might skyrocket to some level leaving no one with any options and this is majorly caused by the war between Ukraine and Russian.

Honestly there's no positive impacts on them to the world or the economy rather everything keeps depreciating,inflation is in the rise,everything just keeps going higher due to the fact that it's been affected highly by the war between the two allies.i just get sucked with all of this as it's not favourable to the nation and economy.

As we can see, this ongoing war has affected the world in so many aspects. We may not feel it as individuals, but I believe it has impact in the economy especially neighboring countries and countries which have direct relation with Ukraine and Russia, like the import and export of their respective products.
Below are just of the major impact of this war to the world -
> supply chain disruptions
> food security and affordability
> humanitarian crises
> catastrophic damage to civilian infrastructures
> millions of refugees
> and most of all about 23000 casualties and counting...

Source : Ukraine war: What are the impacts on the world today?

[Argoo]

Ukraine has lost the war, it's pretty clear already. NATO are considering direct confrontation with Russia as a last chance to turn the tide. Very foolish idea and a road to nuclear apocalypse. Our planet is in extreme danger and only because some crazy guys like Blinken and Biden Jr want to secure their investments in Ukraine. C'mon guys, let go, it's over. Money is not worth dying for in nuclear flames.

The "Second Army of Peace" has been attacking Ukraine for three years now, using all possible military means except nuclear weapons. Even taking into account the seizure of Crimea and parts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in 2014, this is only 27 percent of Ukraine. Russia cannot defeat Ukraine on the battlefield, so every day it bombs the entire territory of Ukraine with missiles and drones, mainly targeting energy and other civilian facilities, or simply residential buildings of Ukrainians to intimidate them. This is the tactic of cowards and terrorists.

Also, the tactic of cowards is the constant intimidation of both Ukrainians and the entire civilized world by the fact that if Ukrainians continue to resist destruction or if other countries provide Ukraine with assistance with conventional weapons, then Russia will use nuclear weapons. This intimidation cannot work, because in this case, the maddened Putin will seize one state after another with impunity, waving a nuclear baton. Such military actions against neighboring states in the 21st century can really lead to a nuclear apocalypse if Putin and his entourage are not stopped in time. After all, it is not only Russia that has nuclear weapons.

Our planet is in danger not because individual states are trying to defend their independence from military invasion by an aggressive neighbor, but because aggressors like Russia, when attacking, threaten to use nuclear weapons as well.

[serveria.com]

Also, the tactic of cowards is the constant intimidation of both Ukrainians and the entire civilized world by the fact that if Ukrainians continue to resist destruction or if other countries provide Ukraine with assistance with conventional weapons, then Russia will use nuclear weapons. This intimidation cannot work, because in this case, the maddened Putin will seize one state after another with impunity, waving a nuclear baton. Such military actions against neighboring states in the 21st century can really lead to a nuclear apocalypse if Putin and his entourage are not stopped in time. After all, it is not only Russia that has nuclear weapons.

That's not true. Russia only said they might use the nukes if NATO uses long-range missiles on targets in Russia (as Ukrainian military can't operate such weapons they will be operated by NATO personnel thus NATO will be considered side of the conflict). If Russia wanted to use nukes, they would have used them long ago. But there is no winner in a nuclear war, only losers.

Our planet is in danger not because individual states are trying to defend their independence from military invasion by an aggressive neighbor, but because aggressors like Russia, when attacking, threaten to use nuclear weapons as well.

Russia has never threatened to attack anyone with nukes, just defend itself, if it's own territory is in danger (like in case of a retarded suicidal attack on Kursk region).

Anyway, Russians continue their advances in Donbas: today they have captured the town of Ukrainsk and the village Lesovka. Ukraine has lost these territories without a chance to regain, they will never belong to Ukraine again.

AFU also hastily withdrew from a number of villages near Kurakhove: Berestki, Novoselidovka, Ilyinka. The end of this war is near.  

[Argoo]

Also, the tactic of cowards is the constant intimidation of both Ukrainians and the entire civilized world by the fact that if Ukrainians continue to resist destruction or if other countries provide Ukraine with assistance with conventional weapons, then Russia will use nuclear weapons. This intimidation cannot work, because in this case, the maddened Putin will seize one state after another with impunity, waving a nuclear baton. Such military actions against neighboring states in the 21st century can really lead to a nuclear apocalypse if Putin and his entourage are not stopped in time. After all, it is not only Russia that has nuclear weapons.

That's not true. Russia only said they might use the nukes if NATO uses long-range missiles on targets in Russia (as Ukrainian military can't operate such weapons they will be operated by NATO personnel thus NATO will be considered side of the conflict). If Russia wanted to use nukes, they would have used them long ago. But there is no winner in a nuclear war, only losers.

Our planet is in danger not because individual states are trying to defend their independence from military invasion by an aggressive neighbor, but because aggressors like Russia, when attacking, threaten to use nuclear weapons as well.

Russia has never threatened to attack anyone with nukes, just defend itself, if it's own territory is in danger (like in case of a retarded suicidal attack on Kursk region).

During Putin's visit to Vietnam in June 2024, Putin said that in the event of Russia's strategic defeat in Ukraine, Russia is allegedly ready to take the most extreme measures.
"For Russia, this means the end of its statehood. This means the end of the thousand-year history of the Russian state. I think this is clear to everyone. And then the question arises: why should we be afraid? Isn't it better to go to the end? This is elementary formal logic," he said.
https://nv.ua/world/geopolitics/ugrozy-putina-diktator-snova-pugal-yadernym-oruzhiem-v-sluchae-porazheniya-v-ukraine-50428889.html

With the thousand-year history of the Russian state, Putin, of course, lied.
But perhaps you can comment on what Putin was threatening here if Ukraine continues to resist military aggression and the Russian army continues to suffer military defeats in Ukraine?

[serveria.com]

During Putin's visit to Vietnam in June 2024, Putin said that in the event of Russia's strategic defeat in Ukraine, Russia is allegedly ready to take the most extreme measures.
"For Russia, this means the end of its statehood. This means the end of the thousand-year history of the Russian state. I think this is clear to everyone. And then the question arises: why should we be afraid? Isn't it better to go to the end? This is elementary formal logic," he said.
https://nv.ua/world/geopolitics/ugrozy-putina-diktator-snova-pugal-yadernym-oruzhiem-v-sluchae-porazheniya-v-ukraine-50428889.html

How many times I have asked you not to use Ukrainian propaganda outlets as sources? During war, do you expect the media of the war-affected country to be objective to the enemy? Don't get ridiculous!

As to what Putin meant, it's about direct confrontation with NATO ground forces. Only in that case Russia can be defeated. Russia can't be defeated by Ukraine alone, it's impossible. In fact, Ukraine has already lost this war.  

With the thousand-year history of the Russian state, Putin, of course, lied.
But perhaps you can comment on what Putin was threatening here if Ukraine continues to resist military aggression and the Russian army continues to suffer military defeats in Ukraine?

OMG, hilarious!   So, in your parallel universe Russian army suffers military defeats in Ukraine?  

[Argoo]

During Putin's visit to Vietnam in June 2024, Putin said that in the event of Russia's strategic defeat in Ukraine, Russia is allegedly ready to take the most extreme measures.
"For Russia, this means the end of its statehood. This means the end of the thousand-year history of the Russian state. I think this is clear to everyone. And then the question arises: why should we be afraid? Isn't it better to go to the end? This is elementary formal logic," he said.
https://nv.ua/world/geopolitics/ugrozy-putina-diktator-snova-pugal-yadernym-oruzhiem-v-sluchae-porazheniya-v-ukraine-50428889.html

How many times I have asked you not to use Ukrainian propaganda outlets as sources? During war, do you expect the media of the war-affected country to be objective to the enemy? Don't get ridiculous!

Here is a link to similar words by Putin from a Russian publishing house.
https://regnum.ru/opinion/3896913

I will also provide a commentary on this statement by Putin, set out in the same Russian article:
"These words by Putin are reminiscent of his old statement about the possible use of nuclear weapons, when he rhetorically asked why we need such a world if Russia is not in it. But then he was talking about the theoretical probability of a nuclear war, and now the president was talking about a specific, ongoing battle.
His words leave no doubt (for those who still doubted it) that Putin will not simply not turn back or retreat - he does not even consider the possibility of defeat. Indeed, when there is nowhere to retreat, there is no fear - you just need to win."

As we can see, there is no doubt that Putin is threatening the world with nuclear weapons in the event of defeat in Ukraine.

As for information about the progress of the war between Russia and Ukraine, I am forced to refer to Ukrainian news outlets, because in Russia negative information about the problems and failures of the Russian army on the battlefield in Ukraine is not published. In Russia, such information is considered discrediting the army and is punishable by imprisonment, that is, the truth is punishable by prison.

Third countries do not always write in detail about this war and their comments are very vague. In addition, more than 50 countries are helping Ukraine in this war and you will also consider them interested and biased. Should we then refer to African countries? They, by and large, do not care what is happening in Ukraine, as long as the grain corridor works.

[shield132]

During Putin's visit to Vietnam in June 2024, Putin said that in the event of Russia's strategic defeat in Ukraine, Russia is allegedly ready to take the most extreme measures.
"For Russia, this means the end of its statehood. This means the end of the thousand-year history of the Russian state. I think this is clear to everyone. And then the question arises: why should we be afraid? Isn't it better to go to the end? This is elementary formal logic," he said.
https://nv.ua/world/geopolitics/ugrozy-putina-diktator-snova-pugal-yadernym-oruzhiem-v-sluchae-porazheniya-v-ukraine-50428889.html

With the thousand-year history of the Russian state, Putin, of course, lied.
But perhaps you can comment on what Putin was threatening here if Ukraine continues to resist military aggression and the Russian army continues to suffer military defeats in Ukraine?

He is crazy. He said that nuclear war and the end of the world is not a problem for him because he doesn't want to live in a world where Russia doesn't exist. I don't know who has a problem with the existence of Russia, I think no one because it's Russia that wages war, not the other side but at the same time I understand that he does it because he doesn't want NATO near its borders.
Btw he motivates the society to agree to nuclear war if Russia doesn't win the war in Ukraine. It's simple for him, if Russia doesn't win, then no one wins and that's terrible for the rest of the world.

[Argoo]

During Putin's visit to Vietnam in June 2024, Putin said that in the event of Russia's strategic defeat in Ukraine, Russia is allegedly ready to take the most extreme measures.
"For Russia, this means the end of its statehood. This means the end of the thousand-year history of the Russian state. I think this is clear to everyone. And then the question arises: why should we be afraid? Isn't it better to go to the end? This is elementary formal logic," he said.
https://nv.ua/world/geopolitics/ugrozy-putina-diktator-snova-pugal-yadernym-oruzhiem-v-sluchae-porazheniya-v-ukraine-50428889.html

With the thousand-year history of the Russian state, Putin, of course, lied.
But perhaps you can comment on what Putin was threatening here if Ukraine continues to resist military aggression and the Russian army continues to suffer military defeats in Ukraine?

He is crazy. He said that nuclear war and the end of the world is not a problem for him because he doesn't want to live in a world where Russia doesn't exist. I don't know who has a problem with the existence of Russia, I think no one because it's Russia that wages war, not the other side but at the same time I understand that he does it because he doesn't want NATO near its borders.
Btw he motivates the society to agree to nuclear war if Russia doesn't win the war in Ukraine. It's simple for him, if Russia doesn't win, then no one wins and that's terrible for the rest of the world.

Putin loves to intimidate and bluff. This is what he has been doing since his time in the KGB of the USSR. Moreover, such tactics have been successful for him for a long time already being the President of the Russian Federation. However, he is a coward and clings to his life so much that his words are taken seriously. He has long been warned that if Russia even begins to prepare to launch a nuclear missile, no deep and fortified bunker will save him personally. And this is the strongest argument for him.

At the same time, we cannot discount the fact that Russia may still try to use nuclear weapons if the situation on the Ukrainian front is critical for it. But such a scenario is unlikely. Moreover, clairvoyants predict that in this case something will go wrong there and an explosion may occur on the territory of Russia itself.

Putin attacked Ukraine not because he was afraid of NATO approaching Russia's borders. Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, which have a common border with Russia, have long been part of NATO. And there were no problems with this. Finland, which has a land border with Russia of more than 1,200 kilometers, recently became a member of NATO. In this regard, Russia even stated that it does not see any problems with security for Russia. In short, without Ukraine, Russia will not be a powerful country and this is the reason for the attack on it.

[serveria.com]

Putin loves to intimidate and bluff. This is what he has been doing since his time in the KGB of the USSR. Moreover, such tactics have been successful for him for a long time already being the President of the Russian Federation. However, he is a coward and clings to his life so much that his words are taken seriously. He has long been warned that if Russia even begins to prepare to launch a nuclear missile, no deep and fortified bunker will save him personally. And this is the strongest argument for him.

What makes you think that no nuclear shelter is capable of surviving the nuclear war? I'm sure there are numerous such facilities both in the US and Russia. Another thing is: is the world worth living in after the nuclear winter? In nuclear war there are no winners, only losers.
  

At the same time, we cannot discount the fact that Russia may still try to use nuclear weapons if the situation on the Ukrainian front is critical for it. But such a scenario is unlikely. Moreover, clairvoyants predict that in this case something will go wrong there and an explosion may occur on the territory of Russia itself.

It's clear Russia is not going to use the nukes to hit Ukraine, because it's already winning the conventional war.

Meanwhile, annihilation of AFU in Donbas continues. Russians have entered the town of Vuhledar. The town is also getting encircled currently, so the 72nd AFU brigade defending the city are risking to get cut off from the world completely (unless they abandon the town ASAP). Similar situation is around another strategically important town of Selydove, Russian army is about to encircle the town.  

[Argoo]

  

At the same time, we cannot discount the fact that Russia may still try to use nuclear weapons if the situation on the Ukrainian front is critical for it. But such a scenario is unlikely. Moreover, clairvoyants predict that in this case something will go wrong there and an explosion may occur on the territory of Russia itself.

It's clear Russia is not going to use the nukes to hit Ukraine, because it's already winning the conventional war.

Meanwhile, annihilation of AFU in Donbas continues. Russians have entered the town of Vuhledar. The town is also getting encircled currently, so the 72nd AFU brigade defending the city are risking to get cut off from the world completely (unless they abandon the town ASAP). Similar situation is around another strategically important town of Selydove, Russian army is about to encircle the town.  

That's right. Russia only threatens with the use of nuclear weapons, everyone already understood this when the Ukrainian Armed Forces entered the Kursk region of Russia on August 6 and continue to control about a hundred settlements of Russia on a territory of about 1,300 square kilometers. Putin's Russia was able to scrape together only about 37 thousand soldiers from all the outskirts, partially withdrawing them from the front in Ukraine. These forces went on the counteroffensive and, having lost about ten thousand people killed and wounded, calmed down. Russia is accustomed only to attack, but does not know how to defend itself, to protect its territory. The Russians also throw corrective air bombs (KABs) and attack with aircraft at the settlements of the Kursk region "liberated" by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, destroying their cities and villages, as they do in Ukraine. They do not know how to fight any other way.

In the east of Ukraine, the Russian occupiers are slowly advancing, while suffering colossal losses in manpower and equipment. A couple more months of such a "successful" offensive, and Russia will have nothing to attack with. At the same time, Ukraine does not cling to territories if it is not advantageous for the troops to defend themselves there. In this case, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are tasked with destroying the enemy and his military equipment as much as possible, which is being done successfully. Those territories that the Russians captured during their offensive since October last year, Ukraine will return in a few days, as was already the case in the Kharkiv and then in the Kherson region.

Returning again to nuclear weapons, it is worth mentioning that Putin recently tried to intimidate the world by testing his intercontinental ballistic missile "Sarmat" (another name is Satan). It exploded in the silo, making a crater 60 meters in diameter and virtually destroying the test site and its surroundings. Moreover, this is already the fourth unsuccessful launch of this missile since 2022. https://www.bbc.com/russian/articles/c39lvel98myo

https://www.unian.net/weapons/provalnyy-zapusk-mezhkontinentalnoy-ballistiki-rf-sarmat-poyavilis-foto-s-mesta-vzryva-12766026.html

https://www.unian.net/world/vzryv-rakety-sarmat-aviaekspert-ocenil-posledstviya-provalnyh-ispytaniy-v-rf-novosti-mira-amp-12767673.html

You say Russia is winning this war? Then I advise you to read what Russian Z-patriots are saying about this on social networks.
https://www.dialog.ua/war/302087_1727207888/amp

[serveria.com]

That's right. Russia only threatens with the use of nuclear weapons, everyone already understood this when the Ukrainian Armed Forces entered the Kursk region of Russia on August 6 and continue to control about a hundred settlements of Russia on a territory of about 1,300 square kilometers.

Wait, wait... many trolls like DrBeer and yourself claimed that initially AFU have occupied about 1000-1200 square kilometers (or a tiny piece of land 30x40km) of Russian territory. Eventually, after the Russian counter-attacks AFU have lost about 1/3 of this occupied territory (and 18000-19000 troops). And now you're claiming AFU have occupied 1300 square kilometers? Any explanation?  

In the east of Ukraine, the Russian occupiers are slowly advancing, while suffering colossal losses in manpower and equipment. A couple more months of such a "successful" offensive, and Russia will have nothing to attack with.

Pff... you've said that before. Russia is going to run out of missiles, tanks, artillery rounds, troops etc etc etc. If you believe your lying propaganda media, Russia has lost more than 600000 troops (or more than a half of it's entire armed forces), which is obviously not true, then you could make such a claim.

At the same time, Ukraine does not cling to territories if it is not advantageous for the troops to defend themselves there.

So, heavily fortified Vuhledar, held and stregthened since 2014,  was not advantageous enough for AFU to hodl? Muahaha....

You say Russia is winning this war? Then I advise you to read what Russian Z-patriots are saying about this on social networks.
https://www.dialog.ua/war/302087_1727207888/amp

Yes, I guess by now even retarded persons understand that Russia is winning this war.

Yesterday, Russian forces have captured Vuhledar, a heavily fortified town, held by AFU since 2014. This key town is a huge loss for AFU. Russians have also captured a village of Verkhnekamenskoye and are approaching Siversk, which is also about to be captured. Russians are also storming Toretsk, which, I believe is going to be lost by Ukraine forever too. Ukraine simply had no resources and troops to continue defending these towns. Still confused about who is winning?  

[uche6215]

The Russian and Ukrainian war that has lingered for a while now has negatively affected Europe and the entire world as new alignment in world politics is being formed, it's not good for the world Economy especially European countries that depends on Russia for it's gas supply, critically looking at the on going war I will say this war has lingered this far because of personal interest that has been placed above the life's of citizens but this war is good economically as it's going to shape how world economic events will go

[Nothingtodo]

War has become a competitive common issue in today's world and world humanity is not taking any steps to stop war. Israel and Palestine, Russia and Ukraine are feeling how terrible war is for human civilization. How many innocent people are losing their lives in this war cannot be expressed in numbers. We don't want war anymore, we want peace now.

[martinex]

War has become a competitive common issue in today's world and world humanity is not taking any steps to stop war. Israel and Palestine, Russia and Ukraine are feeling how terrible war is for human civilization. How many innocent people are losing their lives in this war cannot be expressed in numbers. We don't want war anymore, we want peace now.

Every decision that has been made will have direct consequences both physical and non-physical. But, I think there is something very crucial that we are unable to reason as ordinary people who only read the developments and tensions wherever it is happening whether in the Middle East right now or Russia and Ukraine so that the meeting point that everyone hopes for has not been reached or in this moment  Maybe it's that not time to go there.

[Ferozas]

The UN reports that due to rising commodity prices from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, 1,000,000 people in Mozambique (my country) have fallen into extreme poverty.

That is only in one country.

[Argoo]

You say Russia is winning this war? Then I advise you to read what Russian Z-patriots are saying about this on social networks.
https://www.dialog.ua/war/302087_1727207888/amp

Yes, I guess by now even retarded persons understand that Russia is winning this war.

Yesterday, Russian forces have captured Vuhledar, a heavily fortified town, held by AFU since 2014. This key town is a huge loss for AFU. Russians have also captured a village of Verkhnekamenskoye and are approaching Siversk, which is also about to be captured. Russians are also storming Toretsk, which, I believe is going to be lost by Ukraine forever too. Ukraine simply had no resources and troops to continue defending these towns. Still confused about who is winning?  

The Russian occupation army (ROA) loses one of its soldiers per two and a half meters of Ukrainian territory during its offensive. Such data is provided by the OSCE. That is, having a ten-to-one advantage in manpower, eight-to-one in artillery, complete air superiority, the ROA is slowly moving forward over its own corpses, which in any normal state would be considered unacceptable losses.
https://www.dialog.ua/war/303000_1728637299

The small town of Ugledar, where about 14 thousand people previously lived, was continuously stormed by the ROA for two years and was only able to capture it after turning it into ruins. And even then, if not for the actual encirclement, the defenders of Ugledar would have continued to fight. In the West, they are already predicting that another month or two and the Russian offensive, which has been ongoing since October last year, will choke due to the lack of resources for a further offensive.

The current tactics of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are to preserve the army and simultaneously inflict maximum damage on the occupiers. Therefore, if it is not advantageous to defend, the troops retreat to new positions. At the same time, Ukraine is accumulating forces for its offensive.

[HelliumZ]

Although the war between Ukraine and Russia has not affected our country in that way, it has greatly affected some of the products that we import or export from Russia. If there is a disruption to other imports or exports at the right time at the right price, the crisis of that product will definitely be created in our country and that crisis will definitely be created in the global market as well. War thus creates a global sphere of influence where a country can suffer economically as well as incur a trade deficit leading to a massive rise in commodity prices.

[serveria.com]

The Russian occupation army (ROA) loses one of its soldiers per two and a half meters of Ukrainian territory during its offensive. Such data is provided by the OSCE.

Source please?

That is, having a ten-to-one advantage in manpower

Wut? Are you out of your mind? Russian forces fighting (and winning) in Ukraine are in fact outnumbered by Ukrainian forces.

In a Telegram post congratulating his country's troops for Ground Forces Day which is marked on December 12, the Ukrainian president said that there were nearly 600,000 soldiers "of various branches of the military."

"Brave Heroic. Powerful," he wrote next to images of Ukrainian soldiers in various locations, by tanks and some carrying weapons.

Zelensky's figure differs from the estimate of 500,000 Ukrainian troops listed by data gathering and analysis platform Statista and it is the latest number revealed by one of Ukraine's officials about the size of its military.

Source: https://www.newsweek.com/zelensky-reveals-number-ukraine-troops-fighting-russia-1851675

Russian forces in Ukraine are somewhere between 150 and 250k troops strong.

The small town of Ugledar, where about 14 thousand people previously lived, was continuously stormed by the ROA for two years and was only able to capture it after turning it into ruins. And even then, if not for the actual encirclement, the defenders of Ugledar would have continued to fight. In the West, they are already predicting that another month or two and the Russian offensive, which has been ongoing since October last year, will choke due to the lack of resources for a further offensive.

Yes, they already predicted Russia running out of missiles in 2022, running out of tanks and artillery rounds in 2023, running out of troops in early 2024. And guess what?  

The current tactics of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are to preserve the army and simultaneously inflict maximum damage on the occupiers. Therefore, if it is not advantageous to defend, the troops retreat to new positions.

Muahaha   Yes, Kursk region seems like a perfect position to defend! Today, AFU occupiers have already lost about a half of all territories they managed to capture initially, as a result of their sudden attack. Human losses of AFU occupiers have reached and exceeded 20000 troops (about 21500 to be precise) which is almost the entire occupying force of 30000.  

At the same time, Ukraine is accumulating forces for its offensive.

They are what? Accumulating forces?   Offensive?   You're joking, right? Ukraine doesn't have enough troops to defend territories it controls now. AFU are destroyed, the front is crumbling. The last deadly dilemma is to conscript younger Ukrainians (18-25yo) which is going to destroy the economy    

Meanwhile in Kursk region, AFU are getting their asses kicked. Lyubimovka, Zelyonij Shlyah, Olgovka have been liberated yesterday. About 1500 AFU troops have been encircled and their complete annihilation is in progress. In Donbas, Toretsk is about to get captured, Russians have reached the center of the city.  

[CK485]

Although the war between Ukraine and Russia has not affected our country in that way, it has greatly affected some of the products that we import or export from Russia. If there is a disruption to other imports or exports at the right time at the right price, the crisis of that product will definitely be created in our country and that crisis will definitely be created in the global market as well. War thus creates a global sphere of influence where a country can suffer economically as well as incur a trade deficit leading to a massive rise in commodity prices.

with occurs of war between Ukraine and Russia, the impact is very noticeable, especially in the economy, this is the most difficult thing because the supply chain will be disrupted, including the delivery of goods from the two countries at war, and has an impact on the cost of living which is increasingly difficult overall.