Which one do you think its more healthy for a project

[tvplus006]

...There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

If the team is delayed with the development of the project, then there may be 2 reasons for this, one of which is inadequate funding, and the second is the lack of an experienced team. Both of these reasons have a negative impact on development and may eventually lead to the fact that all work may be suspended.

[doomloop]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

I think that the dates seen on the road maps are only an estimation but they can't be accurate. This is the reason why sometimes we are seeing delays and there are times when the development seems to be fast. It's hard to judge if you are only focusing on these things.

For me, as long as the team members are honest and dedicated for the success of their project, I will understand if there are delays but I will be glad if the developments are fast enough. I won't think negatively. For some, maybe they can see delays as a red flag and then when the developments are too fast, they think the teams are rushing their work and this affects the quality of the project.

[posi]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Of course, slow is sure, haste easily leads to unexpected errors leading to damage to the project and investors. The attack on the solana network and the confirmed failure was caused by the slope wallet, which is an example of haste and sloppiness. Crypto is the market where most of the new technologies are concentrated so we need to be very careful, if the project goes on schedule, the better but if there is a slight delay, it's okay as long as they always try to create a product best product.

[$anounimus$]

A healthy project moves steadily toward a goal even if it's new. Ideally, users want to know when a product will be released especially if they are already interested in joining providing users with information is important so that they do not feel that the product is faulty, does not function as advertised, that their needs are ignored, and/or that the company behind the product does not exist.

I think if people have a choice, they want to see the project done quickly and that's human nature. However, I also believe that it is more important for a project to be completed well than to be completed quickly. As long as the team is working hard and making progress, I don't care how long it takes, as long as I get something good in the end.

[xSkylarx]

A good project for me is something that sticks to their roadmap and continues to build it even if the market is at its bear season. Some failed projects during the last bull run rush their project that their only goal is to take advantage of the hype and milk people's money. They didn't planned properly their roadmap resulting for sudden changes if they realize it's not feasible which causes their investors to lose confidence.

[blockman]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Just follow everything that has been presented at the right time. That's what investors want, to be at the right time and do everything what they've said.
If it's on the road map, just do it and there's no excuse for that because all of those things are planned when they're about to launch. Delay of updates is what people don't like and that's why it makes a lot of them disappointed when there's already an expected update to do.

Many projects have the excuse of delaying their things, but it will show how dedicated they are to achieve their targets. A lot are delaying their tasks because of insufficient funds or lack of it. So if they can't raise their targets, high likely that their planned activities will be delayed. This is why if the projects wants a continuous implementation of their roadmap, they need to secure private funding so it won't deter their activities.

You know what, they should put it on their minds that "first impression, lasts". And that's where the investors are getting encouragement to trust them and believe them on what they're doing with the project they're working. Because if they can't deliver the best results through it then they should haven't placed that promise because it is the reason why investors are investing. With those promises and thing they say, that's how most investors are hooked to a project.

[so98nn]

If they are not going to follow the roadmap then definitely they ran into some sort of trouble “genuinely or intentionally”.
If its genuine then they should be able to explain their investors and it better be justifiable. If this does not happens and its intentional then I am sure projects screwed and they wont be able to explain this to their investors.

[bitkanu]

Rushing the things is a very risky decision. You may being ended up with bunch of vulnerabilities and this is potentially making your investors into the big advantage, slowly following the roadmap is far better rather than developing to the app as fast as possible without consider about how many bug available in the app. I think that people know that so well but that's your choice. I think that the first choice was the worst thing.

[Widdop37]

Slow and steady growth is more healthy for any crypto project, I am not talking about those moonshot projects that are released to take advantage of a bull market, always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose, the best advice I can give is good reliable projects are built when all things looks hopelessly for example ( Bear Market ).

[TheUltraElite]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Roadmaps are made to be ignored. To me all roadmaps are bullshit because none of that really matters to the outcome if the project does not have any intrinsic market making capability - that is to generate a demand for their coin. Without that no coin will ever go up and the project will eventually lose investors as they will dump after the advisors end their lock-in and cause the first big dump.

Truely speaking, this type of pump and dump markets will gradually lose its charm among investors, something that has happened with ICO and why they changed their name to IEO and so on.

It is better to just invest in well known altcoins or simply bitcoin than go for these rug pull schemes.

[bonyaserg]

Personally, I can say that now there are a lot of different projects that are just empty shells. And if the project is really worthwhile, then it is worth investing in it. But since the cryptocurrency market is falling or growing, problems arise in the project, and the timing changes because of this, so you just need to be patient and get your profit a little later. So there are problems in business too. So in projects, too, sometimes there are problems of this kind.

[shinratensei_]

slow and steady growth is always good and it could gets considered as natural growth, regardless if the team in doing the gradual updates are doing it slowly that it quite literally stray away from the roadmaps then it could become a sign that the team isn't really committed in their own project, and that could means that you better take away your investment from these project since there's big chance that the result will be this project flops.

[isaac_clarke22]

~

You can't rush art, OP. Maybe with a little luck, you could get something out of a business from rushing but just by not following the roadmap simply speaks for itself for the project.
Roadmaps could change, but the changes should still stick to the methodology. This might not be related to crypto, but even in my own study back then, we just rushed in to write our conclusion with a little sample and population and we ended up scrapping the project because our panelists were not satisfied with the results.

[Farma]

if you ask about a healthy project, then it can be seen from a clear team, a large community, a project that continues to grow and the results can be enjoyed, and run according to the roadmap they made. maybe some will change their roadmap for the better.
however, based on what you said, such as updating slowly, not following their roadmap time, it might be labeled as a bad project, but if they still maintain their principles and try to improve it, then it can be seen from the next development .
on the other hand, you can see that the project is not healthy if the team is not clear, the roadmap is not clear, the community is not that much, the project is not yet running, the funds raised are minimal, and many more.

[crwth]

Roadmaps are made to be a guide rather than an exact concrete plan with exact dates. It's just to show the investors and members that they actually have a plan like having it released in Q1 or Q2 or something like that. I don't think that it's automatically a red flag because plans are plans and it's important that they are doing something about it rather than nothing, right?

In life, there's no "exact" timing with everything. It takes time to build the perfect project.

[palle11]

It is risky to rely on project that doesn't follow their road map. Road map is suppose to look like a mini contract between developer or team and those investing on it. Investors look at the road map to understand the future plans and achievements based on the time for the project. Therefore if a project doesn't follow the the road map or abandon it totally, it is risky. If the roadmap achievement is delayed by any circumstances, the public should know about that.

In life, there's no "exact" timing with everything. It takes time to build the perfect project.

Sure there is no timing because certain circumstances may cause plans to change but regarding for investment, the team can inform the community of what is happening and delays to achieve the road map with evidence and not keep quiet or block others who complain in their telegram channel. If a team refuse to update community of how their investment has gone so far or block them off, definitely that project is scam.

[Lubang Bawah]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

If all roadmaps can be resolved quickly, of course it is better to run faster, I think it doesn't matter if it can jump over the roadmap and this makes investors optimistic, for example if the hardcap target when ICO is planned for 3 months but a month has been achieved then the developer will immediately step faster to the next process.

[danherbias07]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Because that is where the investors are basing where the project should be, the roadmap. If you will do things differently like rushing some updates there will be consequences, and one of those can be a negative reaction from those who believe the developer should just be following their proposed timeline.
I prefer just following the roadmap.
If ever they will inject new things then they should be sure it's not part of that. Just keeping up with new things that are happening.
Been a follower of different ICOs up to the NFT project and most of the time those who rush it just because some group of investors is ranting about the slow movements have all failed.
You can listen to their cries but be sure to not be affected by them. It's possible those are the people who are looking for rush money and didn't even took a second to read the whitepaper.

[icalical]

I think the most important thing is consistency, I mean if you the project can make a big break-through and awesome development in fast-pace so it's good, but then do they keep making good development, or the project just stuck after those break through, if it's the later then the project will most likely fail. But even if the project has slow development, but consistent, and at the end of the day the can reach their goal, the project will most likely to be succeeded.

[vanesha]

it will be healthier for those who strictly follow their roadmap. I saw many of them stalled due to market conditions so the delay brought the roadmap to a halt and the community faded away. I understand being in a negative market will definitely have an impact on public sales and launch prices but I think it will break even with the trust from the community for a project that always follows the roadmap on time.