[SCAM WARNING] QI Blockchain Plagiarized Whitepaper and Website Content

[FatFork]

You don't have to be surprised at my stance on this unless you don't get me right.

You're right. I have no frickin' idea what you're trying to argue here.

An obvious plagiarism is not "tangible" enough for you? Beside, what do you think will happen with a project where team is not capable of writing their own whitepaper and instead they have to copy/paste from someone else's?

An obvious plagiarism of whitepaper is surely a red flag. A scam project is always hasty to get their project running and hence uses any available tools to set up their platform as fast as possible.

So what's your point exactly? You find nothing "tangible" in the OP that this is obvious plagiarism? Or do you mean that even though the project is clearly plagiarized, it can still be "genuine" and honest?

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

Thank you everyone.

Who the hell are you? (with a sarcastic tone)

[Dorjoy Khan]

Who the hell are you? (with a sarcastic tone)

You are such an egoistic person I seen in this forum and you don't need to know WHO I am. I am sharing with you the update of this project and you are blaming me? What kind of stupidity is it?

[FatFork]

You are such an egoistic person I seen in this forum. I am just MOD of the project and I am sharing with you the update of this projecct and you are blaming me? What kind of stupidity is it?

Oh, I see. So you're part of the Fox campaigns team or an alt of Jawadu? How am I supposed to know that if you've never mentioned it before?
I guess that explains the fake retaliatory feedback left on my account. You know that's trust abuse, right?

Dorjoy Khan

2022-08-16

Reference

Fake report about the project called Qi blockchain. He taken no research about the project but just found few information on the website and internet .

By the way, when did I blame you, and for what exactly?

[Rikafip]

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

That's a classic excuse that we heard so many times before, as its always someone else's mistake and just confirms how clueless QI Blockchain is when they are not capable of writing their own whitepaper, or at least proofread it. If they bothered to do that they would catch that ridiculous mistake that mentions BTC price being ~$250. Either way I can't see how this can end up good and don't expect tags being removed just because you sort the whitepaper.

By the way, what's your connection with QI Blockchain?

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

You are such an egoistic person I seen in this forum. I am just MOD of the project and I am sharing with you the update of this projecct and you are blaming me? What kind of stupidity is it?

Oh, I see. So you're part of the Fox campaigns team or an alt of Jawadu? How am I supposed to know that if you've never mentioned it before?
I guess that explains the fake retaliatory feedback left on my account. You know that's trust abuse, right?

Dorjoy Khan

2022-08-16

Reference

Fake report about the project called Qi blockchain. He taken no research about the project but just found few information on the website and internet .

By the way, when did I blame you, and for what exactly?

Oh stop the drama LOL
Well honestly speaking a project can be ruined by the third party workers if they do not have work ethic. It's not always easy to find the right person. But I doubt it's the case here.
I see their website homepage and a 12 year kid can design a html page like this. Are they really thinking to crowdfunding using this website?

It will be a big LOL.

[Dorjoy Khan]

You are such an egoistic person I seen in this forum. I am just MOD of the project and I am sharing with you the update of this projecct and you are blaming me? What kind of stupidity is it?

Oh, I see. So you're part of the Fox campaigns team or an alt of Jawadu? How am I supposed to know that if you've never mentioned it before?
I guess that explains the fake retaliatory feedback left on my account. You know that's trust abuse, right?




By the way, when did I blame you, and for what exactly?

Does it matter I am jawadu or alt account? If you have power just check IP, location, who care? I just wanted to means why did you report a BM or tag a project as scam just because of it's Plagarism before talking with the project team? This could a project team mistake because as far as I know Qi blockchain project still in the early stage. Even their blockchain explorer not updated yet fully so is not this is normal that the there could be some issue with whitepaper .
And at the end , who care the whitepaper ? People just look to project utility . Just look to Terra luna, what happen with them, what about celcius network? They had security , whitepaper , where are they now?


Anyway, I don't want to have any argue, Just to inform you, new whitepaper with solution will be out tomorrow , I wish to see your investigation on it.

[Dorjoy Khan]

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

By the way, what's your connection with QI Blockchain?

No connection, I am part of the team and I am mining the Qie coin.

[noormcs5]

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

By the way, what's your connection with QI Blockchain?

No connection, I am part of the team and I am mining the Qie coin.

This is a little bit confusing that at one point you are saying that you have no connection with the QI blockchain but on the same time you are saying that you are a part of the team 
By looking at the post history of yours, i find you a bounty hunter.

[Dorjoy Khan]

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

By the way, what's your connection with QI Blockchain?

No connection, I am part of the team and I am mining the Qie coin.

This is a little bit confusing that at one point you are saying that you have no connection with the QI blockchain but on the same time you are saying that you are a part of the team 
By looking at the post history of yours, i find you a bounty hunter.

I suggest you all to talk with the team , not with me. I deliver to you what I know .

[Dorjoy Khan]

Guys, new whitepaper ready with plagiarism solution . Stay tune, we will publish it soon.

[FreeWorldUsers]

What a mess in here  I have no idea what to think but one is sure I checked the creator of project he is seems to be a real person with linkedin using phone number related to his location so like for me seems legit I saw many projects where 3rd party prepare many things and they make a shit content. Things like that happen life is life. I know few projects already that promotion and content prepared by 3rd party was a shit but when it comes to play they grows big. Personally I don't mind  website look. Most important is a tech. In times like now ppl want to see all beautiful nice website great looking wallets and to be hones more projects that looks GREAT with great content end like scam instead of those projects with poor content. Just have look on LUNA nice concept looking good all awesome and now tell me that it was not a SCAM. Peoples forget we are here at first place for Tech not design. Cheers

[virasog]

Guys, new whitepaper ready with plagiarism solution . Stay tune, we will publish it soon.

So publishing the new whitepaper which is plagiarism free will solve all the issues and allegations raised on this project?

You were exposed to using a copied whitepaper and now you will replace it with a new one, will have no change in the perception of people on the project and it will remain a risk to invest in this project.

[Dorjoy Khan]

Guys, new whitepaper ready with plagiarism solution . Stay tune, we will publish it soon.

So publishing the new whitepaper which is plagiarism free will solve all the issues and allegations raised on this project?

You were exposed to using a copied whitepaper and now you will replace it with a new one, will have no change in the perception of people on the project and it will remain a risk to invest in this project.

Team apologies to give the deal to third party. Have a  look on new whitepaper here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11gFjEuAfrrfIIsZUsWbImIT1xTay2APV/view?usp=sharing

[FreeWorldUsers]

Guys, new whitepaper ready with plagiarism solution . Stay tune, we will publish it soon.

So publishing the new whitepaper which is plagiarism free will solve all the issues and allegations raised on this project?

You were exposed to using a copied whitepaper and now you will replace it with a new one, will have no change in the perception of people on the project and it will remain a risk to invest in this project.

They already explained that they give whitepaper creation leaved to 3rd party just let them explain and straight what they do wrong 

[Dorjoy Khan]

Guys, new whitepaper ready with plagiarism solution . Stay tune, we will publish it soon.

So publishing the new whitepaper which is plagiarism free will solve all the issues and allegations raised on this project?

You were exposed to using a copied whitepaper and now you will replace it with a new one, will have no change in the perception of people on the project and it will remain a risk to invest in this project.

They already explained that they give whitepaper creation leaved to 3rd party just let them explain and straight what they do wrong 

Exactly, haha. Easy solution, nothing to do argue with this anymore, Hope the creator will understand this and remove this scam tag.

[TopTort777]

Guys, new whitepaper ready with plagiarism solution . Stay tune, we will publish it soon.

So publishing the new whitepaper which is plagiarism free will solve all the issues and allegations raised on this project?

You were exposed to using a copied whitepaper and now you will replace it with a new one, will have no change in the perception of people on the project and it will remain a risk to invest in this project.

Team apologies to give the deal to third party. Have a  look on new whitepaper here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11gFjEuAfrrfIIsZUsWbImIT1xTay2APV/view?usp=sharing

So it took them several days to create a whitepaper on their own, then why would they hire someone to create plagiarized whitepaper on first place, if they could have done it by themselves? I wont believe that the team was "super busy" and delegated the detailed description of their own project, ideas, plans to someone else. That does not make any sense.

If QI delegate such delicate task to third party, then other roadmap stages (btw where is it) are probably going to be made by third party also. Or they will always have issues or excuses like "it was due to someone else". 

[virasog]

Exactly, haha. Easy solution, nothing to do argue with this anymore, Hope the creator will understand this and remove this scam tag.

I don't think the flag will be removed so easily here. This issue is not as simple as you are trying to portray it. The only way to get this tag remove is when your project really becomes a trusted project and this is not gonna happen overnight.

If QI delegate such delicate task to third party, then other roadmap stages (btw where is it) are probably going to be made by third party also. Or they will always have issues or excuses like "it was due to someone else". 

That's the problem that it is now hard to trust them. There is no way to know if they are speaking the truth and they were so innocent that they didn't bother to check the whitepaper produced by the 3rd party.

[FreeWorldUsers]

I will suggest to be calm and wait for results that is the only way to check project is trusted or not. Cheers

[Rikafip]

Exactly, haha. Easy solution, nothing to do argue with this anymore, Hope the creator will understand this and remove this scam tag.

That's not exactly how things work around here and it will take much more than just correcting whitepaper to get thoise tag removed.

So it took them several days to create a whitepaper on their own, then why would they hire someone to create plagiarized whitepaper on first place, if they could have done it by themselves? I wont believe that the team was "super busy" and delegated the detailed description of their own project, ideas, plans to someone else. That does not make any sense.

They probably hired someone else to rewrite whitepaper for them. Or who knows, maybe the same people that wrote the first version wrote the 2nd one as well.

[robinhood123456789]

You don't have to be surprised at my stance on this unless you don't get me right.

You're right. I have no frickin' idea what you're trying to argue here.

An obvious plagiarism is not "tangible" enough for you? Beside, what do you think will happen with a project where team is not capable of writing their own whitepaper and instead they have to copy/paste from someone else's?

An obvious plagiarism of whitepaper is surely a red flag. A scam project is always hasty to get their project running and hence uses any available tools to set up their platform as fast as possible.

So what's your point exactly? You find nothing "tangible" in the OP that this is obvious plagiarism? Or do you mean that even though the project is clearly plagiarized, it can still be "genuine" and honest?

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

Thank you everyone.

Who the hell are you? (with a sarcastic tone)

Your tone sets the ridiculousness of this post.

Kindly note that they have a live blockchain with a NFT marketplace already live and have done no ICO.  Even their previous whitepaper was in line with their vision.  Their actions clearly speak louder than words.  What are you trying to achieve? They are not trying to take investor money clearly.  They offering the general public an opportunity in advance technology with lower transaction fees.  Noticed you also asked about how to mine the coin?!  That furthermore emphasis my point as it is publically available on their site - run the genesis file with their command lines api in a linux terminal.  Just as transparent as their code on github.  If they don`t list on exchanges in September then I will swallow my words otherwise I think you should...