Fortunejack turning into KYC hell trap!

[notblox1]

I'm with you OP..
This stuff grinds my gears too..
Any excuse not to shell out a single shekel..

Thank you for support.
I am not asking anything from fj, but I am really disappointed with behavior of some bitcointalk members.
Some people probably have mash potatoes instead of brain in their skull, if they don't understand why I started this topic.

Or did they all just learn a dirty little trick, that some will support, that they can use to keep some percentage of users coins?

It looks like a trick trap to me, but I would understand if this rule was applied for cheaters and people who try to abuse casinos, not for casual gamblers.

If websites ask for KYC upon signing up it is up to the customer whether to join. If the websites asks for KYC after funds have been won/traded/deposited then the customer should be allowed to withdraw them and subsequently have their accounts closed if they do not want to send KYC.

It's all legal and done by the books, and fj is not controlling any funds after it goes to their legal team and third party partner.
Nobody ever asked who is this third party partner asking for kyc, but I guess it's nothing...  

In this particular case KYC is not the problem but the OP's denial and making it a big issue to make FJ look bad.

I am not trying to make anyone look bad so this is baseless accusation against me,
but you should do something better in your life instead of posting so many times in this topic and supporting random KYC.
Judging by feedback and history you have on your profile you should not be trusted about anything you say.

[Poker Player]

Judging by feedback and history you have on your profile you should not be trusted about anything you say.

I'm not going to go through BitcoinGirl.Club's post history but regarding his feedback, he has one positive, one negative (retaliatory) and two neutral ones saying that his account was hacked in the past and returned to its original owner, so I don't know what you see wrong with that.

I wouldn't want us to go too off topic with this. Regarding your case, as I have commented I think there is an unstoppable trend to more and more KYC, but it would be much fairer if you were asked for it at the beginning. As much as it is in the TOS, the fact that certain houses only ask for KYC when you win a certain amount of money does not look good.

[JollyGood]

My comment was generic, it was not specific to FortuneJack or specific to your situation with them.

If customers are asked for KYC upon signing up it means they are probably going to find resistance but if they allow customers to sign up but implement KYC later it means even if the customers walk away without sending in their private details they will end keeping funds belonging to that customer.

A fair way for all businesses to operate would be allowing customers the option to withdraw funds and close the account if they do not want to send KYC and continue as a customers.

If websites ask for KYC upon signing up it is up to the customer whether to join. If the websites asks for KYC after funds have been won/traded/deposited then the customer should be allowed to withdraw them and subsequently have their accounts closed if they do not want to send KYC.

It's all legal and done by the books, and fj is not controlling any funds after it goes to their legal team and third party partner.
Nobody ever asked who is this third party partner asking for kyc, but I guess it's nothing...  

[cryptofrka]

If this is for only forum members then you are making different low for a certain community which shouldn't be.

I do expect forum members to have a bit of leeway when it comes to situations like these.
Bitcointalk is a place where these companies market their product in a more direct way - and we are in constant communication with their representatives.

I don't expect us to have a different set of rules - but I do hope that the bookies understand that a person from BTT forum will be less likely to do KYC than a random Joe that saw the ad while shopping.
If I had such an issue with Sportsbet for example, I'd contact Steve for sure and expect him to solve it for me.