This is actually a "Frog in the Pot" scenario, where the world are cooked slowly and they never see the disaster, until everything goes to shit. It will be very different, if a huge chuck of ice break away and you suddenly see massive flooding on coastal towns... then people will sit up and take notice.
"absolute sea level has risen at an average rate of 0.06 inches per year from 1880 to 2013 (see Figure 1). Since 1993, however, average sea level has risen at a rate of
0.12 to 0.14 inches per year—roughly twice as fast as the long-term trend." - Source :
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-sea-levelDo you think average people care about 0.12 to 0.14 inches per year? ... I think the only people who will notice that, are people living at the beach or close to the ocean.
lessons to learn from people in the 1800's
if you live on "marsh common" or "boggy street" or "the glades" [insert thousand of examples of names related to wetlands]
know that some deplorable real estate developer built your house on KNOWN flood risks
same goes for beach front real estate too
so when it does flood. dont be fooled by "oh thats climate change" first sue them for building on known flood/wetlands and then realise why there were no houses on that land for 2000 years before your house was build on it
and yes that includes beach real estate
building on beachland is obvious to cause issues
oh and for future reference. even without seeing wetlands.. dont buy real estate on the grand canyons or other spots known for erosion..
im from the UK. we have alot of sea towns that are hundreds of years old.. but do you also know what most of those towns build hundreds of years ago. HUGE WALLS
yep even hundreds of years ago. those wanting to build near the coast would look at the land. notice cliffs (land erosion) and realise 2 things.
1. not proper location to build a house
2. lets build a huge wall first to defend against erosion. and then build a house
this century in silly places like america however, they just build houses into the natural dunes/ coastline and think that insurance companies will cover the problems later.. and to ensure insurers pay out instead of saying it was not covered due to a "act of god" clause. they now call sea erosion a human caused event
..
i still laugh sometimes when comparing the UK's current response to "climate change" compared to history
london when at the smoggiest of the old coal fired house fireplaces where chimney sweepers were a big business and smog was a regular occurance. london suffered the worse FROST periods
most of current response to "carbon" is not about sealevels. but its actually about the dwindling supplies of carbon which will see oil and coal reserves depleted by 2050-2060 anyways.. but requires FUNDING now to pay for conversion to renewables before the fossil reserves run out..
pay particular attention to what the words "renewable" and "sustainable" actually mean in regards to words like "oil reserves"..
as oppose to the media definitions that pretend the words relate to "healing planet", "reversing temperatures"