Will You Support Casino Operated By The Bitcointalk Members

[noormcs5]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

I usually like to play at a casino if it is good, reputed and trusted.  I never look at who is the owner of the casino or in most cases the owner doesn't reveal themselves and that's also fine with me unless and until the casino in question is a good one.
So if the bitcointalk reputed members or any member makes their casino, there is nothing wrong with it unless they provide good services to the community. Secondly, if the developers are already reputed members my confidence in the casino will increase further.

[panjul07]

but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?

Your question reminds me the gold era of moneypot years ago, I remember there was a moneypot app which was owned by one of reputable bitcointalk members "yahoo62278".
At that time yahoo is reputable member already in this forum IIRC, for sure most bitcointalk members supported his project.
There is no need to take it as conflict of interest because of the past experience of promoting other casinos, that was a part of improvement/development.
So it is simple, we have to support the casino owned by reputable members in this forum as long as he/she is operating it professionally.

[yahoo62278]

but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?

Your question reminds me the gold era of moneypot years ago, I remember there was a moneypot app which was owned by one of reputable bitcointalk members "yahoo62278".
At that time yahoo is reputable member already in this forum IIRC, for sure most bitcointalk members supported his project.
There is no need to take it as conflict of interest because of the past experience of promoting other casinos, that was a part of improvement/development.
So it is simple, we have to support the casino owned by reputable members in this forum as long as he/she is operating it professionally.

The issue with Moneypot was the owners of the platform decided to be shady. Someone on the team had access to the server and cheated the investors out of a ton of money essentially causing the ruination of the project. Otherwise, I would still be operating my site.

Moneypot was a great platform that allowed users with little to no bankroll an opportunity to get into business. Would love to see that come back but be operated with a little better management.

[Viscore]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

There’s no reason we will not support them because have known them to become trustworthy and have become reputable members over a period of time. This is even an edge for them instead since they are more inclined into gambling casinos rather than seeing those new gamblers managing their own casinos. Also, for me this is not a conflict of interest, what’s in the past does not matter at all, if they are more capable today, that’s more important.

[lalabotax]

As far as they are reputable/trusted members in this forum, I will support them. It is good to have Casino operators from this forum members, it means that this forum also contributes to providing trusted online Casinos. I am sure that there are many gambling experts among this forum members. We can see that the discussions on gambling boards are very active and many members engaged in the discussion. Sometimes, the discussion is very technical about Casino, and many forum members can have good ideas about it. It simply indicates that many forum members have the capability to be Casino operators.

[qwertyup23]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

Like what I always mentioned on similar posts like these, an essential feature of a gambling website are positive feedback and reviews from its current players. If the online gambling casino website contains positive reviews, then it is more reason than enough for me to at least try it out. Another thing, the fact that the gambling website is also operated by bitcointalk members imply that it will have an active customer support system- which is definitely a must.

I also do not think that it will be a conflict of interest. Given that there is a lot of competition nowadays, it is nothing but normal for people to create their own venture and explore this type of profit-making.

[nurilham]

It will depend on some factors:
- WHo are they, if they have trust, potential, and also experience, it can be considerable.
- WHat kind of gambling platform that is? We should also need to analyze if the gambling platform is legit or not or potential or not like we also analyze the gambling platform from a non-Bitcointalk member.
Although the platform is created by the Bitcointalk member, I will also consider and analyze ethe platform, it is done professionally. As long as they will give more reputation and trust, offering an interesting platform with more easiness, why not? But if they seem like not being professional enough, I think it must be considered twice again.

[goaldigger]

Their reputation here is a big plus, but that is not my basis of playing because even a new gambling site came here with a less reputation even if they don’t have good history here they succeeded simply because they offer a good services and they host a good marketing campaign, in short my decision of playing will only be based the platform itself and will not be base on anyone’s reputation, many site started from the scratch. If a top member here offer a good new platform, I’m pretty sure it will be a big success for him.

[Baofeng]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

Where is the conflict then, obviously if you are not a gambling operator or partly own a crypto base casinos then you should stop promoting other casinos because that is not a good business model to begin with.

And with that, yes I will support that new casinos just like what I did with some of casinos that are popping up in the gambling board. I sort of like to test that casino first and see how it goes. If I like them then I will continue to play with them, simply as that. Hmm, it seems that you are aware that a member here is planning to have their own casinos? or this is what you are seeing in the future?

[romero121]

Already different gambling platforms were backed by reputable Bitcointalk members, so it won't be something different to consider. Whether it is from the Bitcointalk members or from a person who is new to the community, there is a need of specific things in the platform. When it gets fulfilled, automatically it'll receive the support of the gamblers.

From the very beginning we've got more cryptocurrency accepted gambling platforms turn successful through our forum as the key place for promotion. It need to be understood that gambling sites unlike the ownership it is getting good support.

[dunfida]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

Everyone does have the rights on running their business, doesnt matter if they are really that been hired or been part of some gambling site team in the past.
We do have our own will when it comes to various things and also its your money that had been used on raising or building up that business.Therefore, no one has the right on stopping on what
venture or career you would be taking on.It would really just matter on how that person do make out good explanation on what career he had chosen.
For sure he would really be getting some recognition on this forum specially if he's a reputable or known on this place but well everything cant be sure
because it would be depending on how good his site is and the offering it does have.

[fortunecrypto]

I'll support it. they have an insight on what a casino should be based on their experience as a poster, reviewers, and players of casinos, they will combine these insights and experience to create a casino that the gambling community will play and support if newbie gambling operators can come out and operate a casino and just learn the casino operation later why not experienced members of this forum, I'm sure they will do better.

[serjent05]

but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?

Definitely, I will support if ever a reputable member of this forum decided to put up his own casino.  I also don't think that playing on the newly setup casino of a member in this forum will be a conflict of interest.  Gamblers always wanted to try a newly created platform to test his luck and somehow check if the "beginners luck" can kick in.  Besides, if we see that the casino platform is promising then I think it won't be a conflict of interest if we decided to stay on that casino.

[tabas]

We've seen how the early members have responded to the casinos being backed up by co-member of the forum. And most of them have become reputable and known not just on their own usernames but also to the casino that they've launched. It's just sad to see that some of those reputable casinos owned by our co forum members are starting to be disliked by some of their customers because of the issues that they're facing. But hopefully those new that might be launched in the future will be also getting the same support as what the first casinos have received.

[Die_empty]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

It would be a great privilege for me and a big plus to the community. If the member is trusted and has all the needed financial, material, and manpower resources that would make the casino successful, then I would give him all the support by playing games. And I am sure in the nearest future some members would achieve this feat and with the experience they have acquired from this forum, it would be very successful.

If the member is still managing or promoting a different casino, he has to resign and focus on his own casino. There is no way he can successfully promote or give his best to two firms that offer the same competitive services. I am sure there are tendencies that there would be a clash of interests. He would definitely love and work harder for the success of his own casino firm, more than the one he is hired to promote.

[STT]

My first answer would be no for the same reasons as many member pools I used to join back when mining regularly, amateur hour can be a painful experience for all involved even when I have sympathy for those struggling in running it.    If somehow you can come up with a gambling site that doesnt require handling balances at least to start off with then maybe I believe there is a chance of getting off to a decent start to continue and improve establishing a good site and eventual casino setup.

[bitterguy28]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

There are already reputable members here that runs casino for long time , though most of them gathers their reputation over time as they are well known to be owner of those casino still they managed to maintain their names and become more trusted long time.

so it always depend on what kind of person or account is this and what will his plans, actually there can be something good or not to come with this, because what if that reputable account decided to sell His account to casino operators and that operators mishandled the account then what will happen?

as we have seen many reputable account turns out scammers just because of Money so chances are always there.

But as long as the casino runs smooth and better? then yeah I will trust that site but of course starting with small amount as I already have my set of trusted site that i often played.

[Jatiluhung]

I thought that would be good. but about whether it supports or not then I will see the development first. But I feel there will be many who support it. especially if he has a very good reputation here. then there is no reason not to believe it. We even trust a lot the owners of people we don't know before. then of course we will trust the owner who is a member of this forum with the good trust he has got in this forum. I'm optimistic it will be a good thing to try.

[Fundamentals Of]

Whether the operator is a bitcointalk member or not is not the important thing. There are already crypto casinos whose owners have accounts here. Lately, there was also a member of this forum who also had a stake in a newly launched casino. But it doesn't mean anything. What is important is that the casino is operating fairly and well. In the end, players will support a casino not simply because the owner is a member of the forum but because it offers good features and fun games.

[peter0425]

Even how reputable the Bitcointalk members each , of course they need to prove their quality of service first and of course their capability to run and sustain that said casino , because there are so many casino online that exist now and we knew how hard to compete with the old timer and popular.
but i am willing to try and play in the said site if the member is truly active about gambling and not just jumping to the business because of the possible profit , as this will distinguish their capacity to handle Gamblers issue in the future.

Whether the operator is a bitcointalk member or not is not the important thing. There are already crypto casinos whose owners have accounts here. Lately, there was also a member of this forum who also had a stake in a newly launched casino. But it doesn't mean anything. What is important is that the casino is operating fairly and well. In the end, players will support a casino not simply because the owner is a member of the forum but because it offers good features and fun games.

+1 ... Support is what we keep in asking if how they will manage to answer and provide for each gamblers problem that will surely occur over time.