Bet24Star.com | Online Casino Exclusive Bonuses

[klidex]

I definitely understand the concerns about entering personal information like that. Online, it's particularly crucial to be wary of who you share personal information with. You're correct that some casinos have more stringent know-your-customer regulations than others; before joining up, it's best to do some homework and read the fine print.

However, I do recognize the need of adhering to appropriate Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and holding the appropriate license. It's a win-win situation: more safety for the casino and more compliance with the regulations from the players. So, I believe it boils down to striking a balance between security and trust when it comes to our personal data and the casino's operations.

There has been a lot of discussion and debate about KYC in other threads and there is a lot of debate about gamblers who don't want to do KYC or gamblers who really don't mind being asked for KYC as a condition on a gambling platform.
The concern of gamblers who refuse to provide a KYC on average is that they are afraid that their personal data will be misused by the casino.
But in fact there are several casinos that are trusted and can be relied on in terms of security, so we don't need to be afraid of giving out the personal data that we have.
Moreover, I also believe that in the future there will be more casinos that require their users to meet KYC requirements so we don't have to worry about the misuse of our personal data.

[1715350508]

1715350508

[1715350508]

1715350508

[LUCKMCFLY]

I definitely understand the concerns about entering personal information like that. Online, it's particularly crucial to be wary of who you share personal information with. You're correct that some casinos have more stringent know-your-customer regulations than others; before joining up, it's best to do some homework and read the fine print.

However, I do recognize the need of adhering to appropriate Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and holding the appropriate license. It's a win-win situation: more safety for the casino and more compliance with the regulations from the players. So, I believe it boils down to striking a balance between security and trust when it comes to our personal data and the casino's operations.

There has been a lot of discussion and debate about KYC in other threads and there is a lot of debate about gamblers who don't want to do KYC or gamblers who really don't mind being asked for KYC as a condition on a gambling platform.
The concern of gamblers who refuse to provide a KYC on average is that they are afraid that their personal data will be misused by the casino.
But in fact there are several casinos that are trusted and can be relied on in terms of security, so we don't need to be afraid of giving out the personal data that we have.
Moreover, I also believe that in the future there will be more casinos that require their users to meet KYC requirements so we don't have to worry about the misuse of our personal data.

This type of issue must be handled with great tact, because there are very sensitive players who may react badly thinking that they are being attacked, it is necessary to take into account that some casinos acquire licenses that require KYC to maintain authenticity.

I also understand that many players want to take care of their privacy and anonymity, this is considered a right, but each casino has its own rules, and the moment we accept the terms and conditions we accept everything. There are many threads where this has been discussed, however there is no general agreement because they all have different and very valid points of view.

[tbct_mt2]

This type of issue must be handled with great tact, because there are very sensitive players who may react badly thinking that they are being attacked, it is necessary to take into account that some casinos acquire licenses that require KYC to maintain authenticity.

Depends on their license, where their companies are in, they have to fulfill requirements of local authorities and if they are a legit casino with high trust history, nobody will reject KYC. If they love the platform and don't feel they can find better platforms as alternatives, they will continue to use their loved platform and complete KYC with no single complain.

Like on Binance, I don't see reasons for people to reject using it and reject to fulfill KYC on Binance.

I also understand that many players want to take care of their privacy and anonymity, this is considered a right, but each casino has its own rules, and the moment we accept the terms and conditions we accept everything. There are many threads where this has been discussed, however there is no general agreement because they all have different and very valid points of view.

Because many data leaks, data sales from big companies and in dark markets, people are fearful that their identities, privacy will be lost if they submit documents for KYC but later those document files will be leaked or sold.

[redsun114]

This type of issue must be handled with great tact, because there are very sensitive players who may react badly thinking that they are being attacked, it is necessary to take into account that some casinos acquire licenses that require KYC to maintain authenticity.

I also understand that many players want to take care of their privacy and anonymity, this is considered a right, but each casino has its own rules, and the moment we accept the terms and conditions we accept everything. There are many threads where this has been discussed, however there is no general agreement because they all have different and very valid points of view.

There must be other ways to prove that a gambling website is authentic. It's not always about the license and if we check the old gambling sites, I think none of them has a license because it wasn't also a thing back then and as we noticed KYC has only become popular lately.

If they badly want a license because it was ordered by a government then there are still other license out there which doesn't require the customers to do a KYC. Some casinos on the forum have that already. It's a win-win for both the players and the casino because players can enjoy full anonymity while the casinos income won't still be affected in a negative way.

[usekevin]

Welcome to the forum,at first you need to concentrate on the project Announcement thread.It’s looking good,but not excellent.Many good designers in the forum,I had some experience with JAYCE.

So you can check with them and if the price match.You can create the Announcement thread with good design.It’s just an recommendation,following this decision is based on your wish.Secondly you need to concentrate on the Signature campaign,but rising the capital is the important one.People with good experience in the forum will follow this two steps to promote on the forum.Forum with huge number of gamblers,So it will help you sure.Have a try mate,Cheers!

[seoincorporation]

...
There must be other ways to prove that a gambling website is authentic. It's not always about the license and if we check the old gambling sites, I think none of them has a license because it wasn't also a thing back then and as we noticed KYC has only become popular lately.

You have a good point there, in the past, the casinos didn't require a license because they were provably fair, each user was able to verify every single bet to be sure the game wasn't rigged, and users were able to change his seed and that way users get the trust from those sites.

And nowadays we are supposed to trust casinos with a License, even if they are new while we can't verify our bets... These are funny times were money talks.

After reading about the kick issues on this site I will stay away. Let's give it some weeks and if it's looking good in the future I will give it a try.

Good luck with the project.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Welcome to the forum,at first you need to concentrate on the project Announcement thread.It’s looking good,but not excellent.Many good designers in the forum,I had some experience with JAYCE.

Aside the obvious fact that the text in the OP should also be included in the info-graphic for a better look, I don't see anything wrong with the Ann, and besides, all Ann must not look the same or follow the same design pattern, some casinos might choose to do things a bit differently, which is absolutely fine if you ask me.

I think what's really important is marketing, that is promotion, Op should find a way to promote his casino on this forum, else, not very many gamblers will know that such a casino exist, marketing is very important for every business that must grow.

[AmoreJaz]

Welcome to the forum,at first you need to concentrate on the project Announcement thread.It’s looking good,but not excellent.Many good designers in the forum,I had some experience with JAYCE.

Aside the obvious fact that the text in the OP should also be included in the info-graphic for a better look, I don't see anything wrong with the Ann, and besides, all Ann must not look the same or follow the same design pattern, some casinos might choose to do things a bit differently, which is absolutely fine if you ask me.

I think what's really important is marketing, that is promotion, Op should find a way to promote his casino on this forum, else, not very many gamblers will know that such a casino exist, marketing is very important for every business that must grow.

since they manage to get their gambling license, it means, they are pretty serious on their business. however, as you said, they need promotion to expand their reach among gamblers. if they are not up to the sig campaign, the common marketing type of most casinos and bookies here, they can always update their thread on what's new on their site in terms of bonuses, rewards and other promotions. they need to spice up their presence here so gamblers will find a way to check again on their site.

[Slow death]

This type of issue must be handled with great tact, because there are very sensitive players who may react badly thinking that they are being attacked, it is necessary to take into account that some casinos acquire licenses that require KYC to maintain authenticity.

I also understand that many players want to take care of their privacy and anonymity, this is considered a right, but each casino has its own rules, and the moment we accept the terms and conditions we accept everything. There are many threads where this has been discussed, however there is no general agreement because they all have different and very valid points of view.

There must be other ways to prove that a gambling website is authentic. It's not always about the license and if we check the old gambling sites, I think none of them has a license because it wasn't also a thing back then and as we noticed KYC has only become popular lately.

If they badly want a license because it was ordered by a government then there are still other license out there which doesn't require the customers to do a KYC. Some casinos on the forum have that already. It's a win-win for both the players and the casino because players can enjoy full anonymity while the casinos income won't still be affected in a negative way.

this KYC issue is very complicated, for example there are cases where the casino may require people to deliver proof of funds, most people in this cryptocurrency market hold, now let's imagine that a person buys bitcoin in 2015 and this person makes a hold until 2023, one day that person makes a deposit at the casino, then the casino asks for proof of funds, how will that person deliver proof of funds if he bought bitcoin years ago and made a hold?

another case is that they can ask for proof of address, if that person still lives in the parents' house, all documents are in the parents' name, how will that person do KYC? and we have to take into account that when we deliver the proof of address we are showing where we live, is it that delivering the identification document is not enough for KYC? Why do you need more documents? does not make sense

[abel1337]

-snip

There must be other ways to prove that a gambling website is authentic. It's not always about the license and if we check the old gambling sites, I think none of them has a license because it wasn't also a thing back then and as we noticed KYC has only become popular lately.

If they badly want a license because it was ordered by a government then there are still other license out there which doesn't require the customers to do a KYC. Some casinos on the forum have that already. It's a win-win for both the players and the casino because players can enjoy full anonymity while the casinos income won't still be affected in a negative way.

this KYC issue is very complicated, for example there are cases where the casino may require people to deliver proof of funds, most people in this cryptocurrency market hold, now let's imagine that a person buys bitcoin in 2015 and this person makes a hold until 2023, one day that person makes a deposit at the casino, then the casino asks for proof of funds, how will that person deliver proof of funds if he bought bitcoin years ago and made a hold?

another case is that they can ask for proof of address, if that person still lives in the parents' house, all documents are in the parents' name, how will that person do KYC? and we have to take into account that when we deliver the proof of address we are showing where we live, is it that delivering the identification document is not enough for KYC? Why do you need more documents? does not make sense

I think casino who ask for proof of funds is a bs way of verifying someone, I personally haven't asked to submit one but I heard from our fellow members that there are history of being asked for documents like that. There are various situation that makes no sense asking for it and one of it is what you have said. Everything can be tracked now since we are on a blockchain, and proof of funds are just bs. A simple valid id is enough and adding a selfie as another security is more than enough. Asking too much documents because they are required doesn't mean they need to ask more from what they can get.

[LUCKMCFLY]

This type of issue must be handled with great tact, because there are very sensitive players who may react badly thinking that they are being attacked, it is necessary to take into account that some casinos acquire licenses that require KYC to maintain authenticity.

I also understand that many players want to take care of their privacy and anonymity, this is considered a right, but each casino has its own rules, and the moment we accept the terms and conditions we accept everything. There are many threads where this has been discussed, however there is no general agreement because they all have different and very valid points of view.

There must be other ways to prove that a gambling website is authentic. It's not always about the license and if we check the old gambling sites, I think none of them has a license because it wasn't also a thing back then and as we noticed KYC has only become popular lately.

If they badly want a license because it was ordered by a government then there are still other license out there which doesn't require the customers to do a KYC. Some casinos on the forum have that already. It's a win-win for both the players and the casino because players can enjoy full anonymity while the casinos income won't still be affected in a negative way.

The clear example of a reliable site that does not require KYC is freebitco.in, and it is a site with a lot of category and it is also old, the truth is I have played a lot there, and I have never had any problems, the problem is the system for win when you play the multiplier, because the person tends to get excited and make hard bets, and if there is no control you can lose, but that is another matter, here the important thing is, that if a site can minimize the way they ask for KYC It's much better, not only in the casino, we in daily life, to do business they always ask for a lot of paperwork and that's something that discourages you, so when you sit down to play in a casino to wake up, they ask you for more, it's something that tired.

[CryptSafe]

This type of issue must be handled with great tact, because there are very sensitive players who may react badly thinking that they are being attacked, it is necessary to take into account that some casinos acquire licenses that require KYC to maintain authenticity.

I also understand that many players want to take care of their privacy and anonymity, this is considered a right, but each casino has its own rules, and the moment we accept the terms and conditions we accept everything. There are many threads where this has been discussed, however there is no general agreement because they all have different and very valid points of view.

There must be other ways to prove that a gambling website is authentic. It's not always about the license and if we check the old gambling sites, I think none of them has a license because it wasn't also a thing back then and as we noticed KYC has only become popular lately.

If they badly want a license because it was ordered by a government then there are still other license out there which doesn't require the customers to do a KYC. Some casinos on the forum have that already. It's a win-win for both the players and the casino because players can enjoy full anonymity while the casinos income won't still be affected in a negative way.

The clear example of a reliable site that does not require KYC is freebitco.in, and it is a site with a lot of category and it is also old, the truth is I have played a lot there, and I have never had any problems, the problem is the system for win when you play the multiplier, because the person tends to get excited and make hard bets, and if there is no control you can lose, but that is another matter, here the important thing is, that if a site can minimize the way they ask for KYC It's much better, not only in the casino, we in daily life, to do business they always ask for a lot of paperwork and that's something that discourages you, so when you sit down to play in a casino to wake up, they ask you for more, it's something that tired.

I think there are lots of reliable casinos out there but it is just that we have not had any or much experience playing there. Most casinos are just limited as a result of licenses and maybe the local regulations where they operate or find themselves and another is the issue of kyc. I have noticed for a while now complaint coming here about casino demanding for kyc  when initially they did not demand for it upon registering. what makes me laugh is that when they play and loss heavily, the casino do not demand for kyc but upon any big win, you see the casino start to act funny demanding for kyc and at the entire end suspending or banning the account for no just reasoning and when they inquire to know why the ban , they tell the account holders that they violated the casino policy which in the rel sense is not alright.

[klidex]

I definitely understand the concerns about entering personal information like that. Online, it's particularly crucial to be wary of who you share personal information with. You're correct that some casinos have more stringent know-your-customer regulations than others; before joining up, it's best to do some homework and read the fine print.

However, I do recognize the need of adhering to appropriate Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and holding the appropriate license. It's a win-win situation: more safety for the casino and more compliance with the regulations from the players. So, I believe it boils down to striking a balance between security and trust when it comes to our personal data and the casino's operations.

There has been a lot of discussion and debate about KYC in other threads and there is a lot of debate about gamblers who don't want to do KYC or gamblers who really don't mind being asked for KYC as a condition on a gambling platform.
The concern of gamblers who refuse to provide a KYC on average is that they are afraid that their personal data will be misused by the casino.
But in fact there are several casinos that are trusted and can be relied on in terms of security, so we don't need to be afraid of giving out the personal data that we have.
Moreover, I also believe that in the future there will be more casinos that require their users to meet KYC requirements so we don't have to worry about the misuse of our personal data.

This type of issue must be handled with great tact, because there are very sensitive players who may react badly thinking that they are being attacked, it is necessary to take into account that some casinos acquire licenses that require KYC to maintain authenticity.

I also understand that many players want to take care of their privacy and anonymity, this is considered a right, but each casino has its own rules, and the moment we accept the terms and conditions we accept everything. There are many threads where this has been discussed, however there is no general agreement because they all have different and very valid points of view.

However, it seems that until now there has been no resolution of this problem and it is still being debated because there are many different opinions from one gambler to another regarding KYC.
I understand that privacy and anonymity are very important and must be maintained, but if it is necessary and must be given, why should you mind giving it for the sake of smoothness and comfort when playing gambling.
I also appreciate that every gambler must have the right to something like that. But every casino also has its own rules and regulations and they must be obeyed and always applied by all users in it.

[Strongkored]

However, it seems that until now there has been no resolution of this problem and it is still being debated because there are many different opinions from one gambler to another regarding KYC.
I understand that privacy and anonymity are very important and must be maintained, but if it is necessary and must be given, why should you mind giving it for the sake of smoothness and comfort when playing gambling.
I also appreciate that every gambler must have the right to something like that. But every casino also has its own rules and regulations and they must be obeyed and always applied by all users in it.

The solution for players who don't like KYC is to just look for casinos that don't require it, but every licensed casino will eventually make its users do KYC because it fulfills the regulations of the license where they are registered and sadly KYC will become commonplace and normal day by day and players who don't like that end up having no other choice.

[Eureka_07]

<snip>

Does Freebitco really isn’t asking for KYC? They do not have any history of asking for that?
Anyways, if that’s the case, I think most licensed casinos still has the rights to ask their customers to process KYC, especially if they are suspecting something to your account..

[BobK71]

I definitely understand the concerns about entering personal information like that. Online, it's particularly crucial to be wary of who you share personal information with. You're correct that some casinos have more stringent know-your-customer regulations than others; before joining up, it's best to do some homework and read the fine print.

However, I do recognize the need of adhering to appropriate Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and holding the appropriate license. It's a win-win situation: more safety for the casino and more compliance with the regulations from the players. So, I believe it boils down to striking a balance between security and trust when it comes to our personal data and the casino's operations.

There has been a lot of discussion and debate about KYC in other threads and there is a lot of debate about gamblers who don't want to do KYC or gamblers who really don't mind being asked for KYC as a condition on a gambling platform.
The concern of gamblers who refuse to provide a KYC on average is that they are afraid that their personal data will be misused by the casino.
But in fact there are several casinos that are trusted and can be relied on in terms of security, so we don't need to be afraid of giving out the personal data that we have.
Moreover, I also believe that in the future there will be more casinos that require their users to meet KYC requirements so we don't have to worry about the misuse of our personal data.

The main factor behind the rapid development of cryptocurrency casinos is that a gambler feels safe here because he can remain anonymous. Also, what you said is that most gamblers are concerned about the security of their transmitted personal data.
Usually information is leaked when a gambler conducts gambling on a fake platform. Generally all licensed based gambling platforms require KYC. I think there is no harm in doing KYC on a reputable casino platform. Because they are always concerned about the safety of gamblers.

[Daltonik]

<snip>

Does Freebitco really isn’t asking for KYC? They do not have any history of asking for that?
Anyways, if that’s the case, I think most licensed casinos still has the rights to ask their customers to process KYC, especially if they are suspecting something to your account..

In fact, although freebitco does not have generally accepted TaC and there is only a FAQ section in which there is not a word about the need for KYC, also your profile on the site is very concise in terms of the information contained there, where it simply does not provide for the placement of any information other than your email.

[klidex]

However, it seems that until now there has been no resolution of this problem and it is still being debated because there are many different opinions from one gambler to another regarding KYC.
I understand that privacy and anonymity are very important and must be maintained, but if it is necessary and must be given, why should you mind giving it for the sake of smoothness and comfort when playing gambling.
I also appreciate that every gambler must have the right to something like that. But every casino also has its own rules and regulations and they must be obeyed and always applied by all users in it.

The solution for players who don't like KYC is to just look for casinos that don't require it, but every licensed casino will eventually make its users do KYC because it fulfills the regulations of the license where they are registered and sadly KYC will become commonplace and normal day by day and players who don't like that end up having no other choice.

But few and more difficult to trust a casino that doesn't enforce KYC requirements because of course the casino doesn't have a license, And it's true what you said that a licensed casino will definitely use a KYC and definitely they are more trustworthy and reliable than using non KYC casino.
It seems that it will also be like that because like it or not the name is mandatory and the provisions of the rules of a casino must be carried out and obeyed.

I definitely understand the concerns about entering personal information like that. Online, it's particularly crucial to be wary of who you share personal information with. You're correct that some casinos have more stringent know-your-customer regulations than others; before joining up, it's best to do some homework and read the fine print.

However, I do recognize the need of adhering to appropriate Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and holding the appropriate license. It's a win-win situation: more safety for the casino and more compliance with the regulations from the players. So, I believe it boils down to striking a balance between security and trust when it comes to our personal data and the casino's operations.

There has been a lot of discussion and debate about KYC in other threads and there is a lot of debate about gamblers who don't want to do KYC or gamblers who really don't mind being asked for KYC as a condition on a gambling platform.
The concern of gamblers who refuse to provide a KYC on average is that they are afraid that their personal data will be misused by the casino.
But in fact there are several casinos that are trusted and can be relied on in terms of security, so we don't need to be afraid of giving out the personal data that we have.
Moreover, I also believe that in the future there will be more casinos that require their users to meet KYC requirements so we don't have to worry about the misuse of our personal data.

The main factor behind the rapid development of cryptocurrency casinos is that a gambler feels safe here because he can remain anonymous. Also, what you said is that most gamblers are concerned about the security of their transmitted personal data.
Usually information is leaked when a gambler conducts gambling on a fake platform. Generally all licensed based gambling platforms require KYC. I think there is no harm in doing KYC on a reputable casino platform. Because they are always concerned about the safety of gamblers.

Yes, and actually even though gamblers do and provide KYC they can still gamble anonymously because only the management team from the casino knows about their personal data from a KYC, so no other people or other gamblers will know their personal data.
But that's really what happened that every gambler is afraid of leaking their identity or personal data if they provide KYC.
I have also said several times that if the casino is trusted and has a good reputation, you can be sure there will be no abuse of the personal identity of the gamblers there.

[piebeyb]

<snip>

Does Freebitco really isn’t asking for KYC? They do not have any history of asking for that?
Anyways, if that’s the case, I think most licensed casinos still has the rights to ask their customers to process KYC, especially if they are suspecting something to your account..

as far as i know freebitco.in has never asked their users for KYC, because there is only a dice roll game there so since they launched their site until now they have not asked their users to complete KYC.

But I agree with you, usually when the site suspects the user will usually be asked to do KYC, so far I can still withdraw money without KYC at some casinos, as long as I play well and don't cheat I feel safe playing without KYC or if I uncomfortable with KYC regulations, well, just look for a decentralized casino without KYC, back again to the choice

[TimeTeller]

<snip>

Does Freebitco really isn’t asking for KYC? They do not have any history of asking for that?
Anyways, if that’s the case, I think most licensed casinos still has the rights to ask their customers to process KYC, especially if they are suspecting something to your account..

as far as i know freebitco.in has never asked their users for KYC, because there is only a dice roll game there so since they launched their site until now they have not asked their users to complete KYC.

But I agree with you, usually when the site suspects the user will usually be asked to do KYC, so far I can still withdraw money without KYC at some casinos, as long as I play well and don't cheat I feel safe playing without KYC or if I uncomfortable with KYC regulations, well, just look for a decentralized casino without KYC, back again to the choice

How freebitco is operating is a testament that one casino can still operate a credible gambling site even without the license.
It is years of business why they are still here and people are still playing on their site because they have no trouble with their gamblers.
But with the introduction of new casinos, license is like a must for them to compete with the existing market.
People will have better approach if they see that the casino took care about their licensing aspect, but definitely, it doesn't stop there when it comes to promoting their site.