bitcointalk forum vs OpenAI - ChatGPT

[TheBeardedBaby]

The OpenAI is bad at History, LOL.
Just keep in mind that the information given by the AI is not always 100% true.
Got him lying here :

He is using publicly available sources and texts, so in theory he could use any nonsense written by someone, if OpenAI developers allow him to use that sources.
We should also consider that every story and information can have multiple points of view, history can be very different in nations that participated in war with each other.
I also heard students are starting to use ChatGPT in mass scale to cheat on their exams and people are seriously getting concerned with stuff like this happening.
https://fortune.com/2023/01/06/schools-chatgpt-ai-student-cheating-ban/

With this temps of development, people will have to learn less and less and the AI will do most of the tasks for them.
We already see what the AI are capable of and profession like programmers and graphic designers will no need to draw or program, they just have to know how to give the right input to the AI and final touch them them. Now even the musicians are in danger...
The AI will leave a lot of people jobless.

[1714630331]

1714630331

[1714630331]

1714630331

[1714630331]

1714630331

[1714630331]

1714630331

[1714630331]

1714630331

[NotATether]

The AI will leave a lot of people jobless.

There will still be people remaining around to control and monitor the AIs though.

EDIT: considering Google's entire business model is threatened by ChatGPT, I'm also sure they will update reCAPTCHA to be a kind of anti-AI service - besides, they don't have any AI startup of their own to juice up.

[bittraffic]

The AI will leave a lot of people jobless.

There will still be people remaining around to control and monitor the AIs though.

Although many will monitor this AI, his statement will still be true since a lot of writers even journalists may not be able to compete with the newbies who'll just use the AI. It can do almost everything. But maybe if the gptzero.me works, we shall see how to counter AI.  A bit more sophisticated and advanced than gptzero is needed.

Maybe a bot that will also grab the answers of AI, and compare it to the new bot that will check the plagiarism to chatGPT.

[Alone055]

Plot twist: This post was an idea generated by ChatGPT and then rewritten by the OP.

I'm just kidding.  ChatGPT is an amazing tool though. I've used it to generate email responses and it does wonders with it. Remember, it is a model trained heavily on stuff available on the internet, and we all know that internet is also full of a lot of useless crap, so AI is not always a 100% correct. Always double check the answers it provides.

P.S: It also writes code, pretty well (needs double checking though, sometimes). 

[shahzadafzal]

"JUST IN: Microsoft $MSFT in talks to acquire a 49% stake worth $10 billion in ChatGPT owner OpenAI."

It's over guys... it was fun while it lasted.

https://watcher.guru/news/microsoft-plans-to-acquire-a-49-stake-in-chatgpt-owner-openai?c=367

[dkbit98]

The AI will leave a lot of people jobless.

It is possible that some people will lost their jobs because of AI similar like this, but even worse thing could be to have much more stupid people and cheaters.
As for current AI's I think they are way overblown and hyped, I saw many examples of them making obvious mistakes to simple questions.
I think most people become worse in math when calculators first appeared, and I understand using calculator for complex operations but not for everything.

[Welsh]

It is possible that some people will lost their jobs because of AI similar like this, but even worse thing could be to have much more stupid people and cheaters.
As for current AI's I think they are way overblown and hyped, I saw many examples of them making obvious mistakes to simple questions.
I think most people become worse in math when calculators first appeared, and I understand using calculator for complex operations but not for everything.

They're pretty good. Although, comparing a human, and AI the AI is definitely going to come up short. However, its' quite easy to fool an non expecting person that the content they're reading is AI generated. At the moment, it's newish technology, and therefore we haven't really sussed it out yet. However, I suspect not only laws brought in to prevent plagiarism, but also we as the readers/viewers will be able to decipher it much easier as we get used to it.

I suspect this could become a problem for certain universities, such as Math as you brought up. Technically, someone could ask the AI to work out complex math problems, without actually needing to supply a source. Whereas, other content will likely be easier to prevent or decipher.

[Kryptowerk]

It instantly repeated the same grammar mistake for the bicycle joke.

What you mean grammar mistake? There's no mistake that is the joke bro

    Why couldn't the bike stand up by itself? Because it was two-tired!

It's a joke that works by speaking out loud. You hear "It was too tired", but write "It was two-tired" - any mix of both doesn't make sense.
It's a pun or play-on-words, so the grammar still needs to be right when written down.
Here: "A pun, also known as paronomasia, is a form of word play that exploits multiple meanings of a term, or of similar-sounding words, for an intended humorous or rhetorical effect".

But it is not suprising that ChatGPT does make this grammar mistake - it just copy-pastes what it does find most on the internet, and indeed there are a ton of wrongly spelled cases of this joke to be found.

[TheBeardedBaby]

It's "dead" now, overloaded and down...
I don't know how much resourced they had but it's time to go for Clouldflare if it's not there yet.

[mole0815]

I tried to register but the bot seems asking for mobile number verification so I decided to quit.

Exactly at this point I stopped my first attempt to test ChatGPT a few days ago.
It made me somehow afraid of a yet now so powerful tool right at the beginning to give away my mail address, name and then even mobile number.

However, the responses about Bitcointalk are actually quite impressive.

[NotATether]

"JUST IN: Microsoft $MSFT in talks to acquire a 49% stake worth $10 billion in ChatGPT owner OpenAI."

It's over guys... it was fun while it lasted.

https://watcher.guru/news/microsoft-plans-to-acquire-a-49-stake-in-chatgpt-owner-openai?c=367

I'm gonna continue paying for this thing. It's like having an AI in an iron suit while coding.

But for this thing to be worthwhile, they have to make an unlimited message length. I'm sick and tired of my code getting truncated at some arbitrary position.

[Accardo]

The AI will leave a lot of people jobless.

There will still be people remaining around to control and monitor the AIs though.

EDIT: considering Google's entire business model is threatened by ChatGPT, I'm also sure they will update reCAPTCHA to be a kind of anti-AI service - besides, they don't have any AI startup of their own to juice up.

Despite the threat Chatgpt has on people's career, I like the fact that google is getting a strong competitor with a unique feature other than bringing rules now and then to suffocate webmasters. No more monopoly on the internet, people now have a choice of search engine with a touch of interaction with the machine. Though, google is not threatened in any form as the world biggest search engine they can decide to flag any content from their search engine regarding chatgpt and de-rank its site. I think the live sperm of chatGpt can be shortened with just a few line of code from google. They also have the money to buy off the company, and add it to theirs. However, I won't be surprised to know that google has a hand in the chatgpt AI, they're quite quiet about it.

[shahzadafzal]

But it is not suprising that ChatGPT does make this grammar mistake - it just copy-pastes what it does find most on the internet, and indeed there are a ton of wrongly spelled cases of this joke to be found.

Here you are very wrong about ChatGPT… there’s no copy paste involved. It’s a Generative Pre-trained Transformer, that means it generates text based on the trained data. In other words you can say after each word next word is chosen from billions of choices, there are 175-billion parameters involved to generate a human like text.

ChatGPT is a big thing, imagine just 49% of its stake worth $10 billion.

[Synchronice]

With this temps of development, people will have to learn less and less and the AI will do most of the tasks for them.
We already see what the AI are capable of and profession like programmers and graphic designers will no need to draw or program, they just have to know how to give the right input to the AI and final touch them them. Now even the musicians are in danger...
The AI will leave a lot of people jobless.

I find current AIs more likely specialized in searching the data and filtrating it for you and providing in a good manner, current ChatGPT with these limits is far from the word "AI".
Current AIs can't replace a single person in digital industry but in the future, definitely it will be able to replace and I think that that's the aim too. But not only workers in digital industry but if the AI develops well, it may leave movie directors, producers and actors/actress jobless. You just type scenario and it will generate the movie. But at the same time, we have Neuralink that may give us possibility to broadcast our dreams and imaginations, it will outperform AI alone but with the help of AI and Neuralink, I guess there will be no limits.

I think most people become worse in math when calculators first appeared, and I understand using calculator for complex operations but not for everything.

You made a good point!

[sujonali1819]

When I knew about chat GPT more than a week ago. I was really impressed after seeing its capability. Most of the cases I am using it for solving errors in development. It's too much helpful for the Developers. As the OP I also tried to know something related bitcointalk and got a good response. I even tried to search bitcointalk username there , But it said sorry!

I don't know how many bad effects come from this, But it's sure it will help people to become lazy.

[Synchronice]

As it seems, AI knows a thing about signature campaigns on this forum. I used that moment and asked him a question, wasn't expecting that I would get this kind of response
Click on the image to zoom

[n0nce]

I tried to register but the bot seems asking for mobile number verification so I decided to quit.

Exactly at this point I stopped my first attempt to test ChatGPT a few days ago.

I recommend sms4sats for this type of stuff. It even allows you to select OpenAI as a 'service' to receive SMS from. Under a buck via Lightning and you get yourself an OpenAI account.

Never give websites your real phone number! Argh. I think this should be standard security practice. One more example why we need a Cybersecurity subforum.

I'm gonna continue paying for this thing. It's like having an AI in an iron suit while coding.

You pay for ChatGPT?

I don't know how much resourced they had but it's time to go for Clouldflare if it's not there yet.

They already use Cloudflare. Check the little lock icon in your address bar. Still, it's saying: 'ChatGPT is at capacity right now'

But at the same time, we have Neuralink that may give us possibility to broadcast our dreams and imaginations, it will outperform AI alone but with the help of AI and Neuralink, I guess there will be no limits.

We don't have Neuralink and we actually most likely never will.

[AverageGlabella]

You pay for ChatGPT?

They do not yet but they will once it comes out of beta which I think is in the next version of chatgpt?

But it is not suprising that ChatGPT does make this grammar mistake - it just copy-pastes what it does find most on the internet, and indeed there are a ton of wrongly spelled cases of this joke to be found.

Here you are very wrong about ChatGPT… there’s no copy paste involved. It’s a Generative Pre-trained Transformer, that means it generates text based on the trained data. In other words you can say after each word next word is chosen from billions of choices, there are 175-billion parameters involved to generate a human like text.

ChatGPT is a big thing, imagine just 49% of its stake worth $10 billion.

But if the trained data has incorrect grammar then chatgpt would be incorrect and the trained data is coming from people who have not been verified to use grammar correctly. This is true for translations for example I have seen german translations for chatgpt and they fall for the same mistakes as other translations.

[NotATether]

I'm gonna continue paying for this thing. It's like having an AI in an iron suit while coding.

You pay for ChatGPT?

Sorry for the confusion, no, I don't. You can't pay for it right now anyway. But if at some point in the future there is a requirement to pay for using ChatGPT then I wouldn't have a problem with that, as long as it's not an outrageous price (and they remove that idiotic character limit).

[JoyMarsha]

Your findings are fascinating. Unfortunately, I could not create an account on Tor using Guerrilla Mail. Is there any way to anonymously test it?

The demand for ChatGPT is on the rise. Millions of people requesting account creation with them. That causes a bug in account registration. That's the main reason why you find it difficult to open an account with them. It took me days before I finally open a chatGPT account. Anyway, keep trying it will work. There is no way you can test anonymously. You must provide your phone number for code activation


When I first used the chatGPT I marveled at the results I found. It breaks down information to a lame man's understanding. I pity those that will be in a hurry to use it to create posts, thinking that you can't find plagiarism words in an essay written by AI(chatGPT).