Ever tried Anti Martingale Strategy?

[Doell]

Martingale or Anti Martingale a strategy that must be played calmly, this both of strategy I've tried in the slot too. Very useful for profit, the most part I gamble 60% has been lucky using this this both strategy at slot there (also not always lucky), but if asked which one is more risky I think we know that everything is risky because gambling using money which might be lose Sir.

[Baofeng]

I think even Martingale is really hard to achieved and have you winning and the money involved as your based. And for the reverse martingale or anti martingale, although this is more user friendly for beginners, doesn't mean that it is more effective that Martingale.

Here is a link, about a study on Reverse martingale, and it is based on their simulations.



http://gradientdescending.com/martingale-strategies-dont-work-but-we-knew-that-simulation-analysis-in-r/

[goaldigger]

Done this before and had the same result which is more on losses.
Whatever strategy we are going to use, we should always remember that we are actually playing against the house and of course its their system and they always have the advantage over us. Don't want to try this Martingale again because I lose faster and instead of enjoying the game, I'm making a lot of pressure for myself every time I gamble. Even if you are using a provably fair casino, you will still find a hard time to get a win using this strategy and you will only realize it the moment you lose everything.

[aioc]

What would you achieve trying this anti-martingale when it still has the same results, in the end, you will not lose everything instantly but will see you're winning slowly vanish, I never tried that anti Martingale I prefer to believe in my own hunch, and create my own sets of betting, my bet my rules that should be the case since this is a luck based game, instead of copying other strategies its fun doing this everything is unexpected.

[piebeyb]

What would you achieve trying this anti-martingale when it still has the same results, in the end, you will not lose everything instantly but will see you're winning slowly vanish, I never tried that anti Martingale I prefer to believe in my own hunch, and create my own sets of betting, my bet my rules that should be the case since this is a luck based game, instead of copying other strategies its fun doing this everything is unexpected.

to be honest I don't understand what using anti martingale is like, isn't martingale used to return the situation and lose money from the previous bet and increase the bet 2x, it's true it's based on luck but again the house will always win so play wisely so you don't become a addict 

[Reid]

Never tried it even when back then when I was playing dice. Martingale was already risky for me and with your explanation of how anti-martingale works it sounds riskier than the original. If by some chance or bad luck comes you will just be winning all the halved opportunities, then losing at the full bet.
That will be a faster rekt and there will be times it could be confusing.
The other weak side of this is, if you break the discipline and try to chase your losses.

[imamusma]

Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

Firstly, I may have done it but I don't think it's anti martingale. If it is said to be anti, then it cannot be the other way around, which means that you have to switch to another strategy. I reduce or bet 1/2 of the previous loss because I have to adjust my balance and playing time in one session. I want to control the length of my game and of course that's not meant as anti martingale.

Martingale and anti martingale based on your understanding should not be a strategy worth considering in the long term. Both would not be very profitable as we would basically be at a loss with them. But if I may ask, what are the benefits of the anti-martingale strategy in your opinion?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

I have tried the martingale strategy but have never tried the anti-martingale, but from what I understand in its definition or rather explanation, I would honestly tell us all that it is more risky.
Martingale in it self is very risky and for the few times I've tried it, I've sworn never to try it again, anti-martingale from the way I understand it seems more riskier since it is not possible to predict the outcome of the next game, a gambler could halve his bet amount because he is loosing, and double it immediately he starts winning in the hopes that the winning streak would continue, what if at the very top of the double the gambler loses?.

The most advisable strategy for me is to leave anything or strategy related to martingale in gambling.

[panjul07]

Martingale or Anti Martingale a strategy that must be played calmly, this both of strategy I've tried in the slot too. Very useful for profit, the most part I gamble 60% has been lucky using this this both strategy at slot there (also not always lucky), but if asked which one is more risky I think we know that everything is risky because gambling using money which might be lose Sir.

Martingale in slot games? This is I think the craziest or maybe the dumbest strategy I have ever heard.
How can you do martingale while the outcome in slot game is random, no fixed multiplier like in dice game.
Can you tell me more about how you do it with more specific calculation of your martingale strategy?
And how much do you spend to use martingale in slot game since the minimum bet in slot game usually starting from $0.1
Aside from the bigger minimum bet, the chance of losing streak in slot games is bigger than in dice game, do you have really huge bankroll to play slot with martingale?

[Yogee]

I've done that before but I couldn't remember my win or loss ratio anymore. It's a good feeling when you hit twice in a row but it doesn't feel that bad when you immediately lose on the next turn or roll.

I remember some players often use this strategy in a card game against me as the banker. It pisses me off when they cut their bets when I'm on a winning streak and starting to recover my losses hehe.

[Doell]

Martingale or Anti Martingale a strategy that must be played calmly, this both of strategy I've tried in the slot too. Very useful for profit, the most part I gamble 60% has been lucky using this this both strategy at slot there (also not always lucky), but if asked which one is more risky I think we know that everything is risky because gambling using money which might be lose Sir.

Martingale in slot games? This is I think the craziest or maybe the dumbest strategy I have ever heard.
How can you do martingale while the outcome in slot game is random, no fixed multiplier like in dice game.
Can you tell me more about how you do it with more specific calculation of your martingale strategy?
And how much do you spend to use martingale in slot game since the minimum bet in slot game usually starting from $0.1
Aside from the bigger minimum bet, the chance of losing streak in slot games is bigger than in dice game, do you have really huge bankroll to play slot with martingale?

The martingale that I do it at slot, not must be to have a big of bankroll, because I also don't have a target to win a lot also wan't loss a lot. Sorry the minimum bet is not always $0.1, it varies I can play from $ 0.013 or in my country currency exchange rate around 200 Idr, I'll not to explain the minimum bet in more detail because I think you know it. Simply bet martingale to 8 or 10 spin if my bet win, it will go back to basic bet. This works if you play in one line slots Sir.

[swogerino]

In martingale, a gambler increases the bet size to double in the hope to recover the loss from the previous bet. I have tried it a few times & to be honest with you, I have never had a good return on my bets; I have lost most of the time.
On the other hand, the Anti martingale strategy is- to double the bet size when you are winning & halving the bet size when you are losing. In such a condition, when you are winning; you are doubling the size & you will lose from your winning. WEell, this strategy is more risky I guess though some have told it as less risky than martingale.
Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

Martingale is a strategy that only works in perfect conditions which none of us can afford or else meaning we have an infinite bankroll and the casino where we play does not limit our bets so by using Martingale if we hit 100 times in red in roulette by doubling our bet it is impossible statistically that in an offline casino to hit 100 times black so most likely we will win.The problem is though that no casino lets you play unlimited bets with unlimited amount and most of us do not have unlimited amount.

The same can be said for anti Martingale,meaning will not work.Some people have even tried to play Martingale in sport betting by placing bets in odds over 2 for a team every weekend in a certain league but they too have been not successful.

[panganib999]

In martingale, a gambler increases the bet size to double in the hope to recover the loss from the previous bet. I have tried it a few times & to be honest with you, I have never had a good return on my bets; I have lost most of the time.
On the other hand, the Anti martingale strategy is- to double the bet size when you are winning & halving the bet size when you are losing. In such a condition, when you are winning; you are doubling the size & you will lose from your winning. WEell, this strategy is more risky I guess though some have told it as less risky than martingale.
Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

I think that would just work all the same as the regular martingale strategy. If you win and you double down you're basically asking to lose everything the next turn. The other side of this strategy doesn't work well in practice as well, as you'd literally cost yourself higher wins for less losses. I hear you and I myself enjoy winning when I am gambling, so why not instead of applying an "anti" to the current strategy that works for high rollers, how about you try my discipline I found on one of the people in this forum. You win 3 times, you call it a day. You lose 3 times, you call it a day. That literally will allow you to pull yourself away from certain addiction, while at the same time ensuring that you don't lose that much, and you get to take your wins home as well.

[gantez]

What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

Martingale is same like you want to be selfish and grab more profit if it is possible for you to get that but doing gambling after you see the results you did with the first gambling is better than doing the martingale accumulation. If you do martingale you spend more money in faster means and soon your capital is gone. So why not do single betting, wait for result before another betting section so you know the mistake and to adjust.

[lionheart78]

Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

I had tried both, Martingale is used to recover losses in a single spin while the Anti-Martingale as you stated is to take advantage of the lucky streak a player has.  I can say if you are lucky, the anti-Martingale gives more benefits since the player's profit doubles every time he bets in a green streak.  The problem with this strategy is that you will lose all your winnings once you hit a red and the best solution for this is to know when to stop and reset.  

Between the two I still think that Martingale is way riskier in emptying our bankroll sooner since Anti-Martingale does not consume our bankroll as fast as martingale when we experience a series of red streaks.

[safari88]

A Martingale system is almost always associated with gambling in a casino. However, you can also easily try this system out at sports competitions. Look for odds of around 2.00 and then double your bet every time on another match. There are also Martingale systems for higher odds of 3.00, but that is more difficult to achieve a fast success rate. Incidentally, Martingale is no guarantee of profit, you can lose 10 bets in a row and then you have lost your entire bank account and you are left empty-handed. not the most logical strategy.

[Stalker22]

Both the Martingale and reverse Martingale strategies have their own strengths and weaknesses. It really comes down to your personal preferences. The classic Martingale allows you to recover losses quickly, while the reverse Martingale strategy allows you to maximize your winnings. However, both strategies also have significant risks, such as the potential for large losses if you hit a long losing streak. As a result, it is important to carefully consider the risks and rewards of these strategies before using them in online gambling.

Here is a comparison of the two strategies and their application to online gambling (source) :





In the end, the result is the same.

[YOSHIE]

What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

I have tried the Martingale system or technique in the game Roulette & BlackJack, but it doesn't work, it always fails, maybe my capital is too small to do the system
Martingale, I can't keep doubling my bet continuously with the result of losing.

In my opinion, if you don't have large capital, don't ever try to do the Martingale technique, let alone bet with a long enough time span, it will have a greater risk of losing than expected and one more thing if you play a casino with maximum betting limit provisions, don't use Martingale, you can't chase the score to cover your defeat, for now I've never done it again using the Martingale system.


Well, if for the Anti Martingale game, as you mentioned 'double' every time you win, this kind of strategy I often see my friends do in baccarat casino type games, maybe the Anti Martingale system is not the same as above, this only depends on winning, obviously I'm not too pushy to do both systems, if I don't have professional knowledge.

But if you are an expert in the Martingale strategy it is better to try the Anti Martingale system, the risk of losing is less than Martingale and you don't need big capital, you just need a win and fold the bet.

[famososMuertos]

Use the search engine or go Review the different posts that exist, many, repetitive theme and explained over and over again.

Here we go in any case one more time because your context does not change the frequency of the response at all.

There is no personal experience in other players that explains whether it works for you or not.  That is paramount.

Martingale, above all, is a very basic strategy that has its Just success in certain games, in any case if that doesn't work for You is because  don't understand it or don't use the right bet size.

You have to understand that with Martingale if the variance decides to be enthusiastic about you i.e. fuck you the only way it works is a deep bankroll.

Don't forget to use the topic search engine before posting.Tyx.

[Vaskiy]

It can be martingale strategy or anti martingale strategy, the win happens if you are lucky. I've tried with martingale strategy and have lost good sum of bitcoin. Haven't tried with the anti martingale strategy, with gambling we try to experience win. When things didn't work surely we'll loss patience and one such scenario could end the success of these strategies.