Kryptosino Avoid!!!

[QueenVera]

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

It bitters my heart anytime I see an accusation with prove on a casino or generally any business at all, this is because the accuser is tarnishing the name of a business and a possible means of living for another person.
I have talked about this time without number and I think any accusation without a prove should be deleted immediately as simple as that period.
Now back to the accusation, I'm not really familiar with this casino and I guess this is also one of the major reasons why you should have included a prove because I tried checking them out and also found that they have alot of eye catching offers and now I'm confused on wether to give them a try or not.
And the casinos in Caribbean have had such similar issues but I also think carribean is one place that doesn't have much emphasis on KYC.

[1715334394]

1715334394

[1715334394]

1715334394

[minime0105]

Do you have any trusted source for the accusation? You should provide a source for the information you share. If you are a customer you need to provide proof of the accusation.  
Kryptosino is offering amusing wager-free bonuses, which catches my eye. So I need a valid point for not involving with them. 

You are right for the information of bringing up it's evidence of accusation, because i have not seen a cogent point and any information that comes with evidence or source is the believable information, because sometimes some try to condemn other platforms by giving the them a tag name of accusation without proof, so for everyone to agree with this information of op let it attached it with the source so that it will be a clear evidence.

Still, OP failed to provide any proof or anything at all, he was not even a customer and he just accused based on other customers' opinions. Yes, you are right some people from other casinos try to harm their competition which is not a good strategy for taking down your competition. I still convince that OP has the proof of what he claims, and if he fails to provide any, we will report and move on. Mods can do the rest.

In this case i have not seen what is relevant in this, but what i wanted you to understand is that, many can make a gesture and scandal of a particular thing they don't know about, when i checked the account who is accusing this platform , it's a new account account, and assuming it's a sincere one it would have use the main account to justify this platform, i believe the claims can be accepted and comprehendable when the op provide an evidence, because almost everyone in the platform can not agree with op unless theirs a sincere evidence that is attached to it.

[Reatim]

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

providing proofs will serve as complete reason for us to believe in what you are saying here , imagine that you are mentioning a casino name with this accusation but all are based on your own words?

-  What casino name are you talking about mate? Are you one of its victims? You have not even posted here any source to make what you say credible.

It's hard to believe what you say, mate, maybe you are not aware that most of the community members here on this forum platform are knowledgeable in this industry.
But if there is, there are people who will support what you say anyway.

mate the casino name is written in the title , have not you check it first?

[Silberman]

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

It bitters my heart anytime I see an accusation with prove on a casino or generally any business at all, this is because the accuser is tarnishing the name of a business and a possible means of living for another person.
I have talked about this time without number and I think any accusation without a prove should be deleted immediately as simple as that period.
Now back to the accusation, I'm not really familiar with this casino and I guess this is also one of the major reasons why you should have included a prove because I tried checking them out and also found that they have alot of eye catching offers and now I'm confused on wether to give them a try or not.
And the casinos in Caribbean have had such similar issues but I also think carribean is one place that doesn't have much emphasis on KYC.

That is just the way some people manage themselves on the internet, while I am in favor of preserving our privacy while we are online, I am also against people abusing that same privacy to say or even do things that they will never dream to do if their identities were linked to their accounts, so while it is not possible to know if the accusations that were posted by the OP are true as they refused to post any evidence about it, it is still a good idea to avoid casinos which do not have an ANN thread here.

[mak013]

Without proves this thread is about nothing. I`m not registered in this casino and don`t plan to do it, but the OP must tell us smth if he wants us to believe him. We often see here cries that some casino is scam without proves. Most time it means that someone lost or tried to cheat but was catched.

[drwhobox]

What's the reason you want to report @OP? what's rule that the @OP broke in this forum? you need to know scam isn't moderated in this forum, so moderators wouldn't take care with such reports. Also @OP hasn't logged for 7 days, I don't expect he will back and give a full evidence about this accusation.

Well, OP has no proof of what he accuses the casino of. I know that scam isn't moderated in this forum and from my little research of that casino I didn't find anything that OP is referring to. If scam is moderated in this forum OP has no proof that they are scamming and this might get OP some negative feedback.

OP just created this account to post this topic and claims he is working on behalf of scammed customers from this casino. So he just working on customers scammed in this website not other casino sites? The thing is, he is someone who wants the downfall of this casino out of some personal issue or he is from their competitors.

[Wiwo]

Without proves this thread is about nothing. I`m not registered in this casino and don`t plan to do it, but the OP must tell us smth if he wants us to believe him. We often see here cries that some casino is scam without proves. Most time it means that someone lost or tried to cheat but was catched.

This days, no one take empty accusation seriously in here and ops are just wasting his time by posting the statement and taking it to be a valid accusation. There are ways things are done in here and ops have not followed the proper forum guidelines to report scams, but in all, we have to be careful because the point up raised is a serious one, KYC facility is a security aspect and any casino who does not follow the proper AML/KYC processes may expose your data and documents to hackers since there don't take security seriously.

[virasisog]

What's the reason you want to report @OP? what's rule that the @OP broke in this forum? you need to know scam isn't moderated in this forum, so moderators wouldn't take care with such reports. Also @OP hasn't logged for 7 days, I don't expect he will back and give a full evidence about this accusation.

Well, OP has no proof of what he accuses the casino of. I know that scam isn't moderated in this forum and from my little research of that casino I didn't find anything that OP is referring to. If scam is moderated in this forum OP has no proof that they are scamming and this might get OP some negative feedback.

OP just created this account to post this topic and claims he is working on behalf of scammed customers from this casino. So he just working on customers scammed in this website not other casino sites? The thing is, he is someone who wants the downfall of this casino out of some personal issue or he is from their competitors.

If he wants to prove something then he should have provided concrete evidence to support his claims and accusations. If he isn't able to show any proof, then he might only be dragging down the casino for his own motive which is unfair. We can't deny the fact that there are really people who will accuse casinos for their own reasons so it is still important that as we read allegations and accusations, we should still do our own research.

[gunhell16]

What's the reason you want to report @OP? what's rule that the @OP broke in this forum? you need to know scam isn't moderated in this forum, so moderators wouldn't take care with such reports. Also @OP hasn't logged for 7 days, I don't expect he will back and give a full evidence about this accusation.

Well, OP has no proof of what he accuses the casino of. I know that scam isn't moderated in this forum and from my little research of that casino I didn't find anything that OP is referring to. If scam is moderated in this forum OP has no proof that they are scamming and this might get OP some negative feedback.

OP just created this account to post this topic and claims he is working on behalf of scammed customers from this casino. So he just working on customers scammed in this website not other casino sites? The thing is, he is someone who wants the downfall of this casino out of some personal issue or he is from their competitors.

If he wants to prove something then he should have provided concrete evidence to support his claims and accusations. If he isn't able to show any proof, then he might only be dragging down the casino for his own motive which is unfair. We can't deny the fact that there are really people who will accuse casinos for their own reasons so it is still important that as we read allegations and accusations, we should still do our own research.

It's easy to accuse the truth, but it's hard to prove it when looking for evidence, especially when we know ourselves that what we're accusing is not true, but if there is strong evidence, of course, it's easy to prove it It's just that simple, right?

But as you said, what OP is saying is not credible and trustworthy, because whatever his reason for such accusations, he will be the bad guy in the end.

[Agbe]

-  What casino name are you talking about mate? Are you one of its victims? You have not even posted here any source to make what you say credible.

It's hard to believe what you say, mate, maybe you are not aware that most of the community members here on this forum platform are knowledgeable in this industry.
But if there is, there are people who will support what you say anyway.

The problem we are having in the accusations threads is the absent of the said accused links. Now probably this is the casino "Kryptosino" the OP is referring to. Now the best way to do this he would have link the site or if possible provide the link here so that anyone who sees the link would be easier for him or her to click and see the casino site but as it is. The OP argue bind accusation that has no evidence. Reporting such casino with their evil deeds is good but how do we know that this is legit.

[dezoel]

Without proves this thread is about nothing. I`m not registered in this casino and don`t plan to do it, but the OP must tell us smth if he wants us to believe him. We often see here cries that some casino is scam without proves. Most time it means that someone lost or tried to cheat but was catched.

This days, no one take empty accusation seriously in here and ops are just wasting his time by posting the statement and taking it to be a valid accusation. There are ways things are done in here and ops have not followed the proper forum guidelines to report scams, but in all, we have to be careful because the point up raised is a serious one, KYC facility is a security aspect and any casino who does not follow the proper AML/KYC processes may expose your data and documents to hackers since there don't take security seriously.

If the casino that we are talking about here is unpopular then there are people who will now distance themselves on that casino. This is why what the op is doing there is wrong because what if those casinos are really legit and only tries their best to become the next big thing in the gambling industry? But, that will now be hard because there is someone in the background who is trying to destroy their reputation.

It can be the Op's fault on why he experience some issues. I know casinos can made their own mistakes as well because nothing in this world perfect but it should be fixed out as soon as possible before the issue gets bigger.

[klidex]

What's the reason you want to report @OP? what's rule that the @OP broke in this forum? you need to know scam isn't moderated in this forum, so moderators wouldn't take care with such reports. Also @OP hasn't logged for 7 days, I don't expect he will back and give a full evidence about this accusation.

Well, OP has no proof of what he accuses the casino of. I know that scam isn't moderated in this forum and from my little research of that casino I didn't find anything that OP is referring to. If scam is moderated in this forum OP has no proof that they are scamming and this might get OP some negative feedback.

OP just created this account to post this topic and claims he is working on behalf of scammed customers from this casino. So he just working on customers scammed in this website not other casino sites? The thing is, he is someone who wants the downfall of this casino out of some personal issue or he is from their competitors.

If he wants to prove something then he should have provided concrete evidence to support his claims and accusations. If he isn't able to show any proof, then he might only be dragging down the casino for his own motive which is unfair. We can't deny the fact that there are really people who will accuse casinos for their own reasons so it is still important that as we read allegations and accusations, we should still do our own research.

It's easy to accuse the truth, but it's hard to prove it when looking for evidence, especially when we know ourselves that what we're accusing is not true, but if there is strong evidence, of course, it's easy to prove it It's just that simple, right?

But as you said, what OP is saying is not credible and trustworthy, because whatever his reason for such accusations, he will be the bad guy in the end.

The OP's statement must be based on the truth or things that actually happened.
What's more, the statement is aimed at a person's or individual's place of business.
Because creating false or fud rumors can be bad for reputation and defamation.
In this forum, many also explain that every user when giving a statement must be completely original, not just a mere review.
Anyone can even be subject to severe sanctions for false statements.

[rodskee]

Never heard about this casino but if they really violated something, then it should be investigated. Are you one of the victim who experience some irregularities about this site?
Always choose the best site if you are going to gamble, remember that having peace of mind and security with the site should be your priority, if the site can’t deliver this then better not to play with them at all.

No I'm not a customer, I help people with issues regarding Casinos.  There are around 10 Customers who provided me with evidence which I have passed over to CFATF after Kryptosino ignored my correspondence. 

So meaning that your involvement here is purely to help people? you are not even connected or playing in this site? so why are you posting here with newbie account? sorry to ask but are you trying to ask for bribe from this site as you are making noise against them when you aren't even a victim and never experience their site?
sorry for the question but this seems to be Odd to look at.

[mak013]

Without proves this thread is about nothing. I`m not registered in this casino and don`t plan to do it, but the OP must tell us smth if he wants us to believe him. We often see here cries that some casino is scam without proves. Most time it means that someone lost or tried to cheat but was catched.

This days, no one take empty accusation seriously in here and ops are just wasting his time by posting the statement and taking it to be a valid accusation. There are ways things are done in here and ops have not followed the proper forum guidelines to report scams, but in all, we have to be careful because the point up raised is a serious one, KYC facility is a security aspect and any casino who does not follow the proper AML/KYC processes may expose your data and documents to hackers since there don't take security seriously.

But they post again and again, so sometimes there too much such statement and someone can believe it.
Anyway i don`t think that it is a good idea to make KYC in small casino with small auditory and deposit. There are big casinos with history and reputation, they have qualified specialists and can guarantee security of your private data.

[serveria.com]

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

Looks like some weird disguised ad to me. Like negative publicity still publicity sort of stuff. How much do they pay you? I mean, no reference, no link, how can you prove it actually happened? 

[delfastTions]

Without proves this thread is about nothing. I`m not registered in this casino and don`t plan to do it, but the OP must tell us smth if he wants us to believe him. We often see here cries that some casino is scam without proves. Most time it means that someone lost or tried to cheat but was catched.

This days, no one take empty accusation seriously in here and ops are just wasting his time by posting the statement and taking it to be a valid accusation. There are ways things are done in here and ops have not followed the proper forum guidelines to report scams, but in all, we have to be careful because the point up raised is a serious one, KYC facility is a security aspect and any casino who does not follow the proper AML/KYC processes may expose your data and documents to hackers since there don't take security seriously.

But they post again and again, so sometimes there too much such statement and someone can believe it.
Anyway i don`t think that it is a good idea to make KYC in small casino with small auditory and deposit. There are big casinos with history and reputation, they have qualified specialists and can guarantee security of your private data.

So this is definitely a bad idea.

I mean - the introduction of KYC in a small casino, unknown to a wide audience of online gambling players. This damn KYC will only reduce the number of people who want to even go to your site at all, let alone play on it. Why spoil your already modest business in such a way, pandering to these bankers who came up with their own damn KYC just to make it easier for them to take money, or property  from those who seriously lost. No fight against KYC scammers helps, it's all lies. And just by introducing it in cryptocurrency transactions, they ruined an excellent idea and technology of anonymous payments.
And now the banking guys are brazenly brazenly climbing into the cryptocurrency industry everywhere with their damn KYC / AML

[Plaguedeath]

The problem we are having in the accusations threads is the absent of the said accused links. Now probably this is the casino "Kryptosino" the OP is referring to. Now the best way to do this he would have link the site or if possible provide the link here so that anyone who sees the link would be easier for him or her to click and see the casino site but as it is. The OP argue bind accusation that has no evidence. Reporting such casino with their evil deeds is good but how do we know that this is legit.

This is the casino https://www.kryptosino.com/ because I don't find any other casino that has a word of "kryptosino".

The @OP is inactive for 2 weeks until now, so we can't see the evidence of this accusations. The best thing we could do is avoid this casino, there's many legit casino that we can gamble and have an official representative in this forum. So when we face a problem, we can easily ask them in this forum.

[mak013]

Without proves this thread is about nothing. I`m not registered in this casino and don`t plan to do it, but the OP must tell us smth if he wants us to believe him. We often see here cries that some casino is scam without proves. Most time it means that someone lost or tried to cheat but was catched.

This days, no one take empty accusation seriously in here and ops are just wasting his time by posting the statement and taking it to be a valid accusation. There are ways things are done in here and ops have not followed the proper forum guidelines to report scams, but in all, we have to be careful because the point up raised is a serious one, KYC facility is a security aspect and any casino who does not follow the proper AML/KYC processes may expose your data and documents to hackers since there don't take security seriously.

But they post again and again, so sometimes there too much such statement and someone can believe it.
Anyway i don`t think that it is a good idea to make KYC in small casino with small auditory and deposit. There are big casinos with history and reputation, they have qualified specialists and can guarantee security of your private data.

So this is definitely a bad idea.

I mean - the introduction of KYC in a small casino, unknown to a wide audience of online gambling players. This damn KYC will only reduce the number of people who want to even go to your site at all, let alone play on it. Why spoil your already modest business in such a way, pandering to these bankers who came up with their own damn KYC just to make it easier for them to take money, or property  from those who seriously lost. No fight against KYC scammers helps, it's all lies. And just by introducing it in cryptocurrency transactions, they ruined an excellent idea and technology of anonymous payments.
And now the banking guys are brazenly brazenly climbing into the cryptocurrency industry everywhere with their damn KYC / AML

It is a long discussion without one true answer. KYC shows to the gamblers that casino tries their best to become more safe. In this way they can attract new gamblers. But the same time if they include KYC, they don`t need cryptocurrencies - they can just get fiat money. I don`t hate KYC, but i don`t think that we need KYC when we are talking about cryptocurrencies and casinos.

[maydna]

The problem we are having in the accusations threads is the absent of the said accused links. Now probably this is the casino "Kryptosino" the OP is referring to. Now the best way to do this he would have link the site or if possible provide the link here so that anyone who sees the link would be easier for him or her to click and see the casino site but as it is. The OP argue bind accusation that has no evidence. Reporting such casino with their evil deeds is good but how do we know that this is legit.

This is the casino https://www.kryptosino.com/ because I don't find any other casino that has a word of "kryptosino".

The @OP is inactive for 2 weeks until now, so we can't see the evidence of this accusations. The best thing we could do is avoid this casino, there's many legit casino that we can gamble and have an official representative in this forum. So when we face a problem, we can easily ask them in this forum.

Whatever the casino, I doubt if @OP will come back to the thread again and provide more evidence, especially since he has been inactive for 2 weeks. And if it's true that the casino you mentioned is the casino, I've never heard of it before and I don't think the casino has any representation in this forum either. We don't need to bother looking for casinos from out there because this forum already has many casinos that we can use to gamble.

And this is a lesson for us, never choose a casino from out there that we don't know its reputation. We also want to avoid getting into trouble like @OP's.

[Silberman]

What's the reason you want to report @OP? what's rule that the @OP broke in this forum? you need to know scam isn't moderated in this forum, so moderators wouldn't take care with such reports. Also @OP hasn't logged for 7 days, I don't expect he will back and give a full evidence about this accusation.

Well, OP has no proof of what he accuses the casino of. I know that scam isn't moderated in this forum and from my little research of that casino I didn't find anything that OP is referring to. If scam is moderated in this forum OP has no proof that they are scamming and this might get OP some negative feedback.

OP just created this account to post this topic and claims he is working on behalf of scammed customers from this casino. So he just working on customers scammed in this website not other casino sites? The thing is, he is someone who wants the downfall of this casino out of some personal issue or he is from their competitors.

Supposedly he has evidence but he does not wants to share it, which begs the question about why open the thread at all? As we are not going to believe such story without the evidence which demonstrates that what they are saying is in fact the truth, so maybe the OP does not understand how this forum works or as some other users have suggested it is possible this was a veiled attempt to create publicity for the casino as some see bad publicity as good publicity anyway.