Do you know

[samcrypto]

Of course, before investing, one must gain detailed knowledge about any coin. Because I will be investing I must have an idea of ​​the token mix. So before investing the sections must get detailed knowledge about the future of various websites and coins and start investing.

Problem here is that, because of too much hype many are ignoring this process and they invest right away just to ride the hype, some succeed on this but many are suffering from instant loss because of being too greedy and aggressive.

If you are going to invest on any project, having your own analysis and understanding about the project is a must, this is for your own sake so better not to skip this part and be a responsible investor.

[naikturun]

which begs the question whether the tokenomics are permanent, because I often hear about redominization or changes in the amount of supply and supply in circulation, so I don't think we can fully predict that.

[FirmWars]

Bad tokenomics doesn't mean the project won't do well in a Bull market, all you need is good research, there are few projects with confusing tokenomics and they still do very well, some new projects later adjust their tokenomics after several complains and some do huge burnings like gala did some months back, you can never predict, so always DYOR.

[doomloop]

which begs the question whether the tokenomics are permanent, because I often hear about redominization or changes in the amount of supply and supply in circulation, so I don't think we can fully predict that.

Good projects don't really do that, it is not a good practice to make changes in the tokenomics once they are announced publicly or that can shatter the trust the project might have built within the community. I personally wouldn't like to see a project that I follow change anything from the tokenomics they announced at the beginning.

A good project will always have everything planned and calculated before going public since they know that it can be really crucial and harm the integrity of the project and the token if we make any changes later on.

[VRExpress]

It's not always about the tokenomics, I do agree that tokenomics plays a major role in a project but some projects with back tokenomics have proven this wrong, because they still do so well in a bull market, it's better to pick your projects based on their use cases, I believe this is more important because this is what will drive a high adoption rate to the project.

[DOH!]

Do you know that some crypto projects are so amazing that you will want to give up your money just to allocate some portion of the max supply but the tokenomics ruined it all?

Some projects have good utilities but their tokenomics is very bad, if you don't know this do try learning the difference between good utility and good tokenomics because it is very important and this will help you on your future crypto investments.

No matter how tempted you are to invest in a project always learn its tokenomics first.

It is true that tokenomics plays an important role in maintaining the utility and balancing the economy of the project, where the uncontrolled emission rate is what kills projects and brings failure lose. However, it is also acknowledged that it would be unfair to blame the failure of a potentially good project entirely with tokenomics, some projects have bad utility, can't compete, can't have development Seamless and slow development is also a big reason for failure. I think that there is no specific standard for tokenomics, different projects have different approaches to create relevance and flexibility.

But thoroughly understanding the tokenomics component is a good way to increase investment progress and get a good project approach

[raidarksword]

I strongly agree, the tokenomics will always be the first to look into in a new start up project. It all boils down the supply of the project so that we can speculate the price it will be in the futures to come. Partnerships and use can in the crypto community will also be the second to address with. As always DYOR to any projects that are coming out

[Kalchef]

I am fine with bad tokenomics unless the project has an infinite supply, I would rather go for the utility of the token than use it's tokenomics to judge the project, in a bull market, it doesn't even matter, you will still be fortunate enough to make some money off every good and bad token you own.

[Retainly_Collie]

I strongly agree, the tokenomics will always be the first to look into in a new start up project. It all boils down the supply of the project so that we can speculate the price it will be in the futures to come. Partnerships and use can in the crypto community will also be the second to address with. As always DYOR to any projects that are coming out

The thing is quite neutral in terms of understanding as well as problems from each of us when dyor, not too complicated but I see that the criteria for the quality of each of our projects or tokens are quite different so everything here considered only relatively.
I'm quite skeptical of projects with a good ecosystem without a good token? I need examples here to see this, as well as good tokens that project low quality. Both of the above seem to be just one of the ways we are looking at any given project.

[jacafbiz]

This trend seems to be back again, good project but because of greed on the developer's side, they ruin the project and the token price for investors. I think people need to speak out more about this and try to educate people on it, some new people entering the space will be telling you that Cardano is heading to $100, because it is very cheap compared to Ethereum which is trading currently at $1800, forgetting that Cardano has more than 35 billion tokens in circulation currently as compared to Ethereum which is around 100 million. This is how most people get burn