Saudi Professional League 2023/2024

[Tamaperdana]

That’s the problem when multiple teams are owned by the same company or individual—whatever they do seems designed to benefit one side.

For example, when Ronaldo protested against the club owner’s apparent favoritism toward another club under the same ownership. And now, some people view Benzema’s transfer as controversial as well.

This is a common issue for many clubs, such as Girona and Manchester City, which also share the same owner. Manchester City is seen as being overly favored, even though there are valid reasons behind it.

At least in case of Girona and Man City, these clubs are playing in different leagues (Manchester City plays in the English Premier League, while Girona FC takes part in the La Liga). But that is not the case with the four teams that are owned by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF). In their case, four clubs in the same league has the same owner (Al Nassr, Al Hilal, Al Ittihad and Al Ahli). And Ronaldo's complaint was that player requests from Al Nassr were being constantly rejected, while such requests from Al Hilal were getting approved in very little time.

Yes,, that's right, in the case of Girona and Manchester City, it's better because they're in different leagues. So, in essence, it seems more logical if Manchester City is prioritized, because Manchester City is clearly their main team and the best. But in the case of publicly owned teams, I think if they're unfair, it's clearly not good. Basically, all their teams play in the same league, and if the team owner is unfair to one of the teams, it's clearly very detrimental. Therefore, the case of the Saudi Arabian League regarding publicly owned teams clearly needs to be corrected immediately.

Basically, if incidents like this continue in the future, it will clearly damage the Saudi Arabian League's image. Basically, if this continues, the Saudi Arabian League is clearly open to manipulation. Therefore, I hope controversial incidents like this won't happen again in the future. Because basically the Saudi Arabian league is currently watched by many eyes in the world, so basically they must be able to maintain the image of their country's football league well.

[Sithara007]

Yes,, that's right, in the case of Girona and Manchester City, it's better because they're in different leagues. So, in essence, it seems more logical if Manchester City is prioritized, because Manchester City is clearly their main team and the best. But in the case of publicly owned teams, I think if they're unfair, it's clearly not good. Basically, all their teams play in the same league, and if the team owner is unfair to one of the teams, it's clearly very detrimental. Therefore, the case of the Saudi Arabian League regarding publicly owned teams clearly needs to be corrected immediately.

Basically, if incidents like this continue in the future, it will clearly damage the Saudi Arabian League's image. Basically, if this continues, the Saudi Arabian League is clearly open to manipulation. Therefore, I hope controversial incidents like this won't happen again in the future. Because basically the Saudi Arabian league is currently watched by many eyes in the world, so basically they must be able to maintain the image of their country's football league well.

I am not being biased towards Ronaldo, but in recent times those who run the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) have behaved in an extremely biased manner. Ronaldo almost decided to give up and quit the league (he actually boycotted 2-3 matches in the Saudi Professional League in protest a few weeks ago), before mediation talks saw him returning to Al Nassr. And the worst part is that the individuals who are responsible for this fiasco still remain hidden behind the veil. This is more like a ticking timebomb, and other players may also vent their frustration in the future similar to what Ronaldo did. 

[Not your key not your BTC]

al Ittihad has indeed been interested in Salah for the past few seasons, but unfortunately, Salah chose to stay at Liverpool. With the news that Salah will leave Liverpool at the end of the season, Ittihad will certainly prepare everything to secure Salah, and Al Qadisiyah will certainly try to secure him as well. Yes, it's certainly possible that Al Nassr Al Ahli and other teams will also want Salah. But we'll just have to wait and see what happens

In my opinion, any team, especially a strong team, if they can secure Salah, they will have the potential to be lucky. Salah will certainly play well and be able to represent the team that signed him. I think if Salah joins SPL, it will make SPL even more exciting, and it's possible that another top player will join SPL

Salah is a good prospect for Ittihad and it will be really good to have him join them, he has still got some good potentials ahead and will definitely be instrumental in getting the team some really good successes in coming season, if Al Qadisiyah and Al Ittihad goes for salah, I believe  Al ittihad will get a better chance.

Salah has decided to leave Liverpool, and this is a great opportunity for Ittihad to sign him, as he will be a free agent starting next season. If Salah plays in the Saudi Pro League, he will adapt easily, especially in terms of language. Salah, who is originally from Egypt, will have little difficulty communicating in the Saudi Pro League. Salah still possesses excellent abilities, and if Ittihad signs him, he will make a significant contribution to the club. Ittihad must not waste this opportunity to bring Salah in to help the club compete for the title again next season.