bc.game dice is better than stake.com dice

[fullhdpixel]

I have no problem with bc.games even though I also play at Stake.com , I even often play games at their casino, I think winning and losing is a normal thing in gambling, maybe you are lucky at bc.games and no luck on Stake.com, doesn't mean Stake.com is a bad site, it's just a matter of luck, so maybe you can try again later

Agree with this mate, cause in the world of gambling there are only two option we have loss or win and we can not say that casino A is better than casino B if we are comparing through our luck it because sometimes if we play in two casinos,  it has different outcome in short sometimes we will win in casino A and loss in casino B or else win in casino B and loss in casino A.
It terms of services I think there are no problem from both casino so OP don't say that your Casino A is better than Casino B because you are basing your luck.

I think there are three not just two, and the last one would be "the draw" or we can get out of gambling with a break even balance. A casino "A" can be better or worse than the casino "B" depending on their reputation and other features but if let say that both of them are identical then it only has to do with our luck.

As long as you equally play on them then I believe you can always experience to lose and win on each of them even though they aren't proportional. The post of the OP seems familiar. Isn't this the guy before who kept making unbelievable gambling stories? And on top of it, is that they are also shilling a specific gambling site. Hhmm??

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I have no problem with bc.games even though I also play at Stake.com , I even often play games at their casino, I think winning and losing is a normal thing in gambling, maybe you are lucky at bc.games and no luck on Stake.com, doesn't mean Stake.com is a bad site, it's just a matter of luck, so maybe you can try again later

Agree with this mate, cause in the world of gambling there are only two option we have loss or win and we can not say that casino A is better than casino B if we are comparing through our luck it because sometimes if we play in two casinos,  it has different outcome in short sometimes we will win in casino A and loss in casino B or else win in casino B and loss in casino A.
It terms of services I think there are no problem from both casino so OP don't say that your Casino A is better than Casino B because you are basing your luck.

I think there are three not just two, and the last one would be "the draw" or we can get out of gambling with a break even balance. A casino "A" can be better or worse than the casino "B" depending on their reputation and other features but if let say that both of them are identical then it only has to do with our luck.

As long as you equally play on them then I believe you can always experience to lose and win on each of them even though they aren't proportional. The post of the OP seems familiar. Isn't this the guy before who kept making unbelievable gambling stories? And on top of it, is that they are also shilling a specific gambling site. Hhmm??

Though I don't quite understand what you said, but from the little I could grasp, I would say that I don't completely agree with you.
Two different casinos can have the same casino and game setting for the same game, but I can tell you that the algorithm that controls the game probably won't be the same, so as such, when gambling on the both casino at the same time and betting the same amount on the same game, it is very possible to be lucky on one casino and be unlucky on the other casino, and it also can be vice versa when you come back another day to repeat the same thing on both casinos again..
The algorithm is the engine that controls the games, it is it that determines whether a gambler wins or not.

[Hamphser]

I have no problem with bc.games even though I also play at Stake.com , I even often play games at their casino, I think winning and losing is a normal thing in gambling, maybe you are lucky at bc.games and no luck on Stake.com, doesn't mean Stake.com is a bad site, it's just a matter of luck, so maybe you can try again later

Agree with this mate, cause in the world of gambling there are only two option we have loss or win and we can not say that casino A is better than casino B if we are comparing through our luck it because sometimes if we play in two casinos,  it has different outcome in short sometimes we will win in casino A and loss in casino B or else win in casino B and loss in casino A.
It terms of services I think there are no problem from both casino so OP don't say that your Casino A is better than Casino B because you are basing your luck.

I think there are three not just two, and the last one would be "the draw" or we can get out of gambling with a break even balance. A casino "A" can be better or worse than the casino "B" depending on their reputation and other features but if let say that both of them are identical then it only has to do with our luck.

As long as you equally play on them then I believe you can always experience to lose and win on each of them even though they aren't proportional. The post of the OP seems familiar. Isn't this the guy before who kept making unbelievable gambling stories? And on top of it, is that they are also shilling a specific gambling site. Hhmm??

Though I don't quite understand what you said, but from the little I could grasp, I would say that I don't completely agree with you.
Two different casinos can have the same casino and game setting for the same game, but I can tell you that the algorithm that controls the game probably won't be the same, so as such, when gambling on the both casino at the same time and betting the same amount on the same game, it is very possible to be lucky on one casino and be unlucky on the other casino, and it also can be vice versa when you come back another day to repeat the same thing on both casinos again..
The algorithm is the engine that controls the games, it is it that determines whether a gambler wins or not.

And we do know on how these things do operates or on how it do works on which it would really be no brainer that you would really be seeing different outcome on different particular time and situations
and this is where we do able to see on how lucky we are on a particular moment which might not really that the same on the time you do play into other platform.People do normally make out those kind of comparison on which there is really something that they could say and would really be always that pertain that they are lucky on some casino while they play and there are places which aren't.
If they would really be looking up back into those words that they do say then they would really be realizing thats not how it usually works.

[seleme]

It is all about the seed you got on both gambling platforms, unless you can't verify the seed it should be fine to lose or win in long sessions. I am sure you will get similar result on Stake dice if you play longer, Bc also can take back all winnings if you continue doing same dice strategy, it is all matter of luck, IMO.

^Definitely right and both have provably fair use that you can verify anytime you want they also have the same odd of 1% if I am right.
So technically, this is based on a luck game, there is no need to use knowledge and skills in this game, just roll the dice and wait for the result.
To be honest, I like on Stake. Because they have a lot of promotions than BC.game, if you will convince me that because of the BC.game casino you have won, no, that was made by luck and you can even do it in the same result, if you will player longer on BC.game, all your winning possible will wipe out.

Exactly my thoughts, the luck factor is only thing OP should take into consideration, comparing both casino games is meaningless. The more we play on same game and doing same strategy will lead to burst balance sooner or later. Bc promotions are good during Christmas, World Cup promos meanwhile Stake also made good bonus drops for low wager users. IMO, both platforms have its own +- sides.

[BobK71]

I think it is normal for a fresher to think like this. He may not have won from stake.com. It may be that he failed several times there and won when he played at bc.game. And at that time if some one asked him to know which is better? then what will he say? Of course bc.game is better. But the truth is that he was lucky in one place and not in another. If Luck doesn't favor he won't win anywhere. When the OP understands these things he won't be able to make such comments.

[panjul07]

So how if the in future you will get more losses in bc.game? Will you say dice game in other sites is better than bc.game?
I would appreciate your opinion if your reason is not about your result, but if your reason is about the dice game itself.
It can be about its speed, fairness, design, features, etc, but if you say a dice game in a site is better than in other sites because of your results, you are just trying to blame the game or the site because of your bad luck.

[Mate2237]

This is good analysis from your personal research. Stake. Com is a good casino which is one of the ruling casinos in the casino world. And bc. Game is not popular as stake. Com casinos. And since the two casinos are from different management, the services must be different as well. You don't have to expect them two to have the same thing. What you benefit from the A might not be the same from the B.

There are some time casino companies make things easier for gamblers to win games to attract more customers or gamblers to the site and as time goes they would change the method. And also you can't use you wins and loses (your results) to judge for another gamblers in the platforms. Everyone has different experience.

[Odusko]

This kind of condition is what gave birth to multiple casinos as competitors, if there is no comparison between the two we won't know which one is better at providing a better game experience and quality even though it is the same game.
Stake.com is a big casino indeed, but they there are not still 100% the best in terms of games quality and reward, casinos differ from one another and the earlier we get used to that affect the better for all of us in the gambling market looking for better services, so ops I give you a big head up even though you may not be accurate in your judgement.

[BitDane]

This kind of condition is what gave birth to multiple casinos as competitors, if there is no comparison between the two we won't know which one is better at providing a better game experience and quality even though it is the same game.
Stake.com is a big casino indeed, but they there are not still 100% the best in terms of games quality and reward, casinos differ from one another and the earlier we get used to that affect the better for all of us in the gambling market looking for better services, so ops I give you a big head up even though you may not be accurate in your judgement.

True, but the term is "better than"  then providing his bet history is just a personal belief.  Every player have different experience and different result in every casino.  One may experience a good winning in a casino than others in one point of time and experience the other casino to give him a better result in another point of time.  Gambling result is random so I believe we cannot use that as a proving factor why x casino is better than y casino because who knows, you the experience might be the opposite the next time you play with those casinos.