The truth about Terra Luna Classic

[zasad@]

I was still hold Luna for $ 350, I bought 7 months ago when Luna drop price was significant and if calculated there was a profit of around $ 30 because I bought $ 320, I think Luna still had power for rising, this could be seen from the volume of large transactions and binance It is still a power of Luna to continue to pump in the future.

The ecosystem is practically dead, I don’t exclude pumps and dumps from manipulators, but in order not to lose money, I would wait for growth by 200-300% and take my investments, and then calmly wait for growth with free coins. But I would not invest large sums in this project.

We can't rely on this coin's capability because its reputation is completely ruined but we can take advantage of its pump and dump and just make a profit out of it. We only have to make sure that we are taking profit wisely because this type of coin isn't reliable when it comes to long-term holding so we should still be careful.

We can make a profit if we invest in serious projects, the price of which has fallen by 90% or less. For example, DOT, IMX (not financial advice). By investing in a dead ecosystem, you can lose 80-100% of your investment. But I do not believe that the price of the DOT coin will fall by 80%. Do you have risk management or do you prefer cryptocurrency gambling?

[1713933235]

1713933235

[1713933235]

1713933235

[1713933235]

1713933235

[1713933235]

1713933235

[1713933235]

1713933235

[Wiwo]

Hello,
Is Terra Luna Classic recovering?

I doubt that it's entirety will recover.

Why does TrustWallet pay 15% profit to stake it?

CZ isn't even delisting it on Binance so, I think that he's still keeping the one that he's got from the team and they're in a total loss with this project. A 15% is attracting more people to stake it but it's useless because it's not going to go up unless you still got a lot of it and you've taken that before the debacle because you can't sell it due to big losses.

One of the fees that centralized exchange get from coins listing in the token/coins in large amount, and Binance in the past few years have been the leading figure of a centralized exchange, this has made it possible for Binance to hold large starch of those coins so at the moment we're the tera luna is craps and crashed project, the exchange is at lost and in other to get a fair recovery for there services in aiding the scam the need to keep the coin listed.
*This is the same with all the other exchanges that seem to be supporting the recovery of Luna classic.
*fairly speaking Luna classic has not done well in the market to pronounce its success.

[glendall]

I'm not sure that Terra will recover, where as we know the price of Terra is so far from their ATH price, it takes a very big pump in this case, the problem is whether there are still people who want to buy and invest again

trust wallet problem paying 15% profit , only they know the truth and what is their goal in this matter
I personally would not invest with a fallen coin

[fuguebtc]

Hello,
Is Terra Luna Classic recovering? Why does TrustWallet pay 15% profit to staking it?
Any idea welcomed.


Thank you.

To be fair, Lunc is like other projects, no one knows in advance what will happen, it can recover or be pumped or will die forever, anything can happen. But why would we risk investing in a project that has collapsed before when we have much better options and much better returns? You can also invest in it, but it will be riskier than other projects, if you have risk tolerance there is no problem with investing in it. If it were me, I would invest in other projects, on CMC we have thousands of potential projects, there is no reason to believe in a project that has scammed us before.

[Silberman]

Hello,
Is Terra Luna Classic recovering? Why does TrustWallet pay 15% profit to staking it?
Any idea welcomed.


Thank you.

To be fair, Lunc is like other projects, no one knows in advance what will happen, it can recover or be pumped or will die forever, anything can happen. But why would we risk investing in a project that has collapsed before when we have much better options and much better returns? You can also invest in it, but it will be riskier than other projects, if you have risk tolerance there is no problem with investing in it. If it were me, I would invest in other projects, on CMC we have thousands of potential projects, there is no reason to believe in a project that has scammed us before.

The only conclusion we can make is there are many traders that do not care at all about the legitimacy of the coin in question and there is only one concern that goes through their minds, and that is to make money no matter what, and even if in a way this makes sense as that is the goal of every single person in any market, at the same time some sort of limits should be in place and projects which are known scams or very likely to scam us should be off-limits.

[bitgolden]

Is Terra Luna Classic recovering? Why does TrustWallet pay 15% profit to staking it?
Any idea welcomed.

LoL I thought you are going to reveal something about them but it turns out that you are also curious on what is happening with them lately. From the recent increase and now to this? Maybe trustwallet or binance are being paid to make the partnership possible. Are they still a giving a hope that those who lost on old luna will recover? Hmm well, I think that was true.

It's up to you now @OP if you will join this ride but just only remember that there are still other good coins out there with no issues whatsoever. I will always prioritize them because they are the only coins where I can have a peace of mind despite of their volatile nature.

[JANUS23]

Hello,
Is Terra Luna Classic recovering?

I doubt that it's entirety will recover.

Why does TrustWallet pay 15% profit to staking it?

CZ isn't even delisting it on Binance so, I think that he's still keeping the one that he's got from the team and they're in total loss with this project. A 15% is attracting more people to stake it but it's useless because it's not going to go up unless you still got a lot of it and you've taken that before the debacle because you can't sell it due to big losses.

As long as people are buying and selling it and he can make a percentage on the trade then why not.  It amazes me how much people are willing to put into luna at this point.  It's a complete gamble that will eventually fade away.  Lunacy if you ask me.

Its crypto, remember. We don't care about losses. We're always thinking a possible happy ending somwhow

[milewilda]

Hello,
Is Terra Luna Classic recovering?

I doubt that it's entirety will recover.

Why does TrustWallet pay 15% profit to staking it?

CZ isn't even delisting it on Binance so, I think that he's still keeping the one that he's got from the team and they're in total loss with this project. A 15% is attracting more people to stake it but it's useless because it's not going to go up unless you still got a lot of it and you've taken that before the debacle because you can't sell it due to big losses.

As long as people are buying and selling it and he can make a percentage on the trade then why not.  It amazes me how much people are willing to put into luna at this point.  It's a complete gamble that will eventually fade away.  Lunacy if you ask me.

Its crypto, remember. We don't care about losses. We're always thinking a possible happy ending somwhow

And searching for happy ending doesnt really always happen but we wont be able to experience these endings unless we do try or unless we dont take the risk and this is why its peoples choice whether they would be able to bare out with the risk or not.So its a personal choice whether you could take up such further step if you are really that prepared for whatever things that might happen.Going back about Terra Luna Classic
which we do know on whats into its past which is really that unfortunate into its investors but surprisingly they are still alive and kicking despite of having those lost up trust into their team
because of what happened.Whose the ones been pumping lately? Its an obvious answer.