DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS

[Maus0728]

It's not really fair to use $1.90 per day as a standard to judge someone is poor because each country has a different currency, minimum income and living cost. $1.90 per day in first world country is definitely a poor, but for third world country, such amount might be normal for them because they can still live with $1.90 per day.

I think that it's enough to be considered because if we complicate things just to suit it with other countries' living cost per day, you'll either get a number that close or it's going to be even lower just to do an average. I don't agree with an assessment that someone's "living" at that amount, they could probably buy a meal for only once with that money in my opinion, we all talk about inflation nowadays and it's not far fetch to say that that amount isn't a lot of money, it's not the 1800s anymore where that dollar and 90 cents can get you to 2 days, inflation has happened baby!!!

It's not "living" if you can only spend $1.90 a day, that's fuckin' surviving in hardcore mode.

It's also preposterous of us to divert from topic about finding a solution about poverty, the discussion was supposed to be about how can we alleviate the problems that those in the poverty line are facing, it's not a matter of what amount is considered poor or not because if that local currency's converted to dollar, it's still going to $1.90.

In regards to solution for poverty, US can easily end the poverty and housing problem in their country by getting a small chunk off their military budget and allocating it to the stuff that needs the money. If we're talking in global scale, international cooperations between nations that have an altruistic intentions is the best way to go, no politics, no corruption, just pure and unadulterated altruism to help the poor.

[1715182866]

1715182866

[1715182866]

1715182866

[rangga28]

Poverty eradication can be held or seen in different forms.Poverty entails more than the lack of income and productive resources to ensure sustainable livelihoods.They include hunger and malnutrition,inadequate access to good education and lots more.
 Poverty in this 21st century should be eradicated individually and not otherwise.Even with the information/Education that they have living their desired lifestyle seems difficult for them.The solution is right with us;no one is coming to fix your life for you.
  Once you've found another means of living well,you can obviously connect to whatever it is you want to achieve without having interest on the governments method.

But regardless on how we define it, government all over the world specially in 3rd world countries are going their best to eradicate it. Unfortunately, it will not be that easy, it might even take centuries to completely curb it out and it's a very complex approach. So I will say that there will be no magic bean for it. Government will really need to developed programs within their country, and sustained it for a long time. The problem is that some form of government changes like every 4-6 years and so the previous government can't sustain what they have started. And so the cycle continues, new government enter, try to solved the problem again with new programs that might or might not effective. And it will only be achieved if everyone will join together, private and government  in addressing poverty through various strategies and policies.

In fact, poverty will always be very difficult to eradicate because it is an inevitability that occurs naturally. Various kinds of data can always be provided, but developed countries still have people in the poor category. So there is no meaningful solution because every period is always campaign material. So in my opinion, poor people are responsibilities for the surrounding residents by providing a way out so they can move one step further. People who have enough should not be stingy because stinginess is not the solution to alleviating poverty. It must be remembered that in our wealth we have other people's rights and we must spend it to help.

[Kriptogram14]

Poverty eradication can be held or seen in different forms.Poverty entails more than the lack of income and productive resources to ensure sustainable livelihoods.They include hunger and malnutrition,inadequate access to good education and lots more.
 Poverty in this 21st century should be eradicated individually and not otherwise.Even with the information/Education that they have living their desired lifestyle seems difficult for them.The solution is right with us;no one is coming to fix your life for you.
  Once you've found another means of living well,you can obviously connect to whatever it is you want to achieve without having interest on the governments method.

But regardless on how we define it, government all over the world specially in 3rd world countries are going their best to eradicate it. Unfortunately, it will not be that easy, it might even take centuries to completely curb it out and it's a very complex approach. So I will say that there will be no magic bean for it. Government will really need to developed programs within their country, and sustained it for a long time. The problem is that some form of government changes like every 4-6 years and so the previous government can't sustain what they have started. And so the cycle continues, new government enter, try to solved the problem again with new programs that might or might not effective. And it will only be achieved if everyone will join together, private and government  in addressing poverty through various strategies and policies.

In fact, poverty will always be very difficult to eradicate because it is an inevitability that occurs naturally. Various kinds of data can always be provided, but developed countries still have people in the poor category. So there is no meaningful solution because every period is always campaign material. So in my opinion, poor people are responsibilities for the surrounding residents by providing a way out so they can move one step further. People who have enough should not be stingy because stinginess is not the solution to alleviating poverty. It must be remembered that in our wealth we have other people's rights and we must spend it to help.

If the problem of poverty is all our own responsibility, we have to find a way out of it all, we cannot depend on the current government, because currently we can see, employment opportunities are minimal, many of the best graduates and graduates are still unemployed, the government At the moment it seems like we are turning a blind eye to poverty, if people don't work hard now in terms of livelihoods such as rice fields, gardens and fish ponds, the government should have to solve the poverty rate in this country, but what we are currently experiencing is poverty which is increasing even more. high, the government is not making the people prosperous but making it even more miserable for the people, just as basic food supplies have soared so far, people are currently having trouble with the economy, plus the basic food supplies are rising, the people in this country are increasingly screaming, when asked by the government the answer is a blunder. , there is no longer a solution in the government, but instead we help each other, blend in with those around us, we both help our neighbors who need it, there is no other way than helping each other.

[bestcoins1]

In fact, poverty will always be very difficult to eradicate because it is an inevitability that occurs naturally. Various kinds of data can always be provided, but developed countries still have people in the poor category. So there is no meaningful solution because every period is always campaign material. So in my opinion, poor people are responsibilities for the surrounding residents by providing a way out so they can move one step further. People who have enough should not be stingy because stinginess is not the solution to alleviating poverty. It must be remembered that in our wealth we have other people's rights and we must spend it to help.

You can say this to people who have high social feelings because some people will definitely not agree that in their wealth they have other people's rights so helping the poor will be their obligation. But on the one hand, I also agree that wealthy people want to help poor people around them in order to lighten the burden on poor people in their own environment. However, you also need to remember that this is not an obligation that must be carried out by the same people in terms of helping the poor, because each person also has limits to their ability to provide assistance voluntarily without being forced.

[boty]

In fact, poverty will always be very difficult to eradicate because it is an inevitability that occurs naturally. Various kinds of data can always be provided, but developed countries still have people in the poor category. So there is no meaningful solution because every period is always campaign material. So in my opinion, poor people are responsibilities for the surrounding residents by providing a way out so they can move one step further. People who have enough should not be stingy because stinginess is not the solution to alleviating poverty. It must be remembered that in our wealth we have other people's rights and we must spend it to help.

As long as there is still greed by a group of people of course there will always be poverty because most of the poverty occurs because of the lack of employment opportunities and people cannot have an income because it is very difficult to find work and if there is work they only get enough wages to cover their food needs and not can save some of the income they earn and I don't think there is a solution to eradicating poverty as you said, it is very true that they take advantage of the condition of poor people to get their votes when they want to get their positions and never think again about the poor people when they get positions.

If poverty is the responsibility of the local people then there is no point in the government system, of course they have to find a solution in this case so that they can reduce poverty by creating jobs that can provide them with income so they can get out of poverty and for some people who already have sufficient wealth they can help as much as they can and maybe they also have their families who also need help to get out of poverty.

[sekalitas]

I just noticed that there are lots of developments challenges in our different society that so many needs a solution and I took some time and see how I can be of help to that by doing some research but I haven't come to conclusions cause I believe there's something to be done

THIS IS WHAT I GOT

Eradication of poverty in all its forms and dimensions
 
It's estimated that approximately 700 million people still live on less than US$1.90 per day, a total of 1.3 billion people are multi-dimensionally poor, including a disproportionate number of women and people with disabilities and 80 percent of humanity lives on less than US$10 per day. Increasingly, middle-income countries account for a large part of this trend.

Quote from :  https://www.undp.org/development-challenges-and-solutions

I believe this can help and I believe you drop SOLUTIONS to someone

Thank you for researching these development challenges. Eradicating poverty is incredibly difficult, and we may not be able to eliminate it completely due to its many complex factors. However, I suggest that we can help reduce poverty by building businesses that create job opportunities for those in need. Additionally, volunteering can make a difference – for example, becoming a teacher in areas with poor education.  While we should offer solutions to those in government, we can also take action within our own capabilities as citizens

[Volimack]

Among the greatest challenges we face poverty is certainly one of the most serious. Without hard work no nation can ever prosper and it is impossible to eradicate poverty it is not possible for any person to eradicate poverty. In addition to the financial problems of the family on the coast there are many reasons such as inadequate communication system the effects of climate change etc. Whether the development programs are run by private individuals or public and private organizations the assistance should be according to the type and reality of poverty.