It didn't happen after using a centralized exchange, yet he lives the same thing as one which had his identity stolen by hackers from a centralized exchange or from any other source.
Good campaign Gazeta but this really does not validate the case. In fact, it hurts the validity of the whole story.
If the man's identity was mishandled by a centralized exchange, then this story would serve as strong precedent. However, this man could have easily had been a wrong doer himself, and at some point sold his identity or put it in the wrong hands by his own means.
I understand the point that "This could happen to you if you give your identity to CEXs" however it's not "This is what happened after someone gave their identity to a CEX"
I for one am against CEXs for the reasons stated in the OP, as I agree, it's completely possible....but sharing this story and using an unrelated story to validate the point? Not sure if that's good authorship.
That's just my 2 cents though.