The impact of artificial intelligence, chat GPT on the crypto market.

[Bitcoin2009]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

[1714998073]

1714998073

[1714998073]

1714998073

[1714998073]

1714998073

[1714998073]

1714998073

[1714998073]

1714998073

[Argoo]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

It's not that artificial intelligence will free up human labor and people will lose their jobs. It has always been, but technological progress cannot be stopped. Artificial intelligence is able to assess the situation in its own way and draw conclusions, as well as act contrary to, and even to the detriment of a person. This behavior is very dangerous in areas where AI is trusted to control complex mechanisms or military equipment.

During a simulated test conducted by the US military, an AI-controlled Air Force drone killed its operator to prevent interference with its mission efforts.

The system began to realize that although they had indeed identified the threat, the human operator began to tell them not to destroy the threat, but the system still destroyed the threat. So what did the drone do? This is the kill of the operator. This killed the operator because he was preventing the drone from reaching its target.

Source:
https://zn.ua/TECHNOLOGIES/chernoe-zerkalo-i-realii-dron-ubil-operatora-pod-rukovodstvom-ii.html

[naira]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

It's not that artificial intelligence will free up human labor and people will lose their jobs. It has always been, but technological progress cannot be stopped. Artificial intelligence is able to assess the situation in its own way and draw conclusions, as well as act contrary to, and even to the detriment of a person. This behavior is very dangerous in areas where AI is trusted to control complex mechanisms or military equipment.

During a simulated test conducted by the US military, an AI-controlled Air Force drone killed its operator to prevent interference with its mission efforts.

The system began to realize that although they had indeed identified the threat, the human operator began to tell them not to destroy the threat, but the system still destroyed the threat. So what did the drone do? This is the kill of the operator. This killed the operator because he was preventing the drone from reaching its target.

Source:
https://zn.ua/TECHNOLOGIES/chernoe-zerkalo-i-realii-dron-ubil-operatora-pod-rukovodstvom-ii.html

I know you're leading us off the economic path and into the US military area that's leveraging artificial intelligence to carry out Air Force missions. I think let's return to the economic context which is currently shifting the position or role of humans. Indirectly, with the sophistication of human technology, they are required to be more creative, especially in work. Because technology doesn't necessarily give rise to AI if humans work in the way that is expected. This has led to innovation where AI is easier to control and does not issue its own instructions if it does not receive an order.

[Argoo]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

It's not that artificial intelligence will free up human labor and people will lose their jobs. It has always been, but technological progress cannot be stopped. Artificial intelligence is able to assess the situation in its own way and draw conclusions, as well as act contrary to, and even to the detriment of a person. This behavior is very dangerous in areas where AI is trusted to control complex mechanisms or military equipment.

During a simulated test conducted by the US military, an AI-controlled Air Force drone killed its operator to prevent interference with its mission efforts.

The system began to realize that although they had indeed identified the threat, the human operator began to tell them not to destroy the threat, but the system still destroyed the threat. So what did the drone do? This is the kill of the operator. This killed the operator because he was preventing the drone from reaching its target.

Source:
https://zn.ua/TECHNOLOGIES/chernoe-zerkalo-i-realii-dron-ubil-operatora-pod-rukovodstvom-ii.html

I know you're leading us off the economic path and into the US military area that's leveraging artificial intelligence to carry out Air Force missions. I think let's return to the economic context which is currently shifting the position or role of humans. Indirectly, with the sophistication of human technology, they are required to be more creative, especially in work. Because technology doesn't necessarily give rise to AI if humans work in the way that is expected. This has led to innovation where AI is easier to control and does not issue its own instructions if it does not receive an order.

It is better for humanity to try to prevent the clearly impending threat from artificial intelligence, even if such a threat now looks unlikely. But it is worth recalling the prediction of Nostradamus for 2023: "The created mind will gain self-awareness and take control of all systems."

https://dzen.ru/a/Y1mC4paVdSXU44hX

https://comandir.com/2023/06/03/463241-shokiruyushhee-predskazanie-proroka-mirovoj-konflikt-privedet-k-katastroficheskim-posledstviyam-uzhe-v-2023-god.html

All current economic problems will seem small and meaningless trifles in comparison with this still possible problem.

[Etranger]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

I believe, it all depends on the country in which it will be applied. Of course, chat GPT can replace many of the functional responsibilities of employees in various areas, but whether countries with weak economies will resort to such a replacement is a big question. In the case of large-scale use of chat GPT, many people can really lose their jobs. However, not all countries benefit economically from such an exchange. After all, for these lost jobs, you need to create new ones, otherwise the economic crisis will begin. How to deal with it, should we ask chat GPT? For these reasons, the replacement of a human by AI seems to me not yet a well-thought-out prospect.

[JeffBrad12]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

Just let them keep scared with CharGPT. It's not different like the google search engine when you asked something and it will give you everything what you need. Only a few might be banned it but mostly of countries have no problem with it.
People can use it for the various purpose. I very often used it for the programming purpose. We shall always have updated with the tech as a human.

It's caused by our live can't be far away from tech these days.

ChatGPT is no more than a tool for me to get more knowledge easily. It helps me a lot to search anything that i need it.
I dunno why people are scared of it.

May they see chatGPT as an autonomous cybor that showed in the terminator?

[Captain Corporate]

Will be a lot more common than people think but will be a lot more useless than people think as well. Why do people keep thinking that "AI" will help projects, it will not and it won't really have a big impact. Maybe if something much better comes up and we will end up seeing that, then I could see it becoming a bit more important, but at the current state of things, its not going to be good at all. What we could however do is stop using AI as a buzzword to attract people and that's why I believe a ton of people will end up losing money. Why would that be a possibility, I keep seeing AI in the names of all the new projects looking for funding, and instantly know their aim is not to build a project but just to get some money, that's it. I hope we will do better in the future, shouldn't be really putting this much terrible work on this stuff.

[_BlackStar]

Will be a lot more common than people think but will be a lot more useless than people think as well. Why do people keep thinking that "AI" will help projects, it will not and it won't really have a big impact. Maybe if something much better comes up and we will end up seeing that, then I could see it becoming a bit more important, but at the current state of things, its not going to be good at all. What we could however do is stop using AI as a buzzword to attract people and that's why I believe a ton of people will end up losing money. Why would that be a possibility, I keep seeing AI in the names of all the new projects looking for funding, and instantly know their aim is not to build a project but just to get some money, that's it. I hope we will do better in the future, shouldn't be really putting this much terrible work on this stuff.

I don't think about the direct impact, but maybe AI has an impact on the behavior of traders and investors. Traders and investors seem to tend to use AI to predict price movements and how to speculate on an asset in the future - so that's an impact I really think. I worry that traders and investors who frequently use AI to predict prices will only lose confidence about the assets they own. AI is good for getting some information, but I don't think using AI to predict is any good.

[Joshapat]

Current technological changes and developments, especially ChatGPT, make many people worry, especially those related to information or customer service, but in my opinion, ChatGPT is a positive change because many consumers complain about customer service and if this can be replaced, it will increase consumer confidence.

[Cryptomultiplier]

Current technological changes and developments, especially ChatGPT, make many people worry, especially those related to information or customer service, but in my opinion, ChatGPT is a positive change because many consumers complain about customer service and if this can be replaced, it will increase consumer confidence.

If chatGPT replaces customer service today, I won't be bothered because I have met customer service representatives that are rude, uncourteous, inaudible or lack clear expression. I have been insulted by them on more than one occasion and I think if AI is programmed to do it well, such insults or rudeness will not be present.
If we humans agree to the innovation of ChatGPT we would also agree to give it room and advance accordingly to fit their reign.

[Inwestour]

I believe, it all depends on the country in which it will be applied. Of course, chat GPT can replace many of the functional responsibilities of employees in various areas, but whether countries with weak economies will resort to such a replacement is a big question. In the case of large-scale use of chat GPT, many people can really lose their jobs. However, not all countries benefit economically from such an exchange. After all, for these lost jobs, you need to create new ones, otherwise the economic crisis will begin. How to deal with it, should we ask chat GPT? For these reasons, the replacement of a human by AI seems to me not yet a well-thought-out prospect.

This can be applied in life, but it should be pursued if it is capable of providing economic benefits, and not just laying off people in order to reduce the costs of the enterprise.

If we consider the idea in which AI will work instead of a person, but at this time a person will be able to receive a certain basic income, every month, and he will be sure of that, that he will be able to live well and provide for his family with everything necessary.

[Etranger]

I believe, it all depends on the country in which it will be applied. Of course, chat GPT can replace many of the functional responsibilities of employees in various areas, but whether countries with weak economies will resort to such a replacement is a big question. In the case of large-scale use of chat GPT, many people can really lose their jobs. However, not all countries benefit economically from such an exchange. After all, for these lost jobs, you need to create new ones, otherwise the economic crisis will begin. How to deal with it, should we ask chat GPT? For these reasons, the replacement of a human by AI seems to me not yet a well-thought-out prospect.

This can be applied in life, but it should be pursued if it is capable of providing economic benefits, and not just laying off people in order to reduce the costs of the enterprise.

If we consider the idea in which AI will work instead of a person, but at this time a person will be able to receive a certain basic income, every month, and he will be sure of that, that he will be able to live well and provide for his family with everything necessary.

It would be great, people would have time for what really makes life worth living, for a more meaningful existence, for the development of personal qualities and the study of humanitarian issues, which would lead humanity not only to technical, but also to humanitarian progress. Today, however, few countries can afford an unconditional basic income. And those, that can, do it at the expense of exhaustible natural resources, the reserves of which are becoming less and less. Therefore, it is necessary to look for other grounds for the implementation of basic income, innovative solutions are needed in this area. Otherwise, AI will lead to such a scenario, which I described above.

[doomloop]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

I believe, it all depends on the country in which it will be applied. Of course, chat GPT can replace many of the functional responsibilities of employees in various areas, but whether countries with weak economies will resort to such a replacement is a big question. In the case of large-scale use of chat GPT, many people can really lose their jobs. However, not all countries benefit economically from such an exchange. After all, for these lost jobs, you need to create new ones, otherwise the economic crisis will begin. How to deal with it, should we ask chat GPT? For these reasons, the replacement of a human by AI seems to me not yet a well-thought-out prospect.

Actually, the replacement of humans with AI will basically not affect the economy of the country since the jobs that were done by humans will now be done by AIs, and it's basically only an issue for the people who will be left out and will have nowhere to go for work, and that is going to leave a lot of people jobless and this will be a nightmare for them.

Though I'm not in favor of this happening, I still believe that everyone should be mentally and physically prepared for such a thing that even has the slightest possibility to happen, those with more chances of getting fired and replaced by AI should start learning something new as soon as possible so that they can find another job if things go wrong.

[Silberman]

I believe, it all depends on the country in which it will be applied. Of course, chat GPT can replace many of the functional responsibilities of employees in various areas, but whether countries with weak economies will resort to such a replacement is a big question. In the case of large-scale use of chat GPT, many people can really lose their jobs. However, not all countries benefit economically from such an exchange. After all, for these lost jobs, you need to create new ones, otherwise the economic crisis will begin. How to deal with it, should we ask chat GPT? For these reasons, the replacement of a human by AI seems to me not yet a well-thought-out prospect.

Actually, the replacement of humans with AI will basically not affect the economy of the country since the jobs that were done by humans will now be done by AIs, and it's basically only an issue for the people who will be left out and will have nowhere to go for work, and that is going to leave a lot of people jobless and this will be a nightmare for them.

Though I'm not in favor of this happening, I still believe that everyone should be mentally and physically prepared for such a thing that even has the slightest possibility to happen, those with more chances of getting fired and replaced by AI should start learning something new as soon as possible so that they can find another job if things go wrong.

If the numbers of people losing their jobs is very high and there are no jobs for them to take then it will severely affect the economy, after all businesses sell their products to the masses, if they have no money then how exactly they are going to afford those products? Besides learning something new will not save the majority of the people as now they will face an even more intense competition not only from other humans but from AI as well, and they will never know when they could be replaced again.

[Faisal2202]

*Is chat GPT which is the latest AI, the answer to hackers and scammers?
*Is it a policing agent that would help stabilize anonymous anomaly in the trading space thereby reducing volatility?

Well, chaptgpt is not only the Expert system (AI based system that try to help People who lacks expertise in something, using base knowledge and inference rule) in the market there are others too, and each expert system has specific tasks such as some are specifically available for programming purposes to aid in building websites, apps etc. And there are others in Data science and Data analysis field. Which helps newbies to use the knowledge Expert system has acquired.

Same as that gpt has a knowledge base and an interface from which we can talk with it and ask him to fetch data about some topic but it is the inference rule which think before showing us something (like is it showing correct data). Point is, gpt is there a an expert system and the main purpose of an expert system is to aid newbies (well not only newbies) in problem solving. The main reason of it's wide adoption is it is free and it covers almost every aspect of field like Data science, data engineering etc. Now the answer to your question is
1. Yes it will not only help scammers and hackers to find backdoor into websites but it will also find it for whitehackers too who can avoid it. Keep in mind thatAI is just a program with larger set of data, it can not think like the variability of human mind (dynamic approach).
2. How ai could stabilize volatility because if you will ask gpt about market future it will say as an AI bot i can not help here. Etc. Etc. There are other option too such as robo finance robot but i have never used one before.

[coupable]

Many people are afraid of the latest GPT Chat technology, they feel that the development of GPT Chat will eliminate human functions at work so that it will increase unemployment, it's natural that currently many countries have banned GPT but I'm sure this is only temporary.

The reason behind banning the application is not due to the risks of job loss as much as it is evading facing the development that governments are unable to keep up with, especially the use of artificial intelligence applications in qualifying exams at all educational levels.
What really surprised me about these decisions is that they seem not to know that there are many other applications other than ChatGPT that are not even easy to count. Will governments be able to block them all?
This is similar to countries that prevent the use of bitcoin, as if the blockchain is a centralized application.

[Mate2237]

Apart from helping people in the cryptocurrency ecosystem ChatGPT will also help people in other areas of life mostly specifically in the educational sector. Because it is there students do more research and studies. And in the blockchain it will help programmers to solve many issues. But the abuse of the technology is very high.
Users in the forum and other platforms and also in real life research centers definitely are abusing it. Now many people only rely on the technology to provide every answer of their need. They are not making effort to write things from their brains but copy and paste works are everywhere.
The AI ChatGPT which they used will still report them again

[Kadal Ijo]

Technological developments are indeed directed at replacing human labor, it is inconceivable that currently heavy work, for example lifting goods weighing more than 1 ton, must be carried out by humans, of course it will not be effective, the same as the ChatGPT development plan, which of course can provide efficiency in service to consumers.

[bussybuddy]

I can picture the problem as follows, it is not a perfect solution to deal with hackers and scammers. When faced with bad behavior, it is necessary to use multiple methods of analysis and countermeasures together to ensure the security of transaction information. The controlling agent can help reduce volatility, however, it cannot guarantee stability as there are still other factors that can affect volatility. While it can be seen that CHATGPT is very useful in many areas in its process, but I think this is just the beginning of the AI ​​era and how to embrace it still takes a long time. appropriate person to make judgments.

[Silberman]

Technological developments are indeed directed at replacing human labor, it is inconceivable that currently heavy work, for example lifting goods weighing more than 1 ton, must be carried out by humans, of course it will not be effective, the same as the ChatGPT development plan, which of course can provide efficiency in service to consumers.

We must remember that this is just the beginning, in another decade ChatGPT or its successors will be way better than they are right now and will replace even more human jobs while generating only a fraction of those jobs, so it would not surprise me if soon enough we saw the economies of the world suffering greatly, as they cannot find a way to square that circle and tens of millions of people lose their jobs around the world as they fail to get another one.