Anti-vaxxers not drinking their own urine

[o_e_l_e_o]

No side effects to properly administered homeopathy plus good nutrition.

That's true. Also no effects whatsoever, except a smaller bank balance for the poor idiot buying water pills.

Unless of course you are buying one of the many homeopathic bullshit pills which have been found to contain dangerous levels of contaminants such as lead, mercury, or arsenic.

[TwitchySeal]

No side effects to properly administered homeopathy plus good nutrition.

That's true. Also no effects whatsoever, except a smaller bank balance for the poor idiot buying water pills.

Unless of course you are buying one of the many homeopathic bullshit pills which have been found to contain dangerous levels of contaminants such as lead, mercury, or arsenic.

Or you're drinking your own urine.  Urine is free.

[BADecker]

No side effects to properly administered homeopathy plus good nutrition.

That's true. Also no effects whatsoever, except a smaller bank balance for the poor idiot buying water pills.

Unless of course you are buying one of the many homeopathic bullshit pills which have been found to contain dangerous levels of contaminants such as lead, mercury, or arsenic.

Kinda the point. Except that homeopathy works when used with proper nutrition. There are even accredited schools for learning homeopathy along with nutrition and some medical.

But the point is the money. Pay through the teeth for medical, possibly get a temporary healing, and loads of side effects, along with long term disabilities.  The medical, along with banking, along with the current form of government, are some of the biggest scams that have ever existed.

[OgNasty]

This now combination of threads is mostly just an admission that liberals will believe anything they read so long as they want to believe it. The threads also show that in the face of irrefutable scientific evidence and mountains of supporting data, they will still not admit when they are wrong. Governments including the USA are now banning these “vaccines” and people arguing here about drinking urine are probably scheduling their next booster…

[TwitchySeal]

Governments including the USA are now banning these “vaccines”

The US Government just approved a second booster this week.  What are you talking about?

[arielbit]

No side effects to properly administered homeopathy plus good nutrition.

That's true. Also no effects whatsoever, except a smaller bank balance for the poor idiot buying water pills.

Unless of course you are buying one of the many homeopathic bullshit pills which have been found to contain dangerous levels of contaminants such as lead, mercury, or arsenic.

Kinda the point. Except that homeopathy works when used with proper nutrition. There are even accredited schools for learning homeopathy along with nutrition and some medical.

But the point is the money. Pay through the teeth for medical, possibly get a temporary healing, and loads of side effects, along with long term disabilities.  The medical, along with banking, along with the current form of government, are some of the biggest scams that have ever existed.

Cured a puppy with mange using homeopathy, nutritious meals and essential oils/carrier oil and baths with castille soap.

[tvbcof]

...

I don't remember anyone espousing the drinking of one's urine or anyone elses' urine on the original thread that you locked.

Seems like drinking so much urine has clouded your memory. Your anti-vax pals were espousing drinking cow urine: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5380868.msg59869858#msg59869858

Nope.  That's not what the guy did.  He specifically said he was NOT doing it and was happy that, because he wasn't stupid enough to get the scamdemic gene therapy jab, he didn't have to explore such things.

What he did do was to provide some links to information about the arguments the proponents of urine consumption are making.  That is not AT ALL the same thing as promoting them.  It is real old-school science to avail of ALL of the scientific arguments (and a lot of the non-scientific arguments) and weigh them against other information.  Upon doing so one is perfectly free to reject some, most, or all of the info.

Scientism, on the other hand, is characterized by:  'It's eeew.  It's yuck.  I won't look into anything.'  And also 'It's not reported in the mainstream media as a 'scientific consensus' so it has no merit and is not worth 'learning' about.'

Most people, be they scientismists or otherwise, would consider the treatment of getting someone elses' shit jammed up your own butt-hole to be absurd and not worth looking into.  That's because most people have no idea that colonization of the gut by a wide variety of bacteria is fundamental to how humans are able to acquire food to fuel their bodies.  Upon considering this, 'fecal transplant' is not so ridiculous on it's face.  But it also doesn't make the practice of fecal transplant the be-all-end-all of healthy living, or even necessarily effective.

Employing actual science can shed some light on the questions around fecal transplant (for instance.)  Scientism will never even get you to first base...and that's probably one of the reasons it's popularized for mainstream consumption by 'celebrity-scientists' like Niel deGrasse-Tyson.

[arielbit]

...

I don't remember anyone espousing the drinking of one's urine or anyone elses' urine on the original thread that you locked.

Seems like drinking so much urine has clouded your memory. Your anti-vax pals were espousing drinking cow urine: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5380868.msg59869858#msg59869858

Nope.  That's not what the guy did.  He specifically said he was NOT doing it and was happy that, because he wasn't stupid enough to get the scamdemic gene therapy jab, he didn't have to explore such things.

What he did do was to provide some links to information about the arguments the proponents of urine consumption are making.  That is not AT ALL the same thing as promoting them.  It is real old-school science to avail of ALL of the scientific arguments (and a lot of the non-scientific arguments) and weigh them against other information.  Upon doing so one is perfectly free to reject some, most, or all of the info.

Scientism, on the other hand, is characterized by:  'It's eeew.  It's yuck.  I won't look into anything.'  And also 'It's not reported in the mainstream media as a 'scientific consensus' so it has no merit and is not worth 'learning' about.'

Most people, be they scientismists or otherwise, would consider the treatment of getting someone elses' shit jammed up your own butt-hole to be absurd and not worth looking into.  That's because most people have no idea that colonization of the gut by a wide variety of bacteria is fundamental to how humans are able to acquire food to fuel their bodies.  Upon considering this, 'fecal transplant' is not so ridiculous on it's face.  But it also doesn't make the practice of fecal transplant the be-all-end-all of healthy living, or even necessarily effective.

Employing actual science can shed some light on the questions around fecal transplant (for instance.)  Scientism will never even get you to first base...and that's probably one of the reasons it's popularized for mainstream consumption by 'celebrity-scientists' like Niel deGrasse-Tyson.

Vaccines(mrna) are killing the gut microbiome, the bifidobacterium, losing that is connected to various health issues.

Source: ProgenaBiome, sabine hazan MD

[TwitchySeal]

What he did do was to provide some links to information about the arguments the proponents of urine consumption are making.  That is not AT ALL the same thing as promoting them.

This is what promoting urine therapy looks like:

“The antidote that we have seen now, and we have tons and tons of research, is urine therapy.  OK, and I know to a lot of you this sounds crazy, but guys, God’s given us everything we need.”

I'm not gonna go dig through the most retarded part of the internet to find the video of the guy talking about how drinking your own piss can cure covid, but unless that quote is fake the guy was promoting drinking his own peepee.

[tvbcof]

I don't remember anyone espousing the drinking of one's urine or anyone elses' urine on the original thread that you locked.

Seems like drinking so much urine has clouded your memory. Your anti-vax pals were espousing drinking cow urine: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5380868.msg59869858#msg59869858

Nope.  That's not what the guy did.  He specifically said he was NOT doing it and was happy that, because he wasn't stupid enough to get the scamdemic gene therapy jab, he didn't have to explore such things.

What he did do was to provide some links to information about the arguments the proponents of urine consumption are making.  That is not AT ALL the same thing as promoting them.

This is what promoting urine therapy looks like:

“The antidote that we have seen now, and we have tons and tons of research, is urine therapy.  OK, and I know to a lot of you this sounds crazy, but guys, God’s given us everything we need.”

I'm not gonna go dig through the most retarded part of the internet to find the video of the guy talking about how drinking your own piss can cure covid, but unless that quote is fake the guy was promoting drinking his own peepee.

Doesn't sound like something Tash would have said.  Is that why you presented bare text with no link at all?

If you found that in a link that someone pointed to, I would thank whatever someone provided the link to the text.  This because information which points to something being kind of scammy is itself quite valuable in analyzing that something.  For instance, someone clumsily trying to save their ass with crude non-linked quoted text without context ==> a loser.  But in this case most people already figured that out.

[TwitchySeal]

I don't remember anyone espousing the drinking of one's urine or anyone elses' urine on the original thread that you locked.

Seems like drinking so much urine has clouded your memory. Your anti-vax pals were espousing drinking cow urine: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5380868.msg59869858#msg59869858

Nope.  That's not what the guy did.  He specifically said he was NOT doing it and was happy that, because he wasn't stupid enough to get the scamdemic gene therapy jab, he didn't have to explore such things.

What he did do was to provide some links to information about the arguments the proponents of urine consumption are making.  That is not AT ALL the same thing as promoting them.

This is what promoting urine therapy looks like:

“The antidote that we have seen now, and we have tons and tons of research, is urine therapy.  OK, and I know to a lot of you this sounds crazy, but guys, God’s given us everything we need.”

I'm not gonna go dig through the most retarded part of the internet to find the video of the guy talking about how drinking your own piss can cure covid, but unless that quote is fake the guy was promoting drinking his own peepee.

Doesn't sound like something Tash would have said.  Is that why you presented bare text with no link at all?

If you found that in a link that someone pointed to, I would thank whatever someone provided the link to the text.  This because information which points to something being kind of scammy is itself quite valuable in analyzing that something.  For instance, someone clumsily trying to save their ass with crude non-linked quoted text without context ==> a loser.  But in this case most people already figured that out.

Anti-Vax Leader Urges Followers to Drink Their Own Urine to Fight COVID
https://www.thedailybeast.com/anti-vax-leader-christopher-key-urges-followers-to-drink-their-own-urine-to-fight-covid-19

‘Drink urine,’ anti-COVID vaccine advocate tells supporters
https://www.kxan.com/news/weird-news/drink-urine-anti-covid-vaccine-advocate-tells-supporters/



Will you do it now?