Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 12:22:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Please help sanity test: version 0.5.1  (Read 2263 times)
Gavin Andresen (OP)
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 2216


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2011, 04:16:34 PM
 #1

Please help sanity test version 0.5.1 release candidate 1.

Why a version 0.5.1 ?  To fix the bugs listed below before starting on 0.6 release candidate testing.

After doing some testnet testing to make sure it works properly, I plan on using the "alert" system built in to the client to warn 0.4 users that if they have an encrypted wallet they need to upgrade to be secure.


Bitcoin version 0.5.1 release candidate 1 is now available for download at:
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.5.1/test/

This is a bugfix-only release.

This release includes 13 translations, including 5 new translations:
Italian, Hungarian, Ukranian, Portuguese (Brazilian) and Simplified Chinese.
More translations are welcome; join the project at Transifex if you can help:
  https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/bitcoin/

Please report bugs using the issue tracker at github:
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues

Project source code is hosted at github; we are no longer
distributing .tar.gz files here, you can get them
directly from github:
 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tarball/v0.5.1  # .tar.gz
 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/zipball/v0.5.1  # .zip

For Ubuntu users, there is a new ppa maintained by Matt Corallo which
you can add to your system so that it will automatically keep
bitcoin up-to-date.  Just type
 sudo apt-add-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
in your terminal, then install the bitcoin-qt package.

BUG FIXES
---------

Re-enable SSL support for the JSON-RPC interface (it was unintentionally
disabled for the 0.5.0 release binaries).

The code that finds peers via "dns seeds" no longer stops bitcoin startup
if one of the dns seed machines is down.

Tooltips on the transaction list view were rendering incorrectly (as black boxes
or with a transparent background).

Prevent a denial-of-service attack involving flooding a bitcoin node with
orphan blocks.

The wallet passphrase dialog now warns you if the caps lock key was pressed.

Improved searching in addresses and labels in bitcoin-qt.

===============================

Thanks to everybody who contributed code or helped test this release:

Alex B
Clark Gaebel
Dylan Noblesmith
Gavin Andresen
Luke Dashjr
Matt Corallo
Michael Hendricks
Nick Bosma
Nils Schneider
Wladimir J. van der Laan

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
1713961342
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713961342

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713961342
Reply with quote  #2

1713961342
Report to moderator
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713961342
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713961342

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713961342
Reply with quote  #2

1713961342
Report to moderator
1713961342
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713961342

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713961342
Reply with quote  #2

1713961342
Report to moderator
finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 13, 2011, 04:30:42 PM
 #2

Looking nice!

nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 13, 2011, 05:08:22 PM
 #3

A little off topic, but when did the transaction dates stop being shown from the block timestamp and started being the timestamp at which the block was received? This bugs me because I do mental averages of generation, and only start the client every now and then, which then proceeds to download the blockchain pinning all new transactions under more or less the same date and time, i.e. now.

This still happens with 0.5.1, don't know if a bug or feature, it started somewhere on the 0.4 series and I always forget to report...

Other than that, looks very stable to me, but I've only done 'normal' usage, no real hard core testing.
fornit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 991
Merit: 1008


View Profile
December 13, 2011, 06:01:09 PM
 #4

works on windows 7, 64bit.

nice to see a bugfix release so fast after 0.5.  Smiley
please please please sneak in a fix for the autostart option.
thats very likely easy to fix and can keep quite a few people from running bitcoin all the time.
pusle
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2011, 06:21:12 PM
 #5


works on good old XP 32bit  *pet*pet*  Grin
Gavin Andresen (OP)
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 2216


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2011, 09:29:10 PM
 #6

I'll be uploading Release Candidate 2 binaries this afternoon, with two bug fixes from RC1 (text was being truncated in the wallet passphrase dialog box, and previous versions of bitcoin-qt did not display "alert" messages).

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
December 14, 2011, 05:57:11 AM
 #7

Also tagged are 0.4.2rc1 (bitcoind only) and 0.5.0.1rc2 (bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt). Note that I do not intend to maintain 0.5.0.x very long.

randomguy7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 14, 2011, 03:47:40 PM
 #8

I found a bug but while running the most up to date code from github (running on linux), I assume it's also in 0.5.1.
It's the keypool-bug which afaik was fixed in an earlier version. If I start the client with -keypool=<whatever>, I have to create a new address to actually get the keypool increased.
btc_artist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 101

Bitcoin!


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2011, 06:35:15 PM
 #9

Nice to see this release so soon after the 0.5 release.

BTC: 1CDCLDBHbAzHyYUkk1wYHPYmrtDZNhk8zf
LTC: LMS7SqZJnqzxo76iDSEua33WCyYZdjaQoE
btc_artist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 101

Bitcoin!


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2011, 06:36:05 PM
 #10

The sweep/import privkey posts were moved here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54603.0

BTC: 1CDCLDBHbAzHyYUkk1wYHPYmrtDZNhk8zf
LTC: LMS7SqZJnqzxo76iDSEua33WCyYZdjaQoE
kyoo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 14, 2011, 09:38:18 PM
 #11

A little off topic, but when did the transaction dates stop being shown from the block timestamp and started being the timestamp at which the block was received? This bugs me because I do mental averages of generation, and only start the client every now and then, which then proceeds to download the blockchain pinning all new transactions under more or less the same date and time, i.e. now.

This still happens with 0.5.1, don't know if a bug or feature, it started somewhere on the 0.4 series and I always forget to report...

Other than that, looks very stable to me, but I've only done 'normal' usage, no real hard core testing.

For me this also seems like a bug. If this should be a feature, at least it should be possible to display both sorts of dates.
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
December 14, 2011, 09:59:27 PM
 #12

A little off topic, but when did the transaction dates stop being shown from the block timestamp and started being the timestamp at which the block was received? This bugs me because I do mental averages of generation, and only start the client every now and then, which then proceeds to download the blockchain pinning all new transactions under more or less the same date and time, i.e. now.

This still happens with 0.5.1, don't know if a bug or feature, it started somewhere on the 0.4 series and I always forget to report...

Other than that, looks very stable to me, but I've only done 'normal' usage, no real hard core testing.

For me this also seems like a bug. If this should be a feature, at least it should be possible to display both sorts of dates.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54527.0

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!