marry rich: marry fiat rich or crypto rich, which is better?

[radjie]

I have never agreed that material-based marriage is not a marriage but a transaction, If there is another choice then I will choose to marry someone who is commensurate with me (who loves me for who I am).

However, of the two options above, I would prefer to marry a crypto rich rather than a fiat rich because I already know how big the value of crypto assets is, especially if my future partner has a lot of bitcoins, not satoshis.

It will not last long if the marriage is based on material things, where there will be conflict later when the finances are no longer stable and the wealth previously owned will become a demand.

When I have to choose between the two, on the contrary, I prefer FIAT rich people, where the results of their wealth are real and can be developed in various other businesses and one of them will be used as an investment asset in crypto.

[1714771396]

1714771396

[1714771396]

1714771396

[1714771396]

1714771396

[1714771396]

1714771396

[reagansimms]

Everyone will have a different answer to this type of question. Love is often seen as the essence of marriage, but it is not love that makes a marriage last for decades, but commitment. Life without love is like a garden without flowers, but love without material support will also wither due to limitations in the freedom to express desires to obtain something.
Social and economic aspects are needed for the welfare of couples as a vital factor in marriage. It is very realistic for someone to look for a life partner who has material things, in the course of marriage there must be a balance between love and money.

[khiholangkang]

I view people who are looking for rich people to marry to get rich as leeches.  I hate this kind of people because they want to enjoy other's hard work without working hard themselves.  IMO, I prefer people who work hard and make their way to becoming rich through hard work and smart decisions.

hahaha... we have similarities, I also hate parasites like that.

Everyone wants to be rich, but everyone has a different view in assessing wealth, whether it is wealth of the heart, financial or other things, this can be the subject of their assessment.

These days, there's only one description for being rich and that's all about money. Whether we like it or not, that's what truly is what the majority believes. Being wealthy is all about money to the most but as you've said which is right, there are many descriptions of what being wealthy really is. And as we goal for being rich, there have been methods that are being done the odd way or we should say that it is no longer odd because many are doing it.

It's quite natural that wealth orientation = having a lot of money, that's not wrong and that's how wealth is generally seen, because nowadays the main problem for everyone in life is money, money, and money, so it's quite understandable from this general point of view.

But it's true that getting married requires money, but that doesn't mean you have to wait to get rich first to get it, this is a little different. IMO

Yes, working your ass 24/7 to become rich just before getting married. Many got that mindset before that everyone should be at the best status of their lives before they get married. But that's not the point or it is the point because as you have said that we've got different views.

This is more about principles and more advanced thinking in my opinion, people who have this mindset have studied problems in previous people's households, most marriage problems and failures are due to economic problems and again it's about money, I also don't close my eyes and an ear for it

[Dickiy]

I have never agreed that material-based marriage is not a marriage but a transaction, If there is another choice then I will choose to marry someone who is commensurate with me (who loves me for who I am).

However, of the two options above, I would prefer to marry a crypto rich rather than a fiat rich because I already know how big the value of crypto assets is, especially if my future partner has a lot of bitcoins, not satoshis.

It will not last long if the marriage is based on material things, where there will be conflict later when the finances are no longer stable and the wealth previously owned will become a demand.

When I have to choose between the two, on the contrary, I prefer FIAT rich people, where the results of their wealth are real and can be developed in various other businesses and one of them will be used as an investment asset in crypto.

That's obvious and of course vice versa, marriages won't last long if they rely solely on love without any material possessions to survive. In my opinion, both have an important role to play so that the marriage or family relationship can remain harmonious and run normally. It's true that if one of them gets married for the sole purpose of material things then there's probably something very likely to happen in the future, the life of their marriage won't last long and obviously if the material things eventually disappear then maybe divorce or separation could happen.

That's a pretty good choice, but I think it's just about a little bit of a difference, I think whether they're rich in fiat wealth or crypto wealth I don't think it's going to affect their lives that much, and obviously for the economic factor they're not going to have a problem. But yeah in terms of business opportunities real wealth does have a wider range of opportunities as you said, but honestly I'm not saying either option is bad.

[AicecreaME]

Everyone will have a different answer to this type of question. Love is often seen as the essence of marriage, but it is not love that makes a marriage last for decades, but commitment. Life without love is like a garden without flowers, but love without material support will also wither due to limitations in the freedom to express desires to obtain something.
Social and economic aspects are needed for the welfare of couples as a vital factor in marriage. It is very realistic for someone to look for a life partner who has material things, in the course of marriage there must be a balance between love and money.

I definitely agree with you.

Marriage and relationship always last for a lifetime if both parties never agree when it comes to material things. What I mean is, it is much better if you guys met, love each other unconditionally even though you guys both started with nothing, not rich, but not that poor. It is much greater when you guys helps each other to achieve each other's dream and succeed together, this way, a solid foundation is built.

Rather than choosing your partner based on what can they make or how much they have, because if you guys experienced bad things like being bankrupt, for sure you're going to end up with a divorce.

[red4slash]

Being in a relationship ultimately comes down to our own perspectives and views because we have our own criteria for what makes someone a partner.
In this case, there are still many people who are materially oriented but life is not as beautiful as a film story where a poor person will marry a billionaire. even though it does exist like the story of Prince William and Kate Middleton but it is only a small part because in the end we also adjust in all kinds of perspectives including material.
On the other hand marriage is also not just limited to material things because in the end what is needed is not only that but someone's attraction in feelings that are difficult to talk about directly because this is related to what is called love.
for the bitcoin benchmark problem at 21 million bitcoins does not mean that it belongs to 21 million couples because the context of being in bitcoin we do not have to have one bitcoin to be considered a bitcoin investor.

[Ever-young]

None is better, since getting married over wealth is also not a good option to consider,
Instead I will rather like the question to come this way; being fair rich, crypto rich or which ever form of wealth you will like to add to the question, I will then have to chose from their, if am a crypto millionaire today, what I have is also equal to what I can have in fiat if I want to, but what I have in fiat can also at the same time some times be close to what i can have in crypto the difference is that their are limitations to how much of the fait i can be able to spend or use per day, which is not the same to that of crypto m, so I will rather be a crypto millionaire myself and a fiat thousandaire that way I will be safer as I will have need to spend few fiat couple of times i and I will not have to go through conversion process that time.

It’s better to have my own money than depend on spouse own wealth. That’s just my own point.

[dothebeats]

None is better, since getting married over wealth is also not a good option to consider,
Instead I will rather like the question to come this way; being fair rich, crypto rich or which ever form of wealth you will like to add to the question, I will then have to chose from their, if am a crypto millionaire today, what I have is also equal to what I can have in fiat if I want to, but what I have in fiat can also at the same time some times be close to what i can have in crypto the difference is that their are limitations to how much of the fait i can be able to spend or use per day, which is not the same to that of crypto m, so I will rather be a crypto millionaire myself and a fiat thousandaire that way I will be safer as I will have need to spend few fiat couple of times i and I will not have to go through conversion process that time.

It’s better to have my own money than depend on spouse own wealth. That’s just my own point.

While each of us have our own criteria in choosing who to marry and be our partner, I personally agree with you. Instead of relying and depending on my partner's wealth and income, I choose to make my own money and have the goal of being financially stable. To know that that the money I have comes from my own hard work, actions, and decisions rather than someone else (of course this is a personal choice). Moreover, there is also the benefit it will bring to my future family kids to have parents that both make money for the good of our family's financial status.

[Tony116]

I have never agreed that material-based marriage is not a marriage but a transaction, If there is another choice then I will choose to marry someone who is commensurate with me (who loves me for who I am).

However, of the two options above, I would prefer to marry a crypto rich rather than a fiat rich because I already know how big the value of crypto assets is, especially if my future partner has a lot of bitcoins, not satoshis.

It will not last long if the marriage is based on material things, where there will be conflict later when the finances are no longer stable and the wealth previously owned will become a demand.

When I have to choose between the two, on the contrary, I prefer FIAT rich people, where the results of their wealth are real and can be developed in various other businesses and one of them will be used as an investment asset in crypto.

You need to know one thing, money cannot buy love, but without money you cannot maintain and nurture your love. No marriage or family will say they are very happy while not having enough money to take care of life. That is reality and you need to adapt and accept it.

Marrying for money will mean that happiness will not last long because there will be calculations in love. But without money, your marriage will also face many difficulties. You can also see that nowadays many couples divorce because the family economy is unstable because when the economy is unstable, many problems will arise that cannot be resolved.

When you own fiat currency, you can buy all the assets you want, including cryptocurrencies. But if your asset is cryptocurrency (not bitcoin) it is difficult to predict because of its volatility, it can make you richer but can also make you poorer.

[Davian144]

It will not last long if the marriage is based on material things, where there will be conflict later when the finances are no longer stable and the wealth previously owned will become a demand.

Now wealth in material form has become the main thing that everyone continues to look at so that there is no longer a feeling of wanting to build it together when someone wants to get married. Indeed, what you say is not wrong because I also often see many couples who end up divorcing after they continue to have difficulty meeting their increasing living needs. But there are also quite a few married couples who are able to survive and continue to struggle not to separate in difficult conditions like now, because they always look for solutions together when facing problems and don't really care about the wealth they have spent together through life.

When I have to choose between the two, on the contrary, I prefer FIAT rich people, where the results of their wealth are real and can be developed in various other businesses and one of them will be used as an investment asset in crypto.

This means that you also really like these two things in your life, so that after you choose to be rich in fiat you still like to choose crypto investment even though your efforts to get it are only through fiat. And in essence, people who are rich in crypto are also preferred and paid attention to by many people because now crypto can also be brought into business, be it everyday business or investment business with long-term targets. So whatever you choose will always be good and will not be wrong.

[xSkylarx]

None is better, since getting married over wealth is also not a good option to consider,
Instead I will rather like the question to come this way; being fair rich, crypto rich or which ever form of wealth you will like to add to the question, I will then have to chose from their, if am a crypto millionaire today, what I have is also equal to what I can have in fiat if I want to, but what I have in fiat can also at the same time some times be close to what i can have in crypto the difference is that their are limitations to how much of the fait i can be able to spend or use per day, which is not the same to that of crypto m, so I will rather be a crypto millionaire myself and a fiat thousandaire that way I will be safer as I will have need to spend few fiat couple of times i and I will not have to go through conversion process that time.

It’s better to have my own money than depend on spouse own wealth. That’s just my own point.

While each of us have our own criteria in choosing who to marry and be our partner, I personally agree with you. Instead of relying and depending on my partner's wealth and income, I choose to make my own money and have the goal of being financially stable. To know that that the money I have comes from my own hard work, actions, and decisions rather than someone else (of course this is a personal choice). Moreover, there is also the benefit it will bring to my future family kids to have parents that both make money for the good of our family's financial status.

Imagine you are the husband but your wife is the one earning money for your family. Though there is nothing wrong with it men should be the ones earning for the family no matter what which is why you should have your own wealth if your wife is earning more.

Money should not be the criteria when it comes to marrying someone but the generation right now does care more about wealth than love. Well that is really the preference and it is not illegal but I do hope in the future that choosing someone to marry is pure love and not because of money.

[terrific]

I have a simple question - and maybe it is better to marry not for money, but for a loved, reciprocating person ? The thing is, if you marry for money, you become a kind of commodity. And the one who pays, most likely with time will find "more attractive goods, for acceptable money", and ... you'll have neither money nor a happy life. And it doesn't matter what you won't have in the end - crypto or fiat money, you won't have it

That's right.
Also a thing is that you'll like begging for love when you're just going to marry for money. Well, as they say it is just being practical but that practicality will make you suffer emotionally and mentally.
Even if you're that rich but you're not in loved with the person you chose as your partner. At the end of the day, you'll still find for that true love, no riches, no material things, just pure love.

That's literally the opposite of practicality. In this economy we cannot judge those who get married due to money. Moreover, we cannot assume and just claim that one day they will find a reason or way to actually love or care for the person they marry. An individual can learn anything they set their mind on, whatever it may be; hence, it is not impossible for any individual to learn to love someone or at the very least care for them to the point that it is very much possible for them to stay with that person for the rest of their life. Love, as good as it is, will not feed us nor provide our needs to live a good life. Money makes the world go round and you will realize it once you actually work for it and see just how much you need to rely on it. At the end of the day, the need to ensure a good future where you are eating three times a day and a have a good place to stay overpowers the desire for love.

We do really have different views from this topic. But I have to disagree that there's no one can change his mind from loving somebody they least like.
I've known people that have done it for life and it's not really that they're for the money but they need to stand on their own and just continue what they've started.
There could be reasons for that why they need to learn to love somebody because they're already on that relationships even if they don't have to like in fix marriages.

[Lorence.xD]

None is better, since getting married over wealth is also not a good option to consider,
Instead I will rather like the question to come this way; being fair rich, crypto rich or which ever form of wealth you will like to add to the question, I will then have to chose from their, if am a crypto millionaire today, what I have is also equal to what I can have in fiat if I want to, but what I have in fiat can also at the same time some times be close to what i can have in crypto the difference is that their are limitations to how much of the fait i can be able to spend or use per day, which is not the same to that of crypto m, so I will rather be a crypto millionaire myself and a fiat thousandaire that way I will be safer as I will have need to spend few fiat couple of times i and I will not have to go through conversion process that time.

It’s better to have my own money than depend on spouse own wealth. That’s just my own point.

While each of us have our own criteria in choosing who to marry and be our partner, I personally agree with you. Instead of relying and depending on my partner's wealth and income, I choose to make my own money and have the goal of being financially stable. To know that that the money I have comes from my own hard work, actions, and decisions rather than someone else (of course this is a personal choice). Moreover, there is also the benefit it will bring to my future family kids to have parents that both make money for the good of our family's financial status.

Money should not be the criteria when it comes to marrying someone but the generation right now does care more about wealth than love. Well that is really the preference and it is not illegal but I do hope in the future that choosing someone to marry is pure love and not because of money.

It's shouldn't be the criteria for marrying someone, but if you're just meeting someone in the age your finding a partner, for sure you would look for a person that are financially stable. Of course there's a love between two people by just starting from girlfriend and boyfriend to know each other first, some people would try to live in to check their compatibility to each other. From that process for sure you would love your partner which makes you want to marry them. Cause for sure if to people in relationship live in the same roof who has an issue financially then for sure it won't work. I suggest people to be responsible first to yourself before commiting on a long term relationship.

[macson]

In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!

So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.

OP's question is quite sensitive in my environment, people here don't marry for money, they hate it, that means they have ulterior motives for marrying someone, marrying a rich person who has a lot of fiat is quite good especially if you come from a country that has strong fiat like  USD, EUR or Pound but in the long term marrying someone who has a lot of crypto is much more profitable, especially if that person has bitcoin as an investment asset that he holds completely, in the next few decades its value will definitely increase significantly, while fiat has to face inflation and the like.

[MFahad]

It will not last long if the marriage is based on material things, where there will be conflict later when the finances are no longer stable and the wealth previously owned will become a demand.

When I have to choose between the two, on the contrary, I prefer FIAT rich people, where the results of their wealth are real and can be developed in various other businesses and one of them will be used as an investment asset in crypto.

Marry someone who is sincere with you and don't think about wealthy or poor person because getting care from your partner will be better for you than money. Those who leave their partner because of financial issue should remember that person can be financially stable anytime but if you lose a sincere person then you will always regret for it.

Encouragement make a bond between partners strong so I will suggests that whenever your partner needs you, be available and if you think that money can strengthen your relationship then its wrong because there are numerous individuals who are financially stable but their life is not happy. Actually you can earn money anytime but you cannot find loyal person all the time.

[ndutndut]

Marriage and relationship always last for a lifetime if both parties never agree when it comes to material things. What I mean is, it is much better if you guys met, love each other unconditionally even though you guys both started with nothing, not rich, but not that poor. It is much greater when you guys helps each other to achieve each other's dream and succeed together, this way, a solid foundation is built.

Rather than choosing your partner based on what can they make or how much they have, because if you guys experienced bad things like being bankrupt, for sure you're going to end up with a divorce.

Yes, that's right, the path to marriage is not only seen from material things, but there is getting to know each other and accepting the partner for who they are, and there is commitment.
The vision and mission of marriage must be clear, so that before marriage we will always be faced with people who are not the right people. However, they want to look for the best and really want to work together in difficult times, so that they can become a lasting family. If you just look at the way you talk, your behavior and material matters, you can already feel that there are several things that confuse other people.

I just share and want to remind friends here not to be afraid of getting married for a long time because we have to improve ourselves and look for quality candidates. because in getting married we have to complement each other, this is done so that we don't expect our partner to just accompany us, but also to complement each other's strengths and weaknesses.

[Ever-young]

None is better, since getting married over wealth is also not a good option to consider,
Instead I will rather like the question to come this way; being fair rich, crypto rich or which ever form of wealth you will like to add to the question, I will then have to chose from their, if am a crypto millionaire today, what I have is also equal to what I can have in fiat if I want to, but what I have in fiat can also at the same time some times be close to what i can have in crypto the difference is that their are limitations to how much of the fait i can be able to spend or use per day, which is not the same to that of crypto m, so I will rather be a crypto millionaire myself and a fiat thousandaire that way I will be safer as I will have need to spend few fiat couple of times i and I will not have to go through conversion process that time.

It’s better to have my own money than depend on spouse own wealth. That’s just my own point.

While each of us have our own criteria in choosing who to marry and be our partner, I personally agree with you. Instead of relying and depending on my partner's wealth and income, I choose to make my own money and have the goal of being financially stable. To know that that the money I have comes from my own hard work, actions, and decisions rather than someone else (of course this is a personal choice). Moreover, there is also the benefit it will bring to my future family kids to have parents that both make money for the good of our family's financial status.

Money should not be the criteria when it comes to marrying someone but the generation right now does care more about wealth than love. Well that is really the preference and it is not illegal but I do hope in the future that choosing someone to marry is pure love and not because of money.

It's shouldn't be the criteria for marrying someone, but if you're just meeting someone in the age your finding a partner, for sure you would look for a person that are financially stable. Of course there's a love between two people by just starting from girlfriend and boyfriend to know each other first, some people would try to live in to check their compatibility to each other. From that process for sure you would love your partner which makes you want to marry them. Cause for sure if to people in relationship live in the same roof who has an issue financially then for sure it won't work. I suggest people to be responsible first to yourself before commiting on a long term relationship.

Even if the wife is earning, the husband should also not be left behind without doing anything in the house, who earn more should not really matter here as the directions of the question is all about what means of earning is better and who to marry base on the wealth in possession.

Even if the wife happens to have money more than the husband in the house, providing that the husband is still able to provide for the essential needs of the family the respect will still be their for the man, unless the man is the type who can just remove shame from himself and feel less concern due to the level of finance that the wife holds in possession.

[STT]

I have never agreed that material-based marriage is not a marriage but a transaction,

Capitalism only really works because people are far more valuable beyond measure then any currency or valued item.   Ultimately we only have so much time to even be people and hence a marriage based on the cheaper of those two things is not worth half as much, but depends who, where and how you are.   For some people marriage is business at least to start off with, I wont criticize its their decision or I hope so as theres also forced marriage still too.

[BitcoinTurk]

Which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich?

I have always been against marriages made for money or citizenship because in any marriage made in this way individuals are not happy and cannot make each other happy. However, if it is necessary to give an answer based on the question asked I think these two options are no different from each other. If the purpose here is to marry for money it doesn't matter what kind of wealth one of the sides has. Of course, both options have different advantages and disadvantages but basically in both options one of the sides has a certain wealth.