I really do understand your views and the views of others that say those from underprivileged backgrounds should or should not receive a tag based on their reason for buying the account. As there would be almost zero chance in ascertaining the truth from the account buyer in the verification process, it would be an impossible task trying to determine.
There is no guarantee greed will not get the better of any person when he/she/they control multiple alt-accounts. If they feel they can do it once and get away with enrolling once in a signature campaign then they will probably try to do it again. In the end they will try to enrol as many accounts as possible on as many signature campaigns as possible therefore the pity and mitigation factors rightly disappear.
Maybe this is one of those conversation that will continue to be had many years from now unless things change and there is solid consensus about how to treat account buying and selling.
Having multiple accounts is allowed, so I cannot really be upset about a person owning and using multiple accounts. The place I start to have an issue is when cheating comes into the scenario. If they have 1 in stake, 1 in duelbits, 1 in a mixer campaign etc, then it's fine. We all know that's not the case because it has been proven over the years that too many try to cheat.
Let's say they own 25 accounts and somehow manage to get them all in stakes sig campaign. That's 4k a week they could earn. 16k a month. We really have no way of detecting them unless people start searching. So it's a small fortune they can earn and live like kings in their countries.
So, while i'm neutral in some cases I can see why others are way against it. How do we make it better? That's the big question and when you break it down the answer is probably just don't allow sales.
