How much longer will JollyGood take to reverse his feedback?

[Timelord2067]

I am unfamiliar with the incident you refer to therefore I will try to search for it but were any of the DT trolls (as you refer to them) added on DT by an alleged alt-account? If you were trolled by a group over a neutral tag then that seems highly excessive but it is not an uncommon phenomena in the forum. Not that long as I was trolled by a group of 3-4 who were using any and every opportunity to troll me and even now occasionally it seems one or two of them from time to time have a small outburst but it does not bother me.

It would be interesting to find out the incident you refer to, is it possible to post a link to the neutral feedback you left?

You can start with any of the threads that were started against me with my user profile name in the title and see which of the DT joined in the free for all that ensued.

As I've said time and time (and time and time) again - You're welcome to sift through all of my trust feed-backs - good, bad or indifferent and either support my findings, or show me where I am wrong (if at all) and I'll make corrections.

There's a couple of alts that DT distrust me which should shouldn't be allowed to occur but does.

[1714494079]

1714494079

[Jawhead999]

There was a 15-20 minute window in which coco23 may have for whatever reason pasted dbc23's BTC address in their own application, which is why I didn't straight up tag him for sig campaign cheating. It still seems highly unlikely that it was a mistake. Have you ever applied for a sig campaign using somebody else's BTC address?

I think I have never applied a campaign using someone BTC address, I always be careful, but I can't make sure if I wouldn't make this mistake because shit can happen.

The thing is coco23 applied the campaign after dbc23, he can use this reason to defend himself and create a drama, so I choose to only look a solid proof. Ninjastic.space tool didn't record all the edited posts, dbc23 might post that BTC address on the third or fourth edit which could be earlier than coco23.

Speaking of which, do you have any tricks for finding images in posts? I tried with ninjastic.space but it doesn't seem to be possible. I can find the links, but not the embeded images.

Nope, this was happen unintentionally by clicking dbc23's image. I don't find anything suspicious until I found an image related with Alisha-k on his imgbb account, that's make me continue to dig more

[Poker Player]

I have seen some curious behavior from Zilon. This week he was several days without writing in the forum, and he has written a lot in the last couple of days to meet his post quota.

With two days left in his campaign week he had only written 6 posts. On the 19th he wrote 8 posts in one hour and 12 minutes, which comes out to a gap of 9 minutes between posts. Yesterday he wrote 6 in a similar period of time. That makes a total of 20 posts, just enough to get paid, although in the spreadsheet I see 21, I don't know if one has been deleted by the moderators.  

Thanks to this he was able to pay back the $50 loan to sashan.

Hhampuz has a rule in other campaigns not to count more than 5 posts per day that I have not seen in this one. In the Duelbits one for example:

A maximum of 5 posts per day will be counted.

I don't know whether to send him a PM for his consideration.

[Timelord2067]

Thanks to this he was able to pay back the $50 loan to sashan.

The repayment came from wallet address TLYCaS9cZErMpUuwjZQbkFvYqx6Zaq11hE which must be an exchange address as it currently has a balance of in excess of $656,000 (and over 3.7M TRX) - at a guess they are looking to sell the UID to an unsuspecting hack who won't know about the negative DT trust until after a sale.

[Jawhead999]

I have seen some curious behavior from Zilon. This week he was several days without writing in the forum, and he has written a lot in the last couple of days to meet his post quota.

I don't know whether to send him a PM for his consideration.

If there's no rule about maximum posts per day, it's mean the user is free to create how many posts per day, this will depends on him to count it or not. Just like in my campaign, he don't set up maximum posts per day.

Let's not forget about legitimate negative feedback by DT member rule, but this would depends on each user to judge legitimate or not the feedback is. It's understandable for campaign manager to accept negative feedback user, but it mostly for someone who's popular or high quality poster.

I don't think Zilon has such reputation, but yet can still accepted, this is not the first time anyway, there are few users without any reputation and received few negative feedback can still allowed to participate in Duelbits campaign.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

<snip>
I don't know whether to send him a PM for his consideration.

If there's no rule about maximum posts per day, it's mean the user is free to create how many posts per day, this will depends on him to count it or not. Just like in my campaign, he don't set up maximum posts per day.

I think this might just be a wee bit off-topic, but I took a look at Zilon's recent posts and they're not only quite numerous but most of them are generic crap that I see a lot when I'm doing post history reviews.  Nobody can read minds, but I think it's pretty obvious when someone is posting just to get paid.  Lack of effort and thought put into posts really sticks out when you're reading closely.

And back on topic....hasn't this issue been put to rest already, even if it wasn't to OP's satisfaction?  I'm not sure what the big deal was, since JollyGood left a neutral, which I think is entirely appropriate.

[JollyGood]

I think this might just be a wee bit off-topic, but I took a look at Zilon's recent posts and they're not only quite numerous but most of them are generic crap that I see a lot when I'm doing post history reviews.  Nobody can read minds, but I think it's pretty obvious when someone is posting just to get paid.  Lack of effort and thought put into posts really sticks out when you're reading closely.

And back on topic....hasn't this issue been put to rest already, even if it wasn't to OP's satisfaction?  I'm not sure what the big deal was, since JollyGood left a neutral, which I think is entirely appropriate.

All the effort the OP exerted trying to drum up support via this thread (in order to have a neutral tag removed) was by all intent and purposes both pointless and counter-productive. It was pointless because he should never had felt the need to stress over a neutral tag and following on from that, it was counter-productive for him because various alt-accounts are now definitely connected whereas some are assumed to be connected.

I am also going to leave a red tag on top of the neutral but I wanted to see what more drama will be added here by the OP as he puts forward counterclaims in the hope of getting tags removed.

[Poker Player]

...
I don't know whether to send him a PM for his consideration.

If there's no rule about maximum posts per day, it's mean the user is free to create how many posts per day, this will depends on him to count it or not.

In the end I sent him the PM just to let him know the facts. It is true that Zilon strictly speaking did not break the rules of his signature campaign but I believe it was reasonable to bring the facts to the attention of his manager.

I think this might just be a wee bit off-topic,

I don't think it is (a bit) off-topic.

but I took a look at Zilon's recent posts and they're not only quite numerous but most of them are generic crap that I see a lot when I'm doing post history reviews.  Nobody can read minds, but I think it's pretty obvious when someone is posting just to get paid.

I wanted to emphasize the "just" because actually getting paid to write works as an incentive for those of us who wear paid signatures, but there is a considerable difference with those who write just for the money, than those who consider the money an extra for doing an activity they like.

Regarding the quality I had not commented anything but I also think that his posts are quite generic, although in a campaign where half of the 20 required posts are required in the Gambling Section that style of writing is usual.

[SatoPrincess]

I noticed OP stopped posting after his account was tagged, it seems OP abandoned his account since it can’t be of any use to him campaign wise but the other accounts linked to the OP are very much active. One of them already has previous negative tags as being a promoter of 1xbit and I don’t think they care about their reputation, the other did not respond to this thread or try to defend himself. I’m sure OP will be waiting for a campaign that accepts negative tagged accounts like 1xbit to emerge so he use his account.

[JollyGood]

Not saying they are alts, however, there is a clear pattern going on here:

the only other UID's with "coco" in their names all have "23" in their profile name:

Code:

Offline 	coco23 							Hero Member 	2013-03-19 	2706 	
Offline 	Rococo23 							Brand new 	2018-01-09 	0 	
Offline 	coco2392 							Brand new 	2018-02-22 	0 	
Offline 	dricoco23 							Newbie 	2017-09-07 	1 	

Then we have dbc23 which also has "23" in the name

Alisha-k was registered on the 23^rd...

Code:

Offline 	Alisha-k 							Member 	2020-10-23 	1899 	

This looks very interesting and deserves to be brought up and posted in the latest page rather than be at the bottom of page 2. Thank you for bringing this as an update to the conversation. I will end up tagging each of the following accounts with appropriate feedback and will be happy to remove or revise any and all tags if relevant new information comes to light:

~dbc23
~Zilon
~Alisha-k
~coco23
~Mistafreeze
~DomainMagnate
~Rococo23
~coco2392
~dricoco23

I noticed OP stopped posting after his account was tagged, it seems OP abandoned his account since it can’t be of any use to him campaign wise but the other accounts linked to the OP are very much active. One of them already has previous negative tags as being a promoter of 1xbit and I don’t think they care about their reputation, the other did not respond to this thread or try to defend himself. I’m sure OP will be waiting for a campaign that accepts negative tagged accounts like 1xbit to emerge so he use his account.

Time is always of the essence when it comes to signature campaigns therefore I am not surprised the OP (dbc23) has given up on posting using that account but as you pointed out as soon as the OP can enrol on to signature campaign that pays participants with negative tags, he most probably will start using that account again.

The puppeteer that is controlling dbc23 is clearly controlling several accounts and not all have been discovered therefore he will be busy focusing on trying to keep them clean while he earns signature campaign fees from them.

I suppose he will never create another thread asking for negative or neutral feedback to be removed from any of his farmed accounts again