Why do you still want to play fake web2 casinos? Why we choose web3 casinos

[Learn Bitcoin]

This is not the problem here. Justbet is a platform that should focus on developing and improving its website. Instead, they are asking some questions which trigger web2 casinos. They directly accuse web2 casinos, saying those web2 casinos are unfair. I am also surprised that no casino representative has defended it yet. Or maybe did? I did not see any comment from web2 casino representatives. Justbet did not submit any proof of their claims. I have asked some questions in my previous post in this thread. Their casino representative simply choose not to answer while they was expecting answers from forum members.

Well, whether it is web 2 or web 3 is not the thing, what really matters is that the casino is honest and advanced, that it has new functions that adapt to all types of players, not just specific ones, I have Given that many people support web3 casinos, which I do not see as much relevance, I think that a person who plays should be respected that they have their money in the casino and that they do not put any type of inconvenience when they go to make withdrawals, that they can have their money easily, this is how the efficiency of a casino is measured , which can be seen clearly well.

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

[1715348269]

1715348269

[1715348269]

1715348269

[1715348269]

1715348269

[1715348269]

1715348269

[BenCodie]

This is not the problem here. Justbet is a platform that should focus on developing and improving its website. Instead, they are asking some questions which trigger web2 casinos. They directly accuse web2 casinos, saying those web2 casinos are unfair. I am also surprised that no casino representative has defended it yet. Or maybe did? I did not see any comment from web2 casino representatives. Justbet did not submit any proof of their claims. I have asked some questions in my previous post in this thread. Their casino representative simply choose not to answer while they was expecting answers from forum members.

Well, whether it is web 2 or web 3 is not the thing, what really matters is that the casino is honest and advanced, that it has new functions that adapt to all types of players, not just specific ones, I have Given that many people support web3 casinos, which I do not see as much relevance, I think that a person who plays should be respected that they have their money in the casino and that they do not put any type of inconvenience when they go to make withdrawals, that they can have their money easily, this is how the efficiency of a casino is measured , which can be seen clearly well.

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

It definitely matters. If web3 is done right, the mechanisms that provide provably fair games is open source, and the funds available for deposits and withdrawals should be viewable at all times due to being operated by smart contract, which also removes chances of embezzlement and fraud.

I will agree that there is still progression to be made to make web3 standard across the board, as well as it being possible for Bitcoin and other coins. That doesn't mean that there is no difference between web2 & web3 though.

[maydna]

Well, whether it is web 2 or web 3 is not the thing, what really matters is that the casino is honest and advanced, that it has new functions that adapt to all types of players, not just specific ones, I have Given that many people support web3 casinos, which I do not see as much relevance, I think that a person who plays should be respected that they have their money in the casino and that they do not put any type of inconvenience when they go to make withdrawals, that they can have their money easily, this is how the efficiency of a casino is measured , which can be seen clearly well.

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

But what if the web3 casino is also required to do KYC, as is already the case with the web2 casino? Do you still choose that casino to gamble? What concerns us here is KYC which has begun to be enforced in web2 and web3 casinos so that many crypto gamblers think that now they are restricted to gambling with crypto anonymously.

But I think that the web3 casino still needs further development to get to the liking of the gambling industry, and it will also take time to get there. And if web3 casino manages to develop it according to gambling industry standards, I think web3 casino can compete with web2 casino. And as long as web3 casinos don't require their users to do KYC, I suspect gamblers will move to web3 casinos, especially when web2 casinos already implement KYC more strictly than now.

[Learn Bitcoin]

But what if the web3 casino is also required to do KYC, as is already the case with the web2 casino? Do you still choose that casino to gamble? What concerns us here is KYC which has begun to be enforced in web2 and web3 casinos so that many crypto gamblers think that now they are restricted to gambling with crypto anonymously.

If web3 casinos also get a license and integrate 3rd party games, they may also ask for KYC. Some providers need information about players when they see suspicious activity on their game, they may ask for a KYC and web3 casinos will be forced to ask for KYC from players. I did not play in web3 casinos yet because I don't think there is any reliable web3 casino developed yet.

Moreover, I am afraid of connecting my wallet to any website. This is another reason I also don't use new unnamed Decentralized exchanges. If any web3 casino can build their reputation and their name in the future, I won't mind playing there.

[slapper]

Well, whether it is web 2 or web 3 is not the thing, what really matters is that the casino is honest and advanced, that it has new functions that adapt to all types of players, not just specific ones, I have Given that many people support web3 casinos, which I do not see as much relevance, I think that a person who plays should be respected that they have their money in the casino and that they do not put any type of inconvenience when they go to make withdrawals, that they can have their money easily, this is how the efficiency of a casino is measured , which can be seen clearly well.

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

But what if the web3 casino is also required to do KYC, as is already the case with the web2 casino? Do you still choose that casino to gamble? What concerns us here is KYC which has begun to be enforced in web2 and web3 casinos so that many crypto gamblers think that now they are restricted to gambling with crypto anonymously.

But I think that the web3 casino still needs further development to get to the liking of the gambling industry, and it will also take time to get there. And if web3 casino manages to develop it according to gambling industry standards, I think web3 casino can compete with web2 casino. And as long as web3 casinos don't require their users to do KYC, I suspect gamblers will move to web3 casinos, especially when web2 casinos already implement KYC more strictly than now.

On one hand, we have the 'traditional' digital gambling platforms that have gradually adopted stricter KYC protocols. On the other, we have the emerging decentralized casinos, their appeal being the promise of pseudonymity. However, this too is threatened by the implementation of KYC. Is it possible that we might be chasing an illusion? The notion of unrestricted, anonymous gambling might be a tempting concept, but isn't it fundamentally at odds with the regulatory nature of our societies? The growth of Web3 casinos might well be inevitable, but a key point to remember is this: the protocols and regulations of a system are not just a feature of the technology, they reflect the wider socio-political context in which the technology operates. If Web3 casinos are to operate within the framework of existing laws, KYC seems an unavoidable reality.

[maydna]

~snip~

If web3 casinos also get a license and integrate 3rd party games, they may also ask for KYC. Some providers need information about players when they see suspicious activity on their game, they may ask for a KYC and web3 casinos will be forced to ask for KYC from players. I did not play in web3 casinos yet because I don't think there is any reliable web3 casino developed yet.

Moreover, I am afraid of connecting my wallet to any website. This is another reason I also don't use new unnamed Decentralized exchanges. If any web3 casino can build their reputation and their name in the future, I won't mind playing there.

I think you can create a new wallet that you specifically use for gambling and don't have your saved coins, so you don't have to worry if your coins are hacked later. I usually do that if I want to connect to a website that can use the connection from my personal wallet, I have had no problems so far. But it's okay if you are afraid to connect to such websites, and I agree not to risk it.

Web3 casinos that do not require KYC on their customers may apply if there is pressure from regulators to require their users to verify their gambling accounts. And it has happened to web2 casinos where many crypto gamblers use big money to gamble. Hopefully, these casinos, be they web2 or web3 casinos, will not be too strict regarding KYC so that we can still play gambling comfortably without verifying our gambling account.

~snip~

On one hand, we have the 'traditional' digital gambling platforms that have gradually adopted stricter KYC protocols. On the other, we have the emerging decentralized casinos, their appeal being the promise of pseudonymity. However, this too is threatened by the implementation of KYC. Is it possible that we might be chasing an illusion? The notion of unrestricted, anonymous gambling might be a tempting concept, but isn't it fundamentally at odds with the regulatory nature of our societies? The growth of Web3 casinos might well be inevitable, but a key point to remember is this: the protocols and regulations of a system are not just a feature of the technology, they reflect the wider socio-political context in which the technology operates. If Web3 casinos are to operate within the framework of existing laws, KYC seems an unavoidable reality.

We have to pay attention to that and look for casinos that still allow us to gamble anonymously so we don't have to worry about KYC. One of the steps we can take is to limit the amount of money we can gamble and not even big money because that could raise suspicions for the casino to look into it. Anonymous gambling may not exist in the future, although there may still be some casinos that do not want to comply with the regulations of the regulator. We know that the regulator can act easily to ask the casinos to apply KYC to their members.

[Learn Bitcoin]

I think you can create a new wallet that you specifically use for gambling and don't have your saved coins, so you don't have to worry if your coins are hacked later. I usually do that if I want to connect to a website that can use the connection from my personal wallet, I have had no problems so far. But it's okay if you are afraid to connect to such websites, and I agree not to risk it.

It's not hard to create another wallet for this purpose only. But, Maintaining a couple of wallets and sending money from one to another every time I play is a waste of time, to be honest. But it could pay off if I get something special from web3 casinos. I asked myself what I would get from web3 casinos? There are not too many platforms available yet. I am unable to choose which one is the best.

Web3 casinos that do not require KYC on their customers may apply if there is pressure from regulators to require their users to verify their gambling accounts. And it has happened to web2 casinos where many crypto gamblers use big money to gamble. Hopefully, these casinos, be they web2 or web3 casinos, will not be too strict regarding KYC so that we can still play gambling comfortably without verifying our gambling account.

I haven't seen any web3 casinos with 3rd party games and with a license. So, it's unlikely that they may ask for a KYC without having 3rd party games and a gambling license. I've checked justbet and there are TOS, Privacy policy or anything related to these info. They don't have 3rd party games and they don't have a Live support to contact if you encounter any issues. So, why I would try them?

[maydna]

~snip~

It's not hard to create another wallet for this purpose only. But, Maintaining a couple of wallets and sending money from one to another every time I play is a waste of time, to be honest. But it could pay off if I get something special from web3 casinos. I asked myself what I would get from web3 casinos? There are not too many platforms available yet. I am unable to choose which one is the best.

It's just one of the solutions that you can use to avoid fraud or bad things so that you will be calm when connecting your personal wallet to the web3 casino. But if you think it's a waste of time, you can still play at web2 or web3 casinos using your usual login email and password. Indeed, there are not many platforms available yet, but maybe there will be more platforms in the future where web2 casinos will tighten the rules so that gamblers want to avoid verifying their identity.

[wxa7115]

On one hand, we have the 'traditional' digital gambling platforms that have gradually adopted stricter KYC protocols. On the other, we have the emerging decentralized casinos, their appeal being the promise of pseudonymity. However, this too is threatened by the implementation of KYC. Is it possible that we might be chasing an illusion? The notion of unrestricted, anonymous gambling might be a tempting concept, but isn't it fundamentally at odds with the regulatory nature of our societies? The growth of Web3 casinos might well be inevitable, but a key point to remember is this: the protocols and regulations of a system are not just a feature of the technology, they reflect the wider socio-political context in which the technology operates. If Web3 casinos are to operate within the framework of existing laws, KYC seems an unavoidable reality.

Right now both forces, centralization and decentralization, are fighting each other, governments are pushing for a massive amount of centralization, and as a response to such a push decentralized options have appeared.

However even if there is little doubt the forces of centralization are stronger, at the same time it is not as if governments can completely subdue this market, and if given enough time then we may get to the point in which the decentralized options we have available will increase, allowing us once again to those which value our privacy to retain it.

[piebeyb]

But what if the web3 casino is also required to do KYC, as is already the case with the web2 casino? Do you still choose that casino to gamble? What concerns us here is KYC which has begun to be enforced in web2 and web3 casinos so that many crypto gamblers think that now they are restricted to gambling with crypto anonymously.

If web3 casinos also get a license and integrate 3rd party games, they may also ask for KYC. Some providers need information about players when they see suspicious activity on their game, they may ask for a KYC and web3 casinos will be forced to ask for KYC from players. I did not play in web3 casinos yet because I don't think there is any reliable web3 casino developed yet.

Moreover, I am afraid of connecting my wallet to any website. This is another reason I also don't use new unnamed Decentralized exchanges. If any web3 casino can build their reputation and their name in the future, I won't mind playing there.

Whatever casinos use web2 and web3, even though it has to be decentralized, I'm sure to prevent fraud and cheating by players in taking advantage of promotions, especially bonuses at casinos, namely by asking their users for KYC, web3 also doesn't encourage people to play independently without strict regulations, let alone free from KYC. everything will look the same the rules will not change.

I believe in the future that there will be many web3 casinos too but that does not mean that they are free from KYC regulations as well because that is to prevent other criminal acts including money laundering, I have never differentiated between the two because they are the same technology that we admit too, I have also been worried about connecting the wallet to an untrusted website, but I use another solution, which is to use a backup wallet to connect to the web3 casino and if I get money from the backup wallet then I will send money to my personal main wallet.

[Learn Bitcoin]

I believe in the future that there will be many web3 casinos too but that does not mean that they are free from KYC regulations as well because that is to prevent other criminal acts including money laundering, I have never differentiated between the two because they are the same technology that we admit too, I have also been worried about connecting the wallet to an untrusted website, but I use another solution, which is to use a backup wallet to connect to the web3 casino and if I get money from the backup wallet then I will send money to my personal main wallet.

Even though they use the same technology, look at the title written by the justbet casino representative. They claim that web2 casinos are fake and unfair, while they claim that web3 casinos are better than them. I also think there will be more web3 casinos in the future. New platforms will learn from old casino mistakes. We might see more improved platforms in the future.

I believe this thread is part of their marketing strategy. They want bitcoin talk users to talk about their platform. No matter if it's positive or negative. They will get some traffic from this topic. But, i don't think such marketing strategies are good for business.

[noormcs5]

I believe in the future that there will be many web3 casinos too but that does not mean that they are free from KYC regulations as well because that is to prevent other criminal acts including money laundering, I have never differentiated between the two because they are the same technology that we admit too, I have also been worried about connecting the wallet to an untrusted website, but I use another solution, which is to use a backup wallet to connect to the web3 casino and if I get money from the backup wallet then I will send money to my personal main wallet.

Even though they use the same technology, look at the title written by the justbet casino representative. They claim that web2 casinos are fake and unfair, while they claim that web3 casinos are better than them. I also think there will be more web3 casinos in the future. New platforms will learn from old casino mistakes. We might see more improved platforms in the future.

I believe this thread is part of their marketing strategy. They want bitcoin talk users to talk about their platform. No matter if it's positive or negative. They will get some traffic from this topic. But, i don't think such marketing strategies are good for business.

First of all, we need to realize that Web 2 casinos are not fake. They have been in existence for decades and even now they are more popular than the Web 3.0 casino. The fake ones are only those who are Web 2.0 casinos but they market themselves as Web 3.0 casino. These casinos should be avoided because if you speak the wrong things in your marketing campaign, that business can't be trusted for honesty and transparency.

Other than this, Web 2.0 casinos are fine and good to play and let the Web 3.0 casino market gets mature.

[Learn Bitcoin]

First of all, we need to realize that Web 2 casinos are not fake. They have been in existence for decades and even now they are more popular than the Web 3.0 casino. The fake ones are only those who are Web 2.0 casinos but they market themselves as Web 3.0 casino. These casinos should be avoided because if you speak the wrong things in your marketing campaign, that business can't be trusted for honesty and transparency.

Other than this, Web 2.0 casinos are fine and good to play and let the Web 3.0 casino market gets mature.

Yeah, those are fake casinos that claim they are web3 platforms, but in reality, they are not. The question is how an average Joe will know that a specific casino is not using web3 technology? I don't know much about the web3 platform because I have rarely used any web3 platform so far. If a casino try to scam, they can do it no matter if it's web2 or web3.

Web2 casinos on the market for a long time now. Yes, there are some scam casinos around. You have to stay away from them. That does not mean all web2 casinos are scams. Beware of phishing too.

[Blitzboy]

I believe in the future that there will be many web3 casinos too but that does not mean that they are free from KYC regulations as well because that is to prevent other criminal acts including money laundering, I have never differentiated between the two because they are the same technology that we admit too, I have also been worried about connecting the wallet to an untrusted website, but I use another solution, which is to use a backup wallet to connect to the web3 casino and if I get money from the backup wallet then I will send money to my personal main wallet.

Even though they use the same technology, look at the title written by the justbet casino representative. They claim that web2 casinos are fake and unfair, while they claim that web3 casinos are better than them. I also think there will be more web3 casinos in the future. New platforms will learn from old casino mistakes. We might see more improved platforms in the future.

I believe this thread is part of their marketing strategy. They want bitcoin talk users to talk about their platform. No matter if it's positive or negative. They will get some traffic from this topic. But, i don't think such marketing strategies are good for business.

Companies have always smeared their rivals. Justbet's representative's assertion that all web2 casinos are "fake and unfair" is ridiculous. Web2 casinos, like web3, differ in fairness, transparency, and user experience. Blockchain's openness might make web3 casinos the next big thing. claiming they'll be better is like claiming books are better than movies - its subjective and depends on implementation. Its possible this topic is a marketing gimmick. You're right: stirring the pot can draw traffic regardless of the conversation's tone. Its another matter whether its good for business. Isnt all publicity good? Is it?

[Webetcoins]

Companies have always smeared their rivals. Justbet's representative's assertion that all web2 casinos are "fake and unfair" is ridiculous. Web2 casinos, like web3, differ in fairness, transparency, and user experience. Blockchain's openness might make web3 casinos the next big thing. claiming they'll be better is like claiming books are better than movies - its subjective and depends on implementation. Its possible this topic is a marketing gimmick. You're right: stirring the pot can draw traffic regardless of the conversation's tone. Its another matter whether its good for business. Isnt all publicity good? Is it?

Aren't there terms like positive publicity and negative publicity? Publicity that is positive should be good for a business where people use their money but negative publicity can go wrong with such businesses because they might catch the attention of the audience but the audience will not really prefer them for their services because they know how negative they have been, and this is exactly what's happening here, calling your rivals bad only so that you look good.

Web2 casinos will never be affected by this because they have already created their place within the gambling community and people know that they are not fake since they've been using them for years, web3 is a very new concept and it will take time for it to take it's place within the industry.

[CarnagexD]

First of all, we need to realize that Web 2 casinos are not fake. They have been in existence for decades and even now they are more popular than the Web 3.0 casino. The fake ones are only those who are Web 2.0 casinos but they market themselves as Web 3.0 casino. These casinos should be avoided because if you speak the wrong things in your marketing campaign, that business can't be trusted for honesty and transparency.

Other than this, Web 2.0 casinos are fine and good to play and let the Web 3.0 casino market gets mature.

Yeah, those are fake casinos that claim they are web3 platforms, but in reality, they are not. The question is how an average Joe will know that a specific casino is not using web3 technology? I don't know much about the web3 platform because I have rarely used any web3 platform so far. If a casino try to scam, they can do it no matter if it's web2 or web3.

Web2 casinos on the market for a long time now. Yes, there are some scam casinos around. You have to stay away from them. That does not mean all web2 casinos are scams. Beware of phishing too.

Web3 is basically the integration of blockchain and cryptocurrency systems to any platforms brother. Casinos which built from a project of cryptocurrencies are mostly web3 in which those have their own coins or token to play in exchange for Fiat. For Web2, you can say that these are traditionally made within the scope of its transactions.

Realistically, with new popping websites, regardless if it is web2 or web3 based, it's very difficult to determine which one is a fraud, and which one is reliable. Most need intensive research.

[Hispo]

First of all, we need to realize that Web 2 casinos are not fake. They have been in existence for decades and even now they are more popular than the Web 3.0 casino. The fake ones are only those who are Web 2.0 casinos but they market themselves as Web 3.0 casino. These casinos should be avoided because if you speak the wrong things in your marketing campaign, that business can't be trusted for honesty and transparency.

Other than this, Web 2.0 casinos are fine and good to play and let the Web 3.0 casino market gets mature.

Yeah, those are fake casinos that claim they are web3 platforms, but in reality, they are not. The question is how an average Joe will know that a specific casino is not using web3 technology? I don't know much about the web3 platform because I have rarely used any web3 platform so far. If a casino try to scam, they can do it no matter if it's web2 or web3.

Web2 casinos on the market for a long time now. Yes, there are some scam casinos around. You have to stay away from them. That does not mean all web2 casinos are scams. Beware of phishing too.

Web3 is basically the integration of blockchain and cryptocurrency systems to any platforms brother. Casinos which built from a project of cryptocurrencies are mostly web3 in which those have their own coins or token to play in exchange for Fiat. For Web2, you can say that these are traditionally made within the scope of its transactions.

Realistically, with new popping websites, regardless if it is web2 or web3 based, it's very difficult to determine which one is a fraud, and which one is reliable. Most need intensive research.

I would add that the biggest difference between searching for information to know whether a casino is a shady one or a scam, is the fact that the so called web-2 casinos (traditional ones) have access to centralized registrations with the government and other politici authorities. There is some kind of regulation which could provide confidence to gamblers.

On the other hand, the so called web-3 casinos still lack of any kind of certification, beyond providing the source code of their service, and yet not everyone can read it to verify the integrity of the service.

In order to verify a tradicional casino, it only takes a couple of hours at most, with Web3 one needs to have more knowledge on coding or trust someone who does.

[wxa7115]

Web3 is basically the integration of blockchain and cryptocurrency systems to any platforms brother. Casinos which built from a project of cryptocurrencies are mostly web3 in which those have their own coins or token to play in exchange for Fiat. For Web2, you can say that these are traditionally made within the scope of its transactions.

Realistically, with new popping websites, regardless if it is web2 or web3 based, it's very difficult to determine which one is a fraud, and which one is reliable. Most need intensive research.

It seems to me web3 casinos and their supporters are trying to make them out to be something they are not, they are trying to appear as if they are the only good casinos out there by trying to defame other casinos by saying they are not to be trusted.

But this is a lie, whether a casino can be trusted or not depends on how high is reputation they have obtained until that point on time and how willing is the casino to try to keep that reputation, anything else is secondary, including whether the casino is fully decentralized or not.

[LUCKMCFLY]

This is not the problem here. Justbet is a platform that should focus on developing and improving its website. Instead, they are asking some questions which trigger web2 casinos. They directly accuse web2 casinos, saying those web2 casinos are unfair. I am also surprised that no casino representative has defended it yet. Or maybe did? I did not see any comment from web2 casino representatives. Justbet did not submit any proof of their claims. I have asked some questions in my previous post in this thread. Their casino representative simply choose not to answer while they was expecting answers from forum members.

Well, whether it is web 2 or web 3 is not the thing, what really matters is that the casino is honest and advanced, that it has new functions that adapt to all types of players, not just specific ones, I have Given that many people support web3 casinos, which I do not see as much relevance, I think that a person who plays should be respected that they have their money in the casino and that they do not put any type of inconvenience when they go to make withdrawals, that they can have their money easily, this is how the efficiency of a casino is measured , which can be seen clearly well.

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

It definitely matters. If web3 is done right, the mechanisms that provide provably fair games is open source, and the funds available for deposits and withdrawals should be viewable at all times due to being operated by smart contract, which also removes chances of embezzlement and fraud.

I will agree that there is still progression to be made to make web3 standard across the board, as well as it being possible for Bitcoin and other coins. That doesn't mean that there is no difference between web2 & web3 though.

Well, I think we all want to play in casinos, it doesn't matter if they are web 2, web 3, the important thing is to have a good experience, because I personally like to play and that I can have the freedom. doing what I like the most, withdrawing, depositing, all this is under a great responsibility as it is to play with Intelligence.

Web3 casinos do have something that can benefit players because I think that's the only way players would leave land-based casinos and go away because everyone is going to make money, I don't think they just go there for fun, fun is a complement, but we all know that when we enter a casino our greatest illusion is to win, having a good time is something that we give ourselves when we win, but in general terms it is a game that lends itself to adult fun, because you have to be responsible when spending the money that is budgeted for the casino, without danger of falling into addictions.

As I said before, there are many people who don't really know what a web3 casino is, and they expect a lot from them, but what really matters is that the casino is reliable, honest, and that they actually do things well so that People win or lose, be fair, that's all.

This is not the problem here. Justbet is a platform that should focus on developing and improving its website. Instead, they are asking some questions which trigger web2 casinos. They directly accuse web2 casinos, saying those web2 casinos are unfair. I am also surprised that no casino representative has defended it yet. Or maybe did? I did not see any comment from web2 casino representatives. Justbet did not submit any proof of their claims. I have asked some questions in my previous post in this thread. Their casino representative simply choose not to answer while they was expecting answers from forum members.

Well, whether it is web 2 or web 3 is not the thing, what really matters is that the casino is honest and advanced, that it has new functions that adapt to all types of players, not just specific ones, I have Given that many people support web3 casinos, which I do not see as much relevance, I think that a person who plays should be respected that they have their money in the casino and that they do not put any type of inconvenience when they go to make withdrawals, that they can have their money easily, this is how the efficiency of a casino is measured , which can be seen clearly well.

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

What I have said, the things that occur with web 3 casinos or something like that are always another way of seeing things, the Traditional casinos are the ones that I trust the most, I don't see any other way to trust more, I have not seen the web3 casinos seen a lot of relevance , just the fact that it is called a web 3 casino is what draws players attention , and I am very sure that many do not even know what a web 3 casino means , taking these things into consideration it is normal that things can be go another way , or who want to see it as the Ultimate or as Something that can be above web2 casinos , or Traditional casinos.

For many Players , it is necessary to clarify that they should be very careful , it is not Known that there are casinos that are eb23 there and they fall for nothing and cheat , scam , that is the care that must be taken.

[AmoreJaz]

Web3 is basically the integration of blockchain and cryptocurrency systems to any platforms brother. Casinos which built from a project of cryptocurrencies are mostly web3 in which those have their own coins or token to play in exchange for Fiat. For Web2, you can say that these are traditionally made within the scope of its transactions.

Realistically, with new popping websites, regardless if it is web2 or web3 based, it's very difficult to determine which one is a fraud, and which one is reliable. Most need intensive research.

It seems to me web3 casinos and their supporters are trying to make them out to be something they are not, they are trying to appear as if they are the only good casinos out there by trying to defame other casinos by saying they are not to be trusted.

But this is a lie, whether a casino can be trusted or not depends on how high is reputation they have obtained until that point on time and how willing is the casino to try to keep that reputation, anything else is secondary, including whether the casino is fully decentralized or not.

very well-said. if the regular crypto casinos like stake is not to be trusted, then they won't get high number of players who are as well high rollers. these seemingly web 3 casinos should just accept the competition in this market. and a lot of gamblers are still opting for regular crypto casinos where they can see the gambling license at a glance and can easily reach out the customer service. and besides, most casinos claiming to be web 3.0 are not really web 3.0 but as they are not totally decentralised in nature.