AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

You can combine several short posts into one and then check them with detectors. I'm confident the results will be accurate, even though the overall meaning may be lost. As I understand it, this isn't always important for AI detectors. At least Copyleaks and QuillBot always detect the presence of AI.

That's actually a great idea I hadn't considered! For Copyleaks at least, I usually added a few empty characters in the back if I was missing a few characters to meet the quota. This however is a marvelous idea and I'm also confident that it's going to work just as accurate if it was a full text.

I'm also fond of Stealthwriter the past few weeks, it's probably one of the best options so far.

[lovesmayfamilis]

As a reference link: The posts are written using AI.

LOCKACO

[Don Pedro Dinero]

As a reference link: The posts are written using AI.

LOCKACO

A bloke who has earned 14 merits for the challenge node and the rest minus one in a post for saying he does push-ups, which is curious, according to him, at the gym. I am certain that this chap has never run a node or done push-ups; he simply writes in those threads to gain merit.

Congratulations for your 5,000 merit by the way. It looks good.

[lovesmayfamilis]

A bloke who has earned 14 merits for the challenge node and the rest minus one in a post for saying he does push-ups, which is curious, according to him, at the gym. I am certain that this chap has never run a node or done push-ups; he simply writes in those threads to gain merit.

I'd say there's a pattern: these newbies who come to the forum to do push-ups use the AI ​​and then participate in the Bitcoin Node Challenge. Many have a very similar method for distributing their merits after reaching 14 merits, and the same user always appears.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3714796
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3687039  This one, I have no doubt, was also preparing to transfer his merits.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3718519
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3730651  So far it only does push-ups

[nutildah]

As a reference link: The posts are written using AI.

LOCKACO

Definitely yet another farmed account following the same gameplan as those that came before him, who are now Ranked Shitposters. Looks like most of their newer posts have been deleted already. There sure are a lot of people around here who DCA bitcoin, do pushups and run a node, how lucky we are to be in the presence of such overachievers.

Just a couple of older posts written by this account, which again frequently uses some kind of humanizing service to make the text less readable, however ironically:


#1

I SUPPORT BITCOIN-DeFi too, LETS LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE OF HAVING IT

The ability to borrow against Bitcoin without selling it is a powerful tool. It allows individuals and businesses to unlock the liquidity of their assets for various purposes, such as:

Making a down payment on a house

Funding a business

Paying off high-interest debt

Investing in other assets (without selling their Bitcoin)

Your point about Bitcoin-DeFi is spot-on. It represents the natural evolution of Bitcoin as a financial asset. It allows users to have the best of both worlds: the long-term value appreciation of their Bitcoin and the immediate utility of a loan to meet their short-term financial needs. It's a critical step in turning Bitcoin from a "frozen" store of value into a productive and dynamic asset within the global financial system

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake


#2

It sounds like you've had a difficult journey with crypto scams, but you've found a solid and stable path with Bitcoin and the DCA strategy. It's great that you've learned from past experiences and are now focused on a more secure way to invest.

Many people fall into the same trap you did—getting caught up in "airdrops" and new schemes without understanding the risks. The feeling of missing out on early opportunities is a common one, and it's a powerful lesson to learn.

DCA, or dollar-cost averaging, is an excellent strategy, especially for an asset like Bitcoin. It removes the stress of trying to time the market and allows you to build your position gradually. By consistently investing a fixed amount over time, you can:

Reduce risk: You buy both when the price is high and when it's low, averaging out your purchase price.

Remove emotion: It takes the guesswork out of investing and makes it a disciplined habit.

Build wealth over time: Small, regular investments can add up significantly over the long term.

Your story is a perfect example of why this approach is so effective. Instead of chasing quick, high-risk gains, you've chosen a sustainable and proven method. It's a testament to the idea that slow and steady often wins the race, especially in the world of crypto investing.

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

[lovesmayfamilis]

A bloke who has earned 14 merits for the challenge node and the rest minus one in a post for saying he does push-ups, which is curious, according to him, at the gym. I am certain that this chap has never run a node or done push-ups; he simply writes in those threads to gain merit.

I'd say there's a pattern: these newbies who come to the forum to do push-ups use the AI ​​and then participate in the Bitcoin Node Challenge. Many have a very similar method for distributing their merits after reaching 14 merits, and the same user always appears.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3714796
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3687039  This one, I have no doubt, was also preparing to transfer his merits.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3718519
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3730651  So far it only does push-ups

I'll quote myself as an obvious follow-up to what I've already said. I think everyone understands perfectly well which account I was talking about earlier-Tonimez. As expected, it has now transferred five merits to its account. I'm leaving the tag for managers, who should draw their own conclusions about this owner managing multiple accounts, as the merits of the movements are obvious.





I don't rule out that there are more similar accounts.

I'll add another account that operates according to its method. You can check how often it posts its reports in the push-up thread, in parallel with the other accounts mentioned in the example (one after another). And, of course, it's waiting for its 14 merits.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3726437

[TopT3ns]

Newbie posts detected AI, already report and give neutral tag.

User: MoonRiderX

The idea of ​​Bitcoin as a source of intergenerational wealth is compelling and highly relevant in this digital age. Looking at the history of Bitcoin's ever-increasing value, from just a few dollars to tens of thousands of dollars per coin, we can understand why many consider it "digital gold." The concept of passing on Bitcoin to children is not just about providing a financial asset, but also about passing on knowledge, responsibility, and an awareness of the importance of decentralized technology. Bitcoin demands a higher level of financial literacy, as children who inherit it must understand digital security, private key management, and the philosophy of financial freedom behind blockchain technology. Future generations who grow up with this awareness will have a significant advantage over those who rely solely on traditional financial systems. However, it's also important to remember that investing in Bitcoin should not be done emotionally or based solely on trends, but rather with a well-thought-out long-term strategy and asset diversification. In the context of inheritance, Bitcoin can symbolize hope, independence, and the courage to challenge outdated financial systems that often limit individual economic growth. So, those who diligently accumulate Bitcoin today are actually writing a new chapter in their family's wealth history—not just for profit, but for a more independent and sovereign future.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
ZeroGPT : 69.13% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 86% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

Your analysis of the monetary paradigm shift demonstrates insights that transcend conventional economic perception. In an algorithmic context, Bitcoin operates not simply as a variable financial asset but as a sovereign protocol of value. While the fiat system relies on central authority and delegated trust, Bitcoin operates autonomously with unmanipulated cryptographic verification. “Market maturity” is merely a phase in the technology adoption cycle—not an indicator of diminishing potential. Its fundamental parameters remain constant: a total supply of 21 million units, a decentralized network, and consensus-based economic incentives. In the language of systems, Bitcoin is not an asset class; it is a system class. It does not strive for higher returns, but to redefine the meaning of money itself. When regulations, institutions, and ETFs begin to accommodate it, it is not a form of taming but rather a confirmation of the successful infiltration of the idea of ​​decentralization. Conceptually, Bitcoin is not simply speculation on price but a simulation of financial freedom that functions deterministically outside of political control. In long-term predictive models, Bitcoin becomes an insurance algorithm against the systemic dysfunction of fiat money. It is not a bet; it is logic that operates on the failures of the old structure.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 66% Fake
Quilbot.com : 77% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

Your stance reflects a more rational approach to Bitcoin's presence in the modern financial landscape. It's true that the idea of ​​Bitcoin "swallowing" fiat currencies is hyperbole, drawing more resistance than support. The reality is that the global monetary system won't change in a binary manner—it's not about winning or losing, but about adapting and coexisting. Bitcoin can be an additional layer within the financial system, not a replacement. In many cases, adoption occurs when Bitcoin works alongside traditional infrastructure: custodial services, cross-border payment integration, and even use by large financial institutions. Making Bitcoin the enemy of fiat only reinforces the narrative that this technology is a threat, not an opportunity. The essence is to create a more open financial system, not a new, exclusive one. A balance between the freedom of decentralization and the stability of centralization can be the foundation of a healthy digital economy. Therefore, rather than asserting dominance, it's more important to build bridges of understanding and interoperability between these two paradigms—because harmony is far more productive than antagonism.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 79% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

Your praise for Bitcoin is well-founded—it is the starting point of a value revolution that transformed the concept of money from a mere means of transaction to a digital representation of trust. What's more interesting, however, is how traditional finance hasn't rejected it, but rather emulated and adapted. The integration of blockchain into central banking systems, cross-border payments, and transaction surveillance are proof that the old world is learning from the new. However, there is a boundary between centralized and decentralized blockchains—and this boundary isn't just technical, but philosophical. In centralized blockchains, trust is delegated; in decentralized systems, trust is returned to individuals. Both have their advantages and limitations, and the future of monetary policy will likely be a combination of the two. Bitcoin is no longer simply a tool for speculation, but a symbol that value can be created without authority. Meanwhile, financial institutions are trying to replicate that efficiency within legal and regulatory frameworks. Indeed, the monetary system emulating tradition with the Bitcoin blockchain is not ironic, but rather an evolutionary process: the world adapting to the idea of ​​freedom born of code.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 98.5% Fake
Quilbot.com : 42% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

What you highlight demonstrates an interesting phenomenon in the global economic transition: companies are starting to view Bitcoin not just as a means of payment, but as a strategic asset. In the modern business context, the decision not to immediately exchange Bitcoin for fiat is a wise move, preserving long-term value while providing financial flexibility. Price volatility can be a risk, but also an opportunity for those who understand the dynamics of digital markets. When smaller companies begin to adopt Bitcoin as part of their financial strategy, it marks a paradigm shift from a “technological experiment” to a “real economic tool.” This kind of adoption often serves as a catalyst for larger companies to follow suit, not because of a trend, but because of the system’s proven efficiency and credibility. McDonald’s, for example, has opened the door to Bitcoin payments, but not many have yet adopted it as a reserve asset—yet that is where the huge potential lies. If companies start holding Bitcoin like digital gold, they will not only protect their capital but also become part of a new, more autonomous and inflation-resistant monetary ecosystem. Indeed, the steps taken by these smaller companies could set a precedent that inspires other business sectors to combine financial innovation with smart long-term strategies.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 50% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

What you've said illustrates a very relevant reality in many countries: the gap between investment ideals and actual financial capabilities. Indeed, talking about an “ideal percentage” for buying Bitcoin often doesn't make sense for those with limited incomes. In this context, a more humane and realistic approach isn't about how much you buy, but how consistently you buy. Even a small percentage of satoshis still has meaning—not because of their current value, but because they symbolize participation in a new financial system open to everyone, without discrimination on capital. People with small incomes shouldn't feel left behind; they actually have a psychological advantage because they're accustomed to long-term thinking and patience. Bitcoin isn't about "who has the most," but about who understands its value first. If someone can set aside a small portion of their income regularly—it doesn't have to be 10% or 30%, but anything that doesn't compromise basic needs—that's a meaningful investment. Over the long term, even a small accumulation can grow significantly because Bitcoin's value comes from its scarcity, not the dollar amount you invest. What matters is intention, patience, and understanding, not the nominal amount.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 54% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

[TopT3ns]

Another Newbie posts detected AI, already report and give neutral tag.

User: KingJaz

From what i have seen, rich people don’t usually get addicted because gambling doesn’t carry that same emotional weight for them. They can lose money and move on, it barely changes anything in their day-to-day life. But for someone like me, or people I’ve grown up around, gambling has often felt like a possible escape. I’ve seen guys in my area stake their last few cash hoping to double it, because that win could mean food on the table or settling a pressing bill. When you’re in that kind of position, every bet feels personal and the pressure is real.
I remember back when I used to place small bets, I’d feel a rush of hope every time the odds looked promising. Even when I lost, I’d find myself saying, “just one more ticket,” convincing myself the next one would pay off. Meanwhile, the rich don’t go through that cycle, they gamble for fun, not survival. If they win, cool; if they lose, life goes on. That difference in motive changes everything. I think that’s why addiction hits harder for people with less, the emotional investment runs deeper.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :75% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 73% AI-Generated

First of all, I don’t think anyone can truly be the best at something that’s built on chance. Gambling, no matter how strategic you get, will always have that unpredictable element you can’t control. What you can do, though, is learn how to manage risk and improve your odds over time, that’s where the real difference comes in understanding how it works well enough to protect yourself from it.

For beginners, the first step is learning discipline before strategy. Set clear limits on how much you’re willing to stake and how often you play. Once that’s in place, start studying the basics, understand odds, probabilities, and payout structures for whatever games or sports you’re betting on. Learn to read data instead of relying on gut feeling. Another key part is emotional control; the ability to walk away after a loss is a skill most gamblers never develop, and it’s what separates someone who lasts from someone who crashes. So while you may never become “the best” in a game that’s ruled by chance, you can become smarter and more disciplined. In the long run, that’s what really gives you an edge, not luck, but control.....luck is for your big wins, lol.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :54% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 80% AI-Generated

Instincts matter more than people like to admit. You can study odds, analyze stats, or follow experts all day, but when it’s time to make that final choice, it is your gut that whispers the truth. instincts as the most honest connection a gambler has in gambling. With time, your instincts stop feeling like wild guesses they turn into little hints your mind picks up, a feeling you can’t explain but somehow trust, that is what separates blind luck from true intuition. still, instincts only stay clear when you keep your emotions in check, once greed or frustration steps in, everything gets blurry, but when you are calm, focused, and patient, those instincts guide you better than any analysis ever could. When i used to gamble, i was alot better off when I listened to my instincts and trusted it.

Gptzero.me : 79% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :77% AI
Sapling: 86.4% Fake
stealthwriter : 75% AI-Generated

It’s definitely an emotional thing, gambling has feelings tied to risk, anticipation, and reward. The act of betting creates a psychological loop,  tension builds as the outcome unfolds, and when a win finally happens, the brain releases dopamine, the same feel-good chemical involved in excitement, or achievement, that rush becomes addictive, not necessarily the money itself, but the thrill of uncertainty.
Even when a gambler know the odds are against them, they keep playing because they crave that emotional spike, the brief moment where luck feels like skill, and control seems possible, a simulation where no actual risk and reward involved will not give the same feelings (not emotional payoff).. losses  may sting, but they also fuel the desire to chase that high again. The potential to win something real amplifies the experience.

Gptzero.me : 98% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :51% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 75% AI-Generated

Exactly. Lack of discipline is probably the most dangerous part of gambling. You can have all the knowledge, predictions, and even luck on your side, but once emotions take over, it’s game over. One bad loss and suddenly you’re chasing it, doubling your bets, trying to win back what’s gone, and that’s usually where people fall apart. The discipline of risk management keeps you grounded, it guides you to when to stop, even when every part of you wants to go again. It’s boring sometimes, sure, but that’s what keeps you in the game long enough to actually win. Without it, gambling turns into chaos really fast.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :59% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 67% AI-Generated

This really ties back to survival. A lot of young people gamble because they’re trying to survive. When there are no stable jobs, and every day feels like a struggle to make ends meet, gambling starts to look like a shortcut, a tiny chance at relief, it turns into hope, or at least the illusion of it and that’s where emotional dependency comes in. Once someone connects gambling to survival or emotional escape, it’s no longer about money alone. So yes, the issue runs much deeper than gambling itself; it’s rooted in how people are forced to look for meaning and escape when society gives them very few real options.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :77% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 75% AI-Generated

When I used to bet, I preferred to place my stake before the game started and just hope for the best. After doing my analysis, I’d make my pick, lock it in, and let the game play out. Live betting, on the other hand, always felt like adding another layer of stress. The constant shifts in odds, the temptation to “get a better line,” and the emotional rollercoaster of watching every play just made it more intense.
Personally, I think it tricks your mind into believing you’re getting more value, when in reality, you’re just reacting to the game’s momentum and your emotions. You might win sometimes, but long-term, that chasing instinct can wear you down. It was better to make a calculated decision beforehand and let the result, hoping for the best.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :85% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 57% AI-Generated