Active members are promoting Bitcoin mixers, betting or casino. Lmao.

[CryptSafe]

Just joined BitcoinTalk forum and I must say, I'm quite surprised to see that it has turned into a place where 50% of the forum active members are promoting Bitcoin mixers, betting or casinos. Was hoping for more discussions on the technology and its possibilities.

I have not seen anything wrong promoting mixer and other casino, if you have a cogent point while people should not promote mixer you have to portray to the hearing of the public, so I believe that you have make a research well and make your findings to be more active before you can make a point. I will like you to concentrate on your account and make more observations of the forum and make sure your innovation is been known and also get emulated by some other forum members. So discussing such kind of issues of promoting mixer site you have to get more positive and negative informations about mixer so that you can defend yourself base on your point of view

OP really do not understand how the forum works though. I see OP is a newbie and would definitely ask such questions to clear his doubt. If there are no options of such nature in here how does the forum want to grow, how does they casino, mixers, exchanges etc want to gain recognition. Since OP is new he does not know  how the system works but however, what you have said to OP is just the best option for OP to follow and if OP is reasonable enough to follow up, I think OP could go a long way on this platform.

[1715608377]

1715608377

[1715608377]

1715608377

[1715608377]

1715608377

[1715608377]

1715608377

[GazetaBitcoin]

The promotion of mixers, gambling or casinos does not obstruct anyhow the discussion about Bitcoin, technology or crypto at large. Obviously, OP is too new on the forum and makes allegations without any sense. If OP wants to participate to any technical discussion he is always free to do it, no matter if the other participants wear any signature or not. How can the presence of a signature obstruct a discussion? I really don't get that.

Furthermore, and I don't know if anyone else observed this, OP just started this thread and never came back with any reply. It seems simply ridiculous to initiate a discussion thread, complaining about how to discuss and then never make any post inside your own thread. I guess it's common sense to debate inside the topic you started, since it was your interest to start it but OP is probably lacking this common sense.

[Aikidoka]

Just joined BitcoinTalk forum and I must say, I'm quite surprised to see that it has turned into a place where 50% of the forum active members are promoting Bitcoin mixers, betting or casinos. Was hoping for more discussions on the technology and its possibilities.

If you search enough about 'the more discussion on the technology of Bitcoin' as you asked, you'll find plenty of topics about it. You can basically find anything you want here and even if you don't find what you're looking for, feel free to open a topic and engage in some discussions that you want to talk about. Many members here have a huge knowledge about Bitcoin and related topics so they'll surely help you if you don't understand anything.

This is the best Bitcoin forum on the internet, and in my opinion it will remain the best forever! )

[acroman08]

The promotion of mixers, gambling or casinos does not obstruct anyhow the discussion about Bitcoin, technology or crypto at large. Obviously, OP is too new on the forum and makes allegations without any sense. If OP wants to participate to any technical discussion he is always free to do it, no matter if the other participants wear any signature or not. How can the presence of a signature obstruct a discussion? I really don't get that.

I have a feeling he felt that there are too many threads/replies that are unnecessarily made because of signature campaigns and just ranted because of it.

Furthermore, and I don't know if anyone else observed this, OP just started this thread and never came back with any reply. It seems simply ridiculous to initiate a discussion thread, complaining about how to discuss and then never make any post inside your own thread. I guess it's common sense to debate inside the topic you started, since it was your interest to start it but OP is probably lacking this common sense.

I noticed that when I made my first post in this thread but it was just the second day since the OP created the thread so I didn't think much of it. anyway, even if OP wanted to reply now he won't be able to since he got banned from plagiarising content multiple times.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

The promotion of mixers, gambling or casinos does not obstruct anyhow the discussion about Bitcoin, technology or crypto at large. Obviously, OP is too new on the forum and makes allegations without any sense. If OP wants to participate to any technical discussion he is always free to do it, no matter if the other participants wear any signature or not. How can the presence of a signature obstruct a discussion? I really don't get that.

I have a feeling he felt that there are too many threads/replies that are unnecessarily made because of signature campaigns and just ranted because of it.

This is definitely true (as signature campaign makes some people to be more active) but when you think about it, the more we participate in discussion (topic and replies) the more knowledge is been passed on and gained from one user to another). The topics and replies is the reason the forum is active and when it becomes spammy, we can do the needful thing and report the posts when we come across them. The forum will be borrowing if all we do is just get the exact information we needed (just like when googling) the fun of the community come from the replies coming in different forms.

From their replies a new discussion can come up (just like when we see topics been started based on replies from other topics). Sometimes I wonder what people want us to be discussing when there isn't much happening. The most recent Bitcoin development are in relation to politics (as there isn't much going on especially as we're in a bear market period and activities are on the minimum levels this period). When more things to be discussed comes up we'll start discussing them but that doesn't mean we have to keep the forum silent for the time being (although it doesn't justify the spamming as well).

[Despairo]

OP, let me ask in return what is the purpose or contribution of a thread opener who doesn't care to reply or interact in his own thread even after more than 50 replies of other users?

Close the thread if you don't care to reply and rethink your doing!

Because he want to get merited by people who're supporting anti signature campaign in this forum, but sadly those people aren't aware with his thread.

However you can't hope @OP will comeback and reply to users' post in this thread because he's already get banned due to plagiarism lol

Not everyone may accept mixer, betting or casino due to personal interest, but pretty sure everyone can't accept someone behavior who's copy pasting other people words