Another Coup in Africa: What is the economic effect?

[Joshapat]

It will indeed be difficult for Africa to have peace, this is because the economic gap is very high, and in my opinion the conflicts that occur in several countries will certainly make economic problems even more complicated, it is natural that inflation in many African countries will increase significantly and what will the countries that once colonized do? like france is for its own sake.

[superman184]

It will indeed be difficult for Africa to have peace, this is because the economic gap is very high, and in my opinion the conflicts that occur in several countries will certainly make economic problems even more complicated, it is natural that inflation in many African countries will increase significantly and what will the countries that once colonized do? like france is for its own sake.

Countries in Africa are only making improvements in the economic sector so that they can become better so things like peace may be ignored by most of the countries there. Because their main goal is to eradicate difficulties in the economic sector by continuing to manage the important resources that exist there, especially now that inflation still occurs frequently in most countries, making some countries have to try to continue fighting this with their own abilities.

[DrBeer]

I can only hope it does not get worse with mass executions and the military pillaging the civilians.

Such things only happen in the Western orchestrated coups where those involved are taking orders from foreign powers and they have to suppress the people in order to be able to rule over them. In case of the coups in Africa, from what I've seen, they are coming from the people themselves not some foreign powers which means if there would be any executions it would be execution of the foreign criminals and occupiers.

But of course we have to wait and see what the future holds. So many similar previous revolutions were shut down by the colonizers by mass murdering people in order to shut it down and revert the changes.

Take Pol Pot for example - Cambodian politician and statesman, General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Kampuchea (1963-1981), Prime Minister of Kampuchea (1976-1979), leader of the Khmer Rouge movement. Tell us how he was brought to power by the US ?

The Massacre at Vučitrnu (Alb. Masakra e Vushtrrisë, Serbian Masakr u Vučitrnu) was a massacre of Kosovo Albanians carried out by Serbian police officers on the evening of May 2, 1999. Serbs - State Department officials?

Genocide in Rwanda, officially called genocide against Tutsis (Rwanda) - genocide of Rwandan Tutsis April 6 - July 18, 1994, carried out by order of the Hutu government. Is this the hand of Britain ?

Central African Republic and Jean-Bedel Bokassa is a typical representative of France ?

.....

I could go on for a long time, but you don't want the truth, you want empty air and accusations of the Western, developed world....

[uchegod-21]

They always make us believe that the new government will do better but at the end, they turn out to be like the former or even worse. How will things go well when there is no separation of power? There will be too much power vested in the hands of the military which is not healthy for any government. It will only be fair if the new government will do things constitutionally for the benefit of all.
Let's just keep our fingers crossed.  Who knows, this might be a turning point for Gabon and other African countries who have experienced coup.

The coup always target the government and build the new government using the people and army support.But the problem in the coup is they act like the monopoly and military rule in the country,for certain things the military government will be good.But the coup are less knowledge about the administration,So they can’t hold the government for the longer period.The best way of the government to the people is  democratic government,but the government should work for the people.But most of the democratic government was running for the self benefit.

Democracy originally is the government of the people. Whether the administration is fair or not. The masses have every right to speak up. This cannot be achieved under a military rule where rights and freedom are restricted.  No matter the form it comes with, military government should not be an option.  The primary duty of the military is protection of lives and properties of citizens. They should stick to their duty. A country will do well where there is separation of power.  No institution of government should be made powerful.  Abuse will become inevitable if any institution is made powerful.