Which problem will you choose to solve?

[harapan]

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.

Lovely topic. Both of them will make you good fortune and generational wealth in the process in you know what you want and how to get it done.

Solving the problems of the rich will make quickly, though I do not want to be involved with one who steals my ideas to implement on his own without acknowledge me.

There are so many poor people in the world, last time I checked, we have more poor people than rich people in the world.

Let's say I solve the problems of two billion people, I'll end up becoming rich. With a net worth in billions.
I've always wanted to solve and would love to solve the problems of the poor anyday anytime.

[1715290471]

1715290471

[1715290471]

1715290471

[1715290471]

1715290471

[1715290471]

1715290471

[1715290471]

1715290471

[1715290471]

1715290471

[dothebeats]

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.

Lovely topic. Both of them will make you good fortune and generational wealth in the process in you know what you want and how to get it done.

Solving the problems of the rich will make quickly, though I do not want to be involved with one who steals my ideas to implement on his own without acknowledge me.

There are so many poor people in the world, last time I checked, we have more poor people than rich people in the world.

Let's say I solve the problems of two billion people, I'll end up becoming rich. With a net worth in billions.
I've always wanted to solve and would love to solve the problems of the poor anyday anytime.

First of all, if you are seeking to get money from helping people then I suggest you help the rich as it will ultimately lead you to have a good network for your business or investments. Helping poor people on the other hand will require you to have your own money to give financial assistance to them, because let's be real here, most of the problem of the poor people is money related. Additionally, if we are being realistic here it is impossible to help two billion people unless you are rich or influential. Hence, if you really want to help the poor you have to be fully realistic and do not expect that you'll be making much fortune out of it.

[Fortify]

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.

It's a dumb statement for a start. Firstly, rich people problems are nothing like the poorest and they usually revolve around legislation designed to regulate their activity for the better of everyone - which are not really problems at all. Nor is helping "poor" people necessarily a good thing, I'd love to help genuine people stuck in trouble but not people who willfully waste money. The best you can do is try to educate future generations how to wisely use money and how to get the best value education possible for them. University can be good, but I think they have maybe been a bit too commercialized because there are too many worthless courses out there that send the students into staggering debt without much opportunity to use them well.

[Gozie51]

Solving the problem of one rich person can save thousands of jobs so it depends on who is that rich person and what is their problem.

I would be thinking your view is that the few rich or that rich will help bring out thousands of poor out of that poverty but the majority view of the mindset of the rich is that they don't like to help the poor out of poverty because they want people under them for services they think they have overgrown because of their social status. This factor might disqualify help for a single rich. This is a general view but I believe their are few rich that also want good for the poor.

If you see more replies that say to solve the problems of more poor people then its not a wonder because that is the right thing from an ethical Point of View.

It is trite to consider helping the poor for different reasons. At least the number of poor people keep increase and that leads into different vices in the society. The poor with their size if given help means their will be more labour force that will also contribute to the GDP of the country and that will improve standard of living. A poor person has a very good idea of how to better others behind him because he has been there and that will mean more people getting out of poverty than what would have been with helping a rich.

[bangjoe]

Solving the problem of one rich person can save thousands of jobs so it depends on who is that rich person and what is their problem.

I would be thinking your view is that the few rich or that rich will help bring out thousands of poor out of that poverty but the majority view of the mindset of the rich is that they don't like to help the poor out of poverty because they want people under them for services they think they have overgrown because of their social status. This factor might disqualify help for a single rich. This is a general view but I believe their are few rich that also want good for the poor.

The view that you describe is examined from the behavior of the capitalists, they do not like to lift the poor for the better or in the same ranks as them if the poor are not useful to them. But not all of their rich people are capitalist and have such a viewpoint, but only a small portion if calculated.

If you see more replies that say to solve the problems of more poor people then its not a wonder because that is the right thing from an ethical Point of View.

It is trite to consider helping the poor for different reasons. At least the number of poor people keep increase and that leads into different vices in the society. The poor with their size if given help means their will be more labour force that will also contribute to the GDP of the country and that will improve standard of living. A poor person has a very good idea of how to better others behind him because he has been there and that will mean more people getting out of poverty than what would have been with helping a rich.

From the conception of ethics is true like that, but that does not mean that poor people who have become better will have a more concern for other poor people, this is relative and back again to those people who can become better at the level of life.
But in another point of view, they do help the rich, the better they work the better also for the owner of the business, and for the rich they are a tool to increase their wealth, this is a reverse thought but is quite logical if seen from this point of view .

[Biznesmen]

Someone said that "worrying about bills, food, or other problems leaves less capacity to think ahead or to exert self-discipline. So poverty imposes a mental tax." The Global Inequality Crisis Report says the total wealth of 2153 world billionaires was found to be more than the wealth of 4.6 billion people. The world's richest 1% have more than twice as much wealth as 6.9 billion people. As per the latest information released by the World Bank, nearly half the world is trying to survive on $5.50 a day or less. So we should focus on the 99 percent who are poor, not the 1 percent who are already rich. It's required a concerted effort and bold economic decisions.