End

[vmahina]

End

[FP91G]

Great profit for mining on a CPU, but if this coin is similar to Ethereum, then why can’t it be mined on video cards?
I didn't find information about the mining algorithm?
You have plans for the 4th quarter of this year "Multi-dimensional sharding scheme". This is earlier than Ethereum.

[batsonxl]

28gb of ram? My pcs have 8-16gb will it be problem?

[starlemon]

Why do I have real fast, but no money to the account？
2023/09/30 17:27:01 Block: 44600
2023/09/30 17:27:01 Score: 74
2023/09/30 17:27:23 Hash Rate: 612698
2023/09/30 17:28:23 Hash Rate: 619669

[fapar]

Great profit for mining on a CPU, but if this coin is similar to Ethereum, then why can’t it be mined on video cards?
I didn't find information about the mining algorithm?
You have plans for the 4th quarter of this year "Multi-dimensional sharding scheme". This is earlier than Ethereum.

This is an alpha version of the miner, it uses its own unique algorithm. At the current stage we are making payments to AIA.
The next stage involves the launch of our new token.

28gb of ram? My pcs have 8-16gb will it be problem?

Yes, this is a problem. The working size of the database is 28 GB at the moment, and will be larger in the future.

"Unique algorithm" sounds good. But could you tell us more about the mining algorithm used? I'm guessing it's some kind of Ethash-like algorithm because the miner you suggest doesn't work without the db.dat you provided. In this case, db.dat is actually a DAG file (analogous to ETH), since it is a significant size (6 GB), meaning it already contains some specified data (possibly transaction data). But then the requirement for the amount of RAM (28GB) is unclear. Miner "clones" db.dat into RAM to speed up calculations?

[FP91G]

This is a good ASIC-resistant algorithm if you need 28 GB of RAM for mining.
But if your coin becomes popular, then ASICs will appear.
Where are the benchmarks and calculator for other processors?
I just discovered that the miner size is 6 GB and consists of 5 files and the files are deleted after 5 days.

[Easy_freeZzZy]

How exchange this AIA to usdt (erc,trc, etc..)


I'm running on a 3990x
RAM consumption for 127 threads is about 51GB but CPU utilization is only 35 percent
I run a second instance of the miner and the load has increased to 70% and RAM consumption is over 100GB

Is it worth running multiple copies of the miner ? Do the rewards depend on it ?

[YAETC]

How to check how much has been mined, and how to prompt when a block has been mined

[Easy_freeZzZy]

55 gb ram used for 5950x 
At this rate there will soon be nothing to launch on )

[Bitcoin_Arena]

The CPU miner requires 28 GB of RAM.

I was going to do some test mining, but I guess I am going to let this one pass.

I guess at one point it will north of 100 GB of RAM? Let's be honest, what will be the point of the project?
"A leading global decentralised digital economy ecosystem"? Wow, just wow.

[fapar]

How to check how much has been mined, and how to prompt when a block has been mined

The OP initially provided the explorer address https://aiascan.com/. It is no different from others similar.

I guess at one point it will north of 100 GB of RAM?

55 gb ram used for 5950x 
At this rate there will soon be nothing to launch on )

As the OP states, there will later be a GPU miner, therefore the requirement for large amounts of RAM will become irrelevant. In this part, AIA follows the path of similar projects: initially mining only on CPUs and later moving to GPU/FPGA/ASIC. The only mystery is the mining algorithm.

[FP91G]

I have seen coins that at first only had CPU mining, but then miners for video cards appeared. But video cards do not have a lot of memory, and basically most video card models have up to 8 GB of memory. If you can make mining accessible with less memory, then why are there such requirements for CPU mining now?

[fapar]

I have seen coins that at first only had CPU mining, but then miners for video cards appeared. But video cards do not have a lot of memory, and basically most video card models have up to 8 GB of memory. If you can make mining accessible with less memory, then why are there such requirements for CPU mining now?

Until we know what exactly the algorithm calculates (a certain vector and intersections - what and with what?), we can only make assumptions. Perhaps, when switching to GPU mining, the algorithm will change and conditional calculations will be performed only for part of the coordinates (forming a DAG file similar to ETH) and the set of coordinates will change from epoch to epoch. Perhaps the requirement for video memory will also be large, similar to the requirement for RAM, and data center GPUs will be required for calculations (for example, Radeon Pro/Instinct or Nvidia H/L series). Or maybe the subject of the calculation itself, the calculation formula, will change radically.

[FP91G]

I have seen coins that at first only had CPU mining, but then miners for video cards appeared. But video cards do not have a lot of memory, and basically most video card models have up to 8 GB of memory. If you can make mining accessible with less memory, then why are there such requirements for CPU mining now?

Until we know what exactly the algorithm calculates (a certain vector and intersections - what and with what?), we can only make assumptions. Perhaps, when switching to GPU mining, the algorithm will change and conditional calculations will be performed only for part of the coordinates (forming a DAG file similar to ETH) and the set of coordinates will change from epoch to epoch. Perhaps the requirement for video memory will also be large, similar to the requirement for RAM, and data center GPUs will be required for calculations (for example, Radeon Pro/Instinct or Nvidia H/L series). Or maybe the subject of the calculation itself, the calculation formula, will change radically.

Any coin must have adequate mining requirements. If there is no profit from mining, then no one will use video cards with a large amount of memory for mining. Video cards 3090 and 4090 have 24 gigabytes of video memory, but their owners will mine more profitable coins.

[fapar]

I have seen coins that at first only had CPU mining, but then miners for video cards appeared. But video cards do not have a lot of memory, and basically most video card models have up to 8 GB of memory. If you can make mining accessible with less memory, then why are there such requirements for CPU mining now?

Until we know what exactly the algorithm calculates (a certain vector and intersections - what and with what?), we can only make assumptions. Perhaps, when switching to GPU mining, the algorithm will change and conditional calculations will be performed only for part of the coordinates (forming a DAG file similar to ETH) and the set of coordinates will change from epoch to epoch. Perhaps the requirement for video memory will also be large, similar to the requirement for RAM, and data center GPUs will be required for calculations (for example, Radeon Pro/Instinct or Nvidia H/L series). Or maybe the subject of the calculation itself, the calculation formula, will change radically.

Any coin must have adequate mining requirements. If there is no profit from mining, then no one will use video cards with a large amount of memory for mining. Video cards 3090 and 4090 have 24 gigabytes of video memory, but their owners will mine more profitable coins.

Yes, in my reasoning I did not take into account the costs of mining at all. I proceeded only from theoretical relationships between the volumes of RAM and VRAM when changing the algorithm and moving from CPU to VGA mining. Without a benchmark, it is difficult to say how profitable such mining will be.
According to aiascan, the cost of 1 AIA is $0.00126, average block time 3 seconds, the number of tokens on the top20 addresses is huge (for example, one address, when converted into $, has $500K), the premine is also huge. Strange coin.

[FP91G]

I have seen coins that at first only had CPU mining, but then miners for video cards appeared. But video cards do not have a lot of memory, and basically most video card models have up to 8 GB of memory. If you can make mining accessible with less memory, then why are there such requirements for CPU mining now?

Until we know what exactly the algorithm calculates (a certain vector and intersections - what and with what?), we can only make assumptions. Perhaps, when switching to GPU mining, the algorithm will change and conditional calculations will be performed only for part of the coordinates (forming a DAG file similar to ETH) and the set of coordinates will change from epoch to epoch. Perhaps the requirement for video memory will also be large, similar to the requirement for RAM, and data center GPUs will be required for calculations (for example, Radeon Pro/Instinct or Nvidia H/L series). Or maybe the subject of the calculation itself, the calculation formula, will change radically.

Any coin must have adequate mining requirements. If there is no profit from mining, then no one will use video cards with a large amount of memory for mining. Video cards 3090 and 4090 have 24 gigabytes of video memory, but their owners will mine more profitable coins.

Yes, in my reasoning I did not take into account the costs of mining at all. I proceeded only from theoretical relationships between the volumes of RAM and VRAM when changing the algorithm and moving from CPU to VGA mining. Without a benchmark, it is difficult to say how profitable such mining will be.
According to aiascan, the cost of 1 AIA is $0.00126, average block time 3 seconds, the number of tokens on the top20 addresses is huge (for example, one address, when converted into $, has $500K), the premine is also huge. Strange coin.

I think this coin is not for mining. Miners will be given a few coins, as was the case with the TON coin, and then mining will end. But since it is now very difficult to determine the profit and prospects of buying a processor and a large amount of memory, I will wait for mining on video cards. But it may not exist. Coins will be distributed earlier.

[Easy_freeZzZy]

https://aiascan.com/address/0x4545A3a471B5c434a8572ed02f3bb3590b884977/transactions
AIA is being sent from this address (https://aiascan.com/address/0x4545A3a471B5c434a8572ed02f3bb3590b884977/transactions).
but I don't see that the wallet has a claimed volume of 10,000,000 AIA.
The whole story looks like a scam. If I'm wrong, please correct me !?

[fapar]

https://aiascan.com/address/0x4545A3a471B5c434a8572ed02f3bb3590b884977/transactions
AIA is being sent from this address (https://aiascan.com/address/0x4545A3a471B5c434a8572ed02f3bb3590b884977/transactions).
but I don't see that the wallet has a claimed volume of 10,000,000 AIA.
The whole story looks like a scam. If I'm wrong, please correct me !?

IMHO:
Having read a little more about the goals of the AIA project and analyzed the information we have, I can say the following: no, I do not think that this is fraud. Now I’ll try to explain why I think so.
1. The specified distribution pool of 10,000,000 tokens may correspond to reality. However, the initial amount at the address from which the reward was sent was 50,000 tokens. I believe that this is only part of the reward pool which will be replenished as it is used up. Because the address from which it came is “working” and belongs to the developer.
2. One of the goals of the AIA project is “quote from the official website: Decentralized AI arithmetic sharing platform is a platform where any user can become a requestor, modeler, and arithmetic provider for AI usage scenarios, with the goal of building the world's largest shared AI arithmetic pool." That is, we do not mine AIA in the classical sense of mining, we are testing the arithmetic operations module for further use with AI. At its core, an outsourced testnet called mining.

[FP91G]

https://aiascan.com/address/0x4545A3a471B5c434a8572ed02f3bb3590b884977/transactions
AIA is being sent from this address (https://aiascan.com/address/0x4545A3a471B5c434a8572ed02f3bb3590b884977/transactions).
but I don't see that the wallet has a claimed volume of 10,000,000 AIA.
The whole story looks like a scam. If I'm wrong, please correct me !?

IMHO:
Having read a little more about the goals of the AIA project and analyzed the information we have, I can say the following: no, I do not think that this is fraud. Now I’ll try to explain why I think so.
1. The specified distribution pool of 10,000,000 tokens may correspond to reality. However, the initial amount at the address from which the reward was sent was 50,000 tokens. I believe that this is only part of the reward pool which will be replenished as it is used up. Because the address from which it came is “working” and belongs to the developer.
2. One of the goals of the AIA project is “quote from the official website: Decentralized AI arithmetic sharing platform is a platform where any user can become a requestor, modeler, and arithmetic provider for AI usage scenarios, with the goal of building the world's largest shared AI arithmetic pool." That is, we do not mine AIA in the classical sense of mining, we are testing the arithmetic operations module for further use with AI. At its core, an outsourced testnet called mining.

Video cards are better optimized for AI computing, and here is a miner for multi-core processors with a large amount of memory. And I think that AI calculations for a home miner is a new trend that will end very quickly, because this requires other expensive equipment, high-speed Internet and trouble-free operation 24/7.

[Firsttime13]

Good day. Where would I be able to find some instructions on how to use the miner through HIVEOS. Thank you in advance.