because code can do many things.. with the right people coding it
But whoever that might be, you'd still be trying to tell them what they can and can't code. And that's despite the fact that you can't code yourself. Entitled man-child is entitled. Thinks devs are his to direct as he wishes. Maybe one day he'll realise he's a worthless nobody and no one likes his totalitarian concept of how Bitcoin should work.
core devs job is to maintain the bitcoin protocol. however they should not OWN IT. they should instead listen to the community.. and develop things that make bitcoin more useful for the general populous, not just their sponsored commissioners
you thinking i am the only one that wants core devs to do things is YOUR FAILURE.
you want no one to request features. you want core devs to be the authoritarian dictating totalitarians which no one should question or criticise.
the reality is core devs SHOULD be reviewed, criticised and should listen to the populous.
you also dont want other groups to offer other methods to upgrade the protocol or offer a different subnetwork that competes against your centralist design preferences
YOU are the one that does not do coding. you are just a sock puppet hoping a core dev will put their hand up inside you and tickle you as a reward for defending their actions.
it is funny how you pretend i am the totalitarian when its YOU that want bitcoin core devs to be totalitarian
grow up, and realise your favoured subnetwork is not the solution and core devs that are subnetwork motivated should try making a subnetwork that meets bitcoiners needs
if after 6 years of promoting a broken crap subnetwork, you have not been given some compensation or reward for your ass kissing, its time you realise you are a slave to a broken system
its time to start afresh and ass kiss your influencers to make something you can be proud of promoting without you having to lie
edit
responding to below
i have suggested that when core devs do things that dont benefit the general populous and only benefit centralists, that they should try something else.. if he thinks im a "controller", thats a failure of HIS understanding of who controls what
doomad thinking no one should have an opinion, by thinking im the only one left not afraid to speak my mind to be the "last man standing" is a failure on his part... then he wants to pretend there must be some set credentials needed to even dare have an opinion about core dev centralist roadmap.. is a failure on his part of understanding humans ability to have opinions
his belief, where anyone who wants something should f**k off to another network and do their own thing, and never question wanting better things for bitcoin itself, is a failure on his part of what decentralisation is all about.. bitcoins only option is NOT start a new network and leave core devs to just do as they centrally please
speaking my mind is not entitlement, its freedom. his desire to suppress it and beg me to remove my opinions is him acting like a totalitarian. if his memory only lasts a few months to keep forgetting how i point out your adorations of REKT campaigns, thats your own fault for forgetting how you dont like competing dev teams wanting to progress he protocol. you cant use memory loss as an excuse to pretend your innocent, .. this forum keeps records of posts
his thinking that to even have a opinion, to even scrutinise, or make comments about a dev team requires needing to own them.. is a failure on his part.
him thinking it requires me to own them to even dare ask them anything, is a failure on his part.
him thinking because i dont own them i have no right to make requests or suggestions or have opinions is a failure on his part
as for his adoration of saying corporations should be free to ask devs to make changes but users should not. is perfect evidence of his totalitarian centralist ideals
