Do you believe you can win on sports betting by analyzing a betting lines only?

[bitzizzix]

In my opinion, there is no good and consistent strategy or analysis in sports betting, because everything is a factor of luck and analysis can only improve the quality of our knowledge in sports and bring little chance of winning. However, that doesn't mean that every analysis you get will always win.

Because no matter how good the analysis is, sometimes it doesn't match expectations because anything can happen in the field. It is difficult to achieve consistent success in sports betting, and there is no foolproof strategy and analysis that guarantees consistent winning because luck is a factor.

[klidex]

If we can estimate what surprises the leading team or the opposing team can provide, we can adjust the bet. We may choose the opposing team over our favorite team because we see the opposing team as superior to our favorite team. That is why we must be able to analyze well and find accurate information before we bet.

Usually if we bet on sports betting before or a few days before the game in order to get good odds we never know the name of the player their coach will field, that's why sometimes the annoying thing is when a favorite team that we have bet on all turns out to only lower the second tier players make the team worse than imagined, it is difficult to guess even though we can analyze it because the favorite team can lose to a team from the bottom of the board and that happens very often.

But to avoid that, people usually prefer to bet a few minutes before the match or bet directly while the match is in progress so they know which players will be fielded and at the same time look at the opposing team including seeing the strength of both, even though we are good at analyzing it still comes back to luck because without that it will be difficult to win.

This is what makes bettors not place bets before the team they are betting on plays, if they bet when the game is still far away, this will cause losses, there are still changes in the composition of players, there are still changes in odds at any time from the casino bookie, no one can do it guess which players will be fielded if the match has not yet taken place, but we can first analyze the players who are injured so that we can confirm whether the player will be absent for several matches.

Of course, bettors prefer to bet when they know which players the coach will field before the match starts. This can minimize losses. Indeed, this alone is not enough to win because defeat can still happen even though we have used skills, but at least with this can increase your knowledge and experience in the field of sports betting and strengthen your skills to bet carefully and not carelessly.

[danherbias07]

In my opinion, there is no good and consistent strategy or analysis in sports betting, because everything is a factor of luck and analysis can only improve the quality of our knowledge in sports and bring little chance of winning. However, that doesn't mean that every analysis you get will always win.

Because no matter how good the analysis is, sometimes it doesn't match expectations because anything can happen in the field. It is difficult to achieve consistent success in sports betting, and there is no foolproof strategy and analysis that guarantees consistent winning because luck is a factor.

There's no assurance that any bet will win, that's true. But, it only needs a bit of luck, I mean it's not really a big factor. Sports is a talent-based game, there are players who are really good at what they do so it enhances the chance of winning if they are part of the team that you are betting for. The only problem that I could see is if there are spreads that need to be guessed.
In basketball, there are heavy favorites that need to win by 10+ points just so we could get at least 1.60 - 1.80 in profits. That's where it gets messed up because sometimes the underdogs are fighting back trying to prove that they can win games so spreads like -10 are sometimes not covered although the favorite team will win. But, picking the win-only bet is not that profitable. Most of the time it's 1.10 - 1.20 only. High-risk gamblers would not accept this kind of bet thinking it's a waste, they'd rather take the spreads and see if it will be covered. That's where luck comes in. Analysis of which team will win the game and a bit of luck to cover the spread or take the lowest profits and just be satisfied with it.
Anyway, there are a broad of choices to bet on now in any sport. Boxing doesn't only have picking the boxer who will win, you can also guess the round on when it can end. I think that's cool for those who really love their preferred sport. Having more options is better so they won't be forced to choose on one pick only.

[Maslate]

In my opinion, there is no good and consistent strategy or analysis in sports betting, because everything is a factor of luck and analysis can only improve the quality of our knowledge in sports and bring little chance of winning. However, that doesn't mean that every analysis you get will always win.

When you believe that everything is all about luck, then there's no reason to analyze the game as what we work hard would still be useless.

Perhaps try to change your perspective in sports betting as it's not the same as the games with a house edge, here there's a real chance that we will succeed as a sports bettor, and although some may so negative about the word "succeed" in sports betting, if you believe on it, nothing will stop you.

I'm sure you've search search some strategies that could help you win, there are lots of videos in youtube, and even you can find some testimonies from people who claim they are making money in sports betting, so if those interest you, you wouldn't say that sports betting is just all about luck.