You still don't understand. NIST isn't picking algorithm that run on theoretical future architectures. They pick algorithms that run on current computer architectures.
i agree 100% with that and so criticizing NIST that their algos don't run on reversible computers is dumb.
Can you point to a single fully implemented (not simulated) reversible computation CPU out there? (Outside quantum computers, which is clearly not the architecture you're promoting)
no of course he can't.
You also have not explained at all what the mistakes of a non-reversible computation friendly hash function like SHA256 are, in the current year of 2023. Don't ask us to fill in the details. Explain it like we're a group of five year old kids.
don't expect much more from him in that regards, he already gave it his best shot...he might even put you on ignore too if you keep pestering him (like he did me
)
