Mixer restrictions

[mikel_012]

Well, he turned this into a matter of trust, and ironically, it would be interesting to see this as the standard.
I will bold a different part than you in Theymos' message, he flipped the script and made it so that you're a bit responsible for what you promote. Now, if you as a participant, can't trust the one you promote not to do anything shady, why promote them in the first place?

I'm pretty sure that if this rule would be applied to every service that has either broken the rules, exit scammed or just scammed a few users and so on, probably at least half of us would end up with at least one sig ban in a few years, but ....would this not be, at least from a moral point of view, justified?

Oh, and in this scenario I assume he talks about temp sig bans 1-3 months, not permanent otherwise... let be real here.


 

We can never trust any website 100%

Can you trust dex.fo will not exit the market at any moment? I really think they are a real and good company, but you do not know the owner in person and you do not know the website for 10+ years

The truth is they can do bad things at any moment like many websites can, including my signature campaign casino Spinly.io

If we need to trust the website with our accounts or with our life, we will never use any signature

[Pablo-wood]

Well, he turned this into a matter of trust, and ironically, it would be interesting to see this as the standard.
I will bold a different part than you in Theymos' message, he flipped the script and made it so that you're a bit responsible for what you promote. Now, if you as a participant, can't trust the one you promote not to do anything shady, why promote them in the first place?

Well, you have a point here.
I should not promote a brand that I do not trust. But that's where the question arises. Can you guarantee that a platform won't scam its users? I have seen a lot of exchanges, mixers, and casinos start very well, build a reputation, run their service well, and then turn into a scam. I can say that I need to act at the right time. If I notice something bad early, I should stop promoting them. But I cannot know if a service will scam or do something bad from the beginning. The platforms come to this forum to build a reputation. We barely know them before they come to this forum.

It is best we all take responsibility of what we promote, this way every signature participant will review their application before submitting or participating. It will be disturbing if a mixer becomes unpromotable again in the future and the forum gets dragged for promoting their service. It is hard to tell the future reputation of any platform so diligent and careful consideration is needed to avoid shady outcomes.

[cryptofrka]

If they remove anything that "mentions or points toward a mixer in any way whatsoever", then I suppose they can be promoted again. But if new stuff is later changed/discovered which causes them to be become un-promotable again, then I'm definitely going to be handing out some harsh bans, including sigbans to everyone who wears their signature. So everyone involved should consider carefully whether they trust omnisee, in that case.

As a campaign manager myself - nope, not the way to go.
Just make a call and don't let people second/tripleguess stuff nor give reasons for more 'grey area' shenanigans.

I'm against any bans on a free speech forum anyway - but if we do have them let them be strictly defined.

What happens if they post links overnight? Or if I am in their sig campaign and don't visit BTT for 5 days and they post these links in the meantime?.
There's so much that can go wrong here, and these are discussions we want to avoid having.

We have a rule now, it's a shitty one but at least it's properly defined. Let's keep it at that.