What do you want to see in casino reviews?

[samuraijin]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

[Hamphser]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

Doesnt matter on what kind of method they would be using as long they do seem viable and could bring out that recognition and traffic then it would surely count. Basing up on whats been mentioned on which we are talking about influencers on which its a common approach. Having tons of followers could be considered influencers i should say and for a business and budget allocation then it would be a normal approach that they would really be going into this path because they do know that this is something more worth rather than on going into other options on which they do know that it cant really be that effective.

When it comes to casino reviews then not all the time it would really be that something raising up some interest nor people doesnt really like on reading up with those text most of the  time.
They would really be coming after into those real time feedbacks which could be seen on a video or some sort such as this. We dont really know on why some people
do come up with those scam sites after all the things that been provided transparently.

[coinerer]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

Yes casino sites tailor their marketing strategy by targeting major insurers and promote their sites accordingly to attract gamblers. Because it's their business. and there are many reviewers who give good reviews to sites in exchange of money or any other facility and do not hesitate to keep them in the top position in terms of reviews. So you should not always choose a site by looking at reviews from review sites. And when starting gambling on a site, you should first test the site by using small amounts to see if the site is comfortable for you.

[noormcs5]

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

When any influencer says anything about the casino or promotes the casino, I am not impressed with it and I do not believe his word. The reason is that there are high chance that the review or opinion may not be correct as the gambling casino may have paid him for this. The same goes for the advisement campaigns being done by the influencer or the one who has many followers. For example, a gambler streamer who has a large audience can be approached by the casino to give good reviews only for the site and in return they may pay him too.

The best casino reviews are those which are done by the real players without any greediness. They will post a good review if they are happy with the site and a bad review if they had a bad experience. The best way to know about the reviews of different gambling sites is to visit the ANN threads of the site on this forum.

[kotajikikox]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

Yes casino sites tailor their marketing strategy by targeting major insurers and promote their sites accordingly to attract gamblers. Because it's their business. and there are many reviewers who give good reviews to sites in exchange of money or any other facility and do not hesitate to keep them in the top position in terms of reviews. So you should not always choose a site by looking at reviews from review sites. And when starting gambling on a site, you should first test the site by using small amounts to see if the site is comfortable for you.

this is why casino review sites nowadays are gaining nothing specially from bitcontalk users that knows their nature now,casino are conniving with review sites just fo fool people.
also that is why we should only gamble in reputable casino(that we have proven to be best and better according to community experiences .

[EarnOnVictor]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

Good response, I wonder why people are so shallow-minded, we should be up and doing in our smartness, or else, we will be cheated if not scammed. Because a reviewer has now said a good thing about a casino I will now be foolishly believing such and signing up an account with them? I am not that foolish. These days, what you see is not actually what they are and what they tag the "Best" online is certainly not the best, and probably could be the worst. They are just being tagged as the best because of marketing deceit, and the high traffic generated makes them be at the top of the search if it is the search engine that showed it.

It is all about the good technology the company has, how good its dedicated SEO marketers are and how effective their influencers are, so we should always be careful. That is why I love to read the reviews of true people, that is the only way you can read the true users' experience. Through that, you will read the good, neutral and bitter parts of casinos and not the private reviewers and influencers that are already paid. They would often write the best things about the company and lure more people into being cheated even as they've already collected their own share of the money.

[SamReomo]

when I enter money into their platform, it's not a big amount; instead, I'm willing to win what I'm gambling on; it's that simple.

Not only you but everyone who puts money into a casino wants to win and earn profits from that casino but in actual only very lucky ones can win while the rest of the players will lose. Wining and losing is part of gambling and if someone losses then that's not fault of a casino but someone's own luck.

There are players who play in reputed casinos and they also lose money many times, while there are people who place very few bets a week but most of the times they win those bets and take money from the casinos.

[bettercrypto]

To be honest, of course, what I really want to see in the casino is their transparency from the very beginning of operating the casino. Is it in the TOS that all the dos and don'ts are written there? Oh, so in the header of their announcement, it should be stated that it is not required for gamblers to read the TOS first so that they know.

At least in this style, for sure, they will see who are the gamblers who will trust their platform to play the gambling they want to do.

[Dunamisx]

this is why casino review sites nowadays are gaining nothing specially from bitcontalk users that knows their nature now,casino are conniving with review sites just fo fool people.
also that is why we should only gamble in reputable casino(that we have proven to be best and better according to community experiences .

If we are to choose a gambling platform, going by the reviews left on them alone is not a way to play safe, we have to include other measures in making our research over them and see that we have a satisfying outcome before using any, i still want to believe that not all the crypto casinos engaged in this kind of act of faking their online reviews, but when few are doing such, it is believed that others as well are unsafe to be reliable in such regards, with this, we have to conduct our own research before making a final conclusion.

[Hispo]

...Oh, so in the header of their announcement, it should be stated that it is not required for gamblers to read the TOS first so that they know.
...

If we all are honest, we all can tell and admit we do not like to read those long and never ending Terms of Service. It is true.
But even if a casino review website does a good job on summarizing the information written on the TOS of those casinos, it is always advisable to take a look at them and check by ourselves.
It is pretty simple trick which is useful for anyone who does not want to lose much time reading those documents.
Just go to the webpage and use the feature of your browser to look for words in the page of terms of service (Ctrl + F) and type for words like: "withdrawal", "documents", "AML", "Restricted", etc. So you can write down on a piece of paper the most important things about gambling on that specific casino. You are not supposed to trust 100% on the review of someone else.  

Remember that when you sign up on a casino you are legally accepting their terms and there is not much you can do once you do, better safe than sorry.

[Bushdark]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

Yes casino sites tailor their marketing strategy by targeting major insurers and promote their sites accordingly to attract gamblers. Because it's their business. and there are many reviewers who give good reviews to sites in exchange of money or any other facility and do not hesitate to keep them in the top position in terms of reviews. So you should not always choose a site by looking at reviews from review sites. And when starting gambling on a site, you should first test the site by using small amounts to see if the site is comfortable for you.

this is why casino review sites nowadays are gaining nothing specially from bitcontalk users that knows their nature now,casino are conniving with review sites just fo fool people.
also that is why we should only gamble in reputable casino(that we have proven to be best and better according to community experiences .

There are casinos that are ready to keep paying the reviewing site thousands of dollars just to keep having a good review on there site.
We need to be very careful and do things In a way that suit our interest and we should not go and register and create account on casinos we don't have ideas about just because of friends that ask us to register just to have referral bonus from us registering.
We need to know what we are doing and keep take few seconds to do research.

[paxmao]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

Doesnt matter on what kind of method they would be using as long they do seem viable and could bring out that recognition and traffic then it would surely count. Basing up on whats been mentioned on which we are talking about influencers on which its a common approach. Having tons of followers could be considered influencers i should say and for a business and budget allocation then it would be a normal approach that they would really be going into this path because they do know that this is something more worth rather than on going into other options on which they do know that it cant really be that effective.

When it comes to casino reviews then not all the time it would really be that something raising up some interest nor people doesnt really like on reading up with those text most of the  time.
They would really be coming after into those real time feedbacks which could be seen on a video or some sort such as this. We dont really know on why some people
do come up with those scam sites after all the things that been provided transparently.

Reviews also need to be monetised and the best wy is to make sure you are doing them with some profit, like getting paid tips by people. If you monetise by the casinos that are reviewed you would not be able to be independent and the public would loose confidence in them. To get tips and audience you will need to often update the reviews to get good rankings in searches.

[shasan]

Reviews also need to be monetised and the best wy is to make sure you are doing them with some profit, like getting paid tips by people. If you monetise by the casinos that are reviewed you would not be able to be independent and the public would loose confidence in them. To get tips and audience you will need to often update the reviews to get good rankings in searches.

I do not think anyone or any gambling site may give tips for monetise reviews but they may get some tips only from new gambling sites. And only new gambling sites may pay for reviews. I do not think any reputed sites may give any tips or may inspire any review sites. They may for only for those review sites which are too much reputed and which may affect their business, nothing else.

[Hamphser]

I like review sites that actually show the positives and negatives to each site. Most review sites are just ref sites.

well this is the same reason why only few of us  tries to listen to review sites nowadays
because we knew for a fact that they are just a referral or a paid shill, they are the literal advertiser
of each sites that can pay their talent fees.
so why need to support each of them when so very few that they realy give honest reviews
or sometimes unless they are attacking one that they will out negative reviews on them.

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

Doesnt matter on what kind of method they would be using as long they do seem viable and could bring out that recognition and traffic then it would surely count. Basing up on whats been mentioned on which we are talking about influencers on which its a common approach. Having tons of followers could be considered influencers i should say and for a business and budget allocation then it would be a normal approach that they would really be going into this path because they do know that this is something more worth rather than on going into other options on which they do know that it cant really be that effective.

When it comes to casino reviews then not all the time it would really be that something raising up some interest nor people doesnt really like on reading up with those text most of the  time.
They would really be coming after into those real time feedbacks which could be seen on a video or some sort such as this. We dont really know on why some people
do come up with those scam sites after all the things that been provided transparently.

Reviews also need to be monetised and the best wy is to make sure you are doing them with some profit, like getting paid tips by people. If you monetise by the casinos that are reviewed you would not be able to be independent and the public would loose confidence in them. To get tips and audience you will need to often update the reviews to get good rankings in searches.

One of the most challenging thing out of those review site owners is on having that kind of updating those informations that has been changed on which we know that this is something
that would really be that hard and when people do visit out and sees that the information been seen arent updated then for sure it would be the last time that they would be visiting out
such platform or site since its not updated then it wont really be that something that could be trusted or simply reliable.

This is why only a couple of sites that do existing to day are really that still considered out by the masses when it comes to review or guide sites because
the information and words been posted are updated and well written and non bias.

[EarnOnVictor]

Reviews also need to be monetised and the best wy is to make sure you are doing them with some profit, like getting paid tips by people. If you monetise by the casinos that are reviewed you would not be able to be independent and the public would loose confidence in them. To get tips and audience you will need to often update the reviews to get good rankings in searches.

I do not think anyone or any gambling site may give tips for monetise reviews but they may get some tips only from new gambling sites. And only new gambling sites may pay for reviews. I do not think any reputed sites may give any tips or may inspire any review sites. They may for only for those review sites which are too much reputed and which may affect their business, nothing else.

Hi friend, I believe @paxmao is so much on point, only that he did not explain it well. As a fact, this is what is happening in real life, everything is monetised for the marketing's sake so that the company/casino stays atop in their games. You do not trust most of what you see as reviews these days, and the only reviews you may trust are the ones coming from forums like this and also those from websites that allow external people (both registered and anonymous) to write their experiences. Although, some fake reviews would still slip through by this means, overall, one would be able to know the truth on average after reading most of the reviews.

But those reviews that you see on controlled websites are often monetised as @paxmao tried to explain, you never can trust such reviews. They can monetise them through direct cooperation between the website owner and the casino. But in case they are just an affiliate, they will embed their links. Even under the affiliation too, some better/personal packages are given to some people which is higher than the general rates that can be generated through the normal affiliate codes. All these are enticements that motivate the reviewers to work tirelessly for the casinos since it is in the form of partnership, meaning that they can do anything to make them succeed so that they can have higher gains too. This is also the reason why you see companies/casinos fighting for the top spot of search engines, but this might not directly be the work of the casinos/companies, but their agents desperate for the money and using any means necessary.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Reviews also need to be monetised and the best wy is to make sure you are doing them with some profit, like getting paid tips by people. If you monetise by the casinos that are reviewed you would not be able to be independent and the public would loose confidence in them. To get tips and audience you will need to often update the reviews to get good rankings in searches.

You're right, a person who monetizes his work does it with more effort and with more Detail , because he feels that what he does is well Valued, what Happens is that there are very few people who see this work as something worth doing , So there should be some reviewers who have a private service, where they review even each game, or not each game but each type of game, over time it goes deeper, but to be paid they must have a lot of difference in terms of the Reviews that we see, I am a person who always sees and sees very similar criteria from each other, I do not see any difference, the criteria I am looking for I must discover myself with my research.

If a reviewer goes further, that implies that they have to spend More money on the games, and that is understandable, then it is not something that easy, plus the players who have more Experience I know see this as pure gold, because in the end it is It is their money that they deposit in the casino and they want to have the best experience Apart from having the Decent Option for their money to be withdrawn satisfactorily.

[nara1892]

That is the greatness or ingenuity of a casino in inviting everyone to play on their site, instead of hiring several influencers to help promote their site well and even prove to be good at things like that.  So it's not surprising that casino owners or founders have their way of advertising their casinos to people who may have a lot of followers.  So don't be surprised if more and more people will become familiar with gambling and there will be many more active users there.

Doesnt matter on what kind of method they would be using as long they do seem viable and could bring out that recognition and traffic then it would surely count. Basing up on whats been mentioned on which we are talking about influencers on which its a common approach. Having tons of followers could be considered influencers i should say and for a business and budget allocation then it would be a normal approach that they would really be going into this path because they do know that this is something more worth rather than on going into other options on which they do know that it cant really be that effective.

When it comes to casino reviews then not all the time it would really be that something raising up some interest nor people doesnt really like on reading up with those text most of the  time.
They would really be coming after into those real time feedbacks which could be seen on a video or some sort such as this. We dont really know on why some people
do come up with those scam sites after all the things that been provided transparently.

The casino may have its own updates whether it's the game or the rules, and maybe by looking at the reviews we can know the changes that the casino updates, although this is always ignored by many gamblers but of course this also helps us in gambling. Each site will certainly hold new rules with its casino and that cannot be denied by gamblers who are only player-based, they must be able to accept reality, although sometimes the rules or updates that casinos do make us object but we cannot do anything but accept it.

Sometimes the words or many comments in the reviews are deceptive, sometimes it is done by the staff themselves. So from this we must be smart, do not make the wrong step. Choosing a reliable casino may be difficult, but looking at reviews may help.

[betswift]

in general, of course, any reviews can be false or not truthfull. But as for me, I would read independent reviews of third-party publications or people. At the same time, not very long, but meaningful, with some short examples of experience.

[danadc]

in general, of course, any reviews can be false or not truthfull. But as for me, I would read independent reviews of third-party publications or people. At the same time, not very long, but meaningful, with some short examples of experience.

I think the same, for me this thing of getting the reviews in the forum helps me to have an idea of what can be done or can be had, it is always good to have the review of a professional, a person who is dedicated to this, but it is also It's good to check the opinions of others, the best thing you can do is have your own opinion or experience because that's how you have everything in reality, but it's nice to do something like that because trusting is difficult, As they say, only the money that belongs to you hurts you, other people's money doesn't hurt anyone else.

Being in a casino and complying with the KYC, being there to do any other type of thing like guaranteeing the goodness of a casino, well, it's not up to me, I will always defend a good casino, the ones I have seen and played with have never had bad experiences. For example, Rooobet, Dulebtis, Rollbit, are great casinos.

[Out of mind]

There are many things that can be reviewed in a casino, which is very important for a player. When a player gambles in a casino, he must review all the things that he will get good benefits from where he bets. I think all the reviews a casino needs to have is to see a few of the coins and coins it supports. Moreover, it is very good to see how much facility there is for quick deposit or withdrawal and from there KYC support is also very good. Also, see which countries the casino supports and take a good look at the promises that the casino has. So I think it is very necessary for a player to review all these if he wants to bet in a good casino, he can deposit money and gamble here.