An aggressive gambler irrelevantly easing his Irresponsible gambling manner.

[Findingnemo]

The boxers will get paid irrespective of their results but you ain't, and this is pretty much a known fact but we may not accept things at it is, so we just look for excuses to get away the mistake/loss from the view of others. Well what other's think doesn't really matter when it is our money we should know how to use it responsibly and the comment doesn't look that much irresponsible unless he bet the amount that he never intend to lose.

[1715288117]

1715288117

[1715288117]

1715288117

[1715288117]

1715288117

[robelneo]

Someone betted on boxing and lost the game but the gambler out of grieve of his lost is trying to ease his emotion Said, It is okay as it is for at least the guy I betted on made me lost the game but had unfortunate for him too to had taken beaten of his life.

I think such is and aggressive and irresponsible gambler who gambles on the peak of what he can not afford to loose.

We have our way of consoling ourselves I sometimes do that so I can go back to normal thinking, sometimes when we lose a big amount of money we try to ease out by saying that will appease our emotions that was his way of consoling ourselves not knowing that the boxer still make money whether he lose or win and top boxers like Haney although took a lot of beating still takes home $30 million, his ego and his face was busted but his pockets are full of money.

[klidex]

It is still his choice to bet that boxing guy and no one force him to place a bet on that specific boxer but little did the bettor know that the boxer still receive money from that fight even if he lose it. The gambler is for me irresponsible as he balme others for his loss. I don't think he might get some good return in that kind of attitude though still a matter of luck but yeah he is still the loser.

Yes, it's true that as bad as it is, the boxer gets beaten by his opponent and loses, but he still gets paid according to the risk he takes, while the gambler who loses the bet doesn't get anything other than bad luck because he lost his money betting on the boxer, but anyway, it's his fault. himself and makes the decision to bet without any coercion from any party so if he loses he must be able to accept it rather than comparing it to other people's fate which is worse because we also need to think about our own fate because we lost the bet, but no matter what we have to accept the result Whatever it is, whether you win or lose, gambling bets have a greater risk of losing.

Maybe the person's intention is not to blame other people. If he blames him, maybe he will try to make fun of the boxer because he has beaten his bet. He just acts as if the boxer also had bad luck because apart from losing, he was also beaten. But without him realizing that apart from that, beating is his job, and besides, boxers still get paid compared to a bettor who loses money on his bet.

[harapan]

I have heard lots of jokes about this, like people planning on changing their betting pattern.
Going from football to boxing, just so you get some pain for letting them lose money, and it's funny.
 
It's a game; one can lose or win, but these people do not want anything other than winning. Sometimes it's a way for them to console themselves after the loss. This also happened in football; despite the love they have for you, you're the cost of their loss. For that day, you automatically become a careless baller or keeper. I see no reason for being aggressive about not winning, and the statement isn't called for. 

It's really funny as it may seem but the gambler is the big looser here, probably when the normal pattern don't favours them they change the  game and it's just the same or even worse so they end up being aggressive to themselves for not winning.
They don't change the game to another cause they want to console themselves from the loss,they just want to try another and see how it unfolds and then he goes on to boxing and loses alot them you hit it on my your supporting teem that lose that it's a good one he got a thorough beating for loosing just to ease your regrets...
It doesn't make sense and this is so hilarious.

[bitgolden]

Someone betted on boxing and lost the game but the gambler out of grieve of his lost is trying to ease his emotion Said, It is okay as it is for at least the guy I betted on made me lost the game but had unfortunate for him too to had taken beaten of his life.

I think such is and aggressive and irresponsible gambler who gambles on the peak of what he can not afford to loose.

It is still his choice to bet that boxing guy and no one force him to place a bet on that specific boxer but little did the bettor know that the boxer still receive money from that fight even if he lose it. The gambler is for me irresponsible as he balme others for his loss. I don't think he might get some good return in that kind of attitude though still a matter of luck but yeah he is still the loser.

I agree with this, because gambler ends up with nothing while boxer ends up with something. All that beating and all, is their job and they do it, even if you win that doesn't mean that you are not going to get beaten, we have seen many winners in the boxing world that had bloodied faces as well, you could be the winner by points, or you could still knock your opponent out, but in the end that doesn't mean that you are not going to be punched in, you could still be in hospital for weeks even if you are a winner.

That has happened many times before in boxing history, plus on top of that we are talking about losers making more money than we could ever dream of, I would take a full beating even without returning a single punch, I rather get punched by a boxer 100 times in a row, for that kind of money.

[Kavelj22]

even though that is a statement that is not appropriate for a bettor to say, we cannot blame him completely because he said that when he lost, because we know how people are when they lose, usually they cannot control what they say. i will also say dirty words to the team i bet on when they lose, because that is a form of my annoyance at the defeat i experienced, so it doesn't matter.

I have a slightly different point of view than the rest of commentators in this topic (I already read the first 3 pages in full):
- Firstly, the person the Op is talking about may have said that as a joke and did not actually intend to insult or offend. Many gamblers will make emotional statements to express their regret over their loss, no matter what type of sport they are betting on.
- Secondly, I believe that gamblers who bet on violent sports such as boxing are necessarily people with violent tendencies in their personalities. I find it strange for someone to bet on who will hit his opponent more or hurt him more. I know that these are the rules of the game, but betting on them is different from other sports in which the competition is fair and harmless. Maybe I'm overly sensitive because I hate all violent combat sports.

[redsun114]

I have heard lots of jokes about this, like people planning on changing their betting pattern.
Going from football to boxing, just so you get some pain for letting them lose money, and it's funny.
 
It's a game; one can lose or win, but these people do not want anything other than winning. Sometimes it's a way for them to console themselves after the loss. This also happened in football; despite the love they have for you, you're the cost of their loss. For that day, you automatically become a careless baller or keeper. I see no reason for being aggressive about not winning, and the statement isn't called for. 

If they can't handle it anymore, maybe they will do it for real this time? What you said about gambling is true and if one can't accept the other outcome which is losing, much better if they just don't bet at all. If we are true fan, I don't think we will blame our idols once we lose the bet that we made on their game.

There are people who blame them secretly and they won't know it, so they won't feel bad about it but even if let say they are aware, I still don't think they will beat their selves for that. They are professionals and it's not their fault already but it's the fault of the gamblers because they may be too greedy, lazy, ignorant, etc...  to try and earn money out of gambling. 

[Mia Chloe]

During Gambling activities, gamblers are always advised to stake what they can afford to lose. The phrase ( stake what you can afford to lose) is like as fail safe especially in cases of huge losses. This because a majority of Gambling activities require a great percentage of luck therefore logically putting a whole bunch of cash which you can't afford to lose is definitely very wrong. This is even worse in cases where the chances of winning are very thin.
However most of the time greedy gamblers always focus solely on the win forgetting how much they would lost is they lost the bet. This is also because if you observe closely, bets or games and wagers with very thin odds of winning  usually have a bigger target win or jackpot. This is what makes most gamblers end up over staking more than they intend.

[SmartGold01]

But just wait a moment, why do people gambling if I may ask?
Was it  not for profit making so why he lost and decided to channel his blame on something elsewhere knowing too well that he lost his bet.
That is just for an unecesarry excuse to cover up his failure even though we believe that gambling is not a certain game.

[Accardo]

I have heard lots of jokes about this, like people planning on changing their betting pattern.
Going from football to boxing, just so you get some pain for letting them lose money, and it's funny.
 
It's a game; one can lose or win, but these people do not want anything other than winning. Sometimes it's a way for them to console themselves after the loss. This also happened in football; despite the love they have for you, you're the cost of their loss. For that day, you automatically become a careless baller or keeper. I see no reason for being aggressive about not winning, and the statement isn't called for.

If they can't handle it anymore, maybe they will do it for real this time? What you said about gambling is true and if one can't accept the other outcome which is losing, much better if they just don't bet at all. If we are true fan, I don't think we will blame our idols once we lose the bet that we made on their game.

There are people who blame them secretly and they won't know it, so they won't feel bad about it but even if let say they are aware, I still don't think they will beat their selves for that. They are professionals and it's not their fault already but it's the fault of the gamblers because they may be too greedy, lazy, ignorant, etc...  to try and earn money out of gambling.  

I would have said gambling is the cause for this, but it's wrong. Thinking about it, before the institution of gambling in a universal usage across the world, I grew in an environment where people watched sport without gambling and still exhibit similar behaviors like destroying things or really get sad, because their team lost a penalty kick. Gambling I would say brings out the true behavior of some people regarding activities like sports.

Because, these people who behave this way were groomed to behave in such manner. Remember not all gamblers does a things as cruel as that. Hence, players could be aggressive naturally, and whenever something gets them sad they'll begin to act  aggressively. Gambling is a factor that makes such people sad to an extent of causing troubles or become destructive. Gambling, yes, can influence someone to behave in such a way. Yet, the whole blame should be on gambling, as the cause. The player also contributed to the way he acted.

[Mia Chloe]

But just wait a moment, why do people gambling if I may ask?
Was it  not for profit making so why he lost and decided to channel his blame on something elsewhere knowing too well that he lost his bet.
That is just for an unecesarry excuse to cover up his failure even though we believe that gambling is not a certain game.

There are many reasons people Gamble and the sole aim of each user differs from individual to individual although generally the financial aspect of Gambling is part of the reasons, it isn't right to just conclude and generalize it.  For some gamblers, aside from the cash based aspect they also gamble because of things like having fun probably alone or also with friends that are also gamblers. Now in my opinion what matters the most is that the gambler isn't too carried away by the monetary aspect of Gambling that he Begins to exhibit bad habits or make wrong decisions.
If you should ask , some people even believe that Gambling activities have health benefits attached to them especially benefits like stress reduction.

[SmartGold01]

But just wait a moment, why do people gambling if I may ask?
Was it  not for profit making so why he lost and decided to channel his blame on something elsewhere knowing too well that he lost his bet.
That is just for an unecesarry excuse to cover up his failure even though we believe that gambling is not a certain game.

There are many reasons people Gamble and the sole aim of each user differs from individual to individual although generally the financial aspect of Gambling is part of the reasons, it isn't right to just conclude and generalize it.  For some gamblers, aside from the cash based aspect they also gamble because of things like having fun probably alone or also with friends that are also gamblers. Now in my opinion what matters the most is that the gambler isn't too carried away by the monetary aspect of Gambling that he Begins to exhibit bad habits or make wrong decisions.
If you should ask , some people even believe that Gambling activities have health benefits attached to them especially benefits like stress reduction.

As far as I know the health benefits of gambling isn't much than that of the disadvantage it gives us, and again if the monetary aspect of it is being removed believe no one will still have that interest to keep gambling so let not rephrase the whole thing as I believe that monetary aspect is what brought people more closer to gambling and whenever they lose you would find them defending themselves.

[arimamib]

~

If they can't handle it anymore, maybe they will do it for real this time? What you said about gambling is true and if one can't accept the other outcome which is losing, much better if they just don't bet at all. If we are true fan, I don't think we will blame our idols once we lose the bet that we made on their game.

There are people who blame them secretly and they won't know it, so they won't feel bad about it but even if let say they are aware, I still don't think they will beat their selves for that. They are professionals and it's not their fault already but it's the fault of the gamblers because they may be too greedy, lazy, ignorant, etc...  to try and earn money out of gambling. 

The people who engage in gambling should know the consequence of gambling, They need to take responsible of their gambling activity. Accepting the possibility of losing should me the mindset when they enter the game of luck. The key principle is that they should just gamble what you can afford to lose. Gambling shouldn't cloud that true fans support their idols win or lose. A true fan should separate their emotions about the game from the bet. It's just a common understanding of feeling disappointed about a loss, even if it's a bet.

The thrill of a win can be tempting, but as fans, they have to understand that gambling comes with the risk of losing. Giving genuine support means cheering for your idols regardless of the outcome. It's weird to blame athletes when you lose your bet, because the bet is your choice after judging the capability of the athletes. Sometimes, the best bet is to simply enjoy the game and leave gambling aside. This way is better for the mental health, having respects for the athletes is what true fans should be, while acknowledging the emotional aspects of sports fandom.

[pinggoki]

How is that irrelevant? I think that it's a good way to cope with the things that's happening to you, sure, lying to yourself might not be the most optimal thing that you can do but you've got to understand that you need to find a way to not bottle up negative emotions because when you do it, you're definitely going to burst in the wrong moments and you don't want that to really happen. Explain it to us even further because right now, I don't see any reason why that seems to be a negative thing for you. All I see is someone that's doing their best of holding it together after a devastating loss. Maybe the best thing for that man is to learn that gambling isn't about winning because there's not a lot of winning there, and that losses is the biggest part of the game.

[Zoomic]

But just wait a moment, why do people gambling if I may ask?
Was it  not for profit making so why he lost and decided to channel his blame on something elsewhere knowing too well that he lost his bet.
That is just for an unecesarry excuse to cover up his failure even though we believe that gambling is not a certain game.

That is what can make him feel better. Many gamblers are on this table, they will always try to apportion blames on other people for their own loss and even wish those whom they think made them lose no good. It's either they'll say
The gambling platform they used cheated them
Or they were convinced to play certain games against their wish
Or they would have won but someone or something prevented them from winning.
And many will even condemn gambling entirely.

Gambling is all about a win or a loss, so if you lost, you lost. There is no excuse to cover up for why you lost. If there is anyone to blame, then it should be the gambler who allows his personal feelings to come in the way whenever he gambles. People just need to have an open mind towards gambling, this will help them accept whatever outcome they get from the games they played.