Making too many picks reduces chances of winning.

[arimamib]

~

~

You're absolutely correct,in my own  opinion I think making too many picks reduce chance of winning, reason is because probably if you are making selection from any of this prediction sites there are  alot of games that has  been listed in  the platform.in this case you will be confuse on the ones you're going to pick either,some person can even decide to play as many that has been listed in the site without knowing that most of the tips are not correct.but most people pick like two to three games from the tips with this two to three games, I'm very sure that they can get like 2 to 3odds from this three games then they will use like 10k to boost the odd some person also do rollover with 2odds,the reason why some people always lose in gamble is because of higher aim.they can decide to make like 30 selections so they can  get like 10 to 20million in return, and you know too well that this 30 selections cannot play serial.

It's easy to become overwhelmed by too many choices when confronted with a too many potential picks. This can lead to decision fatigue and result in hasty. There may be numerous picks available on prediction sites, but not all of them are equally reliable. In the rush to make multiple selections, it's possible to overlook careful analysis and end up choosing options based on incomplete or inaccurate information. Spreading the bets across a multitude of picks can make the focus beeing divided. This can result in a lack of thorough research and increases the likelihood of making suboptimal choices.

Making numerous picks with the hope of hitting a large payout can be tempting, but it also exposes the bettor to greater risk. Even if a few selections are successful, the overall outcome may still result in a net loss, particularly if the odds are boosted artificially. Setting high expectations can lead to disappointment and frustration when those expectations are not met. This can perpetuate a cycle of chasing losses and taking undue risks in pursuit of unattainable goals. Instead of focusing on making many picks with the intention of hitting a jackpot, it's better to prioritize quality over quantity.

[entertheabyss]

This makes sense but like always there are exceptions, just as trading bots exists, which can implement and automate your trading strategy and allow you to increase your profits by virtue of being able to trade more efficiently and doing so all day, a skilled sport bettor which could put their strategy into programming code could do the same, make a bunch of picks on different matches thanks to their bot and increase their revenue in this way.

This is not crypto one would easily implement the use of trading bot. Betting on more games will definitely ruined our chances of earning in the system, no need to talk much but place excellence in anticipating activities that would lead to profits. Strategy is important in the space, no need to look around because we're in the space for good reasons and profits. There are golden means of enabling our status in the space, no need to give up but striving within our vessels to ensure milking the system becomes our top priority. Winning is guaranteed in the system but it doesn't mean we should sleep over it.

[Hirose UK]

I have seen most people who pay money for the bet just because someone informed them about the game, I will be like... Wow, why will you bet on a game you have no knowledge about and funny enough they will end up not winning the game. People intend to stake more games and analysising multiple games at the same time is stressful so you might not have an assurance about the game also. Even with the idea gambling is said to be a lucky game so staking multiple games can still give you more chance of winning under probability, I just focus on the money spent and I make sure I will not gamble and forget my limit

All working with other people's gambling code is all a scam i don't think have seen someone that won from using does code, if you want to gamble set up your games yourself self and if you fail you will know it on you there is nothing like perfect game predictor and since everyone is betting at the expenses of there own risk. and people who bet on other people's knowledge just want to win forgetting that it does not work that way. there is no way you would have been able to win. and over-selecting of games does not help because if I see some betting slip it is just hilarious because how do you want to win with such many games? it will even create more chances for you to win than selecting plenty of games thinking you will win that is not possible. and focusing on the money you are spending is better so that you do not go above your budget.

Gambling always provides big risks and of course we risk money by taking risks that are clearly present without knowing whether the risk will actually occur and result in failure or not.
But basically taking risks can be much better by optimizing the opportunities that we create ourselves, whether by various methods or strategies that are not necessarily guaranteed but can at least provide experience that can be useful at later time.
There are gamblers who like to risk money by taking more risks in various games or bets, but there are also gamblers who only focus on one bet but can really optimize their chances of winning.
Success may not necessarily be present in every bet but the choices and decisions of each gambler will influence the final result that will occur, it is much better to make bets based on the abilities of each gambler.
We cannot generalize the abilities and thoughts of every gambler in betting because they have different beliefs and knowledge.

[oktana]

It shouldn’t be surprising because the more games you pick, the more you have bigger probability to deal with. Even if you are an experience gambler who has studied the game, you can’t always be right about your picks so if you pick 10 games, there’s a higher chance that one of their outcome will be wrong and I think this is why gambling platforms offers bonuses to people when they pick more games because they know that the more games people add to a particular ticket, the more chance they (the platform) will make money.

[Blitzboy]

~

~

You're absolutely correct,in my own  opinion I think making too many picks reduce chance of winning, reason is because probably if you are making selection from any of this prediction sites there are  alot of games that has  been listed in  the platform.in this case you will be confuse on the ones you're going to pick either,some person can even decide to play as many that has been listed in the site without knowing that most of the tips are not correct.but most people pick like two to three games from the tips with this two to three games, I'm very sure that they can get like 2 to 3odds from this three games then they will use like 10k to boost the odd some person also do rollover with 2odds,the reason why some people always lose in gamble is because of higher aim.they can decide to make like 30 selections so they can  get like 10 to 20million in return, and you know too well that this 30 selections cannot play serial.

It's easy to become overwhelmed by too many choices when confronted with a too many potential picks. This can lead to decision fatigue and result in hasty. There may be numerous picks available on prediction sites, but not all of them are equally reliable. In the rush to make multiple selections, it's possible to overlook careful analysis and end up choosing options based on incomplete or inaccurate information. Spreading the bets across a multitude of picks can make the focus beeing divided. This can result in a lack of thorough research and increases the likelihood of making suboptimal choices.

Making numerous picks with the hope of hitting a large payout can be tempting, but it also exposes the bettor to greater risk. Even if a few selections are successful, the overall outcome may still result in a net loss, particularly if the odds are boosted artificially. Setting high expectations can lead to disappointment and frustration when those expectations are not met. This can perpetuate a cycle of chasing losses and taking undue risks in pursuit of unattainable goals. Instead of focusing on making many picks with the intention of hitting a jackpot, it's better to prioritize quality over quantity.

The scattergun strategy deserves contempt; its a rookie mistake to imagine betting on several possibilities would win. More haste, less speed. You're inviting disappointment, and I hate disapointment.

Careful research and informed decisions are the real art. Its not enough to have the appropriate information - you need conviction to act on it. The idea that "more picks equals more chances of winning" is false. The quality of your decisions matter in high-stakes betting and business. The greats in any subject are recognized for a few well-chosen projects, not their volume.

[slapper]

~

~

You're absolutely correct,in my own  opinion I think making too many picks reduce chance of winning, reason is because probably if you are making selection from any of this prediction sites there are  alot of games that has  been listed in  the platform.in this case you will be confuse on the ones you're going to pick either,some person can even decide to play as many that has been listed in the site without knowing that most of the tips are not correct.but most people pick like two to three games from the tips with this two to three games, I'm very sure that they can get like 2 to 3odds from this three games then they will use like 10k to boost the odd some person also do rollover with 2odds,the reason why some people always lose in gamble is because of higher aim.they can decide to make like 30 selections so they can  get like 10 to 20million in return, and you know too well that this 30 selections cannot play serial.

It's easy to become overwhelmed by too many choices when confronted with a too many potential picks. This can lead to decision fatigue and result in hasty. There may be numerous picks available on prediction sites, but not all of them are equally reliable. In the rush to make multiple selections, it's possible to overlook careful analysis and end up choosing options based on incomplete or inaccurate information. Spreading the bets across a multitude of picks can make the focus beeing divided. This can result in a lack of thorough research and increases the likelihood of making suboptimal choices.

Making numerous picks with the hope of hitting a large payout can be tempting, but it also exposes the bettor to greater risk. Even if a few selections are successful, the overall outcome may still result in a net loss, particularly if the odds are boosted artificially. Setting high expectations can lead to disappointment and frustration when those expectations are not met. This can perpetuate a cycle of chasing losses and taking undue risks in pursuit of unattainable goals. Instead of focusing on making many picks with the intention of hitting a jackpot, it's better to prioritize quality over quantity.

Though we seek options, too many paralyze us. Decision fatigue? In the gambling universe, every choice feels like a fork in the road. The appeal of just one more bet lures the unsuspecting into logic. Isn't the haste and scattered focus just symptoms of a deeper issue? The chase for the jackpot blinds, right? Casting nets in a desert is like betting thinly on many picks. You might capture something, but at what cost?

This pattern of chasing losses, of falling down the rabbit hole in search of the big win, is a trap constructed by optimism and desperation. Quality above quantity, you say? It's more than advice; it's guidance in gambling's treacherous waters. Follow it, and you may locate the shore

[South Park]

It shouldn’t be surprising because the more games you pick, the more you have bigger probability to deal with. Even if you are an experience gambler who has studied the game, you can’t always be right about your picks so if you pick 10 games, there’s a higher chance that one of their outcome will be wrong and I think this is why gambling platforms offers bonuses to people when they pick more games because they know that the more games people add to a particular ticket, the more chance they (the platform) will make money.

The more games you pick, the greater the chances of things not going your way, it is a very simple concept and yet one that many gamblers do not get, the few successful sport bettors out there, are not only experts on a particular sport, many times they are experts on a single league and sometimes even on a single bet, so the sport bettor that dives into different sports and different kind of bets is only asking for trouble, as it is almost impossible that a person can beat the casinos by betting that way.

[MainIbem]

The more games you pick, the greater the chances of things not going your way, it is a very simple concept and yet one that many gamblers do not get, the few successful sport bettors out there, are not only experts on a particular sport, many times they are experts on a single league and sometimes even on a single bet, so the sport bettor that dives into different sports and different kind of bets is only asking for trouble, as it is almost impossible that a person can beat the casinos by betting that way.

I have comes across people whom have picked several games and still break it up without them losing any I think it's very hard to find this kind of game or maybe it doesn't come that regularly as we think.
I have tried several bets picking many games but yet I understand that that is not the secret to constantly win a game so as a gambler it's better to always stick to single bets or also learn more games other than sport betting to secure your lost even though people are saying that learning new games is like creating additional port for one to constantly lose money since he would be channeling his efforts on both game he might stand the chance to lose about 30% more from it original amount use for gambling.

[angrybirdy]

It shouldn’t be surprising because the more games you pick, the more you have bigger probability to deal with. Even if you are an experience gambler who has studied the game, you can’t always be right about your picks so if you pick 10 games, there’s a higher chance that one of their outcome will be wrong and I think this is why gambling platforms offers bonuses to people when they pick more games because they know that the more games people add to a particular ticket, the more chance they (the platform) will make money.

The more games you pick, the greater the chances of things not going your way, it is a very simple concept and yet one that many gamblers do not get, the few successful sport bettors out there, are not only experts on a particular sport, many times they are experts on a single league and sometimes even on a single bet, so the sport bettor that dives into different sports and different kind of bets is only asking for trouble, as it is almost impossible that a person can beat the casinos by betting that way.

Because others think, especially those who expect a big return from gambling, that once they spread their bet among different picks, the chance is higher that they won't lose anything, but if we analyze it carefully, no matter which angle you look at it, you still have a loss, especially if the amount of your bet is bigger compared to your win. So it's better to only make at least 1-2 picks and stick to your choices because if you change your decision before choosing a bet, you might end up with a lot of regrets later.

[oktana]

It shouldn’t be surprising because the more games you pick, the more you have bigger probability to deal with. Even if you are an experience gambler who has studied the game, you can’t always be right about your picks so if you pick 10 games, there’s a higher chance that one of their outcome will be wrong and I think this is why gambling platforms offers bonuses to people when they pick more games because they know that the more games people add to a particular ticket, the more chance they (the platform) will make money.

The more games you pick, the greater the chances of things not going your way, it is a very simple concept and yet one that many gamblers do not get, the few successful sport bettors out there, are not only experts on a particular sport, many times they are experts on a single league and sometimes even on a single bet, so the sport bettor that dives into different sports and different kind of bets is only asking for trouble, as it is almost impossible that a person can beat the casinos by betting that way.

Gamblers actually understand this, but the casino gives enticing offer as you add more games to your ticket. The multiplier keeps increasing and people try their luck to make a lot of money by staking very little. It works for some people but majority end up with a broken ticket. Gamblers who don’t like to keep all their eggs in one basket tend to split their selections in different tickets. Everyone does have their strategies.

[Orpichukwu]

I have seen most people who pay money for the bet just because someone informed them about the game, I will be like... Wow, why will you bet on a game you have no knowledge about and funny enough they will end up not winning the game. People intend to stake more games and analysising multiple games at the same time is stressful so you might not have an assurance about the game also. Even with the idea gambling is said to be a lucky game so staking multiple games can still give you more chance of winning under probability, I just focus on the money spent and I make sure I will not gamble and forget my limit

The thing is, most people believe there are people who are so good in terms of prediction, and just because those set of people have been able to make some good and perfect predictions about some certain games and the games play as they predicted, people now worship their predicted games and will be willing to do anything just to have that game played.
 
So these people set up some prediction group where you need to pay to join the premium group and enjoy their games, but gambling is always gambling; their predictions won't always come out right all the time; sometimes they play, sometimes some of the games lose, so those who pay to get such games are doing that at their own risk.

[iBaba]

When a person makes a lot of single bets, the winnings are usually small, and those winnings are actually eaten up by the losses. Yes, one day you may get lucky and the winnings will cover the losses, but in the long run you will probably lose all your money (a little, but all). And sometimes you may not have enough patience and still feel the urge to put it all on the line.

I always have this mentality that playing gambling for a long time and eventually turn out to be very boring and when you are bored you can start making crazy selections just to be done with it so I always believe that if you are to win, you will win so just take that leap of faith and gambling what you want instead of wasting your time and playing different selection till you get frustrated and confused.

Well, gambling can never become boring for someone who is already psychologically attached to it, indicating that the person is already addicted to the behavioral addiction of gambling.

That's why it's often advised for people to avoid becoming addicted to it as much as possible. In my opinion, the best approach to gambling, which I'll continue to advocate for unless my opinion changes, is moderation. This helps prevent individuals from falling into the trap of using gambling to harm themselves and their financial well-being.

It's important to prioritize health, financial stability, and living within one's means. That's why it's crucial for people who are financially vulnerable to avoid gambling altogether.

[carlfebz2]

It shouldn’t be surprising because the more games you pick, the more you have bigger probability to deal with. Even if you are an experience gambler who has studied the game, you can’t always be right about your picks so if you pick 10 games, there’s a higher chance that one of their outcome will be wrong and I think this is why gambling platforms offers bonuses to people when they pick more games because they know that the more games people add to a particular ticket, the more chance they (the platform) will make money.

The more games you pick, the greater the chances of things not going your way, it is a very simple concept and yet one that many gamblers do not get, the few successful sport bettors out there, are not only experts on a particular sport, many times they are experts on a single league and sometimes even on a single bet, so the sport bettor that dives into different sports and different kind of bets is only asking for trouble, as it is almost impossible that a person can beat the casinos by betting that way.

Gamblers actually understand this, but the casino gives enticing offer as you add more games to your ticket. The multiplier keeps increasing and people try their luck to make a lot of money by staking very little. It works for some people but majority end up with a broken ticket. Gamblers who don’t like to keep all their eggs in one basket tend to split their selections in different tickets. Everyone does have their strategies.

And thats how gambling should really be something that you could really enjoy with on which you would really be having those strategies on the time that you do make out some bets.
Its true that there are really gamblers who dont really like on putting their eggs in one basket. Its not bad to have multiple bets as long with those each bets have accompanied analysis into it.
Unless if you are dealing with casino games on which we know that this is something that cant be applied with some analysis. It would be best that you should really be playing
up for fun and not for the sake of making it as an income stream.

[Slow death]

I have been making multibet bets and I must say that it is necessary for the person to place the games that they know have a greater chance of success and most of the time it is difficult for the person to be able to determine before analyzing the games the number of teams that they will place in the multibet bet. , for example, a person may say that they will make a multibet bet with 30 teams to obtain odds of 200x, but when that person starts analyzing the games they realize that the games with the best chances of winning are no more than 5 games and with odds of 4x, so At that moment, that person will place these 5 teams in that bet. Now there are people who don't analyze the games, they just place 10, 30, 40 games in a multibet bet to try their luck. In my opinion doing this is absurd, although I recognize that like gambling the principle is that it is something that involves luck

for people to win, in the case of sports betting, which are analyzable games, which are games in which a person who has good knowledge can get it right most of the time, selecting many games without making an impartial analysis, without putting feelings into the games and then make a multibet bet to count on luck, I think it's completely absurd, this person will lose most of the time, of course one day this person will be able to get that multibet bet right and count on luck, but my question will be how long it will take for this person to get their multibet bet right. A whole year could go by without her getting it right, and it would make no sense to keep doing that. That's why I think it's better that in a multibet bet there are few games, this increases the chances of success and the person can make a profit that way

[arimamib]

~

Well, gambling can never become boring for someone who is already psychologically attached to it, indicating that the person is already addicted to the behavioral addiction of gambling.

That's why it's often advised for people to avoid becoming addicted to it as much as possible. In my opinion, the best approach to gambling, which I'll continue to advocate for unless my opinion changes, is moderation. This helps prevent individuals from falling into the trap of using gambling to harm themselves and their financial well-being.

It's important to prioritize health, financial stability, and living within one's means. That's why it's crucial for people who are financially vulnerable to avoid gambling altogether.

Gambling can become a source of excitement and stimulation for those who are psychologically attached to it, but this doesn't necessarily indicate addiction from the outset. Many individuals engage in gambling activities without developing problematic behaviors. But gambling can indeed lead to addiction, which is characterized by a compulsive need to gamble despite negative consequences.

The reason that gambling can never become boring, for someone already attached to it, is that they are is seeking a specific kind of thrill or escape, rather than simply engaging in leisurely entertainment. This attachment can be a red flag for potential addiction, but it doesn't mean that everyone who enjoys gambling is addicted. Moderation is indeed a sensible approach to gambling, because it encourages responsible behavior and helps individuals maintain control over their actions. People need to avoid painting everyone who enjoys gambling with the same brush.

[South Park]

I have seen most people who pay money for the bet just because someone informed them about the game, I will be like... Wow, why will you bet on a game you have no knowledge about and funny enough they will end up not winning the game. People intend to stake more games and analysising multiple games at the same time is stressful so you might not have an assurance about the game also. Even with the idea gambling is said to be a lucky game so staking multiple games can still give you more chance of winning under probability, I just focus on the money spent and I make sure I will not gamble and forget my limit

The thing is, most people believe there are people who are so good in terms of prediction, and just because those set of people have been able to make some good and perfect predictions about some certain games and the games play as they predicted, people now worship their predicted games and will be willing to do anything just to have that game played.
 
So these people set up some prediction group where you need to pay to join the premium group and enjoy their games, but gambling is always gambling; their predictions won't always come out right all the time; sometimes they play, sometimes some of the games lose, so those who pay to get such games are doing that at their own risk.

Besides who knows if they are actually good at predicting the outcomes of games, unlike other casino games in which casinos can ban you, even if this were to happen to a sport bettor as they are too good, they could always use sport betting exchange websites and keep betting this way, with the difference that instead of beating the casino they will beat other gamblers, so a good sport bettor has no need to publicize themselves this way, as they will always have a way to generate income through their skill.

[arimamib]

~

The thing is, most people believe there are people who are so good in terms of prediction, and just because those set of people have been able to make some good and perfect predictions about some certain games and the games play as they predicted, people now worship their predicted games and will be willing to do anything just to have that game played.
 
So these people set up some prediction group where you need to pay to join the premium group and enjoy their games, but gambling is always gambling; their predictions won't always come out right all the time; sometimes they play, sometimes some of the games lose, so those who pay to get such games are doing that at their own risk.

That is a common phenomenon in the world of sports betting and prediction groups. There may be people who have a track record of successful predictions, but still gambling inherently involves risk, regardless of the source of predictions. People are often drawn to these prediction groups because of the allure of easy winnings and the perception that certain people possess special insight or skills. However, even the most successful predictors will have their off days, and not every prediction will be accurate.

Joining premium prediction groups can indeed be enticing, but gamblers need to be realistic in understanding of the risks involved. Paying for access to such groups doesn't guarantee success, and members should be prepared to accept losses as part of the gambling experience. Responsible gambling involves making informed decisions, setting limits, and understanding that there are no guarantees of success, regardless of the source of predictions. People should just gamble within their means and view it as entertainment rather than a guaranteed source of income.

[Ever-young]

As gamblers, we love more action, so we tend to make more bets on a regular basis. However, experts say that when we make too many picks regularly, our chances of winning decrease. This is due to the fact that we won't be able to analyze all the games carefully that are in our ticket and won't have the advantage needed to win. So instead, it's recommended that we should value quality over quantity if we want to succeed in sports betting.

Share your opinion regarding this matter.


Edit : I see that some replies are talking about parlay. FYI, this is not about parlay, it's about making many single picks on a regular basis. Please avoid using parlay when sharing your opinion.

Once you have a lot of games on your ticket, it's difficult to give each one the attention it needs. That is why it's my opinion that quality over quantity is the ideal approach, but you need also evaluate how much time and energy you are ready to devote in sports betting. If you can only devote a few hours per week to it, it may be preferable to focus on a few high-quality bets rather than a large number of low-quality bets; however, if you are willing to put in the time and effort to conduct extensive research, you will be able to place more bets while maintaining a high level of quality.

[madnessteat]

~snip~

I don't quite agree with your statement. Most likely, your experts did not take into account that if a gambler has a lot of summary time for analytics or is completely immersed in sports betting (a professional bettor), then the number of his bets, on the contrary, can positively affect the number of winnings. This can be compared to an investment. For example, you can invest money in only one asset, or you can invest in 5. With the right approach, investing in 5 assets can yield a more significant profit. The same thing happens in betting - one winning bet can cover the losses from two lost ones.

[qwertyup23]

It shouldn’t be surprising because the more games you pick, the more you have bigger probability to deal with. Even if you are an experience gambler who has studied the game, you can’t always be right about your picks so if you pick 10 games, there’s a higher chance that one of their outcome will be wrong and I think this is why gambling platforms offers bonuses to people when they pick more games because they know that the more games people add to a particular ticket, the more chance they (the platform) will make money.

I have a genuine question:

The more games you pick, like you said, the more chances of winning. But every time you pick a game, don't you also stake/wage money in the process? If that were the case, won't that be more expensive on your end; and that it would cost you more or even offset your winnings in the process?

I have no experience in picking multiple games at once because I usually stick to the games that I played frequently. Not to mention, the more games that I play on one (1) type, the more experience that I gain. Thus, this would amount to more chances of me winning since I accumulate experience at the end.

I would liken this kind of choice of playing multiple games vs one game, to a quote that Bruce Lee said:

I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.