Leadership and Economics

[fullhdpixel]

Normally most politicians have interest for public positions just for their own personal interest,  but even at that their are some leaders that will still want to do the basic assignment to just capture more support from the common citizens. Every leader has that target of getting their personal interest first , but it is better when s country has a leader who is able to work first .

What we need to understand here is that not all leaders of countries in the world have the same perspective and way of thinking as other leaders. Because apart from having their own targets, both for individuals and for the general public, the way they think about realizing the targets they want is definitely very different so that turmoil in the economic sector will always be visible. Apart from that, the way of leading in each country is also very different because it is influenced by the rules and habits of the residents of their respective countries.

I believe that the majority of us already understand it and even by thinking about other countries alone, we can easily tell it. Leaders target is usually for the sake of the public. They also have their own/personal target but it is outside of their job already as a country leader. They can have a target but sometimes the unexpected can still occur and this is where a turmoil can occur as well.

It was the leader of the country is the ones who release a rule that should be followed by the public but sometimes they are hard-headed to not follow it. This can be another cause of a turmoil. All are affected with it and it's crazy that they can also complain the moment it occurs.

[Cookdata]

A leader means a guardian of the people. Whenever the people of a country or region elect a guardian and a leader through collective efforts, that leader should strive for the welfare of the people and the economy of the country. There are countries in South Asia where getting elected means robbery people's wealth. In those countries, once a leader is elected, he prioritizes his personal greed without thinking about the people or the country. As a result, the wheel of the economy of that country does not change. A competent and good leader plays an immense role in making a country economically prosperous.

Personal greed isn't about a region, it's human characteristics, only few with guilty conscience remember what brings them to the office to serve the people. It's so sad that drying election, they win the heart of the people with manipulation and outcry about the current state of the economy and showcasing how bad the current administration is bad for them but as soon as they take over the office, they continue the same thing the previous people are doing, sometime even worse.

Whenever an elected representative thinks about the country and thinks about the people of the country, good work will be done by him. In simple words, if the leader is corruption free then the country will be corruption free and will reach the root of development. On the other hand, if the leader or leader is corrupt, then the economic condition of that country will also be corrupt.

I personally has come to a conclusion that the only person that can give a good leadership is the man in heaven, man will always be a man. If we want a good leadership, it can't be possible because if the president has good intentions of good leadership, the governors might be crooks and so the senators and many more governments parastatals. Good leadership go way above just one person, it's start with everyone.

[pusaka]

I believe that the majority of us already understand it and even by thinking about other countries alone, we can easily tell it. Leaders target is usually for the sake of the public. They also have their own/personal target but it is outside of their job already as a country leader. They can have a target but sometimes the unexpected can still occur and this is where a turmoil can occur as well.

It was the leader of the country is the ones who release a rule that should be followed by the public but sometimes they are hard-headed to not follow it. This can be another cause of a turmoil. All are affected with it and it's crazy that they can also complain the moment it occurs.

As a leader, in my opinion, personal interests or certain groups must always be subordinate to the interests of the public or society. Because they have a big responsibility to make the lives of their people prosperous, not the welfare of certain individuals or groups. However, the problem is that we often see this, where many leaders are driven by a few people or groups.
It is true what you say, that this kind of thing ultimately causes chaos because the leader is ridden and influenced by some people. Even though they work for society, not for a group of people. In making decisions or policies, things that create problems are people who infiltrate because they have personal or group interests.

[Onyeeze]

Why we have elected president and the lawmakers in a country is to determine the benefits of the economic growth in the country so if we have a wrong law makers and they also present who is the head of a country I don't think that the economic growth of that country will it be growing as expected from the Citizens, so one of the things I know very well that helps for development of a country is when the economic of the country is advancing so when they economic growth or the country is doing well it is obvious that they will not be a recession in such country because what brings inflation into a country is when the management lack the knowledge of developing the country so I know very well that economic growth of any country is differs and it happens through the management and the governance

[ancafe]

Why we have elected president and the lawmakers in a country is to determine the benefits of the economic growth in the country so if we have a wrong law makers and they also present who is the head of a country I don't think that the economic growth of that country will it be growing as expected from the Citizens, so one of the things I know very well that helps for development of a country is when the economic of the country is advancing so when they economic growth or the country is doing well it is obvious that they will not be a recession in such country because what brings inflation into a country is when the management lack the knowledge of developing the country so I know very well that economic growth of any country is differs and it happens through the management and the governance

Its correlation is none other than an effort to help the government run down to the president and their functions are also to make policies affiliated with the needs of the country. But unfortunately the correlation was misinterpreted so that their presence only spoke the interests of the group and to smooth the wishes of a handful of people. The economic growth of a country is largely determined by the leader and those who have the authority in determining decisions and never expect it to be achieved if the leader does not have the concept of progress and is more concerned with the group.

Good cooperation is needed so that the country's economy can grow because if the economy is problematic then the people will get the impact. Therefore we can see the extent to which leaders can bring solutions in the midst of existing problems and how they can provide a place to solve so that the problem does not become bigger.

[passwordnow]

Good cooperation is needed so that the country's economy can grow because if the economy is problematic then the people will get the impact. Therefore we can see the extent to which leaders can bring solutions in the midst of existing problems and how they can provide a place to solve so that the problem does not become bigger.

Whether there's good or bad economy, it's always the people that will either benefit or perish from it. A good leader is a sign that the economy is about to do good and opposite, when the leader is bad and corrupt. Many of the top countries have good leaders or it's that there's a tradition that the past leaders have been good and they can't do wrong with what the past leaders have left as the economic situation of their country is doing good.

The blame will be into them just like what we're seeing with the leaders that are in the democratic countries where election is happening. And after the leader's serving time as per another election happens, the citizens are wise enough to choose the ones that will either continue the good programs of the past leaders that has made the economy of the country well. Otherwise, choosing a bad leader might occur as this politics is always have been politics where leaders are playing through promises and people's emotions.

[ancafe]

Whether there's good or bad economy, it's always the people that will either benefit or perish from it. A good leader is a sign that the economy is about to do good and opposite, when the leader is bad and corrupt. Many of the top countries have good leaders or it's that there's a tradition that the past leaders have been good and they can't do wrong with what the past leaders have left as the economic situation of their country is doing good.

The blame will be into them just like what we're seeing with the leaders that are in the democratic countries where election is happening. And after the leader's serving time as per another election happens, the citizens are wise enough to choose the ones that will either continue the good programs of the past leaders that has made the economy of the country well. Otherwise, choosing a bad leader might occur as this politics is always have been politics where leaders are playing through promises and people's emotions.

Leaders must have a vision and mission in developing a country because they are mandated by the people to build a better existence. In democratic countries, the election of leaders often runs into problems because there are games of dynastic politics and money politics. So it will affect the wheels of government and when they are elected it will give birth to a corrupt government even though it is not carried out by the highest leader such as the president. Good leaders are born from a fair and honest democracy, but this does not rule out the possibility that leaders will also make mistakes that have fatal consequences in their governance.

A leader is responsible for advancing the country, be it economic, welfare, social and so on. If leaders do not have a clear vision and mission, it will be difficult to realize programs that are in favor of the people because they are influenced by various interests. Leaders who do not dare to take policies can also affect poverty levels and make it difficult to make new breakthroughs for the welfare of their society.

[Yukyzu]

Why we have elected president and the lawmakers in a country is to determine the benefits of the economic growth in the country so if we have a wrong law makers and they also present who is the head of a country I don't think that the economic growth of that country will it be growing as expected from the Citizens, so one of the things I know very well that helps for development of a country is when the economic of the country is advancing so when they economic growth or the country is doing well it is obvious that they will not be a recession in such country because what brings inflation into a country is when the management lack the knowledge of developing the country so I know very well that economic growth of any country is differs and it happens through the management and the governance

Of course this will greatly influence the economic growth of a country, because if a leader does not have the ability to manage state finances well of course this will make the country they lead experience problems in the economy and it will also be very difficult for the country to develop and This happens because leaders do not have the ability to manage the development of the country or they only think about themselves but not their people, so it is very important for us to first get to know a leader well before choosing them to bring change towards a better direction. from before because if we don't know them well, it would certainly be wrong to make a leader whose background we don't know well so that they only create a condition where the country they lead does not experience any progress in the economic sector.

[passwordnow]

Whether there's good or bad economy, it's always the people that will either benefit or perish from it. A good leader is a sign that the economy is about to do good and opposite, when the leader is bad and corrupt. Many of the top countries have good leaders or it's that there's a tradition that the past leaders have been good and they can't do wrong with what the past leaders have left as the economic situation of their country is doing good.

The blame will be into them just like what we're seeing with the leaders that are in the democratic countries where election is happening. And after the leader's serving time as per another election happens, the citizens are wise enough to choose the ones that will either continue the good programs of the past leaders that has made the economy of the country well. Otherwise, choosing a bad leader might occur as this politics is always have been politics where leaders are playing through promises and people's emotions.

Leaders must have a vision and mission in developing a country because they are mandated by the people to build a better existence. In democratic countries, the election of leaders often runs into problems because there are games of dynastic politics and money politics. So it will affect the wheels of government and when they are elected it will give birth to a corrupt government even though it is not carried out by the highest leader such as the president. Good leaders are born from a fair and honest democracy, but this does not rule out the possibility that leaders will also make mistakes that have fatal consequences in their governance.

A leader is responsible for advancing the country, be it economic, welfare, social and so on. If leaders do not have a clear vision and mission, it will be difficult to realize programs that are in favor of the people because they are influenced by various interests. Leaders who do not dare to take policies can also affect poverty levels and make it difficult to make new breakthroughs for the welfare of their society.

Leaders aren't perfect but those that does differently are noticeable and they're the ones that will be loved by their constituents. The change will be seen by them and they're going to have it compared to the past administrations if there are things being done accordingly or there are no changes at all for which makes them no different in the past. People like to have something new because if there is nothing new and the government is still the same through that elected leader, they'd just wait for another term that shall save their economy.

As I am saying, they don't have the superpowers and they're imperfect. And I think that all of them have visions and missions but it's not that everyone can see that when they criticize their leaders even if that person is doing something good for their economics. So, to play it simply, the status of a country's economy is also the result of the governance of the leader.

[bots1]

Enacting strict laws by a leader can indeed reduce crime in his country. However, its effectiveness depends on a number of factors, including law enforcement policies, fairness in the legal system, and other social and economic factors. Although providing strict punishments can be one way to reduce crime, attention is also needed to prevent crime, improve socio-economic conditions, and increase legal awareness in society.

When a leader can properly implement the policies that have been made, of course the public will be happy to see this condition because if there is someone who violates the policy, it must be resolved thoroughly and this will certainly be able to reduce or even eliminate those who have plans to act in violation of government policy, when all If this can be carried out well, of course it will be easier for the community to improve their economic conditions and this will make the community prosperous and the community must also have legal awareness by not doing things that violate the policies made by the government.

Good leadership is indeed very important in implementing policies. When all parties, both government and society, support each other and obey the rules, it will certainly create a conducive environment. Legal awareness from the community is also the key so that all policies can be implemented effectively.

[uche6215]

I totally agree with the writer of this article that leadership defines every progress country from others because the role of a leadership when it comes to economic growth and development can never be over emphasized as leaders gives direction and sees what others are not seeing and by practical steps formulates laws and policies to see how set out goals and objectives can be achieved

[EarnOnVictor]

Enacting strict laws by a leader can indeed reduce crime in his country. However, its effectiveness depends on a number of factors, including law enforcement policies, fairness in the legal system, and other social and economic factors. Although providing strict punishments can be one way to reduce crime, attention is also needed to prevent crime, improve socio-economic conditions, and increase legal awareness in society.

When a leader can properly implement the policies that have been made, of course the public will be happy to see this condition because if there is someone who violates the policy, it must be resolved thoroughly and this will certainly be able to reduce or even eliminate those who have plans to act in violation of government policy, when all If this can be carried out well, of course it will be easier for the community to improve their economic conditions and this will make the community prosperous and the community must also have legal awareness by not doing things that violate the policies made by the government.

Good leadership is indeed very important in implementing policies. When all parties, both government and society, support each other and obey the rules, it will certainly create a conducive environment. Legal awareness from the community is also the key so that all policies can be implemented effectively.

Yeah, the leadership quality is good to move the country and its economy forward, but what I won't agree with is people's obedience to the rule is going to change anything, that can only be productive if the leadership is good. I clarified that because they are two have been well-observed in countries and "it always takes two to tangle."

If the citizens are super-good, nothing will happen if the leaders are corrupt or foolish in dispensing their constitutional assignments. A similar thing is happening in my country and it's so pathetic. The obedience of the citizens has led us to this mess. If we had been adamant with the government, I believe our country's pitiful situation would have been averted.

[Oluwa-btc]

Some are saying we will give free electricity, some are providing Special rice (biryani), etc. (short-term beneficiaries) and people are getting attracted by these things even if they have short term benefits,

Having  said this you ought to know that every Good economy or country depends on the leverage of a good leadership and when the reverse is the case you'll definitely get a bad government, governance and bad economy as well. Everything starts with the leadership cause they can't either make you or break you. And if I quote you wrong put me through cause it's very certain that the strength of a nation lies in the hands of the leaders and anywhere they drive it to that's exactly where it would go so this is why when the leaders ain't keeping to their words just as said the masses ain't happy about that.

[Lida93]

Some are saying we will give free electricity, some are providing Special rice (biryani), etc. (short-term beneficiaries) and people are getting attracted by these things even if they have short term benefits,

Having  said this you ought to know that every Good economy or country depends on the leverage of a good leadership and when the reverse is the case you'll definitely get a bad government, governance and bad economy as well. Everything starts with the leadership cause they can't either make you or break you. And if I quote you wrong put me through cause it's very certain that the strength of a nation lies in the hands of the leaders and anywhere they drive it to that's exactly where it would go so this is why when the leaders ain't keeping to their words just as said the masses ain't happy about that.

You're not wrong in my perspective. Let not go too extreme in this discussion but just making an example of the leadership style in other parts of the world like Europe compared to Africa we can all agree that it's the leadership style of the leaders in these two different continents that have landed them to where they are in today's world. It's African leaders pattern of leadership that have kept the continent and it's respective states underdeveloped till date.

The quality of the lives of the citizens largely depends on the quality of good leadership traits the leader(s) possesses and exercises. Leadership is said to be a social influence process, in that process, the leadership in the country could either influence the lives of her citizens positively or negatively with their programmes and policies. And if it's a bad leadership then it's mainly short term benefits they will always make available for her citizens.

[Egii Nna]

Some are saying we will give free electricity, some are providing Special rice (biryani), etc. (short-term beneficiaries) and people are getting attracted by these things even if they have short term benefits,

Having  said this you ought to know that every Good economy or country depends on the leverage of a good leadership and when the reverse is the case you'll definitely get a bad government, governance and bad economy as well. Everything starts with the leadership cause they can't either make you or break you. And if I quote you wrong put me through cause it's very certain that the strength of a nation lies in the hands of the leaders and anywhere they drive it to that's exactly where it would go so this is why when the leaders ain't keeping to their words just as said the masses ain't happy about that.

You have just said the bitter truth. Because even the masses have their on role to play in this aspect because if they are not greedy in voting for their leaders the leaders will not come in a chameleon format for them. Because for a political to have a fake promise lies on the manner the masses will approach to him. That is why they will always suffer for it.

Knowing well that the economy of the country depends on the leadership is enough reason for you as a voter to know what so ever you vote will determine the quantity of the hunger and economic difficulty that you will be facing. But they will not think about that that is why they are always having to choose the wrong leader and end up suffering for it. Although the only fact is that if the masses will focus on looking for a good leader not the one that will give them money of food before the vote him then I think they will enjoy it. But the truth must be told a good leadership signify a good economy and vise versa.

[Yeesha]

what about you, do you agree with the right leader can make your life as a citizen, businessman or an investor comfortable?

I can't agree more with you, because leaders are who shape our future, and if we are talking about the leader (Prime Minister/President) of our country, region nation, etc. Then we should really not compromise on selecting the one who has real potential. But the big problem with developing countries like mine is, that people don't care much about these leaders, for example, there are elections on 8th Feb in our countries. And seat candidates are doing there best to convince people.

Some are saying we will give free electricity, some are providing Special rice (biryani), etc. (short-term beneficiaries) and people are getting attracted by these things even if they have short term benefits, They might give free electricity (like a few unit hundred unites maybe) they might give you some relaxation at the start, but giving votes to a leader who tries hard to give you short term benefit and after that, you don't get to see him/her, I don't think that's a true leader.

As there is a difference between leader and Boss, these are totally two different things, what we make here in our country is just boss not leader. I hope you know the difference b/w them.

I also agree less with the OP, leaders can change the country for good but they are not interested in dealing with that. When candidates or nominee proposed for a certain position, they will make a lot of promises to people, to make them believe that they are going to take them to the land of promise. Voters will not be able to know the good and bad ones among them. Just has you said, they will promise to give free electricity, free schools, and also build hospitals for free treatment. After they have been elected they will be noway to be found, and we will be left with nothing except bad government. They (nominee) will involved themselves in electoral bribery by sharing things like food stuff, clothes etc to the voters. We(voters) sold our rights and we want our country to be batter, it is not possible.

[uswa56]

You have just said the bitter truth. Because even the masses have their on role to play in this aspect because if they are not greedy in voting for their leaders the leaders will not come in a chameleon format for them. Because for a political to have a fake promise lies on the manner the masses will approach to him. That is why they will always suffer for it.

Knowing well that the economy of the country depends on the leadership is enough reason for you as a voter to know what so ever you vote will determine the quantity of the hunger and economic difficulty that you will be facing. But they will not think about that that is why they are always having to choose the wrong leader and end up suffering for it. Although the only fact is that if the masses will focus on looking for a good leader not the one that will give them money of food before the vote him then I think they will enjoy it. But the truth must be told a good leadership signify a good economy and vise versa.

The choice of leaders is indeed determined by the choice of time and the leaders who come with their sweet promises of course have their own goals and even now it is very rare that we can see a leader who has the goal of making a country better because they prefer to enrich themselves and also return the capital that they have spent while running for leader and it will be very It is difficult to eliminate if there is no awareness from various parties.

Of course, everyone has understood that the country's economy depends on leaders and to be able to elect leaders who think about the interests of the people, of course, the election organizers must really select candidates who are indeed natural to be leaders and do not let them pass candidates who do have the potential to commit fraud during the election process.

[Unknown Op]

You have just said the bitter truth. Because even the masses have their on role to play in this aspect because if they are not greedy in voting for their leaders the leaders will not come in a chameleon format for them. Because for a political to have a fake promise lies on the manner the masses will approach to him. That is why they will always suffer for it.

Knowing well that the economy of the country depends on the leadership is enough reason for you as a voter to know what so ever you vote will determine the quantity of the hunger and economic difficulty that you will be facing. But they will not think about that that is why they are always having to choose the wrong leader and end up suffering for it. Although the only fact is that if the masses will focus on looking for a good leader not the one that will give them money of food before the vote him then I think they will enjoy it. But the truth must be told a good leadership signify a good economy and vise versa.

The choice of leaders is indeed determined by the choice of time and the leaders who come with their sweet promises of course have their own goals and even now it is very rare that we can see a leader who has the goal of making a country better because they prefer to enrich themselves and also return the capital that they have spent while running for leader and it will be very It is difficult to eliminate if there is no awareness from various parties.

Of course, everyone has understood that the country's economy depends on leaders and to be able to elect leaders who think about the interests of the people, of course, the election organizers must really select candidates who are indeed natural to be leaders and do not let them pass candidates who do have the potential to commit fraud during the election process.

Every country is facing that kind of situation. The reason is prominent behind the scene because every leader want to compensate his expenses which he use to   become the leader and to to get the ticket. Every leader has addiction of  chair and he use his resources to get more money .But few leaders think about the benefits of their country and they have good impact on their public and public live them .

But many leader get votes to talk about religion as we saw Donald trump and he got votes by taking against Muslims and he became President of USA . Modi also used this technique and he became prime Minister of India again and again.