Leadership and Economics

[Freeesta]

Do you think it is easy to be a leader? Of course, not everyone can be a leader! Every society must have its own leader, he can be formal (endowed with rights) and informal (one who leads people by virtue of his character, the ability to subjugate others). There are also several types of leadership in economics. Some people simply live by stealing from their state, engaging in corruption, and so on. And there are real professionals in their field who are able to govern the country, improve the economic system and propose ways of economic development. These are the kind of people that any state now needs.

[Peanutswar]

To become a successful community or economy you need to have a good leader, who leads to having a good trade with another country, can manage the peace between other country, and makes good decisions that make the economy more growth and people do not suffer in life. But if you face corrupt people in the government sure you can't see a good thing will happen in your community. First-hand experience with our country people face the same issue by generations until now there's no changes, people in my country easily deceived by those promises after they get the position they focus in themselves not for the people.

[Dailyscript]

Do you think it is easy to be a leader? Of course, not everyone can be a leader! Every society must have its own leader, he can be formal (endowed with rights) and informal (one who leads people by virtue of his character, the ability to subjugate others). There are also several types of leadership in economics. Some people simply live by stealing from their state, engaging in corruption, and so on. And there are real professionals in their field who are able to govern the country, improve the economic system and propose ways of economic development. These are the kind of people that any state now needs.

Anybody can be a leader but not everyone can be a leader. This theory is simple but it is misunderstood by most persons because they do not understand what we mean here. Being a leader takes so much from a persons life as such individual will dissociate any form of distraction and maintain discipline in other to develop the characteristics of a good leader. Which means anybody can develop this character easily or through difficult situations and become a successful leader. But its not everybody that is willing to develop such character and maintain consistency. It takes the willingness and dedications of serious minded individual to do that.

[slapper]

To become a successful community or economy you need to have a good leader, who leads to having a good trade with another country, can manage the peace between other country, and makes good decisions that make the economy more growth and people do not suffer in life. But if you face corrupt people in the government sure you can't see a good thing will happen in your community. First-hand experience with our country people face the same issue by generations until now there's no changes, people in my country easily deceived by those promises after they get the position they focus in themselves not for the people.

Take trade deals: its not just numbers, its about understanding cultures and building lasting relationships. Corruption can poison everything. When leaders chase personal gain instead of whats best for the country, things fall apart. Without honesty, accountability, and leadership that cares, no amount of trade will save an economy bleeding from corruption

Look at Singapore's transformation under Lee Kuan Yew: small port city to global powerhouse. That wasnt just trade, it was cracking down on corruption and relentlessly innovating. That's leadership that makes growth happen. Compare that to resource-rich countries going nowhere. Leaders talk change, but nothing changes. The difference? Leadership that puts people first, not their own pockets. A leader's legacy isnt their bank account, its their commitment to real progress and their resistance to corruption

[N.O]

Take trade deals: its not just numbers, its about understanding cultures and building lasting relationships. Corruption can poison everything. When leaders chase personal gain instead of whats best for the country, things fall apart. Without honesty, accountability, and leadership that cares, no amount of trade will save an economy bleeding from corruption

Look at Singapore's transformation under Lee Kuan Yew: small port city to global powerhouse. That wasnt just trade, it was cracking down on corruption and relentlessly innovating. That's leadership that makes growth happen. Compare that to resource-rich countries going nowhere. Leaders talk change, but nothing changes. The difference? Leadership that puts people first, not their own pockets. A leader's legacy isnt their bank account, its their commitment to real progress and their resistance to corruption

Economics of country depends on many criterias. Leadership matters a lot to give strength to the country but mostly politicians came in politics only for corruption. In my country, Chief Minister did a big scam and he took billion of dollars from the country 's money. If politician will do that kind of work ,progress will not happen and country will go down and down . People pay taxes from their income but government don't use this money on a constructive thing. But one I want to add , politics will be same kind as the kind of nation because they selected them as a leader.

[CK485]

Economics of country depends on many criterias. Leadership matters a lot to give strength to the country but mostly politicians came in politics only for corruption. In my country, Chief Minister did a big scam and he took billion of dollars from the country 's money. If politician will do that kind of work ,progress will not happen and country will go down and down . People pay taxes from their income but government don't use this money on a constructive thing. But one I want to add , politics will be same kind as the kind of nation because they selected them as a leader.

In the progress of a country, good, honest and fair leadership is very necessary to bring a country to achieve this, but in reality this is very difficult to realize because we don't know the criteria for the hearts of the leaders. At first glance, they look like they have the potential to become leaders, but after being elected, in reality This is far from what is expected, including law enforcement policies that need to take firm action to prosecute evil leaders and that is a good solution.

[Casdinyard]

In general, leadership describes a close relationship between a leader and a group of people who are led because of common interests. Leadership is the central point and dynamist of the entire process of organizational activities. Leadership is absolutely necessary when there is cooperative interaction between two or more people in achieving organizational goals.

Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in the theory of "Life Cycle Leadership" which was later renamed the theory of "Situational Leadership" (1969), argued that the essence of leadership is achieving goals through group cooperation. Leadership should be placed at the front followed by management. Why leadership must be placed first is because leadership basically reflects the leader's process of creating a vision, influencing the attitudes, behavior, opinions, values, norms, and so on of followers to realize that vision.

➥ https://binus.ac.id/character-building/2024/01/apa-pentingnya-memilih-pemimpin-bagian-8-12-tulisan/

The figure of a leader is very important for the economic growth of a region because the rules he makes will boost the rate of economic growth when it occurs effectively. investors will also feel comfortable with the right leader because their trust in their funds is well maintained, now there are many examples of countries experiencing good economic growth because they chose the right leader

what about you, do you agree with the right leader can make your life as a citizen, businessman or an investor comfortable?

That's the thing, people are quick to dismiss the power of a government, thinking that a person's sole success lies in the effort that he puts in and the money he can make, but the thing is, you can make a million dollars today and still have your grandkids starve in the future, why? Cause the government's fucked that the economy you're in doesn't support a good economy, and even if you're able to succeed and finally get yourself or your immediate family out of poverty? What does that have to say about your grandkids? Your great grandkids?

Talking about a more micro-approach when it comes to this right leader discussion, but I can definitely see how it pans out in the business world as well. I heard about a guy who instead of cutting corners and lay off his employees during the height of the pandemic, he stuck and invested in them, even giving them higher salaries which is severely criticized by businessmen and thought leaders all over the planet. Turns out he was right, and even amidst high attrition rates brought about by the pandemic, his company stood strong and remained up and running!

[Lantind]

Take trade deals: its not just numbers, its about understanding cultures and building lasting relationships. Corruption can poison everything. When leaders chase personal gain instead of whats best for the country, things fall apart. Without honesty, accountability, and leadership that cares, no amount of trade will save an economy bleeding from corruption

Look at Singapore's transformation under Lee Kuan Yew: small port city to global powerhouse. That wasnt just trade, it was cracking down on corruption and relentlessly innovating. That's leadership that makes growth happen. Compare that to resource-rich countries going nowhere. Leaders talk change, but nothing changes. The difference? Leadership that puts people first, not their own pockets. A leader's legacy isnt their bank account, its their commitment to real progress and their resistance to corruption

Economics of country depends on many criterias. Leadership matters a lot to give strength to the country but mostly politicians came in politics only for corruption. In my country, Chief Minister did a big scam and he took billion of dollars from the country 's money. If politician will do that kind of work ,progress will not happen and country will go down and down . People pay taxes from their income but government don't use this money on a constructive thing. But one I want to add , politics will be same kind as the kind of nation because they selected them as a leader.

Having a leader who thinks about the interests of many people will certainly give strength to a country and will even make the country better in all fields, but if a country has a leader who only thinks about the interests of a group of people, of course the country will slowly lead to destruction and this cannot be improved as long as their leaders do not think about the fate of many people and to be able to make changes in this matter is not an easy thing to do and if they have awareness of what they are doing, of course it is very detrimental to many people but they never think about how the fate of their people.

[odunybiz]

To become a successful community or economy you need to have a good leader, who leads to having a good trade with another country, can manage the peace between other country, and makes good decisions that make the economy more growth and people do not suffer in life. But if you face corrupt people in the government sure you can't see a good thing will happen in your community. First-hand experience with our country people face the same issue by generations until now there's no changes, people in my country easily deceived by those promises after they get the position they focus in themselves not for the people.

In most Africa countries, their leaders are corrupt and they hardly do things well. I do always think of how we as member of the community can help to improve our economy. If our leaders has failed us, I believe we shouldn't fail ourself. We can still do something that can impact at least little growth to our economy

[EarnOnVictor]

The figure of a leader is very important for the economic growth of a region because the rules he makes will boost the rate of economic growth when it occurs effectively. investors will also feel comfortable with the right leader because their trust in their funds is well maintained, now there are many examples of countries experiencing good economic growth because they chose the right leader

what about you, do you agree with the right leader can make your life as a citizen, businessman or an investor comfortable?

You have a point there, leadership is key, and it determines a lot in an economy as good policies and management will always shape the economy for the best. But do not also forget that "when the foundation is bad, what can the righteous do?" Many countries of the world are suffering bitterly not because they lack good leaders at present, but because of their bad foundation. The system is not working and the citizens are not even helpful with their selfish attitude.

In this situation, though, everything may still get back to normal over time, but it might take many leadership succession before it happens. People often compare the developed nations in this situation but not regarding the fact that they have a good foundation and their system is working. In this condition, the leaders who are not so serious may still put things right, which can't be compared to the first example. It now gets worse (if not worst) if a bad foundation and system are now cursed with bad leaders. This is what is happening in some African countries. This is indeed a sorry situation.

[Chilwell]

There was a time when the economic system and politics in a country had nothing to do with each other. Then, John Maynard Keynes came up with his theory and suddenly the government became the backbone of a lot of Economies. Many Economists were against the theory propounded by John Maynard because they believed putting everything in the hands of the government was wrong. They believed individuals should make decisions and face the effects of those decisions and also government decisions weren't always all that.

The point I'm trying to make here is that government decisions affect the economy in this age, yeah? Whatever they say stands, so their leadership is very important. One of the most important under-looked stimulants of economic hardship is bad government that makes bad decisions for the country. And then, on the other hand, countries that enjoy good economies usually have good governments. I could give a few examples but that may not be in my place.

Of course government of a particular country is directly related to how the economy of such country is been piloted. If governments have nothing related to the economy, then what are they govern?
When a particular country's Economy is in good condition, is the effort of the government. that's why central banks of a country is control by the government and all other commercial banks are receiving orders from central banks. That's also why government have a particular ministry called finance ministry and also have minister of finance.

Likewise, when the economy is unpalatable, it also the government that will be hold responsible. Government of a particular country can take different actions to boost the economy of the country, if he wants. there are also different ways by which the currency of a particular country is been given value and devalued. That's also why sometimes, you will be hearing that the government will be saying that the country is in recession. Government should make sure there local products are given value to.