Here's why BCH/BSV lovers constantly attack BTC...

[Dunamisx]

Base on my understandings, bitcoin will always be and remain the most decentralized digital currency, we don't have to doubt about this or make further research because its all tells from the way they are being mined from the other currencies, not only that, anything that is not bitcoin can never prove what will be similar or same to what the bitcoin networks provides, that is why none of these developers or crypto projects who have splitted from the bitcoin network could achieve the kind of result bitcoin has today or close to.

[1715311393]

1715311393

[1715311393]

1715311393

[1715311393]

1715311393

[dansus021]

I am very confident there used to be thousands of Shit Coins back in 2017 too.  Most of them just died and got replaced by other new and more fresh Shit Coins.

The things remained the same way for the most part.  They are just finding new ways to lure new investors, fools, into their 'project' which is just a repetitive Scam.  Show me how many of the 2017 Cryptocurrencies actually provide value to the bubble of Cryptocurrencies.  Bitcoin provides Freedom.  Monero provides that too, but with a plus of Privacy.  What do the other Coins share, besides a very heavily Centralized Cryptocurrency with no real new value brought to the scene?

Yep totally agree with you  the bear market usually wiped out everything but somehow the shitcoin dev always has a new lure for investors with gimmicks like AI metaverse play to earn or anything like that.

If we can ride the wave we can make profit but lot of case people join crypto lose and go so sad

[pooya87]

and even tried to take miners to increase their hashrate as an attack on Bitcoin

Any idea why BTC/BCH/BSV don't support merged-mining (since they all depend on SHA-256)? Was it done on purpose by BTC devs to deter forks?

I'm asking because LTC/DOGE support merged-mining with Scrypt.

The nature of different coins leads to decisions such as choosing the algorithm, supporting merge mining, etc. Altcoins that want to be different and investigate different algorithms choose a different algorithm (like Litecoin using scrypt), altcoins that don't want to make major differences and want to live under the shadow of another project choose the same algorithm and use merge mining.

Shitcoins like BCH/BSV that planned to scam people specifically newbies telling them "this is the real bitcoin" while attacking bitcoin use the same algorithm and not even implement replay protection!

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Most people will tell you they have heard of bitcoin when asked but will say no if you ask them about ethereum or any other altcoin.

It has been 6 years since I got into crypto and I still struggle to think of anything useful you can do with ethereum other than buying stupid NFTs, running scam projects and rugpulls.

Mm....I'd say a lot of people have heard of ETH since the ETH/USDT pair is reported on a lot of financial websites and probably in the WSJ as well.  Nevertheless, I agree with you about its uselessness.  That whole ICO craze was based on Ethereum, and it was so full of scams and pie-in-the-sky ideas whereby blockchain technology can be used to solve problems in any industry.  And what happened?  The whole thing came crashing down, and the same thing is or will happen with NFTs (which are idiotic IMO).

Who cares if BCH or BSV fans attack bitcoin?  Those are two altcoins out of thousands, and they're not even the only forks of bitcoin out there.  Bitcoin is king, so sayeth the market, though I have to say that other coins make for much better forms of money in so far as the network fees are much less, confirmation times are shorter, etc.  But who's using bitcoin as money anyway?  Not many people as far as I can tell, so let the bitchers bitch.