What nature of the the rewarding games would you prefer playing with friends

[Promocodeudo]

Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

What's yours?

Just as the name implies, when it comes to gambling and having fun with friends, for me, I will love to go for games which involves staking of funds, whereby whoever happens to emerge winner takes all the money, Because initially I thought that was the concept "Play 2 Play" method of gambling were operating on, but only just that it's quite unfortunate I haven't been opportuned to have a first hand experience how it works.
However, because inasmuch as having fun with friends is one thing that can never be overemphasize, creating an avenue where these friends could put their skill into test where having fun and likewise earning a penny will always be an added advantage to any friendly gathering.

Your views are on point, if money is not involved is not a gambling, in gambling money must be involved, so for me I better go for the money as you said, it is better to play games that will either benefit me or my friends.
If you call it gambling then we must stake, as gambler I don't believe in playing ordinary games that does not involve staking because staking in any kind of game makes it serious, it will trigger the people that are playing the game to be determined to put effort to emerge victorious, though another thing is that we will consider is the people that are involved in the game but as for me I ain't playing such unserious game that has no benefit attached to it.

[irhact]

Personally i would find more fun if funds are been staked and the winner would have to go home with the funds because that is much easier to be settled than with other items which in some cases would want to put in some measures for consideration and the other players may not be totally comfortable with it.

When gambling with my friends, I'll prefer the rewards for winning should be money but when we're having fun then drinks can be used in place of the money where the winner takes the shots or the loser takes the shot. I enjoy gambling with my friends and love it more when I win money from their hand. It makes them competitive and want to win back their money therefore the games gets more interesting. This is just a game therefore I also won't mind wanting to win back my money.

But if I was gambling on a casino or through a sportsbook I won't want to revenge my losses knowing that when we try to do that we're only going to lose more but when I'm gambling with my friends, since we're always competitive between ourselves, I'll not minding playing again immediately after I have lost to them just so that I can win them back. If money or drinks aren't involved I won't want to play with them.

[AbuBhakar]

Your views are on point, if money is not involved is not a gambling, in gambling money must be involved, so for me I better go for the money as you said, it is better to play games that will either benefit me or my friends.

Typical gambling really involved money but in general you can stake anything as long as it has real value which other player can use as reward for the game. So anything even a property, time, food, and etc can be stake on gambling.

If you call it gambling then we must stake, as gambler I don't believe in playing ordinary games that does not involve staking because staking in any kind of game makes it serious, it will trigger the people that are playing the game to be determined to put effort to emerge victorious, though another thing is that we will consider is the people that are involved in the game but as for me I ain't playing such unserious game that has no benefit attached to it.

Yeah right, staking something into a game makes the game more interesting because everyone will be serious. But that’s how you can enjoy the game because everyone will be playing 100% just to win the reward.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

Growing up as a dead serious gambler,  who sees every gambling activity as a money making opportunity, I've always requested that we stake funds for it to make much sense  and bring more seriousness to the gambling activity. It always ended with some people feeling very bad, in worse case scenarios leads to fights, quarrels and other unfriendly outcomes.

Much later, I've come to understand that gambling with friends is a way of doing a fun thing that connects us together, increase the love between us and gives us a sense of belonging and inclusion in the brotherhood. I will opt for everybody contributing money and buying bottles of gin, and a little cup for measurement. Whoever loses will take the gin and nothing more, everybody will still be avoiding the gin and this still brings seriousness and fun to the gambling activity. At the end, nobody feels victimized and those who've taken a lot can go get a sleep.

[EarnOnVictor]

Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

My philosophy is that any game is a game so far it has gaming characteristics. Whether it is being played for the punishment or played for money, what matters is to get the punishment done and the debt paid. However, the punishment assigned to the loser should be reasonable, unlike the way it is being done these days, especially among the youth. They take it to the extreme when it comes to the erotic, alcohol and other dangerous tasks assigned to the losers. That's ill and is not just worth it.

If it is in that company, I prefer the payment option. But if it is such that is being planned by well-mature individuals, it's going to be good because that punishment is the better fun of the game.

Also look at it from this angle, among friends, gambling for the money shouldn't be the main thing as money is not often the main goal in some cases as it will never enrich the winner(s) but for the friendship fun to be derived amongst them.

[EluguHcman]

Growing up as a dead serious gambler,  who sees every gambling activity as a money making opportunity, I've always requested that we stake funds for it to make much sense  and bring more seriousness to the gambling activity. It always ended with some people feeling very bad, in worse case scenarios leads to fights, quarrels and other unfriendly outcomes.

That is the point, you can imagine walking away with your friends money in the name of system game of loosing valuables as what makes it interesting.
It can be affordable to loose your funds on the casino or with a stranger on a P2P than loosing to friends else there would always be that scare instigating malice amongst the friendly hood just as you have mentioned unfriendliness and all that.

Much later, I've come to understand that gambling with friends is a way of doing a fun thing that connects us together, increase the love between us and gives us a sense of belonging and inclusion in the brotherhood. I will opt for everybody contributing money and buying bottles of gin, and a little cup for measurement. Whoever loses will take the gin and nothing more, everybody will still be avoiding the gin and this still brings seriousness and fun to the gambling activity. At the end, nobody feels victimized and those who've taken a lot can go get a sleep.

It is much fun and more friendly bonding if instead of staking cash, let the money be summed to be used to purchase something likely edibles that winner can be rewarded. Such would usually insight more funs and long last nice memories.

[Fortify]

I created such a nature of post like this in couple of hours ago, I was hoping it was going to trend on the board but it did not which got me to check on my profile if was it not successfully posted, it was deleted or was it that the network error occurances obstructed it from succesdful uploading.
It is just unfortunate that it does not have a trace so probably it could be error uploads.

But anyhow, I will still bring it up again because it is such a discussion to be enjoyed as we all endivoirs to air our views.

So on the thread I was concerned to know your opinions towards which of the nature of games that you would prefer playing along with your friends such as...
Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

 It seems like in the modern era, online multiplayer games achieve this result best because they are able to create much more realistic settings like racing or on the battlefield. It might be interesting to see certain betting going on with groups of 2,3 or more players who each enter a stake at the start of the game. Then the team that walks away with the highest score for that session would get the winnings. The tricky thing with these online scenarios is it will always incentivize cheating if there is a potential to make money from it, so it doesn't seem particularly feasible in that sense. I'm not sure what you're referring to about edible stakes, maybe you could elaborate on that point?

[Mahanton]

Growing up as a dead serious gambler,  who sees every gambling activity as a money making opportunity, I've always requested that we stake funds for it to make much sense  and bring more seriousness to the gambling activity. It always ended with some people feeling very bad, in worse case scenarios leads to fights, quarrels and other unfriendly outcomes.

Much later, I've come to understand that gambling with friends is a way of doing a fun thing that connects us together, increase the love between us and gives us a sense of belonging and inclusion in the brotherhood. I will opt for everybody contributing money and buying bottles of gin, and a little cup for measurement. Whoever loses will take the gin and nothing more, everybody will still be avoiding the gin and this still brings seriousness and fun to the gambling activity. At the end, nobody feels victimized and those who've taken a lot can go get a sleep.

This is the main thing on why i dont really like to play in together with my friends on which specially on the time that bets are really that opposing to each other on which there would really be changes or tendency that there would really be some arguments or really have those possible conflicts due to different choices that been made. This is why i do really prefer on solo gaming or gambling rather than in together with some friends.
Somehow it would really be just that depending on what kind of friends you do have because there are ones who are really that could mingle and really that open minded and not really that emotional.
There are ones who are really that too impulsive and there are really ones who are that too aggressive when it comes to possible arguments on which this is something that you would
really be seeing this kind of probabilities.

[ethereumhunter]

Growing up as a dead serious gambler,  who sees every gambling activity as a money making opportunity, I've always requested that we stake funds for it to make much sense  and bring more seriousness to the gambling activity. It always ended with some people feeling very bad, in worse case scenarios leads to fights, quarrels and other unfriendly outcomes.

That is the point, you can imagine walking away with your friends money in the name of system game of loosing valuables as what makes it interesting.
It can be affordable to loose your funds on the casino or with a stranger on a P2P than loosing to friends else there would always be that scare instigating malice amongst the friendly hood just as you have mentioned unfriendliness and all that.

If that's about friends money, it's better we don't use it for anything except if you and your friend have a reason why you used that money. Besides that, you should accepts with anything that can happens with the money so you and your friend will see what will happens. If both of you can accept it and will not angry if the money is lost, you can continue doing that. If that is our close friends, that will triggers to the worse situations that can lead us to have a bad relations with them.

But we can playing gambling together with our friends and not blaming each other if one of us lose the money. We must accept it and not complain because that's gambling and we can win or lose any time. When we can do that, we will not face any problem with our friends and we can enjoy our time by playing gambling games.

[Nwada001]

Your views are on point, if money is not involved is not a gambling, in gambling money must be involved, so for me I better go for the money as you said, it is better to play games that will either benefit me or my friends.
If you call it gambling then we must stake, as gambler I don't believe in playing ordinary games that does not involve staking because staking in any kind of game makes it serious, it will trigger the people that are playing the game to be determined to put effort to emerge victorious, though another thing is that we will consider is the people that are involved in the game but as for me I ain't playing such unserious game that has no benefit attached to it.

I understand where you are going on the aspect that one person needs to benefit from the game at the end of the game, but do you also know that there is no form of game that brings about disputes between friends like face-to-face gambling with one another? 
 
The game might be going very smoothly, and you guys will be happy together, but the moment one of you is not winning and has been on the part who is losing money on almost all the game, you will notice that emotion will come to play, and the person losing will start feeling otherwise, as if all of you planned for him/her to be losing, and if time is not taken, it will result in a dispute.

[Wexnident]

~

~

Eh, I think it'd depend on the character? I mean I myself admittedly can get REALLY hot-headed when my friends play with me in a team-based game, and that's not even gambling! Imagine if it was. But that certainly hasn't gotten in between our friendship. Maybe if someone didn't pay up when they lost in a gamble, then said friendship could be damaged since imo, that's a lot more damaging than losing your money to a friend. Could be a bitter experience initially imo, but given the time if you were truly friends with each other it shouldn't evolve into that big of a deal.

[angrybirdy]

I used to play card games with my friends before. A friendly game wherein we go buy snacks at the grocery for the prices. Every time we end the match, the winner would get the snack he/he like from the plastic bag. We prefer doing these kinds of rewards to ensure that everyone will have fun than making punishment to the loser of the game. But unfortunately, my friends and I do not do this kinds of activities nowadays since everyone are busy with work and priorities. I honestly kinda miss the old days haha.

ohhh we've tried this before especially my friends every time we plan to go on a staycation, we always have ready card games and coins to use, it's just a friendly game with a twist because of course whoever loses will be the one who treats us a dinner or some goods. Actually it's fun to play because it's just a simple gambling card game and the money is not that big, we make it so that somehow we can have a common bonding using the cards we bring. Just like what you've experienced, We rarely do this kind of game due to busy schedules in work but that's okay because we both understand that we need to focus in our priorities for now.

[JMBitcointernational]

I created such a nature of post like this in couple of hours ago, I was hoping it was going to trend on the board but it did not which got me to check on my profile if was it not successfully posted, it was deleted or was it that the network error occurances obstructed it from succesdful uploading.
It is just unfortunate that it does not have a trace so probably it could be error uploads.

But anyhow, I will still bring it up again because it is such a discussion to be enjoyed as we all endivoirs to air our views.

So on the thread I was concerned to know your opinions towards which of the nature of games that you would prefer playing along with your friends such as...
Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

Op friends differ, if am playing with my real friends , I will go by edible stakes because I will not have the mind to go for financial stake with my friend because I will later give him the money back if I eventually win the game .but when we are playing with edible stakes it is probably a means of catching fun and keeping ourselves busy .Also there are some of my friends that I will stake with punishment measures but not all of them.

But if actually am playing with a friend that I just met,I will prefer financial stake , because it will make me to be serious with the game knowing fully well that the person is not my intimate friend and with that I can comfortably go with the money if I win without any fear of betrayal.so the caliber of friends that I am playing with will eventually determine what to be staked.