Football/Soccer Winning Strategy

[Peanutswar]

If you want a safe bet you will find a round-robin game with a higher chance top tier team will be matched against the low-tier team and by this, you can get a safe bet, or else you will seek another bet opportunity to the other games offered in that recent match, most of the time they are offering a match winner, first goal, first card, and etc. with the game you can also grab the chance if you know the team really well by this taking advantage you can easily hit a good run with the single game. For me its easier to predict sports betting if you have a good understanding and analysis with the players and the teams game play.

[Crypt0Gore]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it.  So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

I like that you added 'hope to win' to your point, some people will talk as if the strategy will surely make you win, so there is a chance of losing still, which seems to be impossible to beat.

I think this strategy tends to increase your chances of winning, and thats why I will call this a good one, the reason why many gamblers lose money in sports bets is because of odds, they get greedy picking odds up, if the amount isn't very big they won't be satisfied.

Thanks for the advice, still who will learn will learn, many people are too greedy when it comes to gambling, you made $40 using just $5, many people won't like this, because it is too small to call a win in their head.

When it comes to sports bets, always choose fewer games, and take profit when you are in one even before the match ends.

[target]

If you want a safe bet you will find a round-robin game with a higher chance top tier team will be matched against the low-tier team and by this, you can get a safe bet, or else you will seek another bet opportunity to the other games offered in that recent match, most of the time they are offering a match winner, first goal, first card, and etc. with the game you can also grab the chance if you know the team really well by this taking advantage you can easily hit a good run with the single game. For me its easier to predict sports betting if you have a good understanding and analysis with the players and the teams game play.

The strategy is the opposite of what you are saying. But it implies banking on the favorite team will make a bettor win but the suggestion is to parley though. I think the goal is to make the winning amount higher. While you get the chances of winning are higher in a team with 1.10 odds, adding another team with another odds of 1.10 means hitting 1.20 right?

[pawel7777]

As always with this type of topics, people tend to get overly focused on the probability of winning, completely neglecting payout rates being too small to make it worth it.
Simple example: if you bet on a dye-roll and bet on it rolling any number from 1-5 with a winning bet paying you x1.10 - you'd be winning the vast majority of times, but you'd still be losing money.

To have an effective strategy, you need to find a way of shifting the advantage to your side. Otherwise it's just inventing new ways of losing money.

(...) While you get the chances of winning are higher in a team with 1.10 odds, adding another team with another odds of 1.10 means hitting 1.20 right?

1.21 to be precise. You just need to multiply them together.

[EarnOnVictor]

What I know is that what could be applied to hockey and other sports games could also be applicable to soccer betting as well, which is why I commend you on testing this out. However, this strategy looks odd and it shows some kind of "gambling within gambling" kind of pattern which I am not particularly comfortable with. The best way to bet on sports is to know the full information about the two teams playing and use your discretion and instinct to make your bet. This is still subject to some luck factors as well, and not about a certain pattern that your friend taught you.

Besides, if a team can score a goal and could keep it till the end of the match often, it only means that the team is not weak but strong which is a factor that will reduce the odds of that team against the other. This is never to my advantage and I do not do small odds in my sports betting which has been one of the ways to help me manage my gambling activities well and not be wasting my time like so many people do it randomly.

In other words, this style's risk is too high for me.

Gambling within gambling pattern is always the kind of system done in most strategies even the martingale system which one can apply also in this strategy. and just like @Solosanz said, this is like betting on your favorite team but just multi-betting but this time doing it live and in the 2nd half, and at the same time you are almost sure the team will win because they already scored.

And you do not think that the "gambling within gambling" approach is such that can increase the risk of the gambler? As we are looking for a means to reduce risk, you are here advocating more risk, that's certainly not conservative. Just like the martingale approach you mentioned, it is such that puts the account of the gambler at a higher risk and martingale has never been a term in any risky activity to denote something done with ease but it always denotes something done in desperation. Are you now preaching desperation in gambling which we always advised against?

As for the betting style, this is not just a good style that denote good and careful speculation but gambling on a certain pattern. Mind you, who says since a team has scored, it has now guaranteed their winning? This is baseless and your argument is not just constructive in this regard, histories would prove you wrong millions of times.

Based on my experience, it doesn't work much in the very popular premier leagues or on FIFA because of the chances of DRAWs.

Oh, nice that you know it doesn't work in the EPL. But I do not know what you mean by "FIFA" because that name is the entire football body which the guy claimed he is using the strategy for. So I don't even know if you are For or Against anymore.

[Z390]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it.  So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

Don't let this be a test, five dollars is enough to risk on gambling and sometimes you can even make more than this forty dollars, how do you feel after winning? I can bet with you that you won't feel the same if you start using higher amount, unless its within the certain amount that you are willing to lose.
Either this strategy or that strategy, in the end what matters is the risks you are taking, losses in inevitable in gambling, thats why one must stay within their capability, a gambler who risk small amount of money will always be a happy gambler.

Even if you are rich you should still keep using small amount of money, gambling is not a genuine source of making money, it is a space of making unrealistic gains, that's why you always need to protect yourself, do not be greedy and if you believe that your strategy is one of a kind, just stick to it and don't ever increase the amount of money.

[knowngunman]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

Your under note is very necessary because of newbie gamblers here whom might assume it as risk free strategy that guarantee winning. This strategy doesn't sound new to me. I attempted it some times back but later abandoned it due to my high stake on little odds which I see as risking too much. I tried it on table tennis too and it is use to work some time while it won't at times. Most at times, the game get more intense towards the final period of the game and if care is not lots of goals will be scored and the initial favorite with less odds will be defeated. The strategy in general is a good one but the reason why I later abandoned it is because of how I was managing it. I do pick three to four games some times to realize two odds in order to be able to double the money and if you are not staking huge amount, the return will be very insignificant. So I think it would be better to risk appropriately and earn a decent amount if it works out than to risk huge amount on little return.

[cabron]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

Your under note is very necessary because of newbie gamblers here whom might assume it as risk free strategy that guarantee winning. This strategy doesn't sound new to me. I attempted it some times back but later abandoned it due to my high stake on little odds which I see as risking too much. I tried it on table tennis too and it is use to work some time while it won't at times. Most at times, the game get more intense towards the final period of the game and if care is not lots of goals will be scored and the initial favorite with less odds will be defeated. The strategy in general is a good one but the reason why I later abandoned it is because of how I was managing it. I do pick three to four games some times to realize two odds in order to be able to double the money and if you are not staking huge amount, the return will be very insignificant. So I think it would be better to risk appropriately and earn a decent amount if it works out than to risk huge amount on little return.

Just a small amount enough for a fan to follow the sport and enjoy watching. Yup any sport I guess you can experiment on the strategy. I tried it on some sport that didn't work for me but it could work for you. It is always just betting for the favorite team, the bookmakers rarely make mistakes in their odds which means you are also on the winning side.

You just can't control the upsets and draws which is why there is also the note about the strategy being Not Guaranteed to work for all.